Because it isent true...the 2 main proofs are...

1 FOSSILS!!!

2 were not all retarded due to toushands of years of inbreeding betwen 2 families (well...some are lol)


peace JAH bless

I've wondered about the same thing too. Just doesnt make any sense. Maybe I missed something, but I'm pretty sure I didnt. Seems like a lot contradicting going on.

Well, technically man was the last living thing to be created. Creatures that crawled and swam and flew were supposedly created in the "days" preceeding the creation of man. We do not know how long a day was to god, it could have been millions of years.

-Devil's advocate

adam and eve inst true.its just a story in a 900 year old book of myths.

Its true budy

If you believe in the cristian "god" and whatnot are real then so are all the gods including alah, shiva, tlaloc, zeus, etc etc etc, dude just because ppl call there "one true god" does not make it so especially when there were a gazilion civilizations beforehand that believed in THERE gods with as much fervor.

As for the argument that "it says so on the book" lol...if your argument is that the bible is true because the bible says its true thats a pretty big loop hole.

Its my firm belief that in some years from now the bible will be looked upon as just another book of mythos like we look now at the greek ones with the diference that it was writen bye a bunch of dudes in the desert...



peace JAH bless

notice the ones who claim to believe in god in here are usually the ones using profanity the most and posting all the incest and bestiality stories?How does that work?

Watch how they try to explain, way to skip around the entire crux of the question lol

like for example, how the hell could have dinosaurs and humans co-existed???

Dinosaurs and humans did actually co-exist for hundreds of thousands of years.

1000,0000,000 years ago our ancestors came here in spaceships from the planet Mmmmpzix. Our ancestor's technology was so superior than taht of the dinosaurs whose greatest technological achievement was the first latex condom for dinosaurs. Our ancestors placed brain control devices in the dinosaur's brains and used them as sex slaves for a new bestiality club called "Tyrannosaurus Sex". I have seen photos that are millions of years old of men taking it up the ass from Brontosauruses. Hideously mind scarring stuff.

After a short time the dinosaurs who's immune systems weren't accustomed to herpes, syphilis and gonorrhea died off leaving humans behind.

You think Rick James wastes time wondering about shit like that ,bitch?

Go to whatever search engine you use,type tower of babel, and it will tell you all about the tower of babel, and how the races began.As far as how people came into existence through adam and eve,i have no clue.I guess they could have had more children who had kids with each other,or maybe God created more people,that will remain one of those little mysteries of the Bible.However i dont believe dinosaur fossils are millions of years old,there is no scientific data of how to record that,and there could be some dinosaurs left in regions unknown you never know.

-dirt dobbler

As far as I understand...God is love...and life was originally the manifestation of love...otherwise known as Eden. Everything alive is the manifestation of love. It was the creation of humans (Adam and Eve) that became life's (the manifestation of love) demise. Humans being of free will, chose to eat from the tree of knowledge and thus incorporated evil into life. No longer was life a pure manifestation of love. So...with this in mind suppose that there are fossils and dinosaurs and living things before man....well then, these were manifestations of pure love, not evil. Who says that Adam and Eve weren't Neaderthals anyway? Maybe they were. I really don't think the bible is to be taken quite within the context that it was written...rather it is an interpretation by mere humans of what we now know to be quantum physics. For you see,contrary to popular belief, those atoms that make up life are not solid...they are made up of electrons which are made up of photons...which are merely light...light blended with thought allows the photon to be or not to be...which then allows something to be or not to be. This is called manifestation. Manifestation is the creation of life through thought...it is when pure love becomes solid in our world...but alas, then our world adds in the evil and voila. So...really the manifestation of Adam and Eve is relatively possible, scientifically. They would indeed have originally been manifest of pure light and love (God), but by partaking in evil thoughts...evil was manifest and then there was life as we know it.

carbon dating and the earth "stratos" that the fossils are collected...they can tell

And if we decended form 2 ppl as i have stated wed all be suffering from the ill affects of a little thing i like to call INBREEDING



peace JAH bless

LOOOL well the dude tryed, he pretty much just cramed the word dinnosaur in the bible werever he could XD

in the end its just a matter of faith, it doesent matter how many times you try and prove with things like facts, every1 knows reason is the churches greatest enemy...


peace JAH bless

I dont believe they can "accurately" tell,but anyways the inbreeding factor doesn't matter,because throughout history siblings have had sex,even royalty,and their children are not always deformed and/or retarded. So really it depends on your religious or non-religious beliefs that can form an opinion.

