Alright, before I even read your 3 comments I'm going to firstly apologize for insulting you at the end. It was immature and unnecessary, I was stressed at the time it's not personal.
Anyway, I'm going to read and respond to your points now.
Indeed, we're not. I was not disagreeing we didn't have a link I was disagreeing with your statement of "everything we do is human nature" this means that everything we do is the same because the definition of human nature entails that it's shared by all humans. Everything we do isn't exactly the same as everyone else.
"Complication"? The view of sex and love being wonderful is an opinion and one generally considered not to be a complicated one as it is merely describing the two things positively. If your opinion is different, I disagree that it means you've come above humanity and discovered "what life is all about".
Problems? Yes. But doesn't EVERYTHING cause problems? Eating causes problems because if someone eats it means there's less food for someone else, the same could be said for breathing because someone else is using oxygen that others want which could also cause arguments and dilemmas.
Simple beginnings? On the contrary, scientists find this very difficult to understand how the separate atoms, chemical reactions and how everything started with their various theories (one to name would be the flawed "primordial soup") on how it all began. To this day we don't know the answer.
"Simple rules"? Of what, morale? Morale is differed from place to place and nowhere can you really "make rules" and expect them to be easily followed. In my opinion, there is no absolute rules. There are many shades of gray and what is considered good and bad is greatly differed depending on how you were raised/your environment, ect.
Well, that's just how humans are. Emotions will be emotions. I don't think they can ever be solved unless emotions are wiped out completely or drawn down to a minimum. But then, what would we be living for? We would simply be mindless zombies striving for things with no reason. No point. What will we get out of it? Oh sure, it'd be more efficient and we'd make a tower quicker. But then what? What pleasure/satisfaction does this tower give us with no emotions?
I'm just going to reply to the other two separately, because it seems you've "changed opinions"?
No I am not saying it is the same I saying the motivations are the same and aspects of our primative nature is what is a underline cuase for everything we do . If we live in familys is like living in a pack , if we live in a community that is a clan . If we compete that is nature as all creature compete to survive and rise above the pact . When poeple have instict to protect that is do to natures instict to protect your young. however just as in nature they sometimes reject the previos children from previous marrages or arrangements . Poeple fight over males and females as in nature becuase the better males and females pass on better genes and all poeple have a desire to pass on genes of themselves so there blood line dont die . I am saying the instict to stay with family is a safety issue and instictive for animals to stay within a pack for protection which humans call a family . the home serves as a shelter and sex is for reproduction . humans need a sinificuaint amount of so there bodys can make repairs . Now insanity is a flaw in the genitic structure or dysfuction in brain cussed by tramma or effect of earlier tramatic events . The brain will try to protect you from the terror by represing it and this cuases problems as your brain is not ment to fuction like that which will create insanity . even sweat in your pits when poeple sweat in the pits and down in crotch it was meant to attract mates but we have evolved to be repulsed by it . its also siad poeple give of hormones when they are aroused that psychologicly attracted to when given off . So all this can some down to sceince and human design .
now people have things such as things for guys with glasses or girls with big boobs this too can be explained . Since glasses are a sign of intelligence they could be attracted to what their mind are perceiving as such and it said in the past a busty women was wanted because wide hips , and big breasts proves a better women to have babies with so the bigger the boobs the better the female is for making babies another fact. Now some women want a strong athletic man , a attractive one or a smart one . Why do you think this is ? a strong male makes strong children and has strong genes . A smart male will make money as he can take care of family . A attractive male is attractive for a reason he has superior jenes . So That’s to answer the question . Now the question of gays as that is against nature has many thoerys . Some however think that it is by nature and they become gay as a blocker , it is something that happens to prevent more baby’s from being born when we are over populated and do not have enough resources to share . often when someone becomes like this sometimes it is because they are raped and are repalled by the opposite sex . some say it is insanity as it is illogical a theory that angers most gays . Some say they are born that way but