Is it normal that I am against child mutilation?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 7 )
  • wigsplitz

    Well, that's extraordinary and frankly, unbelievable. How old were you? They'd NEVER do this for a newborn for a routine procedure so it's just not plausible.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • DannyKanes

      Oh I wasn't a baby, I was about six I think. And I was circumsized for medical reasons.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • wigsplitz

        OK, well that's a different story!

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • With all respect we are talking about newborns and babies do your case is not valid at all.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • DannyKanes

          Your post is called "Against child mutilation" What's the difference? I was a child, I had no say in the matter. Maybe you should have called it "Against baby mutilation"

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • The piont is you got pain killers and as a baby you would not yet you say"Oh no they put babys to sleep" So you are not a telling a true statement. The problem is you were old enough to be given pain killer so you do not count. I am speaking for the babys without painkiller but you are not taking them into consideration at all it seems.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • DannyKanes

              Until you wrote this I was unaware that babies were even circumcised. I was merely talking from experience. And no where did I say "they put babies to sleep" I said as a child they do. Like I said, when you said child mutilation I was under the belief you meant children not new borns. Children woul never be circumcised without anesthetic. But babies and new borns, I wouldn't have a clue about what practice they use to remove foreskin.

              Comment Hidden ( show )