-dirt dobbler

Interbreeding would most probably be a major problem if we were all descended from one set of genes.
In fact, we would all be clones. clones...roflmao it makes no sense, this bible.

it all comes down to belief

you need to chose
religeon

or

science

itz all the truth. the adam did the chebanga with the eve and so like that did this humanly human race did began.

this was bible. this was the written of the god. this is not believed to be, then is all of you are going to hell.

if you is in hell i aint not seeing you. becauses I Belief in the GOd. see you in this heaven with that harp. gods gonna be man with beard what listens to that harp. and amen and amen
Amen.

ok... christans dont even believe in gravity... accrding to them adam and eve populated the earth... but then her sons and daughters would have needed to fuck each other... insest is ok.

but we have proven that man started in africa... and moved outwards, their skin, hair, and eyes adapted best to their climate.

religion is a mental illness... just like that guy on the bus talking to his 'invisible friend' there is no difference. just more people believe in god than 'steve' from on the bus. think about it.

its false hope.
and i dont think theyre a mental patient jsut irrational

i say just go with the flow

Youre stupid, starrgirl. Dont put the burden of belief on the non-believer. That burdern lies on you, the believer. Would you believe in Santa just because he "might" be real? As if to say that because theres no proof of him, he is in fact real? Thats the same argument thats used for god. Perhaps there might be a god but since he refuses to make himself known, theres no reason for me to think he exists. And dont presume to tell me im getting my information from somewhere else, im going by my own powers of observation. You however will believe anything you read in the bible as truth.

Ok. I believe in santa. now prove me that it doesnt exists or if we go by your silly logic, he msut exist.

I'm not the only believer, stargirl. If you study psychology, many people have found it to be true... but its also proven you are either science or religion... it is nearly impossible to believe in both equally and strongly.


''Religion is one of the most serious mental illnesses of today. It is the inablity to face the reality of life and the finality of death. It affects as high as 85% of the American Society. Approximately 75% of the American victims of this mental illness are Christians. The more pathetic and desperate a persons life, the more likely they are to believe in a god. Typically, people with otherwise empty lives, are the stongest believers. It gives them the false hope that there is a higher meaning to their sad and pathetic lives. The strongest of believers would admittedly be suicidal without religion and/or a god in their lives providing a mental safety valve.''

''Temporal Lobe Epilepsy disorder has been linked to extreme religious experiences.'' (pentecostal)

''A religion by definition is a superstition. A religion is the belief in a supernatural being or beings. A superstition is the belief in magic or phenomena beyond or outside of nature. A religious belief then is a superstitious belief.''

''A common symptom of religion is delusion. Often including notions of resurrection.''

''Religious people are dangerous. They can not think for themselves...''

---george carlin---- you tube him...

If I talked to an invisible man named 'craig' on the bus, or at the store... and you were sitting next to me, wouldnt you think I was insane? Now change the name to 'God'... same exact thing.

Top 50 Atheism quotes:
http://leftofzen.com/quotes-atheism/2008/01/14/

well first of all, you have to remember that schools aren't aloud to tell a religious based version of how people came to be. So obviously they would teach the, evolution based theory. What you learn in class is true, and you're right, Adam and Eve is basicly impossible. Even if it were true, the bible contradicts itself. I quote the bible

"15 But the LORD said to him, "Not so; if anyone kills Cain, he will suffer vengeance seven times over." Then the LORD put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. 16 So Cain went out from the LORD's presence and lived in the land of Nod, [f] east of Eden.

