Yes I am stating that women need the help of men, but you are not denying that we our government is run by men. Because we live in a man world, women get treated better by the law.
On their own, I would honestly say that both can be pretty dangerous.
The law is run by the man world. So the man world is making it easier for the women to get away with things. They are the reason women get away with so much, not the women themselves.
On their own, I very much dissagree. Women are nowhere near as dangerous as men. If you can find someone that caused as much danger as Hitler, someone that is a female, then maybe you have some sort of point.
I'm not saying women can't be dangerous, I'm saying women's dangerous side pales in comparrison to the male dangerous side.
Cleopatra controlled men with her looks. She ruled an entire society because of her ability to control the masses with her beauty. Hitler was brilliant at persuasion as well. The only difference between the two is how they used their power.
What do you mean by not the women themselves? How would a man get away by himself?
I think that a man can be more physical than a women. Obviously men have a stronger build. If we were in a jungle then yes men would would be more dangerous than women. However, as we've both agreed we have a society that's ran by men. You keep saying that a woman's ability to be dangerous is nothing compared to men. That alone tells me that a girl could easily pull the wool over you, assuming she's a good actress, which a lot can be. You see women inferior to men (when it comes to danger), which in thus proves my point that women are seen as inferior. You argue with me about how men are superior yet I'm arguing that women can be cunning and be pitied. From the way you talk you sound like you pity their stature. Which probably makes you an easy target for a good actress. I'm not saying this to insult you, please don't assume that, I'm merely stating that your mentality can be taken advantage of by a women. Both genders can be dangerous in different ways.
On their own, I would honestly say that both can be pretty dangerous.
On their own, I very much dissagree. Women are nowhere near as dangerous as men. If you can find someone that caused as much danger as Hitler, someone that is a female, then maybe you have some sort of point.
I'm not saying women can't be dangerous, I'm saying women's dangerous side pales in comparrison to the male dangerous side.
What do you mean by not the women themselves? How would a man get away by himself?
I think that a man can be more physical than a women. Obviously men have a stronger build. If we were in a jungle then yes men would would be more dangerous than women. However, as we've both agreed we have a society that's ran by men. You keep saying that a woman's ability to be dangerous is nothing compared to men. That alone tells me that a girl could easily pull the wool over you, assuming she's a good actress, which a lot can be. You see women inferior to men (when it comes to danger), which in thus proves my point that women are seen as inferior. You argue with me about how men are superior yet I'm arguing that women can be cunning and be pitied. From the way you talk you sound like you pity their stature. Which probably makes you an easy target for a good actress. I'm not saying this to insult you, please don't assume that, I'm merely stating that your mentality can be taken advantage of by a women. Both genders can be dangerous in different ways.