Are You Normal?

Curious how others might perceive your situation? Submit your story today and find out what others think...

Foreskin

I am female but I have a question to all you men...
Is it possible/normal for a man to have a foreskin that can't be pulled back to reveal the glans?
i.e, in uncircumsised men, should the foreskin always be capable of being pulled back to show the glans?
I am asking because I have a new boyfriend and he is uncircumsised. We haven't had full sex yet but we have played around a bit and I noticed that when he was hard, the foreskin still covered his glans. I gave him a hand job and when he came, the foreskin was still covering that glans.
Any advice would be appreciated
Do you think it's normal?
Does this story fit one of these flags? If so, click it! [Best Of] [Funny] [Interesting] [Weird][Lame] [Off Topic] [Innapropriate]
Comments (18)
Yeah....sometimes guys feel kind of awkward saying "Peel back my foreskin baby" (*see below).

Just do it. S-L-O-W-L-Y and gently.

You didn't mention an age. Some younger guys may not have yet actually made a habit of pulling back their foreskin while masturbating. If this is the case with your boyfriend, it might be a little painful at first.

Look at it this way, and this always gets me.

*ASK HIM IF YOU CAN/SHOULD.

Come on. You've got your boyfriends dick in your hand. You have stroked him till he cums. That's PRETTY intimate. So why should you be embarrassed to ask such a question?
That's one of the reasons that guys should be "cut" and also for sanitation reasons. I hope he cleans himself well after ejaculation, and urinating, because if not it can start to smell.
well most guys do retract, your bf may have a problem or maybe he just has too much foreskin for his little weiner?
Well, I am uncut and when I have a hard on my foreshin does not pull back. Nothing wrong with that at all. Doesn't present me with any problems. It pulls back when flacid so is easily cleaned. Personall, as a gay guy, I prefer my men to be uncut to. I prefer the look.
There is absolutely no reason other than religious or cultural reasons, to be circumsized. It is not a problem medically to 99.9% of those uncut men.

Type circumcision into your search engin. You'll be anazed at the number of sites there are on the subject. Personally, I think any parent who puts their child through this opporation should be charged with sexual assault and causing actual bodily harm. It is criminal that this practice is still the norm in some countries.
These are my oppinions. I don't ask you to agree with them but I can assure you I have studied this subject at some length before drawing my conclusions.
@: nearly
being uncut is a bit more high maintenance than being circumsized, but if I were to have a baby boy I would leave the choice up to him. My friends give reasons ranging from religious, to medical, and then the "oh but he will feel weird in the locker room" for him to be circumsized at birth, but I think much of their decision is made up by the culture we are in.
@: Potato
Very much so. Medically there is absolutely no reason for the operation. In fact, a lot of doctors and most hospitals in the UK now REFUSE to do the op unless there is a medical problem.
Oh it be easy just imagine it being a banana and peel the motherfucker off.
OUCH.

Did you hear about the jewish lad coming up to his bar mitzvah? He was told he had to make an invention before his ceramony. Weeks later he was seriously strugling when he passed a hosital in Jerusalem. He went in and explained his situation. The Doctor said, "Son, the best I can do is give you these two black bin bags which contain all the foreskins I have removed today".
The lad was disconsulate but accepted the "gift" with a "thank you doc".
Come the day, he was asked what he had invented and made. He drew out a hand bag from his holdall and passed it to the Rabi.
"What is this?" asked the Rabi. "Hand bags were invented years ago"

The lad retorted, "Yes, but if you rub my handbag it will turn into a suitcase"

:-)
@: Potato
no more maintence for an uncut guy.hopefully both uncut and cut guys wash their weiners.just because a guy is cut doesnt mean he doesnt need 'maintenance'.


being cut is unnecessary --100%.we are born with a foreskin.....cutting off a foreskin makes as much sense as cutting off a finger or an ear==== its pointless!

the only thing a circimscion accomplishes is its gets the doctor that did it another set of golf clubs or a new jacuzzi.
I was under the impression that it was a bit more maintenace becuase of the need to clean under the skin and by pulling it back regulaly so that it does not bind... I forget what its called but when I have heard that if a man does not pull it back and clean it sometimes it can become hard and painful for it to retract.
@: Potato
I can only speak for myself. I have never had a problem retracting mine for cleaning purposes. However, it does not "auto retract" when making love. In fact, I tried making love with it retracted once. It was far to sensative. It is a very fine line between pleasure and pain and that bordered on pain for me personally.
I was going to comment on this earlier today especially since I saw tinius's response. But I began to become violently enraged at the idiocy (no offense tinkius, really)of the pro-circumcision side.

I am uncircumcised. I was born with a foreskin as ALL male humans on this planet are.

I love my foreskin. I'm glad my parents had the sense and compassion to let me keep it.

Circumcision is an ancient ritual unfortunately still carried on by some narrow-minded twits that are throwbacks to biblical days and before. It is nothing more than mutilation. It was originally an attempt (not always successful) to inhibit sexual behavior. To lessen the experience. Typical fanatical human behavior.

The excuse of hygiene is bogus. It is no more difficult to wash your penis if you are uncircumcised or not.

I'm so glad to see that their are people out there with some common sense.
@: nearly
LOL LMAO
very well said.

DOCTORS, LEAVE THEM FORESKINS ALONE!!!!!

(my apologies to pink floyd)
Hmmm, thanks for the interesting replies. I am the poster and I was wondering whether it's possible for a foreskin to always cover the head, no matter whether erect or flaccid. I was also a bit corcerned about the hygeine thing.

'Nearly',you have put my mind at rest,good to hear that it's possible for it to stay covering the head when erect but can still be pulled back for cleansing when flaccid.


Personally, I respect all opinions when it comes to circumcision.
yeh, the actual condition is called frenulum breve, type into a wiki and u get a picture of someones fucking dick, so just a warning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenulum_breve
Dump him.
mine doesnt retract when im hard, but i can pull it back with ease, and cleaning it isnt all that hard. it feels way better and getting it cut is a waste of time

some girls are repulsed by it, but those girls are stupid, its just skin, and itll be way more pleasurable with it on.

ive heard the retort of, uncut guys last longer... bullshit,anyone can build up endurance