17 Cain lay with his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Enoch. Cain was then building a city, and he named it after his son Enoch. 18 To Enoch was born Irad, and Irad was the father of Mehujael, and Mehujael was the father of Methushael, and Methushael was the father of Lamech."

WTF IS THIS! If Adam and Eve were the first humans, then how did they're (now) only son Cain, go and live somewhere else, find a wife, and have a child. This means that there were other people around MAGICLY who weren't Adam and Eve's offspring.

"If you want people to not believe in God, you have to actually have proof and not just assumptions."

Arguments in favor of a negative need only be stated after a substantial amount of evidence for the positive has been put forth.

I always thought telling kids sanata is real is pretty sick- though society seems hunkey dory with deluding its youth

is a non-believer one who:
1.doesn't believe in a god (agnostic)
or
2.believes there is no god? (atheist)

Those two very different views seem to be very mixed up here.
They're equally referred to as non-believers... even though their views are very different.

To me, not thinking the world is this, that or the other way has always been the default stance.
And if somebody wants to claim there is a god who is like this-and-this, then they've got some proving to do.
Not the other way around.

"People are allowed to believe what they want. You cannot force anyone to believe or disbelieve something. All you can do is provide evidence....and neither side has provided any evidence of the existence or non-existence of a higher being."
True, which leaves us in a state of not knowing... not believing.


"If someone wants to claim there is no god and have people believe them then they have some proving to do as well."

nobody needs to do that until there are some arguments for one.
a belief in a god that is like this and this and this is not a given state.
a state of not knowing is a given state.


"With your logic a person could go around claiming there's no such thing as air and we'd have to believe him because he wouldn't have to prove it."

No, because by my logic then we do first get evidence of the existence of the air.
We all can feel it and we can detect it through multiple means and we see its effect on things as it moves.

Thus we get convinced of the existence of the air.

And after that, anyone who wants to claim its not real has some proving to do.

"I'm sorry, but you'll never convince me that believers must prove their belief if they want to be believed but non believers don't have to prove their belief if they want to be believed."

Like I've said before, non-believers fall into two categories, atheists and agnostics.
Agnostics don't have a belief.

They're not asking anybody to believe anything,
just that people don't start making up shit in their heads.

ok, heres the thing. Although there is no proof towards or against a "higher being", there is proof that counters many things in the bible. If we can assume that many things in the bible are false, can we not also assume that the most unlikely thing in the bible (logically speaking) is also false? It has been proven that the world was not created 6000 years ago, we know this through fassles and carbon dating. Undebateable proof. We also know, that the story of noah's ark is physically impossible. There is not enough water, and ice, on the planet to cover the surface of the world in water, to the height described in the bible. These two stories, seem believable. But the idea that a being, who just decided, to make EVERYTHING sounds pretty fatfetched. Especially when there are so many more logical theories out there.

If some of the things in the bible are not true, it should be safe to assume that the whole credibility of the book is, not credible.

there is no proof for a god.

@stargirl

yes its amazing how many people think the questions
"do you believe in god"
and
"do you think that the bible is true"

is virtually the same question.

Such a misunderstanding.

@: Stargirl

I am not saying that this proves the falsehood of a higher being. ( and btw, the rough stories r translated correctly). I am simply saying that this could easily, be interpreted as evidence, against one.

"They're still asking for people to adhere to a certain thought process. If someone wants to believe something, who is anyone to tell them it's not right for them to believe unless they can provide solid evidence proving they shouldn't believe it?"
######



People can believe anything they feel like believing.
But they do not have any arguments for it.

And not allowing people to manufacture bullshit inside their heads is not a "certain thought process",

it is logic.

THEY DON'T HAVE A FOKKING BELIEF!


"and according to believers anyone who doesn't[believe] is making up things in their heads"

I have never heard a single believer claiming an agnostic to be making up things in his head.

As a matter of fact, this statement is entirely false.