How do you know these as "facts"? How do you know that the false allegations are a rather high number of actual rapes that haven't been found to be false? How do you know that they are actually rapes and not just females thinking they made a mistake and calling it rape? Is it rape if a female is drunk and engages in sexual intercourse? To some they would say yes.
Yes means yes. No means rape, drunk rape means deliberate taking advantage. If anything it is worse.
These are presumed to be facts because they were convicted by courts, mostly on DNA evidence. I trust the courts more than I trust a YouTube video. And I'll repeat the figure. 1.5%. The absolute highest is 41%, which is still a minority.
Also, the so-called "experts" in your video only give one name, so they cannot be held accountable if they give misinformation, and do not have any proof of their "qualifications". Take Simon the writer and psychologist. He could be anybody. Why should I believe a word he says if I can't research him, hold him to account or see evidence that he has a clue what he is talking about from an unbiased viewpoint?
In fact, I just looked it up. They could make up as little as 1.5% of rape cases. Don't you dare say it is a common occurance.
I could probably pick holes in all of your bullshit videos, but I'm not going to waste my time. I've written 3 posts on just 2 minutes of your bullshit, and I could write more. My point is proven. Good day.
Oh, yes, if a female is drunk and asks for it then it's the "Males" fault. How many rapes do you think are lied about? As in, they were drunk, said ok to sex and then the next morning screamed rape? WHat if a male is drunk? Does that mean the female raped the male? Oh ofcourse not. What if he was drunk and she had sex with him and she fell pregnant with his child and kept the child, does he get to have a say on what his role will be? Oh ocourse nto because he's a male. Don't I dare? I'll "dare" all I want, because you can't possible know anything about these "facts" when even the court rooms can be lied to. What about when men get accused of rape? They don't wait to see if it's a fact, they publicly humiliate people and later on reveal that it was a false accusation. By then the damage is done and many males have committed suicide because of it. Why do you think that the suicide rate of males is four times larger than females?
I can poke just as many holes in your "bullshit" response as you can mine.
What about when females claim they are taking the pill but really aren't? Forcing the father into becoming a fathe rin some sort of role? I guess that's ok. Then the female becomes a single mother and the father gets seen as a bad person, even though he didn't have any part in having a child? Let me guess, it's the males fault for that and not the females for lying about taking the pill?
Do you know who is the victim of most violent crimes? Males. I guess you will jump to the part were you dissagree, though.
I still find it funny how you think you have a point where you say "They could be up as little as 1.5% of rape cases" as if you have a point. Did your five minute google search give you that info? Sorry, you need to search into a larger scale of things than just typing it into google.
Also, how many rapes do you think men would be claiming had happened to them if they had the same standard of what rape is as women do and if they were as willing to say they've been raped? That means if they're drunk and a female has sex with them, if the male has sex with a female he didn't want sex with? (Yes, females do that with men).
We must presume the "lying rate" to be zero, because we have no figures about it, and you can't just make some up. We MUST presume zero. And of course it is rape if the male is drunk and says no. I never said it wasn't. Rape is never convicted if there is any doubt, so the number of false convictions is even lower than the number of false allegations.
I could turn your point on its head. What if the men are just whining, and they really did do it? Your point is worthless.
Of course men are the most common victims of violent crime. Men are also the most common perpetrators of violent crime. Men are, normally, the aggressive ones. Most violent crime is man-on-man.
Why is Google such a bad source? It is better than no source, or a biased source like your videos. Google is a good source because it is unbiased.
Oh "What if they're just whining" wow, good job, you completely turned my point on it's head. Here, I'll turn your point on it's head with a shorter response. "what if they didn't?".
Yes, men do most bad in the world, but the bad is dwarfed compared to the good they have done in the world and the ammount they have contributed to society, which is far more contributions than females have given.
