Throughout my whole life I have believed love conquers all, until recently.
I could tell you why I no longer believe this but we'll be here all day. And I don't think the man in question even deserves my time/words.
So what do you think?
I could tell you why I no longer believe this but we'll be here all day. And I don't think the man in question even deserves my time/words.
So what do you think?
And Lennon/McCartney's bank accounts.
So yes, love does conquer all. But love isn't always what you think it is.
I believe that love can conquer many things, often times, in my marriage, the fact that we love each other has kept one of us from walking away.
That said, I thoroughly believe that the reason that many relationships and marriages fail is because one or both partners believes that love is all it takes to make a successful relationship. It's like saying that the powdered batter is all it takes to make a good cake.
No amount of love with help you if you have shitty communication skills, poor financial sense, if both of you are impatient or immature, jealous, possessive, unwilling to keep the commitments necessary to form a stable relationship, insecure or can't seem to get your shit together. It definitely won't help you if one of you is unwilling to do the work necessary to maintain a relationship.
Don't get me wrong, I believe in love, but love by itself won't turn a shitty relationship into to a good one.
I also believe love does conquer all.
I just don't believe in love.
If you are someone else: I still believe in love.
By the way, I voted No.
Anyway, I would like to say that males sacrificed their lives for their partners in that calorado shooting. Quite irritated that women did not express their love for their partner in any way like that.
One lady I can think off top of my head is Sophie Lancaster. She gave her life to save her boyfriend from being beaten to death.
Does it happen? Ofcourse, but not as much.
Giving your life up for someone you love isn't dependent on your sex/gender. It's usually dependent on the panic of the situation. When you or someone you love is being murdered, you literally have limited seconds to fight or flight.
Or are you just so irrationally angry at women because you constantly get sexually rejected? Because that's what you are making it look like and you're making yourself look like a huge embarrassment.
Irrational? So your idea of rational is to believe that instead of actually fousing on the debate, you try to get personal? Regardless of what you saying being so amazingly off (get to that later)? You think that is rational? Don't call other people irrational when you can only name something as irrational, yet can't explain why it's irrational, then expect to be seen as the rational one here for trying to assume things you have no knowledge on since you don't know me personally. If you want to speak about rationality, you belong on the student chair, not the teacher whiteboard.
Now on to the actual parts in which you assume such things in a complete laughable matter.
I am a virgin, I have no troubles admitting to that, and why? Because I have never tried to have sex. I wouldn't say that I am asexual, but lacking in motivation to do the things before getting sex, or putting myself in a scenario which would make a one night stand, such as clubbing, parties, etc, I hate them (And yes, I have been to a few, and I have been invited many times, so hold your tongue). Besides that, I have had people bluntly ask me for sex, and more implying sex by saying things such as "do you want to stay at my place" when there is no need for me to (I rejected). I have also been sexually harrassed, and in a minor form, sexually assaulted by women and men. Other than that, I knew a girl in Wales that was actually a prostitute (a real one). She asked "me" for sex with no charge..."I" rejected.
Right now I have a female that I can only describe as perfect (appearance wise) trying to talk to me on Facebook. Infact, I am putting this message to you over a gorgeous female. Do I want to have sex with her? No. Personally, I find her appearance as art, not sexually attracted to her.
Believe me when I tell you, if you are trying to imply, insinuate, or bluntly say that I am the one being rejected, you should stick to things other than personal issues that you know nothing about. If you would like I could post my previous Facebook picture of myself. As a matter of fact, regardless of me not agreeing to it, I apparantly look like the IIN "Dorian Gray" according to a specific user. I can't remember their name, they may have been male, not sure.
So just ask, and up that picture goes for you to be shown how stupid it is to say that I am constantly rejected. DO I plan on having sex at some point? Definetly, but not now.
What I love, and you know, I can really have no question in my mind right now that you're female, really. Only women seem to do this. When "they" can't be rational on a gender topic, it's because the man arguing is just sexually rejected, it can be the only reason, right? Women don't want sex with him, that's why he defends the male gender, right? Yet if we were to say women that do the same are just fat lezbians that can't get a man, that's out of line, right?
Listen, little girl, you are not God's gift. If you think we dislike women for some of the things they do simply because we can't get you, then you need to get out of your little princess state of mind, because in truth, compared to the greatness of the male gender, you're merely a spec.
Oh wow. I look like an embaressment to someone that thinks rational thinking is "you're just angry because girls won't have sex with you". My. You're so right, what was I thinking. I definetly should take what you said about me being an embaressment, because you have clearly demonstrated your oh so great rational thinking to me. My apologies, princess. The real reason why I am not agreeing with you is because you won't fuck me. Forgive me, princess.
Get. Over. Your. Self.
But me, get over myself? You have to be joking! You're the one who twists every single comment to how women are so useless etc. Well guess what, women exist, we aren't going nowhere so you'll just have to get over it and get on with it. Stop making yourself look like an absolute idiot making disgusting comments about how much you hate women.
I am certainly not wanting a argument, I am telling you how you are making yourself look like. You're coming across as an anger filled, irrational woman hater. Do you really want to be portrayed as that? Really? And guess what, a LOT of people will back me up on this. A LOT of people have noticed how much time you spend on hatred towards women. THATS LIFE, GET OVER IT.
Yes, get over yourself. If you had read it (pretty sure you did, you just don't want to reply to it), then you would of understood.
Actually, you're wrong. Don't pressume to say that I say women are useless, because I have never said that. Again, you are so rational.
Once again, I do not hate women. Just because something is superior to the other does not mean the inferior thing is hated. I do not hate women at all.
