Are You Normal?
Curious how others might perceive your situation? Submit your story and find out.
1. Read 2. Vote 3. Repeat
What do you think?
Nuking USA would be BEST FOR USA - Long Term
America as a country has lost her way. Where she was once the land of the free and the home of the brave, she is now the land of the clueless enslaved and home of the apathetic.Crime is out of control and most of the weepy-weepy, kissy-kissy, take a punk to lunch bunch liberals can’t wait to force us all to kiss criminals asses even more than we do now.
Every two bit dictator and strong man in the middle east calls for our destruction while sucking off our assistance tit while clueless hippies and louts in Great Britain France and other second, third and fourth world shitholes protest against everything American and call for Our President to be killed.
Worst of all are traitorous, gluttonous, ignorant American, laying up in their HUD homes, swilling food and drink provided by taxpayer dollars and fucking like bunnies to take advantage of welfare benefits – who couldn’t name One of their State representatives to save their lives but who can quote the stats on the latest “American Idol� show from memory.
I’m disgusted by it.
So fine, those of you who hate America – I salute you.
As the Congress of the United States (in violation of the US Constitution) would Never allow the people to rise up, throw them out of power and put INTO power a system that works...
The Best thing for the United States, long term, is full scale nuclear / biological war.
If an event like this happened, America would take casualties; somewhere in the ninety to one hundred and ten million range (Latest DoD guesstimates) plus another twenty to thirty million more dead from starvation, exposure, sickness or wandering gangs of human garbage that seem to survive any disaster.
But the REST of the world would come off Far Far worse.
Britain, France and most of Europe would come apart at their overly socialist seems. Israel and The Middle East would go up like a tinderbox without the US there to keep the peace. They would destroy each other. Japan and China would pound Korea into the ground and then turn on each other, thus ending their economic stranglehold on the US.
The world would crash.
We would be left with a wasteland, but a wasteland can be rebuilt.
The survivors would be mostly tough old bastards. Liberals would virtually die out. They are weak on the idea of defending themselves, guns frighten them and they would rather appease the punks who would rise up and end their lives. The tough bastards though would rebuild for the better and never again allow the USA to sink into crime and degeneracy. It would never again allow US foreign policy to be dictated to us by countries that not so secretly hate us and compared to the rest of the world, We would be back On Top, where we belong.
If a few billion worldwide, and half the US population have to die to achieve this goal, those are acceptable losses I believe.
Do you agree?
Does this story fit one of these flags? If so, click it!
[Best Of] [Funny] [Interesting] [Weird] [Repetitive] [Lame] [Vulgar] [F*cked Up] [Fake] [Off Topic] [Innapropriate] [Adult]
Check out these other stories:
fingering
im 19 hes 28 going on 29
Is it normal to still be hard after orga...
Candyman
Favorite Show
Jess
we;ll need many years to repair the damage....people voted bush into office now they will have to pay the piper for a long time for that decision.
Whether you are liberal or not, MORE drastic measures need to be taken to STOP the things going on in this country. For instance, DUIs, sexual predators, and gang members....what sentences do they get? A damn slap on the hand. There are some countries where your FIRST offense of a DUI is the firing range (and how many DUIs do you think occur in that country?) We need to STOP being pussies and begin to crack down harder on ALL crime. I believe that it costs around $900,000 per criminal in a period of 30 years to keep them in prisons and all of that money comes out of the American taxpayers pockets. Just think if we were to instead KILL most criminals, shit, that right there would lower taxes tremendously.
Sorry, you lost my endorsement. I think you can do a better job of developing a master plan for rebuilding America. I agree with you that it's become a fairly fucked up place for some of the reasons you mention, but I can't see how razing it the ground would be an improvement.
Your opinion is welcomed :) Enlighten me.
Jess
Obviously America is a democracy, the public maybe be united as "Americans" but their political allegiance are as unique as a finger print.
Afterall we do vote for the party we want in power and our opinions reflect that.