How is Youtube Biased? You fail to realize that the link I showed you isn't an attack against females, it's more of the defense for males. I guess defending males on this matter is just stupid, right? There are business built for helping so many types of people, but the average male? You will find there is nowhere near as much.
It's not that you done it on Google, it's that you took about five minutes looking it up, and this discussion can't get an answer just with a five minute search.
Your source is biased because it has an aim other than presenting pure fact. That is the defintion of bias.
Women have also done more good than harm. Women have given less historically because they've been given less opportunity (women still have less opportunity today). The average male does not need as much help because he gets less descrimination. If he needed help, buisinesses would clamour to offer it. But he doesn't, so they don't.
You said that the women might just be lying. I said that the men might just be lying. That is the definition of turning your point on it's head. And five minutes of genuine research is better than hours of biased brainwashing, which is all you can offer.
You mean like feminism is bias? Yes, females have done more good than harm, but compared to the good men have done, women haven't done nearly as good, and the same is with the bad, they haven't done as much bad as men. Oh, so you're saying that males never need help? Oh, my mistake. Here was me thinking males and females were equal? He doesn't get as much descrimination? Men have to watch out for several things. Females can say what ever they want, if a male says something even close to something sexual in the workplace then they get threatened with sexual harrassment, or if they look at a woman that has dressed very revealing in the workplace. There is a difference between needing help and asking for it. Men don't ask for help, that doesn't mean they need just as much help as females.
Biased brainwashing? I used to be what you would call a feminist aswell, so your whole "You've not done any research" was a swing and a miss. Females might be lying, "yeah but males might be lying". Yes, because that's not descrimination saying that you believe a male would lie more than a female. So no, y ou didn't "turn it on it's head" you just showed that you think females "word" is more reliable than a mans.
Women don't get as much oppertunity? Are you sure? Say there are 100 females trying to get in for a univeristy course, and 400 males are trying to get in that same course. The course will have 50% males and 50% females. How is that fair when more males have tried to get in that course and the reason there are just as many females is so that they don't get attacked for descrimination?
How many men have sacrificed themselves for their society? Rather big number, right? How many women have? Not so big a number compared to the men.
But hey, the male gender have litrally sacrificed their lives far more than females, but males are the jerks of the the genders.
I like how you completely avoided how females are to blame for having a child without a father, nice that you try to avoid all the points against your side. Unlike me, I answer all your points as you pick out the parts you want to address.
Not being funny, but I think it's hilarious that you appear to believe women 'should have done more' and 'sacrificed more' when they haven't been allowed to until very recently in history, and STILL aren't in many places around the world today. Sure in the West, things are better and it's 'more equal', but outside of Europe and the USA? Not a chance. Compared to women, men have it very, very easy. It's still a man's world, don't you worry your pretty little threatened head about that. If you still feel threatened, there's probably a place for you in the Middle East where you can happily lord it over 'inferior' women. You'd feel more at ease there, I'd believe.
By the way, I bet there are millions of women out there who've contributed more to this world than you ever will.
Yes, in the west, now that they're allowed, how many are signing up compared to the ammount of men signing up in the army? I feel threatened? No, I feel sorry that the male gender doesn't get enough credit for its sacrifices. Where do you get this idea that I think women should be treated like dirt? Where did I ever say that a man should be treated better than a female? I said the male "gender" as a whole has done more that the female Gender. Where did I ever say that every single male is better than any single female?The funny thing is, I'm not here attacking females rights etc, I'm here defending the male gender. I guess the two are so closely linked together, right? I mean if anyone dares defend their gender (unless it's females doing it) then you're a sexist asshole that doesn't want the other gender to have rights (according to your logic).
"By the way". Wow, serious? There are thousands of females better than me? I guess the only thing I can say to that is... "well done for pointing out the obvious that I never once denied, genius".
Don't judge someone supporting the male gender as someone attacking the female gender.
Last thing. How do men have it easier to women? There are probably alot, that doesn't mean there aren't as much bad things men have to deal with.
