Yeah, you're right. He said that the one to adapt is more likely to survive, which males adapted far more than females in enviroment. So males have the title for the strongest, smartest, and the more likely to survive.
...Darwin did say that the species most likely to survive is the one that adapts...Let me guess, you're going to dissagree with that obvious fact, yet again?
Yo ucan't even begin because there isn't a beginning, you simply thing saying it's wrong is enough, and you've shown that what you think is wrong can be actuallyt a fact.
"Community college", I would rather go to a community college than go to a college that doesn't have a dictionary. Also, I am not in college at the moment. Funny how I have barely been educated on these matters, yet you still get shown wrong.
Thinkingaboutit, I could imagine you as a leader in one of those cliche cartoons. You know the type that is just like "No, no, no, you're wrong!...Prove that you're wrong? AHHHHHHH MY KRYPTONITE!"
Where do you think I got the information? Google. So you're saying that I am barely educated, so obviously I was not taught what it was I said, then assumed I hadn't already looked it up, so where did the information come from? Exactly. You lack common sense.
I did Google it, I clicked on about five links from Google, and they all stated what it was I just said. Ofcourse, reliable sources aren't reliable unless they come from you, right? Yet when asked, you refuse.
All you have are insults, I have sources that say I am right, yet you are insulting my intelligence?
Thinkingaboutit, your intelligence is taught, you have no natural intelligence other than recording information being told to you, you can barely, if at all, solve things that require you to figure it all out on your own, and your debates with me show this.
Yes, you have been taught more than me, I will not dissagree. You have a very small type of natural ability, though, and it's shown by your lack of deductive logic.
Yes, you are smarter than me in terms of being given the oppurtunity to go to a better college, yes you will by all means know more due to college teaching you. However, I do believe that if I was given the same oppurtunity to go to the college you went to, and that I actually was motivated at a young age as you were, I would surpase you easily, becacause you lack natural intelligent ability.
Simpleton? Explain to me, how am I simpleton, and dear God if you say or imply something that basically says "because I said so", I will have to laugh at the irony.
You have no deductive or inductive skills at all. You get shown facts, you can look up the fact, you deny the fact, you say the fact is wrong.
Ah, ofcourse you did. Sorry, I'll have to dissagree. You can't take valid facts as facts on here, so saying you taught yourself anything is something that would be shown on an ironic cartoon sketch. Yes, once again, you were in an enviroment that you would obviously learn from such things, as I wasn't.
Luckily for me I don't take recommendations from people lacking in common sense that says the dictionary is wrong.
"noun ( used with a singular verb ) the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics)."
notice "study" and "belief". Not science. See? see what I did there?
...Where is the castration part? I'm still waiting for a definition that mentions castration...Oh, that was it? Figures.
Where does that even imply castration? You've gone right back to the beginning that I have already countered. How does ""discouraging reproduction" have anything to do with castration? Lesson time: Discourage definition - "dis·cour·age/disˈkərij/ Verb:
Cause (someone) to lose confidence or enthusiasm. Prevent or seek to prevent (something) by showing disapproval or creating difficulties."
Now I know what you're going to reply with, remember, you're predictable, so let me counter what you're planning on saying. "Prevent", you're going to link that with mutilation, but the next part of that line clearly states preventing something due to "disproval or creating difficulties". A difficulty makes something harder to do, it doesn't make it impossible like castration would, so out goes your counter point before you state it.
Yes, "study" and "belief"...continue, no let me...."The study and belief in the possibility of "Improving" the qualities of the human species or a human population.
Need me to babystep it through for you? Ok. It is a study and belief for the "Idea", not the "methods" to make the "idea" happen.
Yes, I seen what you done there, you misunderstood the quote you were trying to make prove your point, yet just proves mine even more, good going! I totally see what you did there! -Facepalm- No natural intelligence at all.
Secondly, no, dictionaries are not "fact machines", they are definition facts of words. You know, the a book that hold information the a word description? See, you obviously just implied that the dictionary is wrong, and you tried (and failed) to prove otherwise. You just showed that you think your opinion of the word beats the definition fact of the word.
What I absolutely love is that regardless of you knowing there is basically no reliable sources or statements that suggest what you are arguing for, so you tried to use the next best thing, which ended up just proving me wrong, and just putting you in an even worse position in this debate.
