Researchers talk to a great many people who have have abortions so that I don't have to. I trust them to do so for me, and trust that only the most reliable statistics are given from unbiased sources. I check that this is the case when I do look on the internet for studies.
You need to take your observations in the context of wider researcher; your own personal experiences does not a valid arguement make, *patronising age-related retort*.
Look, I read your statistics, OK? I also have broad real-life experience in this matter. So, so far I'm way ahead of you. How can you even properly interpret statistics if you don't even know shit about the subject? You can't. You can't even fairly judge the reality of those statistics. How about I just assume it's true that you must have horrible teeth because you're British, and statistically that's pretty accurate, but I've never even seen you. How does that make sense? And what is the definition of 'bad teeth' in the study anyway? Rotten? Crooked? Discolored? Who knows, but it would help to know those things....because horribly misshapen teeth are worse in my opinion than discolored ones. But whatever, who cares, I'm not going to England to find out, I'll just run with the fact that British people reportedly have awful teeth.
You need to take your observations in the context of wider researcher; your own personal experiences does not a valid arguement make, *patronising age-related retort*.