Women ARE signing up to join the army. What the fuck more do you want? It's not women's fault that they're not allowed (by men again) onto the front lines and helping out with the heavy fighting if that's what you're upset about. You do feel absolutely threatened, it's pasted all over this thread I've been reading your petty whine and drivel about how haaaaard done you feel men are done by. Yeah, you know what. Compared to women, men DO have it much easier. Women still earn less and the pay gap is widening. Domestic violence preventation is laughable. In fact, women no longer for legal aid against domestic violence in the UK, despite the fact that most of the serious cases are still men against women (not denying that some women abuse men, but the most serious cases - and deaths - are still commited by men against women). There's still a pretty strong rape culture in that any attractive young girl is a bitch just asking for it. Google slutwalk and see. There's so much more I could go on with, but the night's getting old and I think I rather want to go to bed rather than keep patting your arse and reassuring you.
So women haven't done much by your standards. Big deal, get over it. Again, that's the male gender's fault for centuries of vicious oppression in keeping girls down and preventing them from 'contributing' according to your uppity standards. I'll stop judging you when you fucking stop judging women as uncontributing whores riding off men's backs and getting an easy ride in life. I know plenty of women who don't, so get the fuck off your high horse and get over yourself.
Where did I ever say they aren't? I said they aren't as much as men even though they are now able too. Oh, so the "they weren't able to back then" line works until they are able to do it and then it's not ok to comment on how very little sign up to protect and serve as much as the males? I don't feel threatened at all, I fell that it's unfair that every single subject that is negative against women gets addressed while most of the things that are negative to a man get sweeped under the rug. Women get less pay? Yes, and now because of it there is a rise in female workers, females are getting jobs more because they don't need to get paid as much. Less pay job is better than no job. Yes, do you also know that most child murders are committed by females? Ever hear about all ofthose in the news? Ofcourse you don't, because labeling "females" as anything negative is "sexist" where is it's ok to state that most rapes happen by men.
Ok, this pretty strong rape culture. How many rapists have you met that think "They're just bitches asking for it"? Fucking pathetic.
When did I ever say females don't contribute? Oh shit, I remember, I didn't. I said they don't contribute "as much" and rightfully so. How many females do their work without the uses of the items males have invented? Where did I say females get an easy ride in life? My whole point is that males don't, either. I guess by saying males don't get an easy life then that means I'm saying females get an easy life, right? And then you try to insult me with your shit.
Where have I at all tried to make myself seem superior here? You tell me to "get over myself" but you're so much of a fuck-wit that you don't realize that I've not made this single thing "about me" so when you get your fucking head out of your ass, maybe you'll realize that this "isn't about the individual males and females" It's about the genders as groups.
What about those men that get flung in jail for false accused rapes? There is a law that a male isn't allowed to sit next to an unsuppervised child on a plane (British airways). How many men get shown to be a bad person for not being a father to a child because the female lied about taking the pill? (Happens all the time). Or how females get to choose if a fathers child dies from an abortion simply because the mother doesn't want the child? I could name more, but oh, fuck it, males have everything in life like a fucking ribbon on a sparkly red box, right?
Men have sacrificed far more and given far more to society, but oh, those poor females. Tell me, who is stronger? Male or female? Male. If I said "females shouldn't be firefighters" you would complain. Here's why I don't think they should be firefighters. Say there is a huge fire and there is a child on the other side of the door. The door needs broken down, but the female is the only firefighter at that part of the burning house. She tries to break the door down to save the child, but is too late because she isn't strong enough to break the door. Because of females wanting jobs men can do better, a child has died. But hey, aslong as females don't feel descriminated, right? Hey, the child could of been male, too? Bonus points.
