my kid isn't circumsized,i hope he doesn't get mad at me b/c i didn't get him circumsized.it wasn't my fault it costs over 400 bucks to get it done,and my insurance wouldn't cover it.I told them i was going to have done two weeks later,but then they forgot to mention that after he was 2 weeks old they wouldn't do it,and i would have to go to a urinologist or something.which would have been somewhere around 2 grand,plus i think i'd rather spare my 2 yr old that kind of pain.I used to think it was very gross when i had to clean it.and i thought it hurt him,but he's fine,and i've never seen a guy with an uncircumsized penis,but i really dont think there is that much of a difference.
I am uncut. In the UK most doctors and surgeons refuse to amputate the skin unless there is serious medical grounds to do it.
It makes no difference to the ability of the penis to grow to it's full potential wether you are curcumcosed or not.
50/50 split my ass. "the rest of the world is mostly not circumsised...so all those jewish and arabic states such as israel..that you americans constantly bomb..dont count as the rest of the world. in a western country such as the USA the split will be more like 5% circumsised not 50%. and in the uk anyone can have there baby circumsised. they wont refuse you. Its part of many religions.
Since 2002 more male babies have been spared the barbaric practice.
Be glad you have your foreskin! It is natural. You were born with it. You should no more cut off your foreskin than you should cut off an arm.
It is a practice sadly carried on since the days when serious pinheads roamed the earth.
Just practice good hygiene (pull it back and wash your penis!) and be proud you were allowed to come in to this world intact.
-dirt dobbler
It makes no difference to the ability of the penis to grow to it's full potential wether you are curcumcosed or not.
-dirt dobbler