Are You Normal?
Curious how others might perceive your situation? Submit your story today and find out what others think...
Monkey
Do you think it's normal?
Does this story fit one of these flags? If so, click it!
[Best Of] [Funny] [Interesting] [Weird] [Repetitive] [Lame] [Vulgar] [F*cked Up] [Fake] [Off Topic] [Innapropriate] [Adult]
Check out these other stories:
Little brother gay? Or just "Experimenti...
HELP!!!!!!
TOO SENSITIVE!
I love Asian girls
Instead of saying I love you
its completely normal!
But seriously, monkeys fling thier dung around alot, alotta cleaning up. And they can break stuff in your house, maybe get into your poisens and cleaning chemicles.
Why not a Bonsai Kitty?
http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/
Same habits, same IQ, same ability to speak a language correctly. No differince right?
1. Why are blacks NOT human?
First of all, blacks are RELATED to humans, but are NOT human. They are a un-evolved form of human. And why is this do you ask? I will present certain answers.....
- White people adapted to become white, so that they could pick up more rays from the sun. Blacks, did not.
- White people evolved so that they could drink milk, which....Many millions of african people, can't.
- Whites have also been shown to be of greatly higher intelligence, not just in America where blacks are gangster niggers, but all over the glove. Why did this happen you ask? On the african planes, you don't need that much intelligence. When your group of people moves away from that life and starts evolving, you find the need for more intelligence.
- Saying whites are usually smaller or weaker than blacks is 100% incorrect. In fact, germanic, russian, and many northern european groups have 28.7% higher ratios of hieght/weight. We only assume that blacks tend to be bigger, because they choose sports like football and basketball that REQUIRE strength and height. Most white athletes do not choose these sports, meaning that all you can associate black with are big strong men in sports team. Sorry to break it to you, but most blacks are smaller than most whites. I will say, though, that blacks MATURE faster physically, than most whites do. But they also have slower metabolisms (thus, all the fat black girls) and are subject to getting many types of deadly diseases which whites aren't. (Oh, and just to let you know....Take a look at all the people in the world's strongest man competition and UFC, almost all of them are whites, or some form of european).
- Blacks have been progressively ''down-trodden'' since history began. Blacks have constantly had issues WITHIN THEIR OWN GROUPS, have not made ANY meaningful contributions to the scientific world, and have for the most part...Been, well, stupid niggers.
Now I'm going to be fair, and give you a list of what I think blacks ARE good at vs. whites, I'll rack it up.
Blacks:
Matures faster, tend to be more leanly cut, usually have more leg muscle, have a higher rate of creating children. (Notice, all of these things are very similiar to things you would find in an ANIMAL).
Whites:
Greater intelligence, relatively same or slightly higher rates of muscle/height development, has made most of the world's scientific discoveries, ability to ingest more food types, less prone to becoming hostile, higher ability to reason, less prone to diseases. (Notice, all of these things are very similiar to things you owuld find in a higher evolved form of creature)
You all can call me a racist, a prick, a cracker, I really don't care. These are not hypotheses, not guesses, not fiction. These are actual facts, actual realities which you can google and or read about. We all came from africa, some stayed and some went. Those who went, and make up the majority of the world, are humans. Blacks, and they're like, make up a relatively small majority of the world, and are an unevolved form of human, much like a Cromagnum man, which were highly related to humans, but still not human. Thats what a black person is. People who stayed in africa didn't find the need to evolve in the way whites did, but whites DID need to evolve that way. They are more evolved. Thats just the fact.
Provide some unbiased sources. Go on. I want to see you make more of an idiot out of yourself than you already have.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6397001.stm
http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=8269 (I added this one for fun)
http://lilt.ilstu.edu/gmklass/pos334/archive/murray.htm
http://news.ufl.edu/2001/06/11/ethnic-illness/
http://www.theworldsstrongestman.com/wsm/history/history.html
Oh, and if those still don't convince you, my father is a graduate grade biology and physiology teacher with 20 years and 3 degrees under his belt, my brother has a degree in biology and is in graduate school as we speak. I know my shit :)
-That is because they lived in hotter places. Conversly, white people often burn up in the sun, making them inferior in certain climates.
-White people evolved so that they could drink milk, which....Many millions of african people, can't.
-You foget, asians have this problem as well. I would say, that being able to eat cheetos without getting a tummyache is hardly something that makes you superior.
Whites have also been shown to be of greatly higher intelligence, not just in America where blacks are gangster n*****s, but all over the glove. Why did this happen you ask? On the african planes, you don't need that much intelligence. When your group of people moves away from that life and starts evolving, you find the need for more intelligence.
-Black people had a different culture for thousands of years, they did not develop the same cultural and artistic as the white people of Europe. That does not mean they are not capable of the same levels of thought. You fail to show how it is biological and not cultural or even social and economic that not all black people prode themselves on academics.
