Are You Normal?

Ask your question today!

Do many other girls go without panties?
Favorited (undo)
92% Normal
134 Comments

I am 20, female. I do not wear underwear... ever except when I need to use feminine products every month.
How many others don't wear panties? Is it normal?
Is It Normal?
Next >>
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks! [Report] [Best Of] [Vulgar] [Funny] [Fake] [Weird] [Interesting]
Comments (134)
well i always wear underwear but i knowlots of girls who don't its normal in my opinion
Comment Hidden (show)
-
From the Interne
''Happy Go Commando Friday! It’s comfy, practical, and undeniably sexy""

Seems to be very, very normal ... also practical, comfortable, more healthy ... even economical

Makes a person wonder how women ever got started wearing them at all ... probably Emma Bloomer & bicycle riding!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
I Never Wear Underwear, Even on Public Transportation, Even When I Have My Period: Author:Rebecca:Jul18,2013\\\I don’t understand why anyone wears underwear. I mean, I can conceive of why as a person with a penis you might want to -- it could get stuck in things like train doors or the slats of a beach chair. But as a lady, it’s something I have a hard time wrapping my head around. Because I almost never do. I haven’t for as long as I can remember. I’m pretty sure it started out of laziness, but now as a much-less-lazy adult with a penchant for pretty things, bottom-lingerie is still something I’d rather do without.\“Oh my god,” my friends say when I disclose this intel. “What about when you are wearing a skirt?”\To which I respond, “Whatever man, it’s already a crazy-complex ecosystem happening down there in the bush&beyond -- I doubt a little office-chair-contact is going to fuck it up.”\People also get squicked when they consider the fact that I ride the subway. But let’s be real -- most of the time I don’t get a seat &when I do, it’s not like I’m wearing a lot of micro-minis (my ass does this things where it extends to basically right above my knee, eliminating the things most of you have called "thighs.") For the most part my shit is covered, protecting my parts&protecting you from any&all juices, because I am a model citizen.\Besides, even if your jeans come into contact with some of my crack/slit sweat, I doubt it’s the worst thing you’ve rubbed up against on public transportation. I once watched a drunk guy pee onto the floor&run so quickly between cars to hurl that he threw up on the door while careening into it&then fell back down into his own pee. Just as a “for example.”\I don’t wear underwear because I hate it. I hate how it makes me sweat, no matter what the fabric, cut, or style. I hate how it loves to sneak into my asshole uninvited. I hate how even the ones that fit right enhance my muffin top. Not to mention, modern underwear doesn’t flatter the bush-having among us. It make me look like my vagina is a wearing a tiny spandex hat.\Sure, there’s underwear with a more generous cut. This also tends to be the underwear that can double as a strapless bathing suit, or even better, serve as a parachute were I ever to find myself in a position of unexpectedly jumping from a plane. I hate feeling so restricted.\What about during my period, I hear you ask? Mostly no! Mostly still no! If anything I’m even more anti-drawers during my monthlies. That shit gets to stankin’ &keeping it hidden away to sweat&bleed in a little nether-tent only makes it worse.\To be fair, at night during my moon blood time, I shall don a pair of the gigantics. But this is only because I am tired of buying new sheets&have a tendency to re-enact both the elevator scene from "The Shining"&the part in "The God-father" when dude finds a horse head in his bed overnight. Even so, slapping on a pad to the adult-sized-lady-panties&pairing it with a super tampon seem to simply provide more material for me to bloody. It’s much easier to clean off your ass&legs than it is to haul your private woman shame down to the laundry so that the all&sundry might bear witness.\My parents have tried to intervention me several times. My dad, not a yelling guy, once screamed in a way I’d only ever seen Al Pacino do, when I confessed that no, I was not wearing underwear one day in sixth grade. They probably thought I was a secret sex pervert.\My mom tried to make the prospect of underwear wearing (underwearing, perhaps) alluring to me by buying me a set of blue silk underpants. I hated them&their itchy lace bands with the fire of my soul&at age 10, wore them only so that they might serve as the hilarious punchline to a joke I’d been working on about “blue moons.” \Admittedly, now that I’ve got some jeans that I have not purchased for less than $10, I will wear underpants. Because, you know, odors amassing over time. (Oh my god I am a monster). Still, on the days I do this, I am totally aware that I am in a vaguely worse mood than I could be if I were going commando. I’m basically one step away from being Zach Galifianakis in that Tim&Eric Vodka ad, bellow/crying “IT’S TOO HOT!”\You might think I am the most disgusting person on the planet &that is your right. Having conceded this point, I’d now like to share something that might sway you back toward me on this one: I have never gotten a yeast infection. Never. Not once. Never, never, never. Is this because I am always airing my bits? I don’t know. I am not made of science. But it is a fact, all the same. Don’t believe me? I shall put you in touch with gynos present&past!&verily, do I rest my case.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Apparently, "normal" is whatever u find most comfortable:

"Arielle

"Re: Reasons for going without
No score for this post August 23 2011, 12:15 AM

"I started going without for the naughtiness of it, then I discovered it was really comfortable. Being without makes me feel really sexy, and empowered, because it takes a confident woman to go without."

One wonders why women started wearing "knickers" at all!
Comment Hidden (show)
Quite "normal" indeed ... long before fashion tried (with a lot$ of $ucce$$$$) to impose pantie$/ thong$/ G-$tring$/ etc on women'$ fashion, pantie$/ knicker$ weren't even heard of ... awful hard to "squat and pee" with all those petticoats in the 1st place ... (elastic wasn't invented either, so it was buttons and hooks galore) the "norm" was to be natural, comfortable and disease-free where yeast infections thrived inside warm, moist, dark places under one's skirts. Hooray for pantiless. Back to Mother Nature!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
ELITE DAILY:
In 2015, I of course turned to the Internet and Google to round out my research. A number of articles touted the health benefits of commando life. An article at Elite Daily listed things like comfort and feeling sexy as reasons for turning your body into a no-underwear zone.


I didn’t need an article to point out potential economic benefits. Some brands are pricey. Swearing off underwear could pad my wallet, though not lift my butt.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
from the Internet - is pantiless normal? these days, anything goes especially au naturel (the way Mother Nature intended) and how your body was designed to be in the first place:

""Hi, I left school about two years ago, but for my last two years at school I didn't wear panties under my regulation grey skirt. I had to be careful as I grew quite tall and my skirt became increasingly short. Even in the gym I never wore panties under my shorts. Most of the girls knew that I didn't wear them, and a few of them did the same. Since leaving school I am always pantyless and would never go back to wearing them.""
Comment Hidden (show)
-
It appears that either it's a lot more "normal" and popular than many folks thought or more likely it has become more and more POPULAR to admit openly (and advocate for good health and comfort --- also economy -- tampons only "down there" once a month) on the Internet that going commando/ pantiless is a great idea.

"Arielle

"Re: Reasons for going without
August 23 2011, 12:15 AM



"I started going without for the naughtiness of it, then I discovered it was really comfortable. Being without makes me feel really sexy, and empowered, because it takes a confident woman to go without."
Comment Hidden (show)
-
from the Internet:


"I've been underwear for 4 years and bra-free for 2 years. It's been so liberating for me. Plus, I save TONS of money on panties and bras.

"The thing about jeans is that I don't wear them often because they're not really my style, but I'm wearing some today and I definitely don't have a crotch wedgie or anything. I don't tend to have problems with heavy discharge or wedgies (especially since I cut the underwear loose) so it's never really been an issue for me.

"Just keep washing your skirts and jeans and trousers and you should be fine."

"""Read more at VaginaPagina: <a href="http://vaginapagina.livejournal.com/5138747.html#ixzz4RXrAlGZL%22 rel="nofollow">http://vaginapagina.livejournal.com/5138747.htm...</a>"""

Seems that panty-free and bra-less are popular enough for most folks to enjoy!!! If not delight!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET:The first time that I ever found myself concerned with the visibility of a panty line was during my 8th grade graduation. I found the most beautiful dress that unfortunately highlighted the lining of my undergarments. My mom made me wear a thong under that dress, even though I would have preferred to wear no underwear at all.
Walking around with a thong a.k.a. a semi-permanent wedgie drove my nuts after just a few minutes.
At that age, I never even thought of it was a possibility to actually no wear underwear at all. It was something that “we” just don’t do as the elder women in my family would say. Little did they know, it may have just been the best thing that they’ve never tried.
By the time I was in high school, that “only nasty girls go outside without panties on” mentality that was embedded in my head since I was a preteen slowly started to wither away. In fact, I became very close friends with someone whose views of going commando was totally opposite from what I had been taught all of my life. In fact, her mom is a true commando connoisseur, opting out of wearing underwear most days. Getting a better understanding of what life was like “free-balling” from people who have actually done it is what got me to try it out for myself. It’s actually pretty damn amazing if you ask me.
Like most women, when I’m faced with the many wonder of life, I turn to my circle of friends. Here were the responses I got on the big question at hand. To go commando, or not to go commando.
“That sh*t is a lifestyle for me. It’s freeform…freedom. And if need be easy access. It’s breathable. I feel like it’s especially great when I wear a dress or skirt or some loose fitted pants.” -Melissa

“I like not wearing panties some times. I wear panties with jeans though. I definitely don’t wear panties at night. My mom tried to tell me to (not wear panties at night) and I would have a fit. Like…I have to wear panties!” -Tonya
“I’m scared of sweating (if I’m outside). I usually go commando at home and when I sleep though.” -Shauna
“At first I thought it was something that fast. Nasty girls did and I was just like heck no. But one day drastic times called for desperate measures and I realized what I have been missing all of this time.” -Michelle
“I personally don’t do it because I think way too hard. What if I sweat and it leaves a stain? What if aunty flow makes an unexpected appearance? Yeah, I’ll pass on that one.” -Kori
“I think it depends on what you have on. I don’t really go commando unless it’s something that requires it like a dress or skirt where you will see the pantyline. But I would never go commando in pants. That just seems uncomfortable to me. Or short skirts.” -Danielle
It seem like it may be some hope for going commando after all. Yet and still, some women feel going outside without panties is utterly disgusting, while others are all for letting their vajayjays get some fresh air at least every once in a while. One gynecologist, Dr. Alyssa Dweck, M.D. in fact stated that “if [the area] is constantly covered—especially by a fabric that’s not moisture-wicking or absorbent—moisture collects…That’s a perfect breeding ground for bacteria or yeast.” Yikes, that’s a bit frightening.
If that’s not enough to get you to try it, here are some other things for you to keep in mind:
It’s SUPER comfortable
I barely can describe the feeling in words. I can tell you personally, when you have a little bit more junk in your trunk most cuts of underwear feel super uncomfortable, especially with pants. Thongs can be irritating to the skin. Others give you unwanted bumps and bulges. No underwear, no problems. There are even panty liners made specifically for going commando.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Pros And Cons Of Not Wearing Underwear-June15, 2012 "You will be surprised to know how many people prefer not to wear underwear on the daily basis. Some think it is gross while others believe it is quite normal to go without anything down there to almost any place, including office. People have different opinions, but what do doctors say about it? Let’s discuss pros and cons of not wearing underwear.

"Pros Of Not Wearing Underwear
•Skipping your underwear has [QUITE! ESPECIALY MORE MONEY FOR OUTERWEAR] a few practical advantages. First of all when you don’t wear anything under your dress, skirt or pants, you eliminate visible panty lines (But you can avoid those by wearing a G-string, for example [IF U LIKE CHEESE-WIRE]), which is especially important if you choose to don a very revealing dress (Remember Anya Rubik’s gown at the 2012 Met Gala?).
•You get better air circulation when you don’t wear underwear. Underwear tends to trap heat and moisture and hold it against your skin. This can result in jock itch in men and vaginal yeast infections in women. (But if you wear cotton underwear this is [PERHAPS MORE unlikely to happen.)
•We know it sounds ridiculous (but for some it can be a big problem!) but if you don’t wear panties you’ll never run out of clean underwear.
•Many people consider it sexy to appear in public without underwear. Some even compare it with wearing stockings – no one knows about it but everyone supposes it can be true. (Besides, if your man suddenly gets to know you’re pantyless he’ll start burning with desire!)"

THE 'BOTTOM LINE' IS THAT PANTIES ARE A VERY, VERY RECENT IMPOSITION ON WOMEN'S FASHION AND TOTALLY A MATTER OF YOUR OWN CHOICE/ COMFORT/ CONVENIENCE - ONE MORE GARMENT NOT TO WORRY ABOUT WEARING!
Comment Hidden (show)
If u hav any doubts about panties/ knickers/ cheese-wire G-strings/ thongs etc. being very, very recent impositions on women's fashion (versus no-nothing/ au naturel ... sunshine, fresh air & not collecting moisture &amp; "gunk" -- and bugs -- "down there"), then GOOGLE on "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" among many, many other postings declaring panties unhealthy, uncomfortable & worse.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
from googling on the internet

The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing
knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you
Vanessa Fernandez, 35, from Edgware, stopped wearing knickers two years ago after suffering an 'embarrassing' vaginal infection
Gemma Cromwell, 29, from Dunstable, spent years wearing thongs to avoid a VPL until she became pregnant and now only wears them on her period
Growing numbers of women are giving up on knickers for health reasons
Comment Hidden (show)
From the Internet:"Prior to the French Revolution, women simply wore heavy skirts with petticoats under their dresses. It was only in the Regency era when pantaloons were invented, that a need to cover up and keep warm was instigated. Early forms of underwear were very long and similar in style to ankle-length men’s trousers. As time went on and fashions changed, so knickers and underwear developed until by the 1970’s ‘no leg’ knickers were born and have continued to be adapted into smaller and smaller versions ever since."
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Smaller and smaller ... until somebody realizes they have disappeared completely (and permanently) from daily wear ... the sooner the better ... if only for the health of it!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
"You will be surprised to know how many people prefer not to wear underwear on the daily basis. Some think it is gross while others believe it is quite normal to go without anything down there to almost any place, including office. People have different opinions, but what do doctors say about it? Let’s discuss pros and cons of not wearing underwear.