Why it has put you in a worse position you ask? Because now it has been shown that you have tried to look up information on the internet to support your claim, and the closest thing that you could get to doesn't even support your claim, it supports mine. So what is your excuse now? You obviously tried to look for a source of information to support your claim, otherwise you wouldn't of gotten that quote, yet you couldn't find one that supports your argument, therfor that shows that you couldn't find any reliable source to support your claim, which in terms means it isn't at all accurate.
But hey, I'm going to love how you reply to this, something along the lines of "I'm not reading that" and a mixture of petty insults due to me putting your whole argument six feet under.
For someone that loves to mention their intellectual superiority over me, you sure just got shown to be a moron by someone you claim to be your "inferior"...Which in terms doesn't make me so inferior.
I totally am. Proving a "straight A student" to be an idiot, it just burns me inside.
I love this part, though. It is what people need to do to reclaim the "woe is me" self esteem.
The most I got was mildly irritated, but if you think I am raging, and you have to say it over and over again, then it just shows how low you steep to try gain some sort of power in a situation in which you had no power.
"I got proven wrong, so lets just turn it around to pretend I wanted to make him angry and successfully done it, I just got made to look like a fool, so let's tell someone else how they are feeling."
Your whole counter to being proven to be an idiot is that you know how someone feels when all you have is text? If I do remember, you were the one calling me a "cunt", etc, all things that could imply your emotional anger towards me. So in reality, there is enough proof to suggest you were tearing your hair out. "UMADBRAH?". ";)"
-IN SHORT: (Because I know you'll make some excuse not to answer these such as "TL;DR", I'll make this bit a main point from the part bellow. You have claimed you have proven that I know nothing of the subject, yet you have given no proof other than your petty insults. In order to prove something, you need proof, you have given none, therfor you have proven nothing, where as I have. _______________________________________________________________
I gave quotation after quotation from relable sources such as the dictionary, and so on. You gave me a quote to something you "thought" was something that would show your "opinion" correct, yet only helped prove my argument even more valid.
It's actually sad watching you think simply saying you're right without giving any actual proof or relable sources that suggest you being correct, regardless of the fact that you have tried to look for something that would prove you right, yet failed to do so.
For the sixth time, you have simply stated you are right and that I am wrong, yet you offer no evidence to suggest you are right, and again I mention this, when you did try to find something to support your claim, it backed up mine even more.
How have you "proven" this? Quote where you have "proved this". In order to "prove" something you have to have proof, in which I will be more than happy to read over any "proof" you might happen to have other than "I said so".
Without proof, you have proven nothing. I have proof, I have quoted the dictionary definition, explained the definition of words used to descripe the definition of the word "eugenics", and still, what do you have to offer to claim your point?
But I know, don't worry, Thinkingaboutit, you are put on the spot "once again" to try bring some actual reliable information, quotes, links, the whole internet is at your fingertips, and for something you imply is such an obvious fact, it should be no less than five minutes to find something that supports your "opinion" online, and for the third time, you only gave a quote to something that proves me right even more.
You're actually pathetic, and I pity you. You apparantly have all this intellect (according to you), yet you don't know how to debate in the slightest or accept that you have been proven wrong.
-Sigh- I'm done with you, simply for the fact that you're done (you have nothing to give). You have nothing to offer. You have given no proof to support your claim, only your opinions. You have given no reliable source of information that suggests what you said is correct, even though you tried to.
I would ask for you to prove you have given proof (Apparantly you have ten times), but you will complain about typing it all out, in which I would reply to just copy and paste it, which you will make another moronic excuse to try escape the fact that your so called "proof" is just your opinion with no reliable source of information to back your claim and that you have not even given one proven infomation, regardless of you apparantly doin it ten times.
No, you were just done, there is a difference. You didn't "choose" to be done, otherwise you wouldn't of "tried" to quote something to back you up that actually backed me up even more.
You don't have time to be my teacher? Then what was that quote you tried to define the word eugenics with for, then? Oh, my bad. I forgot, you use the "I'm not your teacher" when you know you're wrong, having nothing to say, and can't accept you lost the debate. You really are pathetic, I would find it funny if it wasn't so sad. I pity you.
"I am not your teacher, I am not your teacher. Here is a definition of the word eugenics (Ha, just proved him wrong, aint I the best). -gets shown the quote proves me right and you wrong- ...I don't have time to be your teacher. I don't have time to be your teacher" - Thinkingaboutit.