Saying whites are usually smaller or weaker than blacks is 100% incorrect. In fact, germanic, russian, and many northern european groups have 28.7% higher ratios of hieght/weight. We only assume that blacks tend to be bigger, because they choose sports like football and basketball that REQUIRE strength and height. Most white athletes do not choose these sports, meaning that all you can associate black with are big strong men in sports team. Sorry to break it to you, but most blacks are smaller than most whites. I will say, though, that blacks MATURE faster physically, than most whites do. But they also have slower metabolisms (thus, all the fat black girls) and are subject to getting many types of deadly diseases which whites aren't. (Oh, and just to let you know....Take a look at all the people in the world's strongest man competition and UFC, almost all of them are whites, or some form of european).
- Different races have different physical makeups. None are superior, so get over it. Also, white people need a variety of shots and vaccines to go to africa. Gee, I wonder why that is?
Blacks have been progressively ''down-trodden'' since history began. Blacks have constantly had issues WITHIN THEIR OWN GROUPS, have not made ANY meaningful contributions to the scientific world, and have for the most part...Been, well, stupid n*****s.
- White people have historically massacred themselves, its universal that people are assholes to each other. Africans were for many years on their own continent, removed from the European culture. This may not have been a bad thing necessarily. They are being intergrated into the scientific community very well considering the history of people like you pulling them down by calling them inferior.
Now I'm going to be fair, and give you a list of what I think blacks ARE good at vs. whites, I'll rack it up.
Blacks, and they're like, make up a relatively small majority of the world,
-incorrect
and are an unevolved form of human, much like a Cromagnum man, which were highly related to humans, but still not human.
- they are human, look at the DNA
- If you honestly think that being able to digest milk products isn't that big a deal....Wow, you are an idiot.
- Did I say whites didn't have problems? No. Its human nature to fight. But did a black guy invent the TV? Did a black guy invent modern weaponry? Did a black guy invent 99% of the stuff we use today? The answer is no. And don't give me shit about ''Oh we kept them as slaves for 150 some years blah blah'', they've have the last 50 years, and thats not even being generous, to make something of themselves and add to the betterment of the world. The best nigger I've seen so far was MLK, who did nothing more than preach about togertherness to benefit his OWN race. Oh, and the very REASON blacks did none of that, especially BEFORE we had them as slaves, was because they didn't EVOLVE TO THINK THAT WAY. They didn't migrate, they didn't move, they did nothing. They didn't even BEGIN to understand even primitive technology until they were introduced to it by caucasian people.
- incorrect? Are blacks all over? Are there tons of blacks in china, europe, america? No. There aren't. There are SOME in africa, and africa isn't even made up totally of blacks, there are other ethnic groups there, and don't even get me started on that.
- Cromagnum men or blacks? Cromagnum men differed, and caucasian people differ from blacks.
I'd like you to tell me how two ''ethnic'' groups who are so different, can be the same breed? Your logic just plain baffles me kiddo.
- This is not true. at all. What planet do you live on?
If you honestly think that being able to digest milk products isn't that big a deal....Wow, you are an idiot.
- calling me an idiot because I don't believe that lactose intolerance makes you an inferior person won't make it any less rediculous.
- Did I say whites didn't have problems? No. Its human nature to fight. But did a black guy invent the TV? Did a black guy invent modern weaponry? Did a black guy invent 99% of the stuff we use today? The answer is no.
- or course not. History does show that whites have been on the cutting edge of technology longer. How does that make a person inferior today? did YOU invent the lightbulb? no more than a black person, so there is no personal credit.
And don't give me sh*t about ''Oh we kept them as slaves for 150 some years blah blah'', they've have the last 50 years,
- Where did I say that? Paranoid.
The best n***** I've seen so far was MLK, who did nothing more than preach about togertherness to benefit his OWN race.
- out of necessity, whites were being ignorant pricks so much of the black people.
Oh, and the very REASON blacks did none of that, especially BEFORE we had them as slaves, was because they didn't EVOLVE TO THINK THAT WAY.
- human migration occured much more recently in the evolutionary time table than you seem to think. There are no major differences in thought processes when it comes down to it, much of the differences are simply cultural, and have little to do with race itself.
They didn't migrate, they didn't move, they did nothing. They didn't even BEGIN to understand even primitive technology until they were introduced to it by caucasian people.
- Like I said, most of technology has been seeded by white people. You can not claim that that makes your race superior, when every race has the capacity to do something just as well as another race.
incorrect? Are blacks all over? Are there tons of blacks in china, europe, america? No. There aren't. There are SOME in africa, and africa isn't even made up totally of blacks, there are other ethnic groups there, and don't even get me started on that.