Do you think by bearing arms would unite Americans?
So in other words you think there is some pride shooting things? Don't get me wrong but for the general public to have guns there is something seriously flawed in society for the public to continue to have guns which is something not to be proud of.
Wouldn't you want a society that does not need guns to defend one's self?
I would also like to find the proper fuel for the space ship I'm building in the back yard. Anyone have any ideas?
It's pretty much built and I need to get it in the air before Christmas.
Jess
But seriously IT IS POSSIBLE.
Destroying a world?
No.
CREATING a world, a new and Improved one I hope. If a few million need to die to achieve that, it is a price that is acceptable. I am responsible for me and mine - as are all of you, so don't whine about all the poor poor people.
MOST of those poor poor people who you empathise with and whine about, well, they would take everything you own, rape your wives and children and kill you in a heartbeat if it meant getting ahead, surviving or even getting a little bit bigger piece of the pie for themselves.
It's like the concept of love thy neighbor and Christianity. Great in theory, ridiculous in reality. Sure, you CAN chhose to worry about all the other bastards out there, but all that will get you is a grave, because Those bastards will not be Nearly as contemplative and giving to you.
So, if a nice worldwide disaster is what it takes, fine. I will worry about keeping Myself and those one or two people I care about alive, and the rest can go right straight to hell.
Not My Problem, and afterwards a better more sensible world will be built.
This is only a dream of mine you understand.
Yes, I can imagine it. It would be a horrible time. Can't make oatmeal without soggy oats.
Do I visualize being able to control who will live or die? To a limited extent. Assuming one survives the inital assault (by being prepared) then the only ones who will be safe against the thugs and slime will be those people who have firepower, know how to use it and won't hesitate to do it to them before they do it to you.
I will be safe and I will do Anything in order to make sure the two or so people I care about in this miserable world will be safe. For everybody else? Who cares - not My problem. The world would be a better place if we could get rid of about 90% of the human crap that is allowed to slop about the trou.
In this situation sacrifices would have to be made. These days, people are so lazy and stupid and self centered that their idea of sacrifice is to have to drink their Starbucks coffee Without the added flavoring. They care about only their own fat, ignorant happiness and will stab you in the back, front or side in a eyeblink in order to advance themselves over your fresh corpse.
Worry about all the people?
Fuck Them.
But I have no choice but to be human, and to seek that which is in me that strives for the greater good. The elimination of all others save myself and the few fellow humans that I love strikes me as incredibly selfish and defeatist. I think you over-romanticize the notion of tearing down the house and rebuilding something that is pure and noble. It's one of those concepts that sounds good on paper but would iikely not play out as well as you imagine it.
How would you tear down this flawed world of ours? To achieve the kind of effect you seem to envision, wouldn't you have to ultimately poison the entire planet? And what of the other life forms who bear no responsibility whatsoever for humanity's waste and destruction?
I'd love to see your blueprint from A to Z. Believe me, I'm not mocking you; I'm just curious to see how you would really pull this off. Who knows; maybe I would join you. (Oops. But I'd just be cinders in the wind in this scenario, wouldn't I?)
The only thing your stupid half-thought out attempt at being profound and critical would acheive is making a weaker foundation for life to resume in any form. In the next hundred years the world would rebuild itself, only this time with a continent gone along with all the people, animals, plants, and RESOURCES. Thats not to mention the environmental impacts like weather patterns, jet streams, migration patterns, global warming, the nucleur waste, the radiation. (which, ironically, are the things many smart liberals strive to preserve)
The people who would survive would probably be deformed, malnourished, and ANGRY as hell. They would not be the smartest, perhaps just the most hardy.
Its funny how someone like you seem to think you are a conservative... (and a shit poor one you make ideologically)
Soda not working for space-ship fuel.
Got to get this bird in the air before doomsday.
Cannot secure supply of Flubber and the world has gone mad; MAD I tell you.
COME ON, PEOPLE!! LITTLE HELP HERE?>!!!
Jess