I can't believe that it's oblivious to you that in order to prove your point valid, you need reliable sources of information to prove it...You "tried" to give a quote to prove you right (which required you searching it on the internet despite you "not being my teacher"), and yet you couldn't find anything that backed you up, but in your mind you're still right.
You were done because logic slapped you in the face, and now you're too dazed to understand common sense.
Now I'm done, I won't waste time on someone like you.
god. I can't even begin to explain why what you just said is SO WRONG. SO WRONG. get your ass out of community college. seriously.
Yo ucan't even begin because there isn't a beginning, you simply thing saying it's wrong is enough, and you've shown that what you think is wrong can be actuallyt a fact.
"Community college", I would rather go to a community college than go to a college that doesn't have a dictionary. Also, I am not in college at the moment. Funny how I have barely been educated on these matters, yet you still get shown wrong.
Thinkingaboutit, I could imagine you as a leader in one of those cliche cartoons. You know the type that is just like "No, no, no, you're wrong!...Prove that you're wrong? AHHHHHHH MY KRYPTONITE!"
But hey, explain to me then, how did it happen?
I don't need to prove you wrong, because I don't have time to be someones online school teacher.
THAT'S RIGHT. You are barely educated. BARELY.
simpleton.
I did Google it, I clicked on about five links from Google, and they all stated what it was I just said. Ofcourse, reliable sources aren't reliable unless they come from you, right? Yet when asked, you refuse.
All you have are insults, I have sources that say I am right, yet you are insulting my intelligence?
Thinkingaboutit, your intelligence is taught, you have no natural intelligence other than recording information being told to you, you can barely, if at all, solve things that require you to figure it all out on your own, and your debates with me show this.
Yes, you have been taught more than me, I will not dissagree. You have a very small type of natural ability, though, and it's shown by your lack of deductive logic.
Yes, you are smarter than me in terms of being given the oppurtunity to go to a better college, yes you will by all means know more due to college teaching you. However, I do believe that if I was given the same oppurtunity to go to the college you went to, and that I actually was motivated at a young age as you were, I would surpase you easily, becacause you lack natural intelligent ability.
Simpleton? Explain to me, how am I simpleton, and dear God if you say or imply something that basically says "because I said so", I will have to laugh at the irony.
I pulled myself up by the boot straps, and taught myself half the shit I know.
My parents were flight engineers. I can safely say that I possess quite a bit of that ambiguous natural capacity, you so speak of.
you know what I recommend of people like you? the service industry. :)
Ah, ofcourse you did. Sorry, I'll have to dissagree. You can't take valid facts as facts on here, so saying you taught yourself anything is something that would be shown on an ironic cartoon sketch.
Yes, once again, you were in an enviroment that you would obviously learn from such things, as I wasn't.
Luckily for me I don't take recommendations from people lacking in common sense that says the dictionary is wrong.
either way, dictionaries are not fact machines.
"noun ( used with a singular verb )
the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics)."
notice "study" and "belief". Not science. See? see what I did there?
Where does that even imply castration? You've gone right back to the beginning that I have already countered. How does ""discouraging reproduction" have anything to do with castration? Lesson time: Discourage definition - "dis·cour·age/disˈkərij/
Verb:
Cause (someone) to lose confidence or enthusiasm.
Prevent or seek to prevent (something) by showing disapproval or creating difficulties."
Now I know what you're going to reply with, remember, you're predictable, so let me counter what you're planning on saying. "Prevent", you're going to link that with mutilation, but the next part of that line clearly states preventing something due to "disproval or creating difficulties". A difficulty makes something harder to do, it doesn't make it impossible like castration would, so out goes your counter point before you state it.
Yes, "study" and "belief"...continue, no let me...."The study and belief in the possibility of "Improving" the qualities of the human species or a human population.
Need me to babystep it through for you? Ok. It is a study and belief for the "Idea", not the "methods" to make the "idea" happen.
Yes, I seen what you done there, you misunderstood the quote you were trying to make prove your point, yet just proves mine even more, good going! I totally see what you did there! -Facepalm- No natural intelligence at all.
What I absolutely love is that regardless of you knowing there is basically no reliable sources or statements that suggest what you are arguing for, so you tried to use the next best thing, which ended up just proving me wrong, and just putting you in an even worse position in this debate.
Why it has put you in a worse position you ask? Because now it has been shown that you have tried to look up information on the internet to support your claim, and the closest thing that you could get to doesn't even support your claim, it supports mine.