You don't want an argument, yet you were willing to be petty and try insult me? Now that I shoved all those petty insults back in your face, "now" you don't want to argue. Pfft.
You are telling me from "your" opinion, and all your opinions so far are wrong about me. You think I hate women, which I don't. You think saying that they aren't equal to the male gender means I hate them, and then you are trying to say I'm irrational. Good job.
Yes, I am coming across that way to "women". Why is that? Because as soon as they are offended, everyone else but them are wrong.
I am in no way being irrational here. You have yet to answer anything I ask, yet I'm irrational?
"You're wrong, but I don't need to prove you're wrong. You're irrational, but I don't need to explain why you're irrational". How...rational of you.
By women, I don't care how I'm portrayed. You clearly imply indirectly that in order to not be portrayed like that, I have to be a little suck up and avoid facts that might offend the itty bitty princesses.
I have no doubt that a lot of people will back you. I also have no doubt that the vast majority of them will be female. And guess what, I don't care if females agree with you. Why would I care that people that say something is irrational only if they get offended back you up on this? Why?
I also have no doubt that the majority of these people would be people I debated with before and shown them to be wrong.
Once again, I don't hate women. You sure your immaturity, and prove my point further. You are offended by what I say that you misunderstand the difference between seeing something as inferior and hating something.
You just demonstrated yourself of one of my points.
Genders are not immune to facts. It is a fact men have been superior at most things and have made nearly everything we need in our society, and that they built civilization.
"THAT'S LIFE, GET OVER IT".
Atleast I don't try to get personal. So you're at your end wits with me because I just shoved your attemped personal attacks right back at you?
Future knowledge. If you don't like being shown wrong, move on from replying to me.
I am at my wits end because you views and morals seem atrocious. Not because you apparently shoved whatever back at me, since again, did not read what you wrote. Many other people are sick to their teeth with you, isn't just me.
Future knowledge. Grow the fuck up and stop moaning and whining about how unfair the world is because women exist.
There is no such thing as "being wrong" or "being right" but just opinions and perception. And to be quite Frank, your opinions stink. That's all I have to say, your behaviour and opinions really are truly disgusting. You may get people through your life who tolerate you, put up with you just because they have to but then you get people like me who won't put up with shit. Move on darling. Women exist. We aren't scum of the Earth.
You're calling me pathetic for explaining in full why you're wrong? What are you, twelve? Are your conversations so short based to a minimum of a ten second response? Ugh. You can't expect to be taken seriously if that's what you're doing here. You just implied that you have no time for reading long bits of text, even if they to do with the debate entirely, yet you still reply...What is the point? There is none. You're trying to hold on to your ego, which just pulls you down faster if you don't have the decency and reasonable thinking to engage in the debate and read the points that were in response to "your questions and points".
Oh well, you're pissed off, what do you want me to do about it?
Again, my views and morals are atrocious to "you" because you are "offended". You preffer to see my points in an emotional matter rather than a rational matter, and you can't say that you have other wise you would of used your rational thinking to show me wrong, and if I was indeed wrong, you should of been able to prove me wrong easily.
Again, these people are all female, and the majority of them are offended rather than able to prove what I say wrong. Do you think I'm bothered that these people are at their wits with me because they cannot stand what I say mainly because they can't prove what I say is wrong? I know it isn't just you, and I know who the people are that you share feelings with, and most, if not all have been proven wrong by me to the point they can only state I'm wrong, then can't prove I'm wrong.
Oh, future knowledge? This should be interesting. Please, do teach me of this great knowledge you hold...Oh, suprise. You say for me to do something which you need to heed yourself. Lovely.
Tell me how I should grow up and why. Why do I have to "grow up"? If it's due to my beliefs, explain to me why they need to be abandoned, explain to me why they're wrong. Again, you can't.
What are you talking about? You think I blame women for all of the things they get away for? Again, you have no knowledge of me. I blame the goverment and women. Women for their social negatives, and the goverment for theirs. Women do actions, goverments allow them to get away with it. Without the goverment, women wouldn't be getting away with any of the things they do.
-Facepalm- What? There's no such thing as wrong and right? Ofcourse you say that, because you're wrong. Women do this often, and I am not suprised you have done it. Women do this aswell with the whole "the genders are equal" thing aswell. Yes, there is such thing as right and wrong, you're simply saying this because you know you're wrong or know you can't prove yourself right, which implied you're wrong, and so you're trying to say "Nobody is right, it's all just opinions" because there is no other methods rationally of showing me wrong.
My opinions stink? Why? Because you don't like them or because they're wrong? Again, explain why they're wrong. Do you not understand that you can't just say "you're wrong", and then proceed by saying "Why are you wrong? I don't know, I just don't like what you said, therfor you're wrong". The world doesn't work like that, you know this, I know this, I have accepted this, you have yet to.
Again. You say they're disgusting, and wah, wah, you're offended. I reply "who cares?". Really. If you have nothing to back up your statements, your statements are useless to the world. Here, I'll go by your own logic. "It is disgusting that you don't believe there is a flying speghetti monster, and I don't need to prove you wrong that I'm wrong, if I say it, it is so."
Really, stop trying to get personal. You know nothing of me, and I have moved so many times that I am willing to bet that I have more people that are friends than you ten times over.
LOL! Really. "You don't put up with my shit"? Little girl, you have to. You have done nothing to prove me wrong, yet you insist on being seen as right? Pffft.
Really? Dur, women exist? You know, that is the most obvious thing you have said, yet the only rational thing you have said, that women exist...Here I thought women were just men with slimmer bodies and lumps on their chests.
Anything reliable? Anything to back up your claims? No? Then what in the hell are you doing trying to be taken seriously?