"girl-without-underwear

"Pros Of Not Wearing Underwear
•Skipping your underwear has a few practical advantages. First of all when you don’t wear anything under your dress, skirt or pants, you eliminate visible panty lines (But you can avoid those by wearing a G-string, for example.), which is especially important if you choose to don a very revealing dress (Remember Anya Rubik’s gown at the 2012 Met Gala?).
•You get better air circulation when you don’t wear underwear. Underwear tends to trap heat and moisture and hold it against your skin. This can result in jock itch in men and vaginal yeast infections in women. (But if you wear cotton underwear this is unlikely to happen.)
•We know it sounds ridiculous (but for some it can be a big problem!) but if you don’t wear panties you’ll never run out of clean underwear.
•Many people consider it sexy to appear in public without underwear. Some even compare it with wearing stockings – no one knows about it but everyone supposes it can be true. (Besides, if your man suddenly gets to know you’re pantyless he’ll start burning with desire!)...."
MORE ON INTERNET BUT IT SEEMS THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH PANTILESS!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
FROM THE iNTERNET
"I have never worn knickers... And I am in my 50's. They are unhygienic, uncomfortable, ruin the line of clothes and totally unnecessary. This is not news. It's common sense.

"Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3573984/Women-say-key-good-health-NOT-wearing-knickers-sounds-extraordinary-evidence-surprising.html#ixzz4QfxIyCyI
"Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"

Knickers are also expensive (as well as un-necessary and hazardous to your health and comfort), they are a billion dollar industry supported by vast advertising/"organized persuasion" = propaganda .... so stay off the bandwagon, tho the world's best-paid psychologists are working in the advertiSing busine$$, dare I $ay racket!
Comment Hidden (show)
It was pretty obvious that Emma Bloomer "wore the pants" in the family as far as women's sports and bicycle riding ... however, as far as the history of fashion, "panties" r a very recent "invention"/ imposition on women's health and comfort. Visit "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" and "Ditch Your Panties" for the story of What's Up Down There as far as Au Naturel, back to Mother Nature and health happiness and comfort. Besides more healthy, pantiless is a lot less expensive an more comfortable. It seems that with "pantiless/ knickerless/ thong-G-strings-made-of-cheese wire" it's "once they really get used to it" women never go back to dark, moist, wet and filled with germs panti prison versus the fresh air and sunshine of pantiless!!! In a word, 'freedom' to be all they want to be.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
FROM THE INTERNET - PANTILESS IS PRETTY WELL ACCEPTED as "whatever you like best": Age 31 and still (delighted to be free and)panti-less

"Re:Pantiless at school(1person)July11 2011,5:30 AM

"You should go to school dressed in a way that you feel comfortable with- and if you are feeling comfortable when not wearing panties- then just don't put them on.
"On top, if you are not wearing any beneath some kind of shorts no one can tell anyway because the lack of vpl can now-a-days mean that you are/ might be wearing a thong underneath your clothes. The same is for a skirt as long as you don't let anyone look up your skirt and find out that you aren't wearing any, but be sure you will soon find it very arousing to open your legs every now and then just a little to tease them all and sooner or later you will accidentally flash a bit- but you will love it. Believe me, it was the same for me and now being 31 I'm completely pantieless for 16 years now and there is nothing which will bring me back to wearing any."

It seems once u get used 2 the "feel" of clean, fresh air and moisture free, u may never want 2 having any panties, thong, G-string or anything else cutting in to u "down there" (and collecting germs, yeast, crud or gook)! And elastic is bad 4 the circulation! Happy panty burning party!

Mother Nature and Eve never intended there 2B anything "down there" but sunshine (and delight)!
Comment Hidden (show)
A survey conducted by Vanity Fair and 60 Minutes has revealed that a lot more women prefer not wearing underwear than you might think!

The magazine found that 25% of people they asked said they DON’T wear underwear.

Of that 25%:
•13% would wear underwear “occasionally”
•5% “once a week”
•7% go commando “all the time”

Do you prefer the feeling of freedom or are you rather attached to your underwear?
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET CRYSTAL COLLINS - WHY I DON'T WEAR UNDERWEAR

"Hi Crystal,

"I really enjoyed your article. My husband raised an eyebrow or two when he found out that I don’t wear underwear to the gym. Lol. I’m not stinky up my good panties. Then, he really freaked out when he found out that I don’t wear panties outside of the gym. Lol. It feels better.

"I like your sense of humor and bravery. I know my mom would gasp if she found out that I’m often panty-free. I’m going to forward this article to her and wait for my phone to blow up. Lol.

"Thanks again,
Tee from CA
Comment Hidden (show)
PLEASE REFER TO:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3573984/Women-say-key-good-health-NOT-wearing-knickers-sounds-extraordinary-evidence-surprising.html#ixzz4OOx4U5eP
Comment Hidden (show)
Internet: I started going pantyless at first because I was a rather rebellious teenage girl and I did it because it annoyed my mum. But after I went pantyless for a few times I started to love the freedom and the slightly cool breezes under my skirts so I never went back to wearing panties.
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM DOWN UNDER-
HISTORY LESSON101:The Evolution of Underwear\Peter the Great, visiting Paris in 1717, was riding down a crowded street when a woman slipped and fell in front of his horse. The czar, intently watching the pretty Parisienne scissor and squirm out of danger, observed with some delight: "The gates of Paradise are open."\What's interesting is not that that particular French woman didn't wear any underwear, but that almost no French women at the time wore any underwear that would have blocked the czar's view. Or any English women. Or any German women. Or any American women.\It amazes us (or at least me) to learn that women for the first five thousand years of Western civilization wore nothing between their legs beyond their natural chinchilla. "Until the late 18th century, [women's] underwear consisted only of smocks or shifts, stays [i.e., corsets] and the highly important petticoats of all kinds," harrumphs The History of Underclothes by Willet and Cunnington. But nothing between the legs.\It seems fairly mind-boggling to consider millions of women for thousands of years with no garment snugly covering their Delta. Sure, they generally wore very long dresses, but why not any close-fitting under-wear? \Yeast infections and crab lice, among other reasons, argue authors Janet and Peter Phillips in their masterful article, History From Below: Women's Underwear and the Rise of Women's Sports. "Pre-20th century women had to do without knickers and the like because of the perpetual threat of thrush [i.e., yeast infection]," state the British authors. "Since the vagina is naturally warm and moist, any covering increasing the temperature will put out a welcome mat to thrush," they contend, pointing out that yesteryear's lower standards of personal hygiene, due to lack of indoor running water, would have greatly promoted thrush and lice.\Near Eastern women who did bathe more frequently than their European sisters did wear trousers or "harem pants," sometimes under skirts. And it's speculated that during the Renaissance, these garments were imported into Europe and gradually adapted into drawers, i.e., loose-fitting under-trousers, with ribbons to "draw" them tight at the waist and the legs. But these imported strange items (considered masculine and somehow perverse) never caught on with working-class women, who could still squat and pee in an alleyway.\In fact, almost the only French women in the 1700s who wore drawers did so by law. A ballerina in 1727 got her skirt caught on a piece of stage scenery. Her exposure led to the passage of a police regulation in Paris that "no actress or dancer should appear on stage without drawers."
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Consult

Going Commando: Is It Healthier?
TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2012 AT 4:25 P.M.
Comment Hidden (show)
A BRIEF HISTORY OF LADIES UNDERWEAR By Tim Lambert Early Women's Underwear Ancient Greek women wore a form of bra called an apodesme. Both Roman men&women wore a loincloth or shorts called subligaculum. Women also wore a band of cloth or leather around their chest called a strophium or mamilare. \\After the fall of Rome women did not usually wear panties until the 19th century. Their only underwear was a long linen garment called a shift, smock or chemise, which they wore under their dress. From the 16th century women wore corsets made with whalebone. Also in the late 16th century women began to a wear frame made of wire or whalebone called a farthingale. Slightly later some women wore a roll around their waist called a 'bum-roll' to hold out their dress.\\From the end of the 16th century women wore skirt like garments called petticoats, which were some-times embroidered. (A petticoat was originally a petty coat, a short coat worn by a man but women borrowed the term).\19th Century Women's Underwear \The word drawers was invented because underwear was drawn on. Where does the word knickers come from? It comes from a novel called History of New York by Diedrich Knickerbocker, supposedly a Dutchman living in New York (it was actually written by Washington Irving). In Britain the illustrations for the book showed a Dutchman wearing long, loose fitting garments on his lower body. When men wore loose trousers for sport they were sometimes called knickerbockers. However women's underwear were soon called knickerbockers too. In the late 19th century the word was shortened to knickers.\In the USA women's underwear are called panties, which is obviously a diminutive of pants. However the word panties has never been common in the UK.\At the beginning of the 19th century women still wore a long nightie-like garment under their dress but it was now called a chemise not a shift. However after about 1800 they also wore drawers. Sometimes they came to below the knee or sometimes they were longer garments with frills at the bottom called pantalettes. However by the 1830s only girls not women wore pantalettes.\Today we still say a pair of knickers or panties. That is because in the early 19th century women's underwear consisted to two separate legs joined at the waist. They really were a 'pair'.\At first women's drawers were usually very plain but in the late 19th century they were decorated with lace&bands. In the winter women often wore woolen knickers &woolen vests. In the 1860s some women began to wear colored petticoats &drawers although white remained very common.\Life in the 19th Century\In the 19th century women's underwear were sometimes called bloomers. Elizabeth Miller invented loose trousers to be worn by women. Amelia Bloomer promoted the idea from 1849&they became known as bloomers. In time long underwear became known as bloomers.20th Century Women's Underwear\In the 19th century women's underwear was usually open between the legs but in the 20th century closed knickers replaced them. In 1910 stockings&knickers were first made of rayon (at first rayon was called artificial silk). Nylon was invented by Wallace Carothers in 1935. The first nylon stockings were sold in 1939. Later knickers were also made of nylon.\Meanwhile in 1913 Mary Phelps Jacob invented the modern bra. She used two handkerchiefs joined by ribbon. The wonderbra was invented in 1963.\In the 19th century knickers came down to well below the knee. In the 1920s they became shorter. They ended above the knee. By the 1940s&1950s many women wore briefs. Knickers became briefer still in the 1970s. In the 1990s thongs became common.\Meanwhile in 1949 an American tennis player named Gertrude Moran or Gussie Moran (1923-2013) caused a sensation when she appeared at Wimbledon wearing frilly panties. She was called Gorgeous Gussie&it was very daring in 1949! \Women have worn stockings for centuries but tights (pantyhose) were introduced in 1959. Meanwhile in the late 20th century women's underwear became more basic& corsets& petticoats became less&less common. Finally our word lingerie is derived from the French word for linen, lin. Lingerie were things made from linen.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
NORMAL INDEED, BUT NOT YETTTT COMPLETELY POPULAR, AT LEAST TO OPELY ADVOCATE, ADVISE & OFTEN PRE-SCRIBE FORBETTER HEALTH (ALSO SAVES ON THE CLOTHING BUDGET ... AND LAUNDRY)

FROM TH INTERNET:

Reason for going without
No score for this post August 24 2011, 3:13 AM



There is one simple reason why I do not wear knickers. I HATE THEM! Even as a young schoolgirl I found wearing them uncomfortable, always bunching up. Quite often I would take them off. I immediately felt so much better. As I got a little older I would slip them off when I left for school and not put them back until going home time. By the age of fifteen I didn't even bother to do that until one morning my mother said that the knickers I left in the dirty laundry basket didn't even look as though they had been worn. Taking my courage in both hands I told her that I had stopped wearing them. I expected her to make a big fuss, but instead she told me that sometimes on hot days she left hers off. She said, "just be careful, boys think that girls with no knickers are an easy lay".
From that time I haven't ever worn knickers, even during my periods (just tampons).
Upon leaving school and starting work my skirts have steadily got shorter. I now wear really short miniskirts all the time. I suppose that because I've become a bit of an exhibitionist I really don't care who knows I'm knickerless. Quite a few people have got a flash of my shaven pussy, sometimes intentionally.
Sally
Comment Hidden (show)
"The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you"

GOOGLE on the above if u have any doubts that pantiless/ knickerless/ au naturel/ back-to-Mother-Nature is best for many women ... unfortunately, selling panties is a multi-billion industry ... spend your hard eared money on outerwear & Ditch Your Panties (another good site to GOOGLE).
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Indeed, it's quite normal to be pantiless ... and more important, it's more comfortable (many gals ... and guys too ... have tried it and say that once you get used to it they never, ever want to go back to panty-prison ... wet, warm, dark and inviting to all sorts of diseases). Pantiless is more economical, more healthy. Unless u r a dancer or performer on a stage or TV or engaged in athletics before the public, there's no law against pantiless ... and every advantage to "let your vagina happily breathe" (as it was made 2B) rather than growing germs by the millions --- and odors. Go on line with COMMANDO or WHY I DON'T WEAR UNDERWEAR and hear and see what is going on these days ... and has been going on in fashion as far as pantiless is concerned since the very beginning of clothing. Au Naturel is best and was the style long before anybody ever even thought of panties, G-strings, thongs, knickers, etc. With the widespread acceptance of tampons, there's really no reason to have anything but fresh air and sunshine on your vagina!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
Kinckerless/pantiless is a matter of "as you like it" and getting more (and more and more) popular (to admit or to display) every day! The "fact" is that panties r a rather recent fashion imposition; read up on the chemise 4 a sample!
"Opinion" by many authorities is that pantiless is a lot healthier ... fresh air, sunshine, "let your vagina BREATHE" ... and prevents such things as yeast-ie beasties from setting up household between your legs "down there" among many other diseases, conditions and gooey/smelly "junk" that panties r just about "designed" to collect ... and collect very efficiently and effectively "in dark, moist places".
Mother Nature knows best and if you can conveniently "go commando" it's probably healthier (and less expensive, including gynecologists visits) then anything else.
Lots of times, less is best and u might as well spend your time and budget on outerwear!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
You might as well GOOGLE on "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" for a good sample of practical advice on what's wrong with panties, knickers, g-string cheese wire and thongs when you could be enjoying good health, fresh air & sunshine comfort and FREEDOM from yeast/ junk/ crud and many other smelly, disgusting conditions that should be tossed into the trash heap (on panty-burning party bonfire)!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
P.S. And yes, knickerless/ pantiless/ fresh air and sunshine are very, very sexy, confidence building, comfortable, healthy good 4U and much more enjoyable than u could imagine at "first blush." A lot of folks who "just try it" seriously read Ditch Your Panties) swear they will never go back to "Panty Prison."
Comment Hidden (show)
The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you

•Vanessa Fernandez, 35, from Edgware, stopped wearing knickers two years ago after suffering an 'embarrassing' vaginal infection


•Gemma Cromwell, 29, from Dunstable, spent years wearing thongs to avoid a VPL until she became pregnant and now only wears them on her period




•Growing numbers of women are giving up on knickers for health reasons

By Becky Dickinson For The Daily Mail Published: 19:25 EST, 4 May 2016 | Updated: 12:30 EST, 6 May 2016

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3573984/Women-say-key-good-health-NOT-wearing-knickers-sounds-extraordinary-evidence-surprising.html#ixzz4QUORPdAz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET - FLOATY SKIRT - SEEMS PANTILESS/ KNICKERLESS IS QUITE POPULAR - BACK TO NATURE PROVIDES A GREAT VIEW AND COMFORT, NOT TO MENTION GOOD HEALTH, HYGIENE, FRESH AIR AND ECONOMY! MAKES A PERSON WONDER WHY PANTIES ARE WORN AT ALL ... CHECK INTERNET "WHY I DON'T WEAR UNDERWEAR" ALSO "DITCH YOUR PANTIES" ... MORE COMFORTABLE ... APPARENTLY, ONCE YOU GET USED TO CLEAN, FRESH COMFORT YOU WON'T EVER GO BACK TO PANTY PRISON.

