To me the only real weakness in the human race is the one that allows us to chose, because I don't think we are sufficiently evolved as yet to make the right choices. Most of us make choices we ultimately regret.
Who we befriend, who we hang out with. What we do on a daily basis. How we make statements which are specifically designed to hurt people rather than help them. Who we marry. How we raise our children etc. etc. etc.
The list of human errors is endless. Would YOU give these people the choices they have? Do you REALLY believe they have the right to make those choices when they affect every other person in the human race? Personally I don't!
Now if you have something to ADD to a DEBATE, go ahead, otherwise go back to shagging your mouse since thats about all you could fit your cock into.
As well, i mean, i dunno who said it, but you always have to keep making decisions, even if they are incorrect. Leading on to the idea of making mistakes is the best way for improvement blah blah blah
So anyway, also, everything has negative side-effects, even the most positively-geared decisive measures will wind up with at least one malevolent side-effect, but you can't let that stop you from making these decisions, choices or watever, otherwise ur spend ur entire life procrastina.......ting
no offence but if this really is how u feel, then i think u need to learn to loosen up lol, the list of human errors is endless, but fook me if i'm (or anyone of significance) gonna make a fuss over it
But yes, i guess it is a weakness on re-examination. But, i mean, it always will be, even if we got a computer to make every choice for us, then there's still the likelihood of a mistake, even if we evolve into superfreaks, ur never gonna get a perfect decision
There, i dunno if that makes sense or if it even qualifies as serious discussion, but at least i tried, and quite frankly i dont care so much anymore, cos damn they don't make 'em like this anymore. Fook it, i so goddamn tired.
If we ran on pure instinct, however, would you even have the capacity to write this post, questioning the value of being able to make choices? That's what is achingly wonderful about human choices: how our curiosity leads us into the stars or into the gutter; our compassion leads us to save the lives of complete strangers or to be suckered into loving the wrong people; our reasoning leads us to solve complex problems that can improve the lives of many or to justify genetic hatred; etc.
I am disappointed every day of my life by the choices made by others, but I'm willing to accept that as part of the human condition. The alternative -- a world controlled by some form of moral artificial intelligence (programmed by whom?) or humans genetically engineered to filter out the "bad" choosers from the "good" (again, who decides?), is clearly untenable.
As always, I value your input and thanks for taking the time.
-dirt dobbler
For example, let's say you have two choices; choice A and choice B. You are more inclined to pick choice A; however, to prove your own freewill and disprove determinism, you pick B. By choosing B, you have overridden your initial desire and inclination to choose A simply because your desire to disprove determinism has provoked your desire to choose B. Therefore, B is more appealing to your mind, and thus you choose B over A. This is based on the causality of our everyday decisions, and not freewill at all. We pick what's more appealing, based on our knowledge, logic, and a number of other variables that define who we are fundamentally. Matter is matter, whether it is living or non-living. The brain is a very complex machine made of not mechanical parts, but organic parts, but it is still just a machine. For example, I do not know how a car or computer works precisely, but there are cause and effect relationships in the machinery that allow the machine to work when the key is turned or the power is turned on. When a machine does not do what is expected, it is usually because of a malfunction of some kind and the problem can be tracked down. The human brain is the most complex machine known to man, but if its functions were known; our actions would be perfectly predictable. At the most basic levels, it is just chemical and electrical communication across neurons, nothing more.
You mention human weaknesses. There are far more weaknesses to the human race than you list in your post. Perhaps that is because we consider ourselves to be at the pinnacle of the evolutionary chain, but that conclusion is simply based on the observation of other life-forms that inhabit this planet. Let me list a few more human weaknesses which may be considered far worse than the illusion of freewill. First let me start off with the fact that we are basically stuck on this planet waiting for our ultimate fate. It is highly unlikely that we will ever make it to another planet before this planet is destroyed. Based on heat, radiation, cold, etc, most places in this universe will kill life instantly. At a universal level, our galaxy orbit is bound to come close to a supernova or other phenomenon at some point which will likely wipe out much of the human race. If that doesn't happen, our galaxy will eventually collide with the Andromeda galaxy. If that doesn't kill us, the laws of thermodynamics state that the universe is on a one-way ticket to thermal equilibrium. At a planetary level, there are always earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, floods, tornados, hurricanes, comets, asteroids and other natural disasters that wipe out massive amounts of the human population. Two-thirds of the earth is uninhabitable by humans. Humans aren't immune to diseases, plagues, birth defects, cancer, etc, and our health only gets worse as we age. Compared to our cold-blooded counterparts, we need to eat constantly to stay alive. And I need not mention the faults with our reproductive systems. Suffice it to say, humans are very far from perfect.