Oh, did you watch the link I posted in the description? Did you see how on "national television" they make fun of this man that got his penis cut off by his wife for asking for a divorce? Yeah, females get treated badly in other countries, but just look at how a man is treated in ours. That show had females as the stars and had the full audience as females, they all laughed at the man that got his penis cut off. Hey, can you point out to me "anywhere" on "any" show that a female gets beat up or killed for comedy? Because I can garuantee you that even though you will never find a show like the one in the link but with males laughing about a decapitated female, but it's very rare to find comedy where a female is beaten or killed. I say "rarely" even though I have never seen it happen, but think there must be atleast one scene like that. You might say "what's comedy about a female being killed or beaten?" and I'll reply with that here. What's funny with males getting beaten and killed and have it called comedy? Because that's a large part of what comedy falls under.
Is it rape if a female is drunk and engages in sexual intercourse? To some they would say yes.
These are presumed to be facts because they were convicted by courts, mostly on DNA evidence. I trust the courts more than I trust a YouTube video. And I'll repeat the figure. 1.5%. The absolute highest is 41%, which is still a minority.
I could probably pick holes in all of your bullshit videos, but I'm not going to waste my time. I've written 3 posts on just 2 minutes of your bullshit, and I could write more. My point is proven. Good day.
Why do you think that the suicide rate of males is four times larger than females?
I can poke just as many holes in your "bullshit" response as you can mine.
What about when females claim they are taking the pill but really aren't? Forcing the father into becoming a fathe rin some sort of role? I guess that's ok. Then the female becomes a single mother and the father gets seen as a bad person, even though he didn't have any part in having a child? Let me guess, it's the males fault for that and not the females for lying about taking the pill?
Do you know who is the victim of most violent crimes? Males. I guess you will jump to the part were you dissagree, though.
I still find it funny how you think you have a point where you say "They could be up as little as 1.5% of rape cases" as if you have a point. Did your five minute google search give you that info? Sorry, you need to search into a larger scale of things than just typing it into google.
I could turn your point on its head. What if the men are just whining, and they really did do it? Your point is worthless.
Of course men are the most common victims of violent crime. Men are also the most common perpetrators of violent crime. Men are, normally, the aggressive ones. Most violent crime is man-on-man.
Why is Google such a bad source? It is better than no source, or a biased source like your videos. Google is a good source because it is unbiased.
Yes, men do most bad in the world, but the bad is dwarfed compared to the good they have done in the world and the ammount they have contributed to society, which is far more contributions than females have given.
How is Youtube Biased? You fail to realize that the link I showed you isn't an attack against females, it's more of the defense for males. I guess defending males on this matter is just stupid, right? There are business built for helping so many types of people, but the average male? You will find there is nowhere near as much.
It's not that you done it on Google, it's that you took about five minutes looking it up, and this discussion can't get an answer just with a five minute search.
Women have also done more good than harm. Women have given less historically because they've been given less opportunity (women still have less opportunity today). The average male does not need as much help because he gets less descrimination. If he needed help, buisinesses would clamour to offer it. But he doesn't, so they don't.
You said that the women might just be lying. I said that the men might just be lying. That is the definition of turning your point on it's head. And five minutes of genuine research is better than hours of biased brainwashing, which is all you can offer.
Yes, females have done more good than harm, but compared to the good men have done, women haven't done nearly as good, and the same is with the bad, they haven't done as much bad as men.
Oh, so you're saying that males never need help? Oh, my mistake. Here was me thinking males and females were equal? He doesn't get as much descrimination? Men have to watch out for several things. Females can say what ever they want, if a male says something even close to something sexual in the workplace then they get threatened with sexual harrassment, or if they look at a woman that has dressed very revealing in the workplace.
There is a difference between needing help and asking for it. Men don't ask for help, that doesn't mean they need just as much help as females.
Biased brainwashing? I used to be what you would call a feminist aswell, so your whole "You've not done any research" was a swing and a miss. Females might be lying, "yeah but males might be lying". Yes, because that's not descrimination saying that you believe a male would lie more than a female. So no, y ou didn't "turn it on it's head" you just showed that you think females "word" is more reliable than a mans.