I work in a small office with five girls, one of which is quite new. She always wears fairly short skirts, but not overly so. I never really thought about whether she wore knickers or not until about a month ago when she needed to take some files from the bottom drawer of a cabinet.
As she crouched down, I got a superb view right up her skirt. She had no knickers on and her pussy was clean shaven. She was in that position for a couple of minutes and didn't notice me looking. Since then I have seen up her skirt twice more. On both occasions she was knickerless. Last Tuesday, another of the girls bent over in front of me to retrieve something from the floor. She also had no knickers on. Lately, life is getting a lot more interesting. Ralph Mc J April 7 2011, 12:16 PM

The other day while I was sitting in my office one of the outer office girls came in carrying a folder. She was wearing a summery dress with quite a short, floaty skirt. She threw the folder onto my desk and started complaining that I hadn't put the contents back in the correct order. I said OK I'll sort it out, but this did'nt seem to satisfy her, she still kept moaning. Getting a bit fed up with her, I said,"don't get your knickers in a twist, I'll sort it out". She gave me a funny look, and said, "I'm not wearing any". Jokingly I said, "prove it". With that she took hold of the hem of her dress and lifted it up to her waist, showing me her totally bare, shaven pussy. I asked her why she had no knickers on, and she told me that she hadn't worn any for about five years as it was so much more comfortable without them.

P.S. Pantiless saves laundry too!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
I once knew a lass that worked in a Museum who openly admitted she never wore knickers and on the odd occasion inserted her bullet for good measure.
Comment Hidden (show)
Normal? Natural! Bestest!!! Why wear anything "down there"???

"When I was married, Daddy went"all out", sent me to Saks Fifth Ave., to get a wedding dress, and a dress for Mother and my sister who would be maid of honor. All three of us surprised the Dept. Mgr., who was watching over our "fittings", when we told the seamstress we would be wearing the dresses with NOTHING underneath. We NEVER wore ANY underwear anyway &amp; certainly weren't going to wear any for my wedding. I was always trying to talk friends into going pantyless &amp; braless, so didn't hesitate to ask my six bridesmaids to go underwear-less for my wedding. THEY AGREED. I also asked them to go to my hairdresser &amp; have their hair all the same color. THEY AGREED. I was in white, though hardly a virgin &amp; the girls in very pale blue with strawberry blonde hair. Their dresses, which I picked out at Saks, were as much see-through as possible. In fact (it was a garden wedding) 2 of the girls, who had black "hair down there" let everybody know it, when the sun was shining just right. It was a great wedding, great reception, all of "my girls" got laid at the country club &amp; a great honeymoon.
"Hubby & I went from bar to bedroom &; bedroom to bar, for ten days. Next time we go to Hawaii, we'll go sight-seeing, maybe."

FROM WHAT WE HEAR AND SEE ON THE INTERNET, UNDERWEAR IS JUST PLAIN OUT OF FASHION ... GOOGLE ON "WHY I DON'T WEAR UNDERWEAR" "PANTILESS IN NYC" "DITCH YOUR PANIES" AND MORE TO TELL WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON .... AND OFF!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
FROM THE INTENET:"I just smile"::
""I Don't Wear Underwear
""For about 15 years now I nearly never wear underwear, bra and panties. Just love the free feeling this gives and if the skirt is not too short or the top too thin no one will notice, and if they they do I just smile.
""I did this a few times when going out to get attention when I was younger or once I was with my then boyfriend to tease him - and only him. It started with an accident in which I got a nasty cut from a sharp iron bar on my upper thigh all the way to nearly the "sensitive part". Any panties I had were painful as it was rubbing over the wound and stitches. Advice from the nurse was to go pantyless and I did. Just loved the feeling and never looked back.
""Now I only wear panties when in a short skirt, less than mid thigh or in a situation where exposure is likely and inappropriate. A bra I rarely ever wore, being 34/36B with firm boobs makes it not necessary, wear the occasional lace type bra under totally sheer tops as anything else would be a bit too provocative...""

It seems going pantiless/commando is quite popular ... and comfortable ... and healthy ... once u get out of and away from panti-prison (and ugly panti-lines and nasty yeasty-beasties) it looks like it's try it and you'll like (if not adore) it.
GOOGLE on Why I Don't Wear Underwear for a better idea. Lots of folks seem 2 say they would never go back 2 panti-prison in favor of fresh air, sunshine and delight! Apparently Eve has the right idea from the 1st day about the delight of no panties!
Comment Hidden (show)
Here’s one way to save money on laundry — stop wearing underwear.

Vanity Fair teamed up with 60 Minutes to conduct a fashion-based poll, asking Americans everything from what their biggest fashion nightmare would be, to identifying big industry names to... how often they go commando. According to the results, more people do it than you might think.

25 percent of those polled admitted they go sans underwear at least sometimes. Of that 25 percent, 13 percent said they do it “occasionally,” 5 percent confessed they ditch their underwear “once a week” and 7 percent said they went without undergarments “all the time.”

Of course, there are plenty of reasons to leave the house without your undies every so often. It can be pretty liberating, for one. Plus there’s that whole thing about shapewear being detrimental to your health.

Still, we can’t imagine ditching our beloved undie collection permanently. What about you? Would you go commando for good? Sound off below!
Comment Hidden (show)
Pantiless? It's Natural, Normal, Comfortable, Healthy, Yeasty-Beasty-Free! In a word, Great! Also Liberating, Economical, Easy-to-Pack, Free-From-Panty-Lines Forever &amp; Ditto the bra!

FROM-THE-INTERNET-IS PANTILESS "NORMAL"? What could be more natural?

QUOTE
Going commando
There are plenty of reasons some women choose to go without panties.
First, there's this bright-and-breezy, liberating feeling about going commando that's hard to resist. Then, there's the whole "how to deal with panty lines" nightmare and the relevant wardrobe malfunctions.
More importantly, taking it a step further and ditching your bra as well could be good for your health. After examining for 15 years the effect of bras on breasts, Jean-Denis Rouillon– a sports medicine specialist at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire in France – found out last year that bras are detrimental to women's health. "Medically, physiologically, anatomically – breasts gain no benefit from being denied gravity," he said during a radio interview with France Info.
Yet, despite the undeniable perks that come with skipping your undies, this scandalous habit was always considered the hallmark of provocative wannabe celebs. It hasn't YET (Emphasis Added) evolved into an actual trend, one that grabs the attention of lingerie industry players. But things could be changing.
In a recent, fashion-based poll conducted by Vanity Fair and 60 Minutes, 25% of the Americans surveyed confirmed that they leave the house without undies, at least, occasionally. Apparently, more people go commando than we might think.
Comment Hidden (show)
PANTILESS/ KNICKERLESS/ AU NATUREL SEEMS TO BE QUITE POPULAR (AND HEALTHY AS WELL AS CONVENIENT ... BACK TO NATURE/THE WAY THINGS SHOULD BE).

Maybe some day the question will be whether wearing underwear is Normal!!!

Britain by numbers: top 20 facts

8 Out of 10 Brits, a book on British statistics by Charlie Croker, reveals some surprising facts about what he dubs world's 79th largest nation.

By Sasjkia Otto 11:32AM BST 20 Aug 2009

Charlie Croker is an author and journalist who specialises in compiling unusual lists.

Here is a top 20 glimpse of his numerical portrait of British life, as compiled by The Sun.

1. Almost one in five women have gone to work without wearing any underwear.
2. British people eat twice as many baked beans as anybody else in Europe.
Comment Hidden (show)
From Why I Don't Wear Panties to School (survey):

"When I turned 13 Mom wouldn't let me have a thong so I throw away all my panties and have been going without ever since. I have gone almost 2 years without. Most girls go without sometimes if not most of the time anyways. My best friend don't wear any. Her Mom never wore any on her when she was small and I wouldn't wear any because I was her friend. Mom never checked ."
Comment Hidden (show)
frum the internet - pantiless is bestest

"I'm a twenty three year old girl living in southern England. I gave up wearing knickers (panties) about four years ago.
"It is so much more comfortable without them, and certainly more sexy.
"I love to wear really short skirts and dresses and feel the breeze on my shaven pussy.
"I suspect that quite a few people have seen up my skirt and realised that I had no knickers on. I don't mind this, it makes it even better.
"Geraldine M."

Anonymous said...
"I gave up wearing knickers during my last year at school. Several of us girls did it at about the same time. I'm quite tall which made my school uniform skirts look very short so I had to be very careful. It gave me quite a buzz knowing that one careless move would totally expose me.
"These days I don't really care who gets a look up my skirt at my smoothly shaven pussy. I think that the feeling of total comfort far outweighs the problems."

Anonymous said...
"I'm a 23 year old girl who gave up wearing knickers about five years ago. I never liked wearing them and found it so much more comfortable without.
"I'm quite tall, and love wearing really short skirts to show off my legs which are my best assets.
"With skirts so short I have to be careful when bending and sitting, although there have been many times when it is obvious that I've got no knickers on. It doesn't really bother me, in fact it's quite sexy.
"Marina."

As indicated, commando/pantyless and definitely thong-free (free, clear, clean and unobstructed!) seem to be very popular ... hopefully, they will remain that way PERMANENTLY AND COMPLETELY ... if fashion is any guide, the were never very healthy, comfortable nor even useful in their first imposition on woman-kind!
Comment Hidden (show)
The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you

Vanessa Fernandez, 35, from Edgware, stopped wearing knickers two years ago after suffering an 'embarrassing' vaginal infection

Gemma Cromwell, 29, from Dunstable, spent years wearing thongs to avoid a VPL until she became pregnant and now only wears them on her period

Growing numbers of women are giving up on knickers for health reasons

By Becky Dickinson For The Daily Mail

Published: 19:25 EST, 4 May 2016 | Updated: 12:30 EST, 6 May 2016


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3573984/Women-say-key-good-health-NOT-wearing-knickers-sounds-extraordinary-evidence-surprising.html#ixzz4QUORPdAz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INERNET

Arielle Re: Reasons for going without
August 23 2011, 12:15 AM

"I started going without for the naughtiness of it, then I discovered it was really comfortable. Being without makes me feel really sexy, and empowered, because it takes a confident woman to go without."
*****
A panty burning party is also appropriate for reasons of good health and economy. I once had a girl friend who once she reached her teens was given a "clothing allowance" of so much money (anything more she had to earn for her self). Needless to say she studied her wardrobe carefully & determined (after much budgeting & shopping) that panties could go ... & forever after that, the difference could best be spent on outerwear.

From that point in her life, when the panties wore out &amp; converted into cleaning rags &amp; tossed out, they never ever were replaced ... except by sunshine, good health, fresh air and clean living!

[It was as if women were never designed nor intended to "farm yeast" &amp; worse between their reproductive organs and clean, fresh air.]

She was a mother of two lovely daughters (they never were required to make such a choice of budgets) and lived happily ever after without panties/ G-strings/ thongs/ or anything other than "outerwear" from the waist down (she favored pants for work and play but wore dresses and skirts, which she designed herself, as well).

Once again, less is best when it comes to comfort (as well as economy --- spending your money wisely). Needless to say, she never suffered from any yeast infections or any other problems "below the belt" when treating herself to sunshine, fresh air and pleasure rather than moist, warm breeding grounds for a lot of germs, "gunk," and worse!

Seems like there's a good lesson there between her legs and the sunshine!
Comment Hidden (show)
FOR MORE INFORMATION, GOOGLE:
The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing knickers
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET - ON PANTILESS\

"I've done it sometimes, depending on what I am wearing. The first time I did it was at 24. It felt wierd at first. Now it's normal. lol"
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET:

apisto Member

Joined: 06/11/2015 13:30
Messages: 699
Offline
Personally, I never wear panties. Way too constricting.
Comment Hidden (show)
I couldn't go without, though thongs are pretty close to nothing! lol
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Pretty close indeed, but thongs are closer to cheese wire1 I'd suspect that if it were either cheese-wire thongs or au naturel, there wouldn't anything butt 'fresh air' sunshine & freedom from yeast & other infections!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
try it & once you get used to it, chances are you will never want to go back to anything butt fresh, clean air & sunshine!
Comment Hidden (show)
Thongs? Better off (and more comfortable) without thongs or G-strings! Again, whoever invented them in the first place had nothing in mind but women's discomfort & worse.
Comment Hidden (show)
You would be surprised how healthy "Ditch Your Panties" can be ... also read the recent article (GOOGLE on it or on "Why I Don't Wear Underwear")

"The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you"

Again, you'd be surprised (and most likely a lot more happy and healthy)
Comment Hidden (show)
Apparently, who isn't wearing underwear/ panties/ g-strings/ going "commando"??? Quite a number of women ( and men) - read this from the Internet---
quote
Aalia says: ‘I don’t even think about putting on a pair of knickers when I get dressed in the morning and I feel so much more confident knowing I don’t have to worry about lines everywhere. I feel sexier, too.
‘I don’t wear short skirts very often, but I’ve got a few long, clingy skirts with high slits at the front. I have to make sure nothing is on display when I sit down, but that’s the only time I have to be careful.
‘I prefer going commando with jeans, too. It’s not just about the VPL, it’s so much more comfortable. I may not have the perfect silhouette, but at least I know I’m not bulging out all over the place.
‘I feel like I’m in my prime now and I want to look good. I don’t answer to anybody and I can dress however I want.
‘I’ve become a lot more confident in myself as a woman. I don’t go without knickers for a man, I do it for myself. I feel liberated.’
It may not be good news for lingerie retailers, but daring to go bare under your elegant dress could be just what the doctor ordered.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3573984/Women-say-key-good-health-NOT-wearing-knickers-sounds-extraordinary-evidence-surprising.html#ixzz4IT0ddGdJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Comment Hidden (show)
Reasons for going without
No score for this post September 23 2011, 3:41 AM



True, there is no greater turn-on than being in a crowded place wearing an ultra short skirt without any knickers, knowing just how easy it is to be exposed. Some of my skirts are so short that everyone can see Im knickerless. I just love it.
Comment Hidden (show)
Hot hot hot !!
Comment Hidden (show)
I am a woman who only wears panties when she has to. I wear them to work and to university and that is about it.

