Are You Normal?

Curious how others might perceive your situation? Submit your story today and find out what others think...

a different kind of government
29% Normal
25 Comments ⇓

I have a new form of government that i think will work. It's not anarchy, or communism, or big government, or small government.

Instead of having 100 million people fight over who should be the leader and what should be the laws. We should split up the country into about 20 separate countries. And some of those countries should have a big government and some should be small. And each should have it's very own laws run by it's own citizens.

Unfortunately democracy does not work because the majority of people are just plain dumb. So if you have a country of 100 million people and 99% of them are fucking idiots. Who do you think your gonna get as a leader? Yea, our presidents.

If you think about it, it's actually a major insult to be voted in as president. Because to do that you have to get the majority of americans to vote for you. That means you have to be pretty fucking dumb.

If we implemented my form of government we would all get what we want. All the druggies and potheads (like me) would have their own country. All the god fearing fantasy believing borderline retarded christians would have their own country. All the faggots would have their own country. All the white supremacists (like me) would also have their own country. Everyone would be happy.

We already sort of have a system like this with the 50 states, but the differences are very minor. And they are mostly run by the shitty federal government.

For self defense they should all be allies, meaning they defend each other from attack. But other than that they are enemies, but they don't attack each other.

If your looking for change, THAT'S CHANGE. None of that shitbag obama crap. I hate that guy more anybody. I can't wait for the day that shitbag gets assasinated.

The main reason I want this is because I hate america. Think about it. You know all those groups of people you hate? You know all those individal people you hate? You know all those politicians you hate? They make up america. So you can't like america and hate them at the same time.

That's not to say that your supposed to like everybody in your country. That will never happen. But america is just so fucking big that it's turned into a cesspool of filth.

Unfortunately we are turning into the opposite of this. I give it 20-30 years most before canada and mexico merge with america to become 1 country. And i give it 70-80 max before we have a 1 world government. And then it will be so big. And there will be so many dumbasses voting that some guy who wants world domination will say "i want to help you" and then everybody will vote for him. Then he will enslave everybody then the end of humanity except for 1 smart family.

Am I normal for wanting this to be a government?
Do you think it's normal?
Does this story fit one of these flags? If so, click it! [Best Of] [Funny] [Interesting] [Weird][Lame] [Off Topic] [Innapropriate]
Comments (25)
you have too much time on your hands man.
I think you are on to something---- the last part anyway--- but if you were rich off our system that you hate so much opposed to smoking away your minimum wages--you would appreciate it for what it is---no -it aint perfect--unlike you-- GROW UP!
I agree with some of your points, but it would never work. There is an (unfortunately) overwhelming amount of greed in the world today. Wars would breakout between the "skinheads" and the "faggots", and the "potheads" would be to stoned to care.

No form of government will ever be perfect, but without government there would be chaos. So choose: Chaos and Destruction, or Organized, Time Released Chaos and Destruction?

Accept that Stoner-Skinheadville will probably NEVER exist, and learn some tolerance.
This government is just fine the way it is. All we need to do to make it better is take out the Illuminati, and take that big fat obelisk out of Washington.
Yeah divide into groups but as humans we will find other ways of discrimination within a group. The cycle will continue til there is one damn country for each of us.

The theory is flawed in my opinion.
your brain is flawed, of course there will be discrimination within a group, but with 5 groups instead of 1 there will be LESS discrimination you dumbass
There used to be something like you speak of I think it was called The USSR. where is it now?
@: flikr
Less? You dumb idiot you are flawed, discrimination will still exist hence the person's post.

Read it again dumbass. As long as humans exist there will be forms of discrimination be it in the same group.
One form of discrimination will be substitute for another.

Strange I thought a forum was a place where one can express his/her opinion on a post.

You knew that right? Opinions don't always support your conclusions.
Sorry my last post was for Flicker not Cabinet.
the poster wasn't even talking about discrimination, he was talking about electing better politicians and making better laws that it's citizens would agree with

and no there are no opinions, if you disagree with me YOU ARE WRONG. and that's all there is too it. EVERYTHING I SAY IS FACT
@: flikr
LOL
@: flikr
So if we divide existing countries into smaller ones what's the benefit of smaller countries?

I see your point of global homogenisation separating it for each race or whatever but from history we know that didn't maintain peace.

You speak of better politicians in power? Shit isn't the damn answer so obvious LOL? You vote them in don't you? Isn't that they do in the so call "The Democracy showcase" of America? The person hasn't explained how it's leaders are elected be it by democratic means or whatever.
@: flikr
The post clearly supported the homogenisation of the world which is clearly discrimination.

I should be able to live where I may please. Should I remain in one region/state/area because my people were allocated it?
@: flikr
lol Dear me how can it be fact when there is no country currently using applying the theories this person has put forward?
the people who get voted in are just better at pandering to the masses, and swallowing whatever intelligence and dignity they have so they can appeal to most Americans. most of the country is just blind sheep. I am actually American by birth but left the country at the age of 3 (reside in Canada now). I feel bad for what is happening but it's basically the same deal up here, and for most countries. the person who wins the election is just better at brainwashing blind sheep.
@: spyderr
yea i agree with you, the few intelligent people get outnumbered by the idiots in the voting
That kind of is a form of anarchism you have described. Thats kind of like what things were like before the state emerged, though it was city communes, and not "faggot or druggie" countries. One implication of your idea would be that we would probably enter a phase with loads of wars, as some of the people in these contries utterly despise each other.

I definately agree with you on so called "democracy". There is an old saying in scotland. "Never underestimate the stupidity of the electorate"!
Your ideal government ALREADY EXISTED in the US, prior to the Civil War.

The North was industrialized and urban. South was rural and agricultural. West was, well, wild and untamed. In that day it was very diverse in terms of culture, economics and every other way from one region to the next.

The federal govt was weak in terms of its ability to micro manage every aspect of our lives, like today. There was a military and a federal courts system to uphold the constitution, that's about it. The states ruled!

You should have been born 150 years ago!
true
This is the worst idea for governmental structure I have ever heard in my entire life; you are an idiot. And that is why you're not in charge and not making the rules. Good thing too. Phew...
hmm while my ramblings may be completely idiotic, the guys who have been in charge are just as idiotic as i am
That's actually not a new idea. It's a very old one. You are describing a form of aggressive and primitive tribalism. It was used in Europe in the Dark ages. It was used among traveling Arab tribes. This kind of gov't you describe can result in anarchy or tyranny.
Another thing. I vehemetly disagree with your comment about the majority of us being dumb. they are NOT DUMB. They are immersed in thier own lives. They are working 40-50 hours a week and rearing their children so many of us don't have the time an energy to look for whatever may be going on behind closed doors.
And last, you being a pothead isn't going to win you alot of ears when you open your mouth. I'm sure you disagree with me. I'm sure you think I'm wrong, but the truth is, I'm right.
The only practical and ethical political solution is the stateless society.

No group of people should be allowed to claim the right to kill and steal and counterfeit.

If it's wrong for one person to steal from another, then it's wrong for 1000 to steal from 1000.

Anarcho-capitalism is the new way. Peace and prosperity will result.
This form of government is reminiscent of what was originally laid out for the US. A small federal government that lays out the basic laws while the states take care of the rest individually. The people can move from state to state based on what they want in a government. But thanks to progressives and those who want to act as a world police we have an overbloated, overspending, careless federal government.