So what is your excuse now? You obviously tried to look for a source of information to support your claim, otherwise you wouldn't of gotten that quote, yet you couldn't find one that supports your argument, therfor that shows that you couldn't find any reliable source to support your claim, which in terms means it isn't at all accurate.
But hey, I'm going to love how you reply to this, something along the lines of "I'm not reading that" and a mixture of petty insults due to me putting your whole argument six feet under.
For someone that loves to mention their intellectual superiority over me, you sure just got shown to be a moron by someone you claim to be your "inferior"...Which in terms doesn't make me so inferior.
I love this part, though. It is what people need to do to reclaim the "woe is me" self esteem.
The most I got was mildly irritated, but if you think I am raging, and you have to say it over and over again, then it just shows how low you steep to try gain some sort of power in a situation in which you had no power.
"I got proven wrong, so lets just turn it around to pretend I wanted to make him angry and successfully done it, I just got made to look like a fool, so let's tell someone else how they are feeling."
Your whole counter to being proven to be an idiot is that you know how someone feels when all you have is text? If I do remember, you were the one calling me a "cunt", etc, all things that could imply your emotional anger towards me. So in reality, there is enough proof to suggest you were tearing your hair out. "UMADBRAH?". ";)"
Have a splendid day.
_______________________________________________________________
I gave quotation after quotation from relable sources such as the dictionary, and so on. You gave me a quote to something you "thought" was something that would show your "opinion" correct, yet only helped prove my argument even more valid.
It's actually sad watching you think simply saying you're right without giving any actual proof or relable sources that suggest you being correct, regardless of the fact that you have tried to look for something that would prove you right, yet failed to do so.
For the sixth time, you have simply stated you are right and that I am wrong, yet you offer no evidence to suggest you are right, and again I mention this, when you did try to find something to support your claim, it backed up mine even more.
How have you "proven" this? Quote where you have "proved this". In order to "prove" something you have to have proof, in which I will be more than happy to read over any "proof" you might happen to have other than "I said so".
Without proof, you have proven nothing. I have proof, I have quoted the dictionary definition, explained the definition of words used to descripe the definition of the word "eugenics", and still, what do you have to offer to claim your point?
But I know, don't worry, Thinkingaboutit, you are put on the spot "once again" to try bring some actual reliable information, quotes, links, the whole internet is at your fingertips, and for something you imply is such an obvious fact, it should be no less than five minutes to find something that supports your "opinion" online, and for the third time, you only gave a quote to something that proves me right even more.
You're actually pathetic, and I pity you. You apparantly have all this intellect (according to you), yet you don't know how to debate in the slightest or accept that you have been proven wrong.
I'm done with you, simply for the fact that you're done (you have nothing to give). You have nothing to offer. You have given no proof to support your claim, only your opinions. You have given no reliable source of information that suggests what you said is correct, even though you tried to.
I would ask for you to prove you have given proof (Apparantly you have ten times), but you will complain about typing it all out, in which I would reply to just copy and paste it, which you will make another moronic excuse to try escape the fact that your so called "proof" is just your opinion with no reliable source of information to back your claim and that you have not even given one proven infomation, regardless of you apparantly doin it ten times.
Straight A student my ass.
For the kagillionth time, I don't have to go out of my way to be your school teacher.
You don't have time to be my teacher? Then what was that quote you tried to define the word eugenics with for, then? Oh, my bad. I forgot, you use the "I'm not your teacher" when you know you're wrong, having nothing to say, and can't accept you lost the debate. You really are pathetic, I would find it funny if it wasn't so sad. I pity you.
"I am not your teacher, I am not your teacher. Here is a definition of the word eugenics (Ha, just proved him wrong, aint I the best). -gets shown the quote proves me right and you wrong-
...I don't have time to be your teacher. I don't have time to be your teacher" - Thinkingaboutit.
I can't believe that it's oblivious to you that in order to prove your point valid, you need reliable sources of information to prove it...You "tried" to give a quote to prove you right (which required you searching it on the internet despite you "not being my teacher"), and yet you couldn't find anything that backed you up, but in your mind you're still right.
You were done because logic slapped you in the face, and now you're too dazed to understand common sense.
Now I'm done, I won't waste time on someone like you.
you keep writing, as if i haven't said 10x-plus, I am not reading.
you want to be right so desperately, it's pathetic.
you are not above your own advice.
loser.
I think it's funny because you entitled this thread "why-do-most-females-repeat-something-over-and-over".
fitting;very fitting :)