-white people were primarily in Europe before they migrated and explored other lands. There are relatively smll amounts of white people in asia, the most populated area of the world. What does distribution have to do with superiority anyway?
I'd like you to tell me how two ''ethnic'' groups who are so different, can be the same breed? Your logic just plain baffles me kiddo.
- They are the same breed, just like rabbits.
An English Spot is a type of rabbit, as is a Himalayan. Neither is particularly superior to the other.
And calling me "Kiddo" won't change anything, only make you look like more of an asshole.
- Oh, your disagreance in and of itself isn't what makes you an idiot, the fact that you actually believe not being able to digest milk isn't important, is what makes you an idiot. In fact, since we're speaking about Africa, there is a group of nomads in africa who have found milk SO important, that they live off a mixture of milk and goat blood.
- Oh sure, us all just being here and living doesn't make me any better than them, or vice versa. But over the course of human history, blacks have made close to NONE meaningful contributions to the world. Caucasians have. And why? Not because they had some super-power given by a god to them, to make be able to create technology, but because they evolved in a way that made them superior thinkers, and thus, let them create better technology. Don't you think if africans had had that ability over the course of humanity, they would have the same technology we have? They would. But they didn't evolve to perform those actions because they didn't NEED to perform those actions, and thus, didn't need to grow any smarter.
- Hum...Theres power in numbers...? Heh. It was referring back to a previous post which I can't even remember now, and don't want to search for. Except to say, considering the fact that EVERYONE except some african/jamaican people are hues and shades of white/tan, etc, and blacks being the ONLY ones who didnt evolve that way....Well, darn, that kind of makes you think, doesn't it? All the people who have been in power and responsible for the world we live in today, were the fair skinned people, everyone who was black and stayed back in africa, didn't do jack shit. Want another example of this? Native americans. I was reading a few articles, and double checked with websites/teachers, apparently they came from what is now spain, soon after migration from africa. Notice, they TOO stayed in one place after getting there, and didn't do anything. They're technology sucked just as much as blacks.
- Same breed....Okay, lets pretend we're rabbits. The whites rabbits I'll call 'Humans', the black rabbits I'll call, lets say, ''Blah'', okay? Well, they're both rabbits, just like blacks and whites are both hominids, but so were cromagnum men. Theres a differince between a race and a breed. A dog is a race, but within it are many many many many many breeds. Same with blacks and whites, they are both RELATED, being hominids and evolved/unevolved forms, but they are not of the same breed. Now you could make the same argument for an italian person and a german, right? Well, not really, because everyone who migrated (or most everyone) came down from some moutain range in....I think..russia? I'll have to check, I can't remember the name, but I do remember that fact. And the differinces between a german man and italaian man are nothing more than cultural upbringing, and possibly more hair, growth, etc. just based on the food they eat or invornment they live in.
Let me make this simple. The argument is about, are whites superior to blacks, and are blacks humans.... So let me clear it up, REALLY easily...
You can't argue with the fact, whites are more evolved than black people. They just are. Blacks stayed the same, whites became...Well, white. So their more evolved. They have adapted better to the modern wold, therefore, they are superior.
Secondly, about humanity...If you examine bone structure, DNA, and all around bodily form and composition of lets say...An english person, and a black person, they are VERY different, let me assure you.
That english person, has straightblonde hair, a small, thin nose, ''deformed'' teeth (to use the sterotype for argument), and lets say is very thin, with blue eyes.
The black person has nappy, tangled ink black hair, a broad flat, nose, straight teeth, and lets say, very fat, with dark brown eyes.
Now obviously, they're also different colored. Now...If you ask me, they sound a HELL of a lot different. Meaning...? They have to be of two different BREEDS. You can't say that a black person and white person are the same breed, they are just related in race, by being upright hominids. Thats it.
- You fail to mention that in any hot environment a white person would be at risk of serious skin problems without their suntan lotion, a black person would be fine in england at any time of year. Does that make them superior?
- Oh, your disagreance in and of itself isn't what makes you an idiot, the fact that you actually believe not being able to digest milk isn't important is what makes you an idiot. In fact, since we're speaking about Africa, there is a group of nomads in africa who have found milk SO important, that they live off a mixture of milk and goat blood.
- I believe it is important, but I believe it does not make a race superior. My black roomate loved ice cream, so I don;t know where you get off making irrelevant generalizations like that anyways.
- But over the course of human history, blacks have made close to NONE meaningful contributions to the world. Caucasians have. And why?
- because of innovation, circumstance and necessity. Hardly something that any black person today lacks. If both races have the capacity, who is inferior? neither. White people have historiclly dominated technology, but asians are catching up fast. Will that make them a superior race? hardly.
-Not because they had some super-power given by a god to them, to make be able to create technology, but because they evolved in a way that made them superior thinkers, and thus, let them create better technology.