At home? No panties

Summer? No panties

Partying? No panties
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Quite normal & even more sensible & practical (& economical)
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Indeed, the most important use for skirts is 2 allow a free flow of fresh air (and sunshine) where u need it most... preventing yeast (and other diseases). Panties/ G-strings/ thongs/ bloomers r a rather recent invention/imposition on women-kind and u r better off without same... completely. The invention, popularity, convenience and distribution of the "tampon" make it rather useless to wear anything in the least bit uncomfortable every day of the month!
Comment Hidden (show)
Happiness/ No panties ... they're neither comfortable nor desirable ... better off without with Mother Nature as your guide.
Comment Hidden (show)
Love your girls with or without the only think with out used panties I would have to ask that you let me put my nose in your crotch as I masturbate.
Comment Hidden (show)
Good for you all...it is sexy, although sexy underwear makes you girls even sexies...but if you have the ody and attetude it is a great turn-on.
Comment Hidden (show)
NICE !!!
Comment Hidden (show)
im a dude and i often go without underwear. its not a sex thing, its just, comfort
Comment Hidden (show)
-
and economy ... never to worry about a fresh pair in the wardrobe when it's fresh air and sunshine!
Comment Hidden (show)
LOOKING AT HISTORY, PANTIES WEREN'T WORN AT ALL UNTIL THE 1930'S - SEE PANTILESS IN NYC, ALSO DITCH YOUR PANTIES ...

The era spanning from the 1790s to the 1820s saw an emphasis on elegance and simplicity which was motivated by the democratic ideals of the French Republic but which looked back to classical Greece and Rome for its fashion inspiration. Waists were high, the directional emphasis was vertical, and lightweight white fabrics were at the height of fashions which were so simple that the lady of the time often wore only three garments; a chemise, a corset and a gown! This was an incredible contrast to the clothing of preceding and succeeding periods with their horizontal emphases, multiple layers and often heavy fabrics.

Chemise:
The chemise was the only ladies' undergarment used during the era. (Panties would not be developed until the 20th century and pantalets were not in vogue until Victorian times.) The chemise was simply constructed of linen or cotton. In modern terms its appearance was similar to a long blouse or short nightgown.

Corset:
In the early days of the Regency era some women wore tight but lightweight linen stays which had an effect similar to a modern push-up bra while some chose to wear no support at all. The ideal was to emulate the "classical" Greek look of ancient statuary and the older conical shaped stays of the Georgian era didn't do the trick. But soon new corset designs had caught up in "support" of the latest fashions. The corset was worn over the chemise, was typically made of linen, laced in the back, was “boned” for firmness and often had a long wooden or whalebone busk in the front to create the “lift and separate” support necessary for Regency fashions. A lady wearing a proper Regency style corset will likely carry herself with flawless posture.

Gown or Dress:
The gown was at least ankle length and had a very high “empire” waist. Some bodices scooped quite low in front and/or back while others were more moderate. Some had trains in the rear which were pinned up while dancing. The sleeves could be short or wrist length as each style was popular at different times. Even a few sleeveless gowns were seen early in the period. The fabric was usually light in color with solid white being the favorite of the era. Small patterns and vertical stripes were also used. Good fabric choices would be lightweight such as cotton batiste, lightweight cotton muslin or a silk such as charmeuse that isn’t too stiff but has a good “drape” to it. Sometimes a very light semi-transparent overdress was worn on top of the main article. White cotton voile or silk chiffon might be good fabrics for such an option. Trim could be in the form of piping, metallic braid or ribbon.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
GOOGLE "PANTILESS" "KNICKERLESS" TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PANTIES ... THERE ISN'T ANY ... WEREN'T WORN TILL VERY RECENTLY ... & FOR GOOD REASONS ... HEALTH VERSUS MOIST, WARM, DARK HAVENS FOR GERMS ETC. SUCH AS YEAST

The era spanning from the 1790s to the 1820s saw an emphasis on elegance and simplicity which was motivated by the democratic ideals of the French Republic but which looked back to classical Greece and Rome for its fashion inspiration. Waists were high, the directional emphasis was vertical, and lightweight white fabrics were at the height of fashions which were so simple that the lady of the time often wore only three garments; a chemise, a corset and a gown! This was an incredible contrast to the clothing of preceding and succeeding periods with their horizontal emphases, multiple layers and often heavy fabrics.

Chemise:
The chemise was the only ladies' undergarment used during the era. (Panties would not be developed until the 20th century and pantalets were not in vogue until Victorian times.) The chemise was simply constructed of linen or cotton. In modern terms its appearance was similar to a long blouse or short nightgown.

Corset:
In the early days of the Regency era some women wore tight but lightweight linen stays which had an effect similar to a modern push-up bra while some chose to wear no support at all. The ideal was to emulate the "classical" Greek look of ancient statuary and the older conical shaped stays of the Georgian era didn't do the trick. But soon new corset designs had caught up in "support" of the latest fashions. The corset was worn over the chemise, was typically made of linen, laced in the back, was “boned” for firmness and often had a long wooden or whalebone busk in the front to create the “lift and separate” support necessary for Regency fashions. A lady wearing a proper Regency style corset will likely carry herself with flawless posture.

Gown or Dress:
The gown was at least ankle length and had a very high “empire” waist. Some bodices scooped quite low in front and/or back while others were more moderate. Some had trains in the rear which were pinned up while dancing. The sleeves could be short or wrist length as each style was popular at different times. Even a few sleeveless gowns were seen early in the period. The fabric was usually light in color with solid white being the favorite of the era. Small patterns and vertical stripes were also used. Good fabric choices would be lightweight such as cotton batiste, lightweight cotton muslin or a silk such as charmeuse that isn’t too stiff but has a good “drape” to it. Sometimes a very light semi-transparent overdress was worn on top of the main article. White cotton voile or silk chiffon might be good fabrics for such an option. Trim could be in the form of piping, metallic braid or ribbon.
Comment Hidden (show)
GOOGLE ON

"going-commando-the-only-way-to-live'

ABOUT NORMAL
Comment Hidden (show)
WHY NOT READ
"Why So Many Women Are Ditching Their Underwear"?
Just GOOGLE on the title (using quotation marks)
Comment Hidden (show)
-
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT WOMEN WERE INVENTED/CREATED BEFORE CLOTHING, WHICH CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO THEIR HEALTH
I Never Wear Underwear, Even on Public Transportation, Even When I Have My Period: Author:Rebecca:Jul18,2013\I don’t understand why anyone wears underwear. I mean, I can conceive of why as a person with a penis you might want to -- it could get stuck in things like train doors or the slats of a beach chair. But as a lady, it’s something I have a hard time wrapping my head around. Because I almost never do. I haven’t for as long as I can remember. I’m pretty sure it started out of laziness, but now as a much-less-lazy adult with a penchant for pretty things, bottom-lingerie is still something I’d rather do without.\“Oh my god,” my friends say when I disclose this intel. “What about when you are wearing a skirt?”\To which I respond, “Whatever man, it’s already a crazy-complex ecosystem happening down there in the bush&beyond -- I doubt a little office-chair-contact is going to fuck it up.”\People also get squicked when they consider the fact that I ride the subway. But let’s be real -- most of the time I don’t get a seat &when I do, it’s not like I’m wearing a lot of micro-minis (my ass does this things where it extends to basically right above my knee, eliminating the things most of you have called "thighs.") For the most part my shit is covered, protecting my parts&protecting you from any&all juices, because I am a model citizen.\Besides, even if your jeans come into contact with some of my crack/slit sweat, I doubt it’s the worst thing you’ve rubbed up against on public transportation. I once watched a drunk guy pee onto the floor&run so quickly between cars to hurl that he threw up on the door while careening into it&then fell back down into his own pee. Just as a “for example.”\I don’t wear underwear because I hate it. I hate how it makes me sweat, no matter what the fabric, cut, or style. I hate how it loves to sneak into my asshole uninvited. I hate how even the ones that fit right enhance my muffin top. Not to mention, modern underwear doesn’t flatter the bush-having among us. It make me look like my vagina is a wearing a tiny spandex hat.\Sure, there’s underwear with a more generous cut. This also tends to be the underwear that can double as a strapless bathing suit, or even better, serve as a parachute were I ever to find myself in a position of unexpectedly jumping from a plane. I hate feeling so restricted.\What about during my period, I hear you ask? Mostly no! Mostly still no! If anything I’m even more anti-drawers during my monthlies. That shit gets to stankin’ &keeping it hidden away to sweat&bleed in a little nether-tent only makes it worse.\To be fair, at night during my moon blood time, I shall don a pair of the gigantics. But this is only because I am tired of buying new sheets&have a tendency to re-enact both the elevator scene from "The Shining"&the part in "The God-father" when dude finds a horse head in his bed overnight. Even so, slapping on a pad to the adult-sized-lady-panties&pairing it with a super tampon seem to simply provide more material for me to bloody. It’s much easier to clean off your ass&legs than it is to haul your private woman shame down to the laundry so that the all&sundry might bear witness.\My parents have tried to intervention me several times. My dad, not a yelling guy, once screamed in a way I’d only ever seen Al Pacino do, when I confessed that no, I was not wearing underwear one day in sixth grade. They probably thought I was a secret sex pervert.\My mom tried to make the prospect of underwear wearing (underwearing, perhaps) alluring to me by buying me a set of blue silk underpants. I hated them&their itchy lace bands with the fire of my soul&at age 10, wore them only so that they might serve as the hilarious punchline to a joke I’d been working on about “blue moons.” \Admittedly, now that I’ve got some jeans that I have not purchased for less than $10, I will wear underpants. Because, you know, odors amassing over time. (Oh my god I am a monster). Still, on the days I do this, I am totally aware that I am in a vaguely worse mood than I could be if I were going commando. I’m basically one step away from being Zach Galifianakis in that Tim&Eric Vodka ad, bellow/crying “IT’S TOO HOT!”\You might think I am the most disgusting person on the planet &that is your right. Having conceded this point, I’d now like to share something that might sway you back toward me on this one: I have never gotten a yeast infection. Never. Not once. Never, never, never. Is this because I am always airing my bits? I don’t know. I am not made of science. But it is a fact, all the same. Don’t believe me? I shall put you in touch with gynos present&past!&verily, do I rest my case.
Comment Hidden (show)
Also, if u have any doubt that pantiless/knickerless is more popular (or at last more popular to admit/ discuss/ promote in a world of selling un-wanted, un-healthy "under" things) GOOGLE on

Why I don't wear underwear
Comment Hidden (show)
It seems that I’ve been Sharon Van Winkle, snoozing for years and suddenly waking to a world where a lot of women have ditched their underwear. Commando appears to be en vogue and some of my girlfriends, people in my 45-54 demographic, are choosing to go sans panties.
The chorus of advice I’ve been hearing, “Go Commando.”
Even though it wasn’t advice I’d sought, I couldn’t help considering the directive.
I grew up with Brooke Shields. I didn’t know her personally, but we were two years apart in age, we both grew up in New Jersey, we both sported bushy eyebrows on our adolescent faces. In 1980, Brooke asked, “Want to know what comes between me and my Calvins?” and then she answered, “Nothing.” It was effective advertising, because I took to buying Calvin Klein underwear.
Flash forward a few decades and though my preferred brand has changed I wear underwear. All. The. Time. I’m a big fan of Soma’s bikini Vanishing Edge underwear so there is nothing granny about my panties. They’re my daily accessory.
Sharon Van Winkle discovered that’s not the case for everyone.
During the past year, three different friends have given me their undie-busting advice. Panty-Raider Number One told me to stop wearing them altogether, but especially when I run. I’m an avid runner, have run marathons, and I warily listened to her rationale of no visible panty lines with exercise shorts.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Flash forward a few decades and though my preferred brand has changed I wear underwear. All. The. Time. I'm a big fan of Soma's bikini Vanishing Edge underwear so there is nothing granny about my panties. They're my daily accessory.

Sharon Van Winkle discovered that's not the case for everyone.

During the past year, three different friends have given me their undie-busting advice. Panty-Raider Number One told me to stop wearing them altogether, but especially when I run. I'm an avid runner, have run marathons, and I warily listened to her rationale of no visible panty lines with exercise shorts.

Recently, I've taken up biking. A month ago, I bought bike shorts, which are super-comfy and like riding with a mattress in my pants. After pedaling fifteen to twenty miles, that's a good thing. Panty-Raider Number Two advised me to stop wearing underwear with my bike shorts. It was a suggestion she'd been given when she started biking. She tried it, she liked it. I haven't tried it.

On a not-long-ago shopping trip, Panty-Raider Number Three and I were wandering through a high-end boutique when she whispered, "I have underwear in my purse in case I try on pants."

I stopped short between racks of designer jeans. "Why are they in your purse and not on your body?" Of course, I should have whispered my response, but surprise trumped volume control.

She spoke quietly, "I almost never wear underwear."

"Almost never?"

She nodded. "It's more comfortable. You should go commando."

It may be that the third time's the charm, but I still wasn't convinced that trashing my knickers was something I wanted to do. I needed more information.

First, I took a rudimentary survey of 10 girlfriends who were all around my age. The result: At least on occasion -- exercise being the predominant occasion -- 60 percent of these ladies went commando. In 2015, I of course turned to the Internet and Google to round out my research. A number of articles touted the health benefits of commando life. An article at Elite Daily listed things like comfort and feeling sexy as reasons for turning your body into a no-underwear zone.