-dirt dobbler
Here's a decent example of what I'm talking about. Keep in mind that this is purely a hypothetical scenario. I'm a computer programmer. As a perfect programmer, I have the ability to create the perfect program. In fact, my perfection makes it impossible for me to create any flaws in my code. What good could possibly come from me making flawed code, if it's even possible for a perfect programmer to write flawed code? On the other hand, let's say that this is the perfect code, and everything is playing out as it was meant to, which seems far more logical. That leaves absolutely no room for freewill or choice or even true love. We know, as my last post states, that the human design is an illogical design. So these are the two options here. We're either biological robots, or flawed beings created by a flawed God. Or there's the evolutionary theory that basically says we came from nothingness and will return to nothingness, in which case, we are still, in essence, biological robots with the ability to adapt which leads us right back to the initial option. What do you think?
I find life so interesting, and I would never regret the events that happened to me. I've learned so much even in my few years of life, not only by my owns mistakes, but others as well.
I can't complain...
For you to not believe in "true love" is a shame,for there are many different types of love,love can be companionship with another,your parents love you in an indescribable fashion,and if you ever have kids you will understand that type of love.Lust is not love.Love is not something hallmark invented.I've never been in love,but i'm sure like the unique properties of an individual,no love story is the same.
"We're either biological robots, or flawed beings created by a flawed God."
I think people have a hard time believing there could be a god out there who is an omnipotent being,and knows every strand on your head to every thought in your mind. It is a little overbearing to think about really,and by no means do i have the answers on how the origin,demise or afterlife of man came or comes about,but maybe if God did create us,his intentions were when he created us with flaws would be to save us from these flaws,so that he to could have a purpose.
-dirt dobbler
Regardless of the type, love is still just a function of the brain. All love has a conditional aspect to it. I see nothing special about it. Yes, it affects different people in different ways, because everybody is different as we've determined. The same can be said for hate, or any other emotion. The difference is, I've concluded from my observations that, overall, love is one of the least productive of all emotions, and in the end, can result in the most emotional pain and suffering of all emotions if it doesn't work out.
I haven't come to a conclusion as to whether an omnipotent and perfect God exists, and I find the idea far less than overbearing. If he does exist, I just question his motives and logic.
I look at nature,and the human body,even how children can grow from something the size of a dot from a ball point pen to an adult,it's incredible. Throughout time people in history have always felt like there was something out there more superior.I mean Indians used to worship the sun,stars,moon,and some even corn,and of course other civilizations have been known to worship idols they created. Honestly i think people who dont believe there is a God are too smart for their own good. I'm not trying to tell you you should believe in God,but having an open mind is better than having a robotic mind. =)
-dirt dobbler
I have never flat out said that I don't believe in God, because I do indeed think that there is a possibility that God exists. I am human, so I don't know everything. I just say that the thought of a perfect God creating flawed humans is highly illogical. Perhaps there is a God, but he is imperfect. Perhaps Alien beings came to this planet long ago and genetically modified primates to mine gold so they could spray into their atmosphere to prevent global climate changes on their planet. Who knows for sure? I don't, and I highly doubt any human will ever know for sure. I always keep an open mind. I just follow the logic that is programmed into me and serve my functions. If something you say seems logical to me, I'll follow your advice. If it doesn't, I won't. And it is my position that, since the existence of a God cannot be proven, I will have to allow my brain to process the data it receives while attempting to come to a logical conclusion.
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Either your going emo, or your thinking of world domination through anti-free will chips implanted into the anus of all newborns.
Personally, I like the second better.