- not superior thinkers... Black people can, and do, think as innovativly as white people. And vice-versa black people in america have come up with their own ways to work the markets and governmant to their own advantage, which they have every right to do.
Don't you think if africans had had that ability over the course of humanity, they would have the same technology we have? They would. But they didn't evolve to perform those actions because they didn't NEED to perform those actions,
-exactly
and thus, didn't need to grow any smarter.
But they are as smart as white people, thats where you fail.
- Except to say, considering the fact that EVERYONE except some african/jamaican people are hues and shades of white/tan, etc, and blacks being the ONLY ones who didnt evolve that way....Well, darn, that kind of makes you think, doesn't it?
- huh? latinos are dark skinned, asians have olive skin, whites have tan skin, and blacks have brown skin... and blacks are not the only race in many parts of the world who did not originally come up with advanced technology. There are white populations who have contributed nothing to science, but have been born white, does that make them superior to a black rights activist with a harvard degree?
All the people who have been in power and responsible for the world we live in today, were the fair skinned people, everyone who was black and stayed back in africa, didn't do jack sh*t.
- Surviving without technology is not jack shit, its even admirable. They have the ability to walk into a white coorporation and work just as well and as intelligently as a white person. Where is the inferiority as a whole race of people?
Want another example of this? Native americans. I was reading a few articles, and double checked with websites/teachers, apparently they came from what is now spain, soon after migration from africa. Notice, they TOO stayed in one place after getting there, and didn't do anything. They're technology sucked just as much as blacks.
- You talk alot about technology, but a skin color of people who came up with technology does not make them a superior race in general if they all, I will say this yet again, have the same capacity. Maybe you are fighting the wrong battle, perhaps you should focus on who has the superior culture.
- Same breed....Okay, lets pretend we're rabbits. The whites rabbits I'll call 'Humans', the black rabbits I'll call, lets say, ''Blah'',okay?
- um... ok then
Well, they're both rabbits, just like blacks and whites are both hominids, but so were cromagnum men.
- hominids, yes, homosapiens, no. Black people and white people are both homosapien sapiens.
Theres a differince between a race and a breed.
- No, a breed is an equivalent of a race.
A dog is a race, but within it are many many many many many breeds. Same with blacks and whites, they are both RELATED, being hominids and evolved/unevolved forms, but they are not of the same breed.
-which is essentially saying that white people and black people are different races. We have established that k.
Now you could make the same argument for an italian person and a german, right? Well, not really, because everyone who migrated (or most everyone) came down from some moutain range in....I think..russia? I'll have to check, I can't remember the name, but I do remember that fact. And the differinces between a german man and italaian man are nothing more than cultural upbringing, and possibly more hair, growth, etc. just based on the food they eat or invornment they live in.
- so, what is the point? they differ in culture, not in intelligence, like black people.
You can't argue with the fact, whites are more evolved than black people. They just are. Blacks stayed the same, whites became...Well, white. So their more evolved. They have adapted better to the modern wold, therefore, they are superior.
- You forget, that although white people and other races have branched off the homo sapien tree at some point, all races evole as time goes on, by necessity. It does not make one race more advanced if they have adapted to a different climate than the black people. You could just as easily say that they have taken an evolutionary step backwards. Neither is really true.
Secondly, about humanity...If you examine bone structure, DNA, and all around bodily form and composition of lets say...An english person, and a black person, they are VERY different, let me assure you.
- different, yes.
That english person, has straightblonde hair, a small, thin nose, ''deformed'' teeth (to use the sterotype for argument), and lets say is very thin, with blue eyes.
- and yet there are so many variations to the people you lump together as white. There are also many variations to the people we lump together as black.
The black person has nappy, tangled ink black hair, a broad flat, nose, straight teeth, and lets say, very fat, with dark brown eyes.
-have you been to africa? tell me the people there are fat and I will laugh. If you are going by american standards, black people have more fat acceptance, and less pressure to conform to the white dominated media "ideals".
Now obviously, they're also different colored. Now...If you ask me, they sound a HELL of a lot different. Meaning...? They have to be of two different BREEDS.
- aka race, and yet again you state the obvious
You can't say that a black person and white person are the same breed, they are just related in race, by being upright hominids. Thats it.
- no, you are getting your terms confused. We are of the same species, different breed/race.
As for the rest...I don't see anything among them to suggest white people as superior. You're obviously reading too much into the articles.
And as for your claims that your father has three degrees, as well as your brother having a degree in biology...don't make me laugh. Unless you can provide some proof of this you're just making more of an idiot out of yourself; else wise you had best believe I'm the King of Spain.
Your arguments also seem to lack any substance. You make great statements saying how whites are superior to black without getting into any real detail about why.
Such sophistry is common among those who haven't a clue what they're talking about.
Until I stab the little fucker in the face.