I didn't need an article to point out potential economic benefits. Some brands are pricey. Swearing off underwear could pad my wallet, though not lift my butt.
Comment Hidden (show)
and I warily listened to her rationale of no visible panty lines with exercise shorts.
Recently, I’ve taken up biking. A month ago, I bought bike shorts, which are super-comfy and like riding with a mattress in my pants. After pedaling fifteen to twenty miles, that’s a good thing. Panty-Raider Number Two advised me to stop wearing underwear with my bike shorts. It was a suggestion she’d been given when she started biking. She tried it, she liked it. I haven’t tried it.
On a not-long-ago shopping trip, Panty-Raider Number Three and I were wandering through a high-end boutique when she whispered, “I have underwear in my purse in case I try on pants.”
I stopped short between racks of designer jeans. “Why are they in your purse and not on your body?” Of course, I should have whispered my response, but surprise trumped volume control.
She spoke quietly, “I almost never wear underwear.”
“Almost never?”
She nodded. “It’s more comfortable. You should go commando.”
It may be that the third time’s the charm, but I still wasn’t convinced that trashing my knickers was something I wanted to do. I needed more information.
First, I took a rudimentary survey of 10 girlfriends who were all around my age. The result: At least on occasion — exercise being the predominant occasion — 60 percent of these ladies went commando. In 2015, I of course turned to the Internet and Google to round out my research. A number of articles touted the health benefits of commando life. An article at Elite Daily listed things like comfort and feeling sexy as reasons for turning your body into a no-underwear zone.
I didn’t need an article to point out potential economic benefits. Some brands are pricey. Swearing off underwear could pad my wallet, though not lift my butt.
I chewed on all the well-intentioned advice from friends and the information I found online. Most of those I’d queried leaned toward ditching their underwear before exercising. Using that as my guide, I tried going commando for two of my runs. I didn’t like it, preferring an extra layer between the world, my spandex and my sweaty self. And though I’m not a stage performer, after Lenny Kravitz’s in concert commando-wardrobe malfunction, I think underwear is a key piece of clothing—for women and “dudes”. #penisgate
For now, I’m leaving the commando lifestyle to others. Lucky for me, a few weeks ago Soma had a buy-three-get-two-free underwear sale.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
FROM HISTORY-HISTORY LESSON101:The Evolution of Underwear\Peter the Great, visiting Paris in 1717, was riding down a crowded street when a woman slipped and fell in front of his horse. The czar, intently watching the pretty Parisienne scissor and squirm out of danger, observed with some delight: "The gates of Paradise are open."\What's interesting is not that that particular French woman didn't wear any underwear, but that almost no French women at the time wore any underwear that would have blocked the czar's view. Or any English women. Or any German women. Or any American women.\It amazes us (or at least me) to learn that women for the first five thousand years of Western civilization wore nothing between their legs beyond their natural chinchilla. "Until the late 18th century, [women's] underwear consisted only of smocks or shifts, stays [i.e., corsets] and the highly important petticoats of all kinds," harrumphs The History of Underclothes by Willet and Cunnington. But nothing between the legs.\It seems fairly mind-boggling to consider millions of women for thousands of years with no garment snugly covering their Delta. Sure, they generally wore very long dresses, but why not any close-fitting underwear?\Yeast infections and crab lice, among other reasons, argue authors Janet and Peter Phillips in their masterful article, History From Below: Women's Underwear and the Rise of Women's Sports. "Pre-20th century women had to do without knickers and the like because of the perpetual threat of thrush [i.e., yeast infection]," state the British authors. "Since the vagina is naturally warm and moist, any covering increasing the temperature will put out a welcome mat to thrush," they contend, pointing out that yester-year's lower standards of personal hygiene, due to lack of indoor running water, would have greatly promoted thrush and lice.\Near Eastern women who did bathe more frequently than their European sisters did wear trousers or "harem pants," sometimes under skirts. And it's speculated that during the Renaissance, these garments were imported into Europe and gradually adapted into drawers, i.e., loose-fitting under-trousers, with ribbons to "draw" them tight at the waist and the legs. But these imported strange items (considered masculine and somehow perverse) never caught on with working-class women, who could still squat and pee in an alleyway.\In fact, almost the only French women in the 1700s who wore drawers did so by law. A ballerina in 1727 got her skirt caught on a piece of stage scenery. Her exposure led to the passage of a police regulation in Paris that "no actress or dancer should appear on stage without drawers."
Comment Hidden (show)
Let Her Breathe: Why I Wish I Could Go Without Panties
July 22, 2014 ‐ By Renay Alize

Read what others are saying, doing & wishing for
Comment Hidden (show)
-
try GOOGLING on

The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing
knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you
Comment Hidden (show)
from-the-internet

"I've been underwear for 4 years and bra-free for 2 years. It's been so liberating for me. Plus, I save TONS of money on panties and bras.

"The thing about jeans is that I don't wear them often because they're not really my style, but I'm wearing some today and I definitely don't have a crotch wedgie or anything. I don't tend to have problems with heavy discharge or wedgies (especially since I cut the underwear loose) so it's never really been an issue for me.

"Just keep washing your skirts and jeans and trousers and you should be fine.

"Read more at VaginaPagina: http://vaginapagina.livejournal.com/5138747.html#ixzz4RcXFThrZ"
Comment Hidden (show)
I knew a woman once who couldn't wear undergarments without getting a bad case of thrush. Didn't matter if they were cotton, lace, or other - she wore underwear, she got thrush.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Seems to me getting thrush, etc. is exactly what one would expect from "panty-prison" & fashion slavery! indeed, pantiless has a lot of advantages & makes the most sense!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Knickers: mandatory or meaningless?

Isadora Vibes // 22 July 2014

Tags: clothing, health

hanging bloomers.jpg

At a recent party, I got talking to a friend about the relative benefits of going sans knickers, panties, undergarments – whatever you wish to call them. She was, in the main, all for it but did draw attention to certain biological factors that perhaps required the protection of a gusset. And no, I won’t go into details on this as I am sure we are all familiar with the practicalities of the female condition. Rather, I am interested in the reasons the majority of us wear knickers every day. Is it for hygiene or is it just learnt behavior? Do we reach for the knicker drawer because it’s what we are taught to do when we could be just as comfortable (if not more so) without? And what does it say about us as women if we choose not to wear knickers? Is there a direct correlation then made about our attitudes to sex?

The relationship we have as women to our knickers/underwear has been going on for centuries. And as always, I must point out that I am writing this article only through my known experience as a European woman. Culturally, I am not aware of undergarments other than my own (!). Prior to the French Revolution, women simply wore heavy skirts with petticoats under their dresses. It was only in the Regency era when pantaloons were invented, that a need to cover up and keep warm was instigated. Early forms of underwear were very long and similar in style to ankle-length men’s trousers. As time went on and fashions changed, so knickers and underwear developed until by the 1970’s ‘no leg’ knickers were born and have continued to be adapted into smaller and smaller versions ever since.

But what are knickers really for? Yes they keep us warm (thongs excluded) and yes they keep us protected (thongs excluded again!) but do we actually need to wear them everyday? I would argue not. And if many of us actually chose not to wear knickers then would we perhaps feel more comfortable and liberated? The sensation of being without pants is one to be celebrated and of course it saves on washing. I have been choosing to wear knickers less and less as time goes on. In fact some weeks I do not wear them at all. And it feels good! Not just because it is my personal preference but I also feel a sense of empowerment. I am choosing this. I am choosing not to wear a piece of clothing that I think is loaded with meaning. If we knowingly choose to walk around with unclothed genitals does this sexualize us more? Are we judged as sexually promiscuous if our vaginas have one less layer covering them? Of course not! Why would this make us any more open to sex than if we were wearing knickers? Ridiculous.

Going commando – and what that means – is an oft told joke. It is a male centric term from army days which has been stretched to include women. Whenever I hear it being used it is usually with a giggle and a whisper behind closed doors. I also discovered when researching this piece, that the act of not wearing underwear in Chile has been called “andar a lo gringo” (to go gringo-style) for decades. Perhaps the Chileans caught on to the fact that not wearing underwear is incredibly comfortable long before we did. And yes, not wearing underwear can be arousing on occasion. But as women isn’t it important to own this arousal without judgment or discrimination? And let’s not forget that not wearing underwear is practical in many ways – particularly if you are conscious of lines showing (although why that should matter I don’t know). Now I have started this piece I can see what a political minefield knickers can be. The VPL debate could be a whole article on its own!

So – mandatory or meaningless? I guess it all comes down to personal choice. What I would like to remove from the decision is any reference to sexual morality or indeed judgment of hygiene. With thrush infections on the increase perhaps not wearing knickers is a health benefit rather than a hindrance. I think I fall part way in between. Some days I want to, some days I don’t. And that is entirely my choice. So let’s think again about what underwear really means to us as women. Protection or privilege – it’s up to you.
Comment Hidden (show)
Not surprising, especially if u check the Internet on the subject of health (and economy) as well as fashion history:

"Prior to the French Revolution, women simply wore heavy skirts with petticoats under their dresses. It was only in the Regency era when pantaloons were invented, that a need to cover up and keep warm was instigated. Early forms of underwear were very long and similar in style to ankle-length men’s trousers. As time went on and fashions changed, so knickers and underwear developed until by the 1970’s ‘no leg’ knickers were born and have continued to be adapted into smaller and smaller versions ever since."

Somebody ought to get the idea across that panties, G-strings, thongs, knickers or whatever keeps in the warm moisture and the germs, and keeps OUT the sunshine and clean fresh air that would eliminate them!
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET hooray for fresh air, sunshine & no germs collected all day "down there" ... & inside:

""honeybee808 • 2 years ago
i love going commando! it's so freeing i don't even think about wearing draws anymore.
the only time i may put some on is if the skirt i'm wearing blows easily in the wind (and my period),
but other than that,
''i love being free!''

Seems that pantiless is normal and natural, & has been for all but very recent times ... a lot of 'drawers' & sanitary belts in "fashion" were appropriate before TAMPONS but now TAMPONS are safe clean & available, panties/ thongs/ g-strings/ etc. are "passe" --- clothing that really serve any useful purpose & indeed are hazards to your health & comfort -- they just trap 7 collect germs & disease)!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Indeed pantiless is becoming lot more ... if what's called "panties" these days gets any smaller, they will serve no function at all & disappear altogether ... saving a lot of spending money for outerwear ... & saving a lot of visits to the gynecologist to treat yeast infections & other "panty-caused" diseases down there. It seems the main purpose of "bloomers" is to restrict/injure women's ability to enjoy good health, movement & freedom on the job market (as well as in competing with men elsewhere, such as in sports).
Comment Hidden (show)
It would appear that pantiless (and thong-less, G-string-less, bloomer-less and just plain back-to-Mother Nature) are very much a return to comfort health and economy. So spend your money on outerwear not underwear, unless you live in a very cold climate ... then go for long Johns and "union suits" not panties that cover practically nothing and contribute mainly to thrush & other germs taking up housekeeping between your legs! Read "Pantiless in NYC" on that score as well as "Ditch Your Panties." Also read up on fashion history/ History of "Unmentionables" and there's even a Museum of Menstruation!
Comment Hidden (show)
TO: "hotchickie81"
who wrote in "I couldn't go without, though thongs are pretty close to nothing! lol"

Try it & go commando consistently, perhaps a bit at a time, & it's a good bet that once you get used to it & feel comfortable with it, you'll never go back to G-strings, thongs, panties, or any other germ traps .... nor anything butt clean fresh air & sunshine ( and freedom from yeast & other consequences of having a warm, wet, dark place to cultivate discomfort & diseases)
Comment Hidden (show)
from the Internet- What's "Normal"? WIFL - whatever I feel like ... this is America, this is a free world ... as long as it doesn't harm anyone else, I can pretty much do & wear (or better yettt, not wear) whatever I like ... & "free" "clear" &amp; 'unobstructed" is what Mother Nature intended instead of panties collecting dark, moist, hot places for germs &amp; whatever else under my skirt or whatever! Now that's really really FUN much easier to "squat & pee" in an emergency or privacy or the woods!!!

Meredith Vieira Admits She Still Doesn't Wear Underwear, Is the Ladies' Answer to Jon Hamm November 20, 2014 @ 1:40 PM By Rose Walano Meredith Vieira admits to More magazine that she still doesn't like to wear underwear! Read more from her interview here. Credit: Ari Michelson/More Commander Commando!\\Back when Meredith Vieira was a co-host on The View in 2006, she revealed to the audience that she does not like to wear underwear. 8 years later, the former Today Show host is finally explaining her breezy decision.\\"I always thought, 'Why bother?'" Vieira, 60, reveals inside the December/January 2015 issue of More magazine. "I've always been a pretty open book, for better or worse."\\That doesn't mean that she's always going completely free. "If it's pantyhose, it's built in.&amp;in the summer I wear leotards," Vieira explains to the mag, for which she posed in a tulle Brunello Cucinelli dress&amp;studded heels.\Thinking back to her time on the morning show, then-anchored by Barbara Walters, Vieira recalls, "I would say the craziest things [on The View]&amp;people would look at me like, 'Oh my God, what are you talking about?' I'd be screaming out, 'I DON'T WEAR UNDERWEAR!' It was like something was the matter with me." But she adds, "I liked it. It was really, really fun."
Comment Hidden (show)
-
FROM THE INTRNET (QUOTE) The vagina is a funny thing. One little change in its ecosystem can throw it
off balance for weeks. That’s why it’s so very important to take care of it. I’m
a huge fan of <A title="That Time I Put Garlic in My Vagina…" href="http://naturalthrifty.com/how-to-treat-a-yeast-infection-with-garlic.html"
target="_blank">putting garlic up there</A>, using vbars, and all sorts of other
remedies for keeping mine in prime form.</P>
<P>And one other thing I do? I don’t wear underwear.</P>
<P>I know I know… That’s probably way too much TMI and probably an invitation
for all kinds of inappropriate comments from men (do it and I ban you!!), but I
truly believe that it’s an important habit for women to get into.</P>
<P>The vagina is housed in a confined location. It gets dark and damp down
there, AMIRIGHT? And if it continues to stay that way on a regular basis, it
becomes a breeding ground for all kinds of nefarious things like yeast and
bacteria.</P>
<P>And if you throw in the occasional member of the opposite sex, then you’re
introducing even more bacterial culprits that can throw you off balance.</P>
<P>I don’t say this to be disgusting, but to point out how our vaginas are
constantly fighting for their rights to stay clean. It is an amazingly magical
piece of equipment, and for the most part it does a fabulous job at cleaning
itself. But it often needs a little help along the way. And there is hope: it
comes in the form of oxygen.</P>
<P>Here’s a video where I discuss more on why I don’t wear
underwear.
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INERNET-QUOTE
In 2015, I of course turned to the Internet and Google to round out my research. A number of articles touted the health benefits of commando life. An article at Elite Daily listed things like comfort and feeling sexy as reasons for turning your body into a no-underwear zone.


I didn’t need an article to point out potential economic benefits. Some brands are pricey. Swearing off underwear could pad my wallet, though not lift my butt.
Comment Hidden (show)
ELITE DAILY No Panties, No Problems: 11 Reasons Why Women Should Go Commando

No Panties, No Problems: 11 Reasons Why Women Should Go Commando
Feb 17, 2015
1:34pm
Like Us On Facebook
To commando or not to commando?

