Don't worry, the spelling error was just a jab to get a reaction from you, which you would see worked.
Aplogies on my reply, not on what you said. I didn't send the right link. Here is the right one. http://isitnormal.com/story/is-it-normal-im-sick-of-people-always-saying-this-119392/
Any, back on topic. I read up to C, and then I realized that you're not making any logical sense, just going by "I say I'm right, so that's it, no need to continue it. I don't need to give you examples of what I say, I just have to say something, and that makes it so."
I give examples, quotes and points, you just give points, say everything I say is stupid, yet don't give any examples to show my so called stupidity.
Except your very fond of pointing those out, when in fact you're the king of gross grammatical errors.[another thing that I ignore].
You probably should have read up to F, which is a perfect example of how you operate; your points are deducted from what you want to believe. Again, I will not participate in that. Its muck and an excruciating waste.
...Many a time have I pointed out the stupid things you've said. In this post and of others.
Only when I take a jab at someone. If I was to point out every spelling mistake I seen, then you could say I'm fond of it. King of it? So you're saying I have the worst grammar, even on this site alone? Insults are only insults if they are 100% true, well, that's how I see insults. I know I'm no wiz of grammar, but if you re-read your reply to me, you'll notice the same is of you. [Something that I usually ignore]
I want to believe that males are being taken advantage of, being allowed to be a victim...I totally want to believe that...
You have pointed stupid things out? Where? Please link me to these things. Once again, I prove my points by linking and direct quotes, you simply think that if you say it, it is true.
Ah, if you say so. You that simply states but doesn't prove. You're a 4, 8, 10, and an 11. (See my profile for details.
You "ma'am", will never deliver the "coup de grace" either.
I CAN say you are fond, because my mistakes are few and far in between. It's all relative my friend. If I had made as many errors as you typically do, but you withheld from pointing them out, I wouldn't say you were fond.
STFU with your god damned quasi-semantics. Another perfect example of your typical argument. You simply can't contest something your 'opponent' did not say. What register in your brain equates "gross grammatical errors" with "worst grammar, even on this site alone".
If I reread my reply, I count my typical "your" mistake and a missing comma. Again, I'm not worried.
I don't elaborate my beliefs on certain issues you fancy pondering. I have always, in some way, pointed out the porous foundation of your alleged rational deductions. If you're replying to all my posts, shouldn't you be able to decipher WHERE I point out all your inconsistencies? This is not something I need to go out of my way to do for you. If you don't understand what I'm saying, why are you replying?
IN THIS POST ALONE:
1) Thinking 19th century computers ran on electricity? Are you aware that nothing ran on electricity prior to the mid-1800's? Take a class, buddy. Programmers write algorithms. Computers can't do anything without an algorithm. Functional hardware? Brought to you kindly by an algorithm.
2) you had no knowledge of the matter, before you decided to form some elaborate conjecture.
3) all humans possess observational learning, a virtue extended even to farm animals. It's not a phenomenal talent that you possess
4) The only distinction between learn and taught is the former's active nature and the latter's passive. You can't learn without being taught and you can't be taught without learning. and regardless, you admit that I have taught you and you have learned
5) 1a. minorty 2a. ofcourse 3a. see me dare say 4a. automaticaly 5a. Notice that I also said men in my previous thing that was like this, where is the example for them? [what are you talking about?! I don't know!!] 6a. they make then their selves 7a. i's known how to do it 8a. men aren't" thing 9a. how would it of worked 10a. Did the materials in which to make it not found by men
6)How in Santa's name do you know where I get my information?!!! bro that's fucking hilarious. Perfect example of your baseless assumptions and half-truths
I forgot to mention that by some strange warped reasoning, you think my having better declarative memory and base knowledge on different topics means that I am stupider than you. This is by far the most ridiculous thing you've said.
= THAT is where I pointed out the stupid things you said.
Now, you can go ahead and reply, but I will not bother looking at your post (I might be tempted to respond when there is but another integral link missing in your train of thought).
Only going to address the main points, got things to do. You said I was the "king" of it, what does that mean? The "king" of it. You did infact imply that I was the worst at garmmar. If I need to remind you of that, then...Yeah. There are more than just those two mistakes, but like I said, I'm ignoring it. If you're not bothered, why are you trying to convince me that you're not worried about it?
I don't understand what you're saying? Ah, ok. Because I don''t accuratly prove your points simply because you say so...-Facepalm-
The next part is just pointless, I already replied to you about those, but I guess I'll have to again. 1) I already said you corrected me. To say someone is stupid for not knowing something is stupid in itself. It's not the fact that they dissagree, it's the fact that they never taught, just like you wouldn't of known if you hadn't been taught. So if someone that knew something, and it was obvious to them, but not to you, does that make you stupid? No, it simply means they were taught/learned it while you are yet to learn it. If that's stupidity, you have a warped view of stupidity.
2) Just the same as number one.
3) Completely missed the point (What a suprise). My point was that I would much rather seek out my information, intentionally looking it up constantly, while you constantly get taught. If you need this explained to you further...
4) Number three again.
5) Spelling mistakes? Even if they are, most of them aren't spelling mistakes, just typos (Or do you think people spell "it's" like I's". Take some common sense and notice a grammar mistake from a typo. Unlike you, I comment on actual gramar mistakes, yours are comments on typos. What I was talking about? My previous post like this that was about male and female, which if you don't see what is being talked about, you lack common sense to put two and two together.