Women don't get as much oppertunity? Are you sure? Say there are 100 females trying to get in for a univeristy course, and 400 males are trying to get in that same course. The course will have 50% males and 50% females. How is that fair when more males have tried to get in that course and the reason there are just as many females is so that they don't get attacked for descrimination?
How many men have sacrificed themselves for their society? Rather big number, right?
How many women have? Not so big a number compared to the men.
But hey, the male gender have litrally sacrificed their lives far more than females, but males are the jerks of the the genders.
I like how you completely avoided how females are to blame for having a child without a father, nice that you try to avoid all the points against your side. Unlike me, I answer all your points as you pick out the parts you want to address.
By the way, I bet there are millions of women out there who've contributed more to this world than you ever will.
"By the way". Wow, serious? There are thousands of females better than me? I guess the only thing I can say to that is... "well done for pointing out the obvious that I never once denied, genius".
Don't judge someone supporting the male gender as someone attacking the female gender.
Last thing. How do men have it easier to women? There are probably alot, that doesn't mean there aren't as much bad things men have to deal with.
So women haven't done much by your standards. Big deal, get over it. Again, that's the male gender's fault for centuries of vicious oppression in keeping girls down and preventing them from 'contributing' according to your uppity standards. I'll stop judging you when you fucking stop judging women as uncontributing whores riding off men's backs and getting an easy ride in life. I know plenty of women who don't, so get the fuck off your high horse and get over yourself.
Where did I ever say they aren't? I said they aren't as much as men even though they are now able too. Oh, so the "they weren't able to back then" line works until they are able to do it and then it's not ok to comment on how very little sign up to protect and serve as much as the males?
I don't feel threatened at all, I fell that it's unfair that every single subject that is negative against women gets addressed while most of the things that are negative to a man get sweeped under the rug.
Women get less pay? Yes, and now because of it there is a rise in female workers, females are getting jobs more because they don't need to get paid as much. Less pay job is better than no job.
Yes, do you also know that most child murders are committed by females? Ever hear about all ofthose in the news? Ofcourse you don't, because labeling "females" as anything negative is "sexist" where is it's ok to state that most rapes happen by men.
Ok, this pretty strong rape culture. How many rapists have you met that think "They're just bitches asking for it"? Fucking pathetic.
When did I ever say females don't contribute? Oh shit, I remember, I didn't. I said they don't contribute "as much" and rightfully so. How many females do their work without the uses of the items males have invented? Where did I say females get an easy ride in life? My whole point is that males don't, either. I guess by saying males don't get an easy life then that means I'm saying females get an easy life, right? And then you try to insult me with your shit.
What about those men that get flung in jail for false accused rapes?
There is a law that a male isn't allowed to sit next to an unsuppervised child on a plane (British airways).
How many men get shown to be a bad person for not being a father to a child because the female lied about taking the pill? (Happens all the time).
Or how females get to choose if a fathers child dies from an abortion simply because the mother doesn't want the child?
I could name more, but oh, fuck it, males have everything in life like a fucking ribbon on a sparkly red box, right?
Men have sacrificed far more and given far more to society, but oh, those poor females. Tell me, who is stronger? Male or female? Male. If I said "females shouldn't be firefighters" you would complain. Here's why I don't think they should be firefighters. Say there is a huge fire and there is a child on the other side of the door. The door needs broken down, but the female is the only firefighter at that part of the burning house. She tries to break the door down to save the child, but is too late because she isn't strong enough to break the door. Because of females wanting jobs men can do better, a child has died. But hey, aslong as females don't feel descriminated, right? Hey, the child could of been male, too? Bonus points.
You might say "what's comedy about a female being killed or beaten?" and I'll reply with that here. What's funny with males getting beaten and killed and have it called comedy? Because that's a large part of what comedy falls under.