That is the question Shakespeare should have asked, for it would have saved women’s magazines years upon years of anguish and debate over whether or not we should suffocate our lady bits in strangling contraptions better known as “underwear” or if we should just let them be.

There are common misconceptions about going commando. Some see it as bad for your sexual health.

Some see it as an indication you’re promiscuous. And others see it as a weird publicity stunt to gasp at (see: Britney Spears, circa 2010).

But, at the end of the day, going commando is not nearly as big of a deal as we all think it is, mainly because you don’t really have to tell a single person you’re doing it. In fact, more women should embrace it.

Here’s why.

1. It’s comfortable.

The number one reason you should go commando is that it’s, honestly, really comfortable.

It’s just you, your vagina and your pants getting to know each other better, hanging out like old friends, sipping glasses of wine.


2. There are no links between going commando and contracting infections.

It might feel like your bare vagina rubbing right up against the inside of your pants would create a perfect breeding ground for bacteria, but that idea has long been debunked.

Dr. Gillian Dean, Planned Parenthood New York City’s associate medical director of clinical research and training, told The Village Voice there’s no scientific research suggesting a direct correlation between going commando and contracting infections like bacterial vaginosis or yeast infections.


3. Going commando can actually help prevent infections.

If you have lots of itching and irritation down there, gynecologists actually recommend you skip wearing underwear.

On her blog, gynecologist “Dr. Kate” has found doing so really will decrease those feelings of discomfort. If you can’t find it in you to ditch underwear during the day, try doing it at night.

Vaginas are already moist and hairy, so adding a layer of suffocation (in the form of underwear) can actually make things worse.

Dr. Alyssa Dweck, M.D., told Shape magazine if your vagina is constantly covered, more moisture collects down there, which cultivates an ideal environment for yeast growth.

And since the risk of yeast infections among humans has actually been increasing, it might be a good idea to start going commando ASAP.
Comment Hidden (show)
AN AGE OLD TRADITION IN THE ARDENNES
For me …. I can only repeat myself. I am a nudist girl, grow up with all day nudity, never had a thought about wearing panties. Mum never bought any for me. It was just normal, I was nude or I had a short dress on or a short skirt. Although wearing no panties for girls was an age old tradition in the Ardennes - where I lived - and northern France. Same with socks or stockings. I got my first socks as I went to school without panties.
Of course I knew that other girls in our village lived in the same tradition as I did. But I also knew that families that moved to our village - and did not have this tradition - did not automatically start living without panties. It even was and is in the villages here a constant reason that there is a kind of separation between the traditionalists and the newbies - but these kinds of separation are as traditional in Belgium as the tradition itself. You may know about the problems in Belgium that occur due to the 3 languages that are spoken here.
So I very well knew that some other girls wore panties, and of course I tried out a panty some times. But it just felt funny on my skin, not to say, that I did not like at all that it felt so warm under my dress, and made me sweaty.
But at the same time, for boys in our village, it was as normal that most girls did not wear panties. The opposite, of what we read here, was the case. They were curious to see the panties !! And laugh about them.
In my pre-teen years I of course noticed that “newbie”-boys tried to get a glimpse under my skirt, and I must admit that it was for a while fun to tease these boys.
But it never was arousing for me just to know I don’t wear panties. It just was normal. I never felt the urge to intentionally flash my bare pussy to someone. And as a nudist I did not care a bit if someone would occasionally see my butt cheeks. Not the least of all, because I have a very nice butt!
Of course I always was and am aware that I do not wear a panty. Meanwhile I also am aware that my life style bears a certain kind of risk - at least if I leave the surroundings of our village and go into the bigger cities. There is rather little understanding for a girl not wearing panties, and it is true, that it is often seen as a fact that you are a slutty girl. That is the reason that I wear jeans if I go to Liege or Verviers or some times to Bruxelles.
It is rather amazing, that just 20 kilometers from our village, just over the german border, things are quite different. From what I know from my female German friends, going pantyless is a real hype. I would say that about 70 percent of the girls between 12 and 16 go pantyless. Not so much at the schools, because it is forbidden at the public schools, but like elsewhere in Catholic schools the percentage will well be 50%.
Like in Belgium, in Germany also hardly any girl that goes pantyless, will keep her pubic hair. Long live the smooth hairless pubis!! Skinny Tiff Tagged:#experiences
Comment Hidden (show)
-
The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing
knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you
Comment Hidden (show)
GOOGLE on "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" for a good idea what's happening and how women are "wising up" to being practical, comfortable and most of all, healthy ... also free from dictates and disease! Down with (and off) with panties, permanently. With, "trust your tampon" modern conveniences, panties are a "part" without a function, unless you are enduring very cold weather ... Panties "off"!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
--from the internet--
GOOGLE on this if you're interested in freedom from panti-prison and worse yet yeast infections galore:


""Christina Aguilera recently caught our attention when she talked about how much she hates wearing underwear. Going pantyless is "empowering," she confessed. "I like to be as free as possible at all times."

""Stepping out sans panties is a frisky fashion move more and more chicks like Christina are daring to try. But it's not exactly a new trend; some of history's hottest sex goddesses, such as Cleopatra and Jean Harlow, reportedly went au naturel beneath their clothes. If you want in on the no-panties movement, read on.""






























Commando Perks

Skipping your undies has practical advantages. First, you eliminate that dreaded wardrobe woe, visible panty lines. Second, you'll never do an emergency load of laundry because you've run out of clean underwear. Plus, briefs and thongs can be icky sweat magnets.

But it's also about reveling in your sexy side. "Not wearing panties is risqué; you get a naughty rush knowing you're so exposed," explains Los Angeles clinical sexologist Ava Cadell, PhD. Removing the barrier that shields your intimate anatomy makes you more in touch with your innate sensuality, she adds.
Comment Hidden (show)
Normal? - pantiless isn't just normal, as in "what-ever-u-like is best", it's healthy, delightful, economical ... in short, what Mother Nature (and Adam & Eve) started out with ... GOOGLE/read "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" for starters!!! Makes a person wonder how women ever put "up" with having knickers, etc. imposed on them by the fashion industry (and Big Fashion's multi-billion dollar BUSINESS profits) in the first place!!! At the very, very least, get rid of cheese-wire G-strings and thongs for starters and keep eliminating right down to no-nothing between your self and clean, fresh air and sunshine rather than dark, moist places for germs (and other crud) to set up housekeeping!
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET:

""Ruth Turner · Human Services Worker at Independant Contractor
I had a vein specialist tell me that panties decrese circulation to the legs, making it more likely to develop vericose veins.""

Many experts agree, panties r hazardous 2 your health (and comfort, budget ... among other hazards, easily prevented)

Saves on the laundry as well
Comment Hidden (show)
As more and more women r "coming out" of "panty prison" into fresh air & sunshine and freedom from yeast infections and worse "down there" where there should b no noting and au naturel, it seems that wearing panties, G-strings is going out of style completely ... the sooner the better!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
From The Internet Quote:
'
nood - check this site - www.freevote.com/booth/panty - it might not be exactly accurate, but according to a high school, voluntary survey, taken by a teacher who is a family friend, the ratio of girls who gp pantyless & those who wear the damn things is just about 50/50 - most interesting. I've gone pantyless since age 13 & have never tried a thong, but understand they are very uncomfortable. They did have g-strings in the days before I started going pantyless full time & they weren't uncomfortable to me, but there is nothing that feels as good as a bare, uncovered pussy, under your dress. Really, most of my friends go pantyless.


kate
(no login)
no panties are best September 5 2003, 7:15 PM

i agree, i too have gone knickerless since 14 - love the feel of fresh air on my pussy, feel so sexy. Would love to hear from other girls/women who do same.
Comment Hidden (show)
2 commando or not 2 commando? That is the question Shakespeare should have asked, 4 it would have
saved women’s magazines years upon years of anguish&debate over whether or not we should suffocate our lady bits in strangling contraptions better known as “underwear” or if we should just let them B.
There are common misconceptions about going commando. Some see it as bad 4 your sexual health. Some see it as an indication you’re promiscuous&amp;others see it as a weird publicity stunt 2 gasp at (see: Britney Spears, circa 2010).
But, at the end of the day, going commando is not nearly as big of a deal as we all think it is, mainly because U don’t really have 2 tell a single person you’re doing it. In fact, more women should embrace it.
Here’s why. 1. It’s comfortable. - The number one reason U should go commando is that it’s, honestly, really comfortable. It’s just you, your vagina&your pants getting 2 know each other better, hanging out like old friends, sipping glasses of wine.
2. There are no links between going commando&contracting infections. It might feel like your bare vagina rubbing right up against the inside of your pants would create a perfect breeding ground 4 bacteria, but that idea has long been debunked. Dr. Gillian Dean, Planned Parenthood New York City’s associate medical director of clinical research&amp;training, told The Village Voice there’s no scientific research suggesting a direct correlation between going commando &amp;contracting infections like bacterial vaginosis or yeast infections.
3. Going commando can actually help prevent infections. If U have lots of itching&amp;irritation down there, gyne-cologists actually recommend U skip wearing underwear. On her blog, gynecologist “Dr. Kate” has found doing so really will decrease those feelings of discomfort. If U can’t find it in U 2 ditch underwear during the day, try doing it at night.
Vaginas are already moist&amp;hairy, so adding a layer of suffocation (in the form of underwear) can actually make things worse. Dr. Alyssa Dweck, M.D., told Shape magazine if your vagina is constantly covered, more moisture collects down there, which cultivates an ideal environment 4 yeast growth. And since the risk of yeast infections among humans has actually been increasing, it might B a good idea 2 start going commando ASAP.
4. No VPL -- We’ve all seen the phenomenon: A woman in tight, light-colored pants who forgets her purple granny panties are visible through her ass — in color, shape &outline — 2 the whole world. Could someone really b that unaware? There’s nothing more embarrassing than that dreaded VPL (Visible Panty Line), but when U go commando, you’ll never, ever have 2 worry about it. Exercise caution, though: U aren’t safe from camel toes.
5. No wedgies -- Ever find yourself digging out a wedgie deeper than you’d dig 4 gold? Going commando means never again having 2 sneak away from a social situation 2 claw around inside your butt. If that right there isn’t enough of a reason, I don’t know what is.
6. When U actually need 2 go commando, you’ll already B used 2 it. In your life, U might wear something 2 require U 2 go commando&amp;there’s no better way 2 prepare 4 that moment than going commando all the time.
Take a look at some of these celebrities whose dresses with impractical cut-outs forced them 2 forgo underwear 4 a fancy event. For those women who’d previously been uninitiated into the commando lifestyle, I’m sure having 2 do so was intimidating. But 4 those who were used 2 it, it was probably just another day. Back in high school, I wore a clingy, white, floor-length dress 4 senior prom that, if I wasn’t 17 at the time, I probably would have gone commando in. If U asked me 2 wear that same dress now, U can bet your ass I would not wear any underwear. I’d just get a really good bikini wax instead.
7. You’ll feel sexier. - Sure, some girls feel sexy in a matching lace lingerie set, but what’s sexier&amp;more risqué than being fully naked under those jeans? And that little secret U have with yourself will totally up your confidence when U talk 2 coworkers, professors, friends&amp;the guy U have a crush on.
8. Your man will definitely find it sexy. - Maybe your relationship needs a little excitement in the sexual department, or, hey, maybe you&amp;your boyfriend already f*ck like wild animals&you just want 2 make things even more interesting.
Let your boyfriend know you’re not wearing any underwear&watch his lust 4 U skyrocket. You can up the ante by whispering it in his ear in a public place where he can’t do anything about it just yet, like at a party. You will officially become the only thing on his mind all night.
9. Your pants will fit better - Are there certain pairs of underwear U can’t wear with certain pairs of pants because they make your pants fit differently? I can’t wear full-coverage underwear with so many of my jeans; the underwear adds just enough extra thickness, making my jeans 2 tight. I feel much better in my jeans when I wear a thong or, better yet,
when I go commando. If U went commando more often, you’d never have 2 worry about what kind of underwear U have 2 wear 4 specific pants. And U probably could afford 2 buy jeans in smaller sizes, which obviously would feel awesome.
10. You’ll feel random bursts of pleasure throughout the day. - Having the seam of your pants run right along your vagina can create some interesting sensations throughout the day. This will especially happen if you’re wearing jeans, where the
stitching is so thick, fidgeting around in a chair can rub U the wrong — or, ahem, right — way 2 make U feel a little unexpected warmth down there. When this happens, smile subtly 2 yourself&amp;embrace it. It’s a day-maker 4 sure.
11. Sometimes, it’s just necessary [&amp;appropriate] If you’ve run out of clean underwear&you’re 2 lazy 2 do a wash, do not
even think about going back in your dirty hamper&fetching a used pair. Instead, just go commando. There’s no better time 2 start th
Comment Hidden (show)
from the internet


I Don't Wear Underwear
It Happened Gradually.

Seriously, I was once a law-abiding panty-loving girl.

A year and a half ago, I bought a particular pair of pants that I didn't like wearing panties with, so whenever I wore them, I went commando.

(PLEASE NOTE: I made sure to wash these pants every time I wore them.)

Anyway, soon I was thinking to myself, "Gee, this feels pretty good." So I started skipping panties two or three times a week. Always with pants, though.

Then, one day, I decided to wear a skirt, and all my skirt panties were in the wash, and I couldn't find a good pair, and I thought to myself, "Do you dare?"

Well, I did. And the rest is history. I can't tell you how deliciously free I feel! It's like skinny-dipping without the water!
Comment Hidden (show)
Given that what's called "panties" or thongs r getting smaller & smaller all the time, it won't be long before (as panties disappear completely) women discover that wearing nothing at all under a skirt or "drawers" is quite comfortable, healthy & indeed economical --- Google on "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" also COMMANDO to hear about what's going on underneath more skirts every day and women's health/ comfort/ pleasure!!!

If u look for fashion history on panties, there just about isn't any ... at least until about the middle of the 20th Century ... seems women r "rediscovering" that less is best & "nothing at all" is the best option (with trust in your tampon, there's no reason/ need for panties any day of the month)! Read also "Ditch Your Panties"!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
Read up on the Internet about the advantages of pantiless ... start with "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" for some of the health advantages, also Ditch Your Panties". A lot of women (and doctors -- male and female -- and mid-wives) seem to advocate going commando; a lot of surveys and candid comments describe how once you get used to "au naturel" --- back to Mother Nature --- "no nothing" --- you won't EVER go back to panty prison and yeast infections for the sheer comfort (and health) and many other benefits, such as no panti-lines ever again. It's your choice but panties are a very, VERY recent AND RESTRICTING imposition on women's fashion BUT WHAT YOU WEAR UNDER YOUR SKIRTS OR PANTS SHORTS OR WHATEVER IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE TO DECIDE (AND ENJOY). Less is best ... also healthier, VPL-proof, and quite enjoyable (and economical) ... once you get used to it, you won't go back!!! Also, trust your tampon and be free every day of the month!
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET QUOTE

From what my wife tells me, it's actually better for you to not wear panties, especially in summer. She's read that it helps to prevent yeast infections. I just like the idea because it's sexy. I remember the first time years ago when we were out at dinner that she wasn't wearing panties. It had an interesting impact on the old boy.

HOWEVER, you do have to (as one person put it) watch out for those stairs in malls and such that have no walls just railings....could provide and interesting show for the crowd on the first level. I remember a woman telling me years back that she used to go commando and flash people when she was out with hubby because hubby found it quite the turn on to see the reaction of other men.

Another story......a friend told us once that she was at a wedding reception and some woman slipped on somthing on the dance floor, went ass over teacups with legs in the air and was not wearing panties. She got a standing ovation from everybody and I'm thinking that some of the men in the audience had something else standing as well.


SEE ALSO "Why I Don't Wear Underwear" on the Internet
Comment Hidden (show)
-
FROM-THE-INTERNET - POPULARITY OF PANTILESS - A LOT OF PEOPLE, IT APPEARS, NEVER KNEW THAT PANTIES R A VERY RECENT INVENTION/IMPOSITION/CONSTRICTION - NO ELASTIC TO MAKE BANDS TO CUT OF YOUR CIRCULATION UNTIL 20TH CENTURY....

"I have just started going commando at work. I had doned it on and off for years 2 or 3 days at a time. But now I have commited just like my husband to do it full time.

"I like to wear skirts instead of pants when I am free. I did not know how freeing it was to be pantyless all day and still be working.
"When I am home I only wear them when "needed". But being out in public pantyless and braless too is very freeing. (Yes, I am for brafreedom also). I look forward to the day "when" I will not need to wear panties at all.

"Without getting to personal and graphic going commando makes it easy to use public restrooms.

"I now know that there are quiet a number of people who like me. We enjoy the free of no more panties."
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Doctor's Advice - Perhaps some day we will have to visit a fashion museum to see knickers, panties, G-strings and thongs...

Re: Wearing no knickers
Quote
""Postby teresh » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:20 pm
I think the chat has strayed a long way from the original post, and from the various reasons why some women don't wear knickers. One of the intial comments mentioned health reasons, and that is my view entirely. I had suffered for years with various female 'problems', and it was a doctor who finaly suggested I should try not wearing knickers. There is never going to be a groundbreaking public health anouncement stating such a radical idea as that would be politically out of the question, but I have no doubt it can make a significant difference to health. Most women will take off a pair of knickers and throw them in the wash without giving it a second thought, but just look at the typical discharge stuck to the inside after even just a few hours, and ask yourself the question, Is having this moist discharge trapped against your skin healthy? That for me was the critical question. I wear knickers just during my period, and my health has never been better. My only wish is I had made the change earlier. Chose sensible length skirts, and wear pure cotton underskirts (half slips). Change your underskirt everyday like you would knickers. Since I made my change, I have met another health professional who conceeded that female anatomy was 'healthier if left uncovered' but who also suggested that no doctor could ever make such a view public.""
Comment Hidden (show)
KNICKERLESS - BRITS AT WORK

SAVES TIME, SAVES MONEY, SAVES FROM YEAST INFECTIONS, FREE, CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED (AND UN-CONSTRICTED) COMFORT ... AS NATURE INTENDED

Britain by numbers: top 20 facts
8 Out of 10 Brits, a book on British statistics by Charlie Croker, reveals some surprising facts about what he dubs world's 79th largest nation.

By Sasjkia Otto 11:32AM BST 20 Aug 2009
Charlie Croker is an author and journalist who specialises in compiling unusual lists.

Here is a top 20 glimpse of his numerical portrait of British life, as compiled by The Sun.
1. Almost one in five women have gone to work without wearing any underwear.
2. British people eat twice as many baked beans as anybody else in Europe.
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Internet Posting
"Hi, I left school about two years ago, but for my last two years at school I didn't wear panties under my regulation grey skirt. I had to be careful as I grew quite tall and my skirt became increasingly short. Even in the gym I never wore panties under my shorts. Most of the girls knew that I didnt wear them, and a few of them did the same. Since leaving school I am always pantyless and would never go back to wearing them."
Comment Hidden (show)
In her book 'Knickers, An Intimate Appraisal', Rosemary Hawthorne records that before 1789 and the French Revolution, long skirts, a petticoat or two, a corset and linen chemise was all the underwear a woman thought desirable or necessary.
Comment Hidden (show)
Vanity Fair teamed up with 60 Minutes to conduct a fashion-based poll, asking Americans everything from what their biggest fashion nightmare would be, to identifying big industry names to… how often they go commando. According to the results, more...
Vanity Fair teamed up with 60 Minutes to conduct a fashion-based poll, asking Americans everything from what their biggest fashion nightmare would be, to identifying big industry names to… how often they go commando. According to the results, more people do it than you might think.

25 percent of those polled admitted they go sans underwear at least sometimes. Of that 25 percent, 13 percent said they do it “occasionally,” 5 percent confessed they ditch their underwear “once a week” and 7 percent said they went without undergarments “all the time.”

Of course, there are plenty of reasons to leave the house without your undies every so often. It can be pretty liberating, for one. Plus there’s that whole thing about shapewear being detrimental to your health.

Still, we can’t imagine ditching our beloved undie collection permanently. What about you? Would you go commando for good? Sound off below!

Huffingtonpost

60 minutes
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET
The other day while I was sitting in my office one of the outer office girls came in carrying a folder. She was wearing a summery dress with quite a short, floaty skirt.
She threw the folder onto my desk and started complaining that I hadn't put the contents back in the correct order. I said OK I'll sort it out, but this did'nt seem to satisfy her, she still kept moaning. Getting a bit fed up with her, I said,"don't get your knickers in a twist, I'll sort it out".
She gave me a funny look, and said, "I'm not wearing any". Jokingly I said, "prove it". With that she took hold of the hem of her dress and lifted it up to her waist, showing me her totally bare, shaven pussy. I asked her why she had no knickers on, and she told me that she hadn't worn any for about five years as it was so much more comfortable without them.

Comfortable Economical Healthy & Delightful -- Makes U Wonder Why Anybody Goes Around in Panty Prison
Comment Hidden (show)
-
In 2015, I of course turned to the Internet and Google to round out my research. A number of articles touted the health benefits of commando life. An article at Elite Daily listed things like comfort and feeling sexy as reasons for turning your body into a no-underwear zone.


I didn’t need an article to point out potential economic benefits. Some brands are pricey. Swearing off underwear could pad my wallet, though not lift my butt.
Comment Hidden (show)
Do you go knickerless?

New Message | View Topics | Watch Topic | Poll ( Vote | Results )


knickerless


Posted by hannaG on 2004-06-06 09:30:10

I started going Knickerless 8 months ago for a bet and I find it quite a turn on. I wear fairly short skirts for work and nearly decided to go back to wearing undies, but in the end I like the feeling of being knickerless too much. Just recently I have started to make sure that my skirt rides up as I sit down on the train to and from work giving a good view of the fact that I am knickerless.It makes me feel really excited and I can't think why I would ever go back to wearing panties.
Comment Hidden (show)
ELITE DAILY No Panties, No Problems: 11 Reasons Why Women Should Go CommandoFeb 17, 2015 1:34pm
Like Us On Facebook

To commando or not to commando?

That is the question Shakespeare should have asked, for it would have saved women’s magazines years upon years of anguish and debate over whether or not we should suffocate our lady bits in strangling contraptions better known as “underwear” or if we should just let them be.

There are common misconceptions about going commando. Some see it as bad for your sexual health.

Some see it as an indication you’re promiscuous. And others see it as a weird publicity stunt to gasp at (see: Britney Spears, circa 2010).

But, at the end of the day, going commando is not nearly as big of a deal as we all think it is, mainly because you don’t really have to tell a single person you’re doing it. In fact, more women should embrace it.

Here’s why.

1. It’s comfortable.

The number one reason you should go commando is that it’s, honestly, really comfortable.

It’s just you, your vagina and your pants getting to know each other better, hanging out like old friends, sipping glasses of wine.


2. There are no links between going commando and contracting infections.

It might feel like your bare vagina rubbing right up against the inside of your pants would create a perfect breeding ground for bacteria, but that idea has long been debunked.

Dr. Gillian Dean, Planned Parenthood New York City’s associate medical director of clinical research and training, told The Village Voice there’s no scientific research suggesting a direct correlation between going commando and contracting infections like bacterial vaginosis or yeast infections.


3. Going commando can actually help prevent infections.

If you have lots of itching and irritation down there, gynecologists actually recommend you skip wearing underwear.

On her blog, gynecologist “Dr. Kate” has found doing so really will decrease those feelings of discomfort. If you can’t find it in you to ditch underwear during the day, try doing it at night.

Vaginas are already moist and hairy, so adding a layer of suffocation (in the form of underwear) can actually make things worse.

Dr. Alyssa Dweck, M.D., told Shape magazine if your vagina is constantly covered, more moisture collects down there, which cultivates an ideal environment for yeast growth.

And since the risk of yeast infections among humans has actually been increasing, it might be a good idea to start going commando ASAP. (SEE INTERNET ARTICLE)
Comment Hidden (show)
READ THE REST ON LINE WITH A GOOGLE SEARCH

I don’t wear underwear. In fact, I hate underwear. I always have! Ever since I was a little girl, if I can get away with not wearing them, I will. I don’t like the feel. I don’t like twisted bunches of fabric. They get hot and sweaty. I have always had a disproportionate-sized booty. Whether large or small—the panties always ended up in no man’s land, anyway. Then, there’s the all-tacky panty lines. Ugh! I know many could argue not wearing panties in general is tacky. Touché my friend, touché. Rest assured, if there is a chance of the sun shining where it never should, I do have on panties. So we will just squash that curiosity right there. Next time you see me at the ballpark in a sundress, there is no need to push me into the sandbox for giggles. I will have on panties.

SEEMS A SHAME NOT TO USE SUNLIGHT THERE ....
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM THE INTERNET - Mother Knows Best?

"I'd forgotten this until I read this older post. My daughters belonged to a clique in school where none of the girls were allowed panties or bras. It was a sort of hazing....if they failed an inspection, the rest of the group would pull the panties off the girl who had been inspected. They said they only went sans at first out of fear of being publicly humiliated on the playground. Of course it wasn't sanctioned by the school, but it had been going on for three years before I found out about it. They were ages 9 and 11 at the time they started, and I was pretty pissed about it, but since it had been going on so long, and we'd just burned all our undies (with their whole-hearted approval) I just dropped it. I've posted on here before what happened the day they revealed it, so won't repeat it here. But it was a day of bonding between us. That was twenty years ago and the three of us have been bra and panty free since then.
"I don't like the aspect of the public embarrassment, but I am really happy that they joined me in the pantieless lifestyle these last twenty years."
Comment Hidden (show)
From the Internet - Pantiless - No Panties For Best Health - Testimonials:

"Cleo November 22, 2015 at 4:22 pm
I’m a woman in my 50’s and haven’t worn underwear since the early 90’s. It was a lifestyle decision my husband and I made and though it was a little difficult to get used to at first, I can’t imagine every wearing any again. I also have two adult daughters who share the proclivity for going sans."

"Anna Webb October 25, 2015 at 2:19 am
"When I was a young child my mother seldom wore underwear, so it was natural for me to do the same. At school several of the girls in my class also went without. I am twenty seven now, and still never wear underwear. The benefits are exactly what this article said, I am very healthy!"
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Women Who Don't Wear Underwear - FROM THE internet

"And the truth was spoken…

"What’s my ultimate point with all this?

"If you are worried about going commando because of the stigma that can be involved, then rethink your position. Sitting through a lot of pain for some outdated taboo is not only a bit silly, but also completely unnecessary.

"Admittedly, I’m not going to claim that going without panties doesn’t sometimes seem like a thrilling and sexy thing to do. It’s lost a bit of its novelty for me now, but it did feel quite freeing in the beginning. Remember, there is never anything wrong with getting in touch with your sexy side and feeling good about your body. Getting comfortable with yourself actually is one of the top ways to reduce most types of sexual pain.

"From another (completely not medically-related) standpoint: You’ll never have to worry about panty lines ever again."
Comment Hidden (show)
In some cases, "normal" is quite proper (even essential to health) without anything on "from the waist down" ... for this rowing team -- where, as usual, knickers are more discomfort, hazard, and health threat than good old fashioned "au naturel" ---as Mother Nature intended "muffs" to be from the very, very beginning of time.

From the Internet

"Did @BBCBreakfast just accidentally show that lady rower's muff?!
— Wendy (@WendyWendybu53) March 7, 2016

"'@BBCBreakfast are you double checking the boat footage. You've got a bare lady parts shot in there. I've got a screen cap if it helps!
— Heather Stanley (@hstanley_) March 7, 2016

"'OMG did BBC Breakfast really just flash some bush on morning TV," wrote one person, while another quipped: "Ha ha ha did you know you showed a lady garden live on breakfast?"

"'@BBCBreakfast are you double checking the boat footage. You've got a bare lady parts shot in there. I've got a screen [grab] if it helps," helpfully added another.

"Speaking about the incident a BBC spokesperson said: 'We quickly realised our error and edited the clip so it wasn’t broadcast again later in the programme. We apologise to our guest and our viewers for the mistake.'"