6. So you didn't get your information from being in the education system? Ah, ok, "bro".
And you finish with yet another "you're only right if I say so". To put it short. You corrected me on about two things, that's it. Why would I admit to one thing you proved me wrong on, but not another? You'd love to think I was just picky.
Aplogies on my reply, not on what you said. I didn't send the right link. Here is the right one. http://isitnormal.com/story/is-it-normal-im-sick-of-people-always-saying-this-119392/
Any, back on topic.
I read up to C, and then I realized that you're not making any logical sense, just going by "I say I'm right, so that's it, no need to continue it. I don't need to give you examples of what I say, I just have to say something, and that makes it so."
I give examples, quotes and points, you just give points, say everything I say is stupid, yet don't give any examples to show my so called stupidity.
Consider your points dented.
You probably should have read up to F, which is a perfect example of how you operate; your points are deducted from what you want to believe. Again, I will not participate in that. Its muck and an excruciating waste.
...Many a time have I pointed out the stupid things you've said. In this post and of others.
You sir, will never deliver a coup de grace.
I want to believe that males are being taken advantage of, being allowed to be a victim...I totally want to believe that...
You have pointed stupid things out? Where? Please link me to these things. Once again, I prove my points by linking and direct quotes, you simply think that if you say it, it is true.
Ah, if you say so. You that simply states but doesn't prove. You're a 4, 8, 10, and an 11. (See my profile for details.
You "ma'am", will never deliver the "coup de grace" either.
STFU with your god damned quasi-semantics. Another perfect example of your typical argument. You simply can't contest something your 'opponent' did not say. What register in your brain equates "gross grammatical errors" with "worst grammar, even on this site alone".
If I reread my reply, I count my typical "your" mistake and a missing comma. Again, I'm not worried.
I don't elaborate my beliefs on certain issues you fancy pondering. I have always, in some way, pointed out the porous foundation of your alleged rational deductions. If you're replying to all my posts, shouldn't you be able to decipher WHERE I point out all your inconsistencies? This is not something I need to go out of my way to do for you. If you don't understand what I'm saying, why are you replying?
IN THIS POST ALONE:
1) Thinking 19th century computers ran on electricity? Are you aware that nothing ran on electricity prior to the mid-1800's? Take a class, buddy. Programmers write algorithms. Computers can't do anything without an algorithm. Functional hardware? Brought to you kindly by an algorithm.
2) you had no knowledge of the matter, before you decided to form some elaborate conjecture.
3) all humans possess observational learning, a virtue extended even to farm animals. It's not a phenomenal talent that you possess
4) The only distinction between learn and taught is the former's active nature and the latter's passive. You can't learn without being taught and you can't be taught without learning. and regardless, you admit that I have taught you and you have learned
5) 1a. minorty
2a. ofcourse
3a. see me dare say
4a. automaticaly
5a. Notice that I also said men in my previous thing that was like this, where is the example for them? [what are you talking about?! I don't know!!]
6a. they make then their selves
7a. i's known how to do it
8a. men aren't" thing
9a. how would it of worked
10a. Did the materials in which to make it not found by men
6)How in Santa's name do you know where I get my information?!!! bro that's fucking hilarious. Perfect example of your baseless assumptions and half-truths
I forgot to mention that by some strange warped reasoning, you think my having better declarative memory and base knowledge on different topics means that I am stupider than you. This is by far the most ridiculous thing you've said.
= THAT is where I pointed out the stupid things you said.
Now, you can go ahead and reply, but I will not bother looking at your post (I might be tempted to respond when there is but another integral link missing in your train of thought).
There are more than just those two mistakes, but like I said, I'm ignoring it. If you're not bothered, why are you trying to convince me that you're not worried about it?
I don't understand what you're saying? Ah, ok. Because I don''t accuratly prove your points simply because you say so...-Facepalm-
The next part is just pointless, I already replied to you about those, but I guess I'll have to again.
1) I already said you corrected me. To say someone is stupid for not knowing something is stupid in itself. It's not the fact that they dissagree, it's the fact that they never taught, just like you wouldn't of known if you hadn't been taught. So if someone that knew something, and it was obvious to them, but not to you, does that make you stupid? No, it simply means they were taught/learned it while you are yet to learn it. If that's stupidity, you have a warped view of stupidity.
2) Just the same as number one.
3) Completely missed the point (What a suprise). My point was that I would much rather seek out my information, intentionally looking it up constantly, while you constantly get taught. If you need this explained to you further...
4) Number three again.
5) Spelling mistakes? Even if they are, most of them aren't spelling mistakes, just typos (Or do you think people spell "it's" like I's". Take some common sense and notice a grammar mistake from a typo. Unlike you, I comment on actual gramar mistakes, yours are comments on typos. What I was talking about? My previous post like this that was about male and female, which if you don't see what is being talked about, you lack common sense to put two and two together.
6. So you didn't get your information from being in the education system? Ah, ok, "bro".
And you finish with yet another "you're only right if I say so". To put it short. You corrected me on about two things, that's it. Why would I admit to one thing you proved me wrong on, but not another? You'd love to think I was just picky.