Once again, Ditch Your Panties!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
THE KEY TO GOOD HEALTH - PANTILESS - IT APPEARS THAT WOMEN WERE DESIGNED NEVER TO EVER WEAR THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE - AU NATUREL - ASK EVE

The women who say the key to good health is NOT wearing knickers: It sounds extraordinary but the evidence may surprise you

•Vanessa Fernandez, 35, from Edgware, stopped wearing knickers two years ago after suffering an 'embarrassing' vaginal infection


•Gemma Cromwell, 29, from Dunstable, spent years wearing thongs to avoid a VPL until she became pregnant and now only wears them on her period

•Growing numbers of women are giving up on knickers for health reasons

By Becky Dickinson For The Daily Mail Published: 19:25 EST, 4 May 2016 | Updated: 12:30 EST, 6 May 2016

Read more: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3573984/Women-say-key-good-health-NOT-wearing-knickers-sounds-extraordinary-evidence-surprising.html#ixzz4QUORPdAz" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-35739...</a>
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Comment Hidden (show)
VOICE-OF-EXPERIENCE FROM THE INTERNET
"I think the chat has strayed a long way from the original post, and from the various reasons why some women don't wear knickers. One of the intial comments mentioned health reasons, and that is my view entirely. I had suffered for years with various female 'problems', and it was a doctor who finaly suggested I should try not wearing knickers. There is never going to be a groundbreaking public health anouncement stating such a radical idea as that would be politically out of the question, but I have no doubt it can make a significant difference to health. Most women will take off a pair of knickers and throw them in the wash without giving it a second thought, but just look at the typical discharge stuck to the inside after even just a few hours, and ask yourself the question, Is having this moist discharge trapped against your skin healthy? That for me was the critical question. I wear knickers just during my period, and my health has never been better. My only wish is I had made the change earlier. Chose sensible length skirts, and wear pure cotton underskirts (half slips). Change your underskirt everyday like you would knickers. Since I made my change, I have met another health professional who conceeded that female anatomy was 'healthier if left uncovered' but who also suggested that no doctor could ever make such a view public."

"I once knew a lass that worked in a Museum who openly admitted she never wore knickers and on the odd occasion inserted her bullet for good measure."
Comment Hidden (show)
-
If you have any doubt at all than pantiless/ thong-less/ fresh air and sunshine between your legs is very much popular (and healthy) ... also economical, on the internet GOOGLE/ tune into


WHY I DON'T WEAR UNDERWEAR
.

High Carb Hannah

High Carb Hannah

and hear why plenty of men and women favor "minimal" clothing .... especially underwear!!!
Comment Hidden (show)
FR OM THE INTERNET -
Re: Reasons for going without
No score for this post August 28 2011, 10:36 AM



"As you regulars know, after being underwearless through most of my childhood and teenage years, I became a "good girl" in my twenties when I got married and had my daughters.

"When I met my current (and last) husband, after a few weeks of dating, he shaved my pubic hair for the first time, and persuaded me to go out on dates without panties. The feeling of being hairless and pantiless in loose shorts or a dress was wonderful (and more than a little erotic) He also went sans, and I convinced him that "what was good for the goose was good for the gander" and began shaving him as well.

"The first year of our lives together was a whirlwind of sexual excitement, as I was gradually able to go sans even to work, which was a major milestone for me. For awhile I felt self-conscious, but that faded after a few weeks. It ultimately boosted my self-confidence, as it more or less forced me to become more social and less withdrawn. Within a few months of meeting my husband, we had an underwear-burning (thinking my daughters wouldnt be home that weekend). Much to my dismay at the time, they caught us at the fire.

"It was only then that they admitted that they had been going sans for several years, and only putting panties in the laundry as a ruse to hide the fact that they weren't wearing any.

"It was my girls who convinced me to ditch my bras as well, though until recently, never thought I could completely go without. An introduction to nipple covers by one of my co-workers has now eliminated bras from my wardrobe as well.

"At first it was the sexual thrill. Leo and I would often walk through our neighborhood (though it's still pretty rural, there are houses just out of sight of each other) and we'd find a private place for him to bend me over and lift my skirt. Once we even had an interlude in the front yard of an empty (perhaps foreclosed?) house.

"Though we still enjoy the added sexual excitement of being so nearly naked, it has largely become a comfort issue, and has become such second nature that we can't even imagine what it would be like to be forced back into underwear. I still feel a little risque from time to time, but mostly I feel somehow transcended above those who feel obligated to imprison parts of their body because of some puritannical ideology."

IS SEEMS THAT PANTILESS HAS BEEN POPULAR FOR A LONG TIME, IF NOT ALMOST FOREVER, AND THE ONLY CHANGE HAS BEEN OPENLY ADMITTING AND ADVOCATING GOING NATURAL, RATHER THAN COLLECTING GERMS...VERSUS JOYS AND DELIGHTS!
Comment Hidden (show)
SEEMS LIKE PANTI-LESS IS NOT ONLY POPULAR BUT ALSO VERY HEALTHY - SOME ARTICLES HOLD THAT PANTILESS/ KNICKERLESS IS THE SECRET TO GOOD HEALTH FOR WOMEN:

"My gynecologists instructions for the health of a woman's nether-regions were succinct and to the point. Women would be better off if they wore a skirt and no panties, Kristen. They would have no problems with yeast infections or anything else. You might want to try it.\You mean you want me to be like Britney and Lindsay? I said jokingly.\ Who?\My doctor is not into the gossip mill of celebrity antics so I explain just who they are and what items of lingerie they don't wear.\Well, they're probably better off, is all he says, patting my shoulder.\Now I am a pretty free-spirited person, at least I like to think I am, but the idea of not wearing panties under a skirt was a bit free-er than my spirit wanted. Still, I decided to give it a shot.\In the outer office I tell my husband what the doctor has recommended and he gets this strange smile on his face. I tell him to stop thinking with his libido for once; I'm trying to stay healthy here for God's sake! In answer he squeezes my hand.\The first day I put on a skirt with nothing underneath I feel weird. Its not like I've never not worn panties, but that was usually under pants so as to avoid VPLs (visible panty lines). But to get back to the skirt and being panti-less, its summer and I have no skirt in my closet that goes below my knees." - from Panti-less in NYC"
Comment Hidden (show)
FROM INTERNET CHATTER

My Wife Does It July 24 2004, 12:07 PM

When we first got married my wife worked as a secretary in the Chicago Loop and I was somewhat concerned to discover that she wore dresses without panties to work everyday. Although she wore pantyhose, which in her opinion don't require panties, I worried about her riding the train, climbing crowded stairs at the station, walking down windy sidewalks, and sitting at her desk with a short dress, high heels and see-through pantyhose.

She has since worked a variety of jobs that do not require business attire or pantyhose but she still goes to work pantiless. She tells me that she just hates wearing panties and my daughter and I just accept it as who she is.

Mine too.....September 12 2004, 7:27 AM

This happened some years ago.
My wife was leaving for work, when I asked her to leave her panties at home. She had often gone without at home and to parties, but had never gone without (as far as I know) at the office. She said she was a little bit worried that someone might find out, but after a short moment she said she would give it a try.

Re: Commando at work.July 24 2004,3:10 PM

I have just started going commando at work. I had donned it on and off for years 2 or 3 days at a time. But now I have committed just like my husband to do it full time.

I like to wear skirts instead of pants when I am free. I did not know how freeing it was to be panty-less all day and still be working.

When I am home I only wear them when "needed". But being out in public panty-less and bra-less too is very freeing. (Yes, I am for bra-freedom also). I look forward to the day "when" I will not need to wear panties at all.

Without getting to personal and graphic going commando makes it easy to use public restrooms.

I now know that there are quiet a number of people who like me. We enjoy the free of no more panties.

Michael(Login mgoodyear)"When Needed": Underwear and MenstruationJuly 26 2004, 9:22 AM

That can be debated frankly I think, some women are concerned about coping with menstruation without underwear.

Unless you are an exceptionally heavy bleeder, tampons should be able to cope, and it is actually easier to change them regularly.

The "Feminine Hygiene" industry has persuaded us to fear 'the scent of a woman'. If anything there should be less odour without underware and good ventilation.
**********
Also saves on the clothing budget - more money for outer-wear and other delights/comforts of life ***
Who wants elastic digging into u day and night and cutting off your circulation? Pantiless seems like an idea whose time hasn't "just come" but was there from the very, very Garden-of-Eden beginning!
Comment Hidden (show)
-
Re: curious - does anyone "go commando"????
I never wear underwear unless it's a thong, and then usually only if I'm wearing a skirt w/no nylons. Once you get used to not wearing them, it feels bulky and weird to have them on.


Old 05-18-2001, 12:06 PM #5
Unregistered
Guest

Posts: n/a

Re: curious - does anyone "go commando"????
I usually go pantyless. If I am wearing a short skirt and am going to be doing any major running around I will wear them... other than that nope.

LOL- I have a big butt, did when i was skinny still do now... I used to get that sir mix alot song dedicated to me all the time. They annoy me becuase of my shape half the time they ride right up and look like thongs anyway and I hate thongs so i just don't wear them.

Steph


Old 05-18-2001, 01:31 PM #6
californiagirl
Newbie

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9
californiagirl HB User

Re: curious - does anyone "go commando"????
I am with redfox! I rarely wear underwear, and if I do only thong. It took a little while to get used to, but I can never go back. Also, I cannot stand underwear lines!

Read more: http://www.healthboards.com/boards/womens-health/801294-curious-does-anyone-go-commando.html#ixzz4QqdI9YAE
Comment Hidden (show)
-
FRMTHEINTERNET:

Knickers: mandatory or meaningless?

Isadora Vibes // 22 July 2014

Tags: clothing, health

hanging bloomers.jpg

At a recent party, I got talking to a friend about the relative benefits of going sans knickers, panties, undergarments – whatever you wish to call them. She was, in the main, all for it but did draw attention to certain biological factors that perhaps required the protection of a gusset. And no, I won’t go into details on this as I am sure we are all familiar with the practicalities of the female condition. Rather, I am interested in the reasons the majority of us wear knickers every day. Is it for hygiene or is it just learnt behavior? Do we reach for the knicker drawer because it’s what we are taught to do when we could be just as comfortable (if not more so) without? And what does it say about us as women if we choose not to wear knickers? Is there a direct correlation then made about our attitudes to sex?

The relationship we have as women to our knickers/underwear has been going on for centuries. And as always, I must point out that I am writing this article only through my known experience as a European woman. Culturally, I am not aware of undergarments other than my own (!). Prior to the French Revolution, women simply wore heavy skirts with petticoats under their dresses. It was only in the Regency era when pantaloons were invented, that a need to cover up and keep warm was instigated. Early forms of underwear were very long and similar in style to ankle-length men’s trousers. As time went on and fashions changed, so knickers and underwear developed until by the 1970’s ‘no leg’ knickers were born and have continued to be adapted into smaller and smaller versions ever since.

But what are knickers really for? Yes they keep us warm (thongs excluded) and yes they keep us protected (thongs excluded again!) but do we actually need to wear them everyday? I would argue not. And if many of us actually chose not to wear knickers then would we perhaps feel more comfortable and liberated? The sensation of being without pants is one to be celebrated and of course it saves on washing. I have been choosing to wear knickers less and less as time goes on. In fact some weeks I do not wear them at all. And it feels good! Not just because it is my personal preference but I also feel a sense of empowerment. I am choosing this. I am choosing not to wear a piece of clothing that I think is loaded with meaning. If we knowingly choose to walk around with unclothed genitals does this sexualize us more? Are we judged as sexually promiscuous if our vaginas have one less layer covering them? Of course not! Why would this make us any more open to sex than if we were wearing knickers? Ridiculous.

Going commando – and what that means – is an oft told joke. It is a male centric term from army days which has been stretched to include women. Whenever I hear it being used it is usually with a giggle and a whisper behind closed doors. I also discovered when researching this piece, that the act of not wearing underwear in Chile has been called “andar a lo gringo” (to go gringo-style) for decades. Perhaps the Chileans caught on to the fact that not wearing underwear is incredibly comfortable long before we did. And yes, not wearing underwear can be arousing on occasion. But as women isn’t it important to own this arousal without judgment or discrimination? And let’s not forget that not wearing underwear is practical in many ways – particularly if you are conscious of lines showing (although why that should matter I don’t know). Now I have started this piece I can see what a political minefield knickers can be. The VPL debate could be a whole article on its own!

So – mandatory or meaningless? I guess it all comes down to personal choice. What I would like to remove from the decision is any reference to sexual morality or indeed judgment of hygiene. With thrush infections on the increase perhaps not wearing knickers is a health benefit rather than a hindrance. I think I fall part way in between. Some days I want to, some days I don’t. And that is entirely my choice. So let’s think again about what underwear really means to us as women. Protection or privilege – it’s up to you.
Comment Hidden (show)
"rarely ever wear panties. They get dirty too often and sometimes itchy too so I feel better not wearing any at all.
"I have been au natural since I was a wee lass" Source: Internet
Comment Hidden (show)
Delighted with emilysans - wish there were more women in the world just like you!

FROM THE INTERNET:
zeuren
Re: Commando at work. post July 25 2004, 5:19 PM

My wife has just started work in a shop on a lingerie department. She dare'nt tell them that she hates panties and goes without a bra very often too. All the other ladies are very pro underwear.

In the whole shop she knows of about 3 ladies who dont wear them, as she has discussed it with them.

Anonymous(Login emilysans)Re:Commando at work.July 26 2004, 3:53 AM

i work part time as a freelance commercial photographer's assistant. i freebuff all the time, and my boss knows it. emily
Comment Hidden (show)
There's plenty of gals (and guys) out there that are more comfortable (and healthier) without the "excess baggage" of underwear---FROM THE INTERNET:
zeuren
Re: Commando at work. post July 25 2004, 5:19 PM

My wife has just started work in a shop on a lingerie department. She dare'nt tell them that she hates panties and goes without a bra very often too. All the other ladies are very pro underwear.

In the whole shop she knows of about 3 ladies who dont wear them, as she has discussed it with them.

Anonymous(Login emilysans)Re:Commando at work.July 26 2004, 3:53 AM

i work part time as a freelance commercial photographer's assistant. i freebuff all the time, and my boss knows it. emily
Comment Hidden (show)
see:Panti-Less in New York City by Kristen Houghton
Comment Hidden (show)
from the Internet:

"Re: this is what going without underwear is for November 7 2013, 10:48 AM



"i think there's a certain frisson in wearing nothing under my outer clothes. nothing but me under my skirt. my hubby says he loves to look at me and know i'm not wearing any underwear. and i love that he looks at me that way. wink.gif"

"Emily"
Comment Hidden (show)
-
The question isn't "Is pantiless NORMAL?" but more like "How popular is it? Or How delightful/comfortable/healthy is it???": from the Internet:

"The only time my wife has wore knickers in the last few years is when she wanted to wear a dress for work as the weather has got hot (about 4 times this year and 3 last), the rest of the time she wears trousers and has not wore knickers with trousers for more than 20 years.
"When we are out together she will always wear a dress or skirt knickerless and sometimes when she goes out with friends as well which I really love .
"When we are out in public I will put my hand up her dress and touch her bare arse, I lifts (elevators) I will leave it till the last minute to take my hand away before the doors open, we have been caught may times.
"I fill very lucky my wife is Knickerless!!!"
Comment Hidden (show)

Sorry, you need to be signed in to comment.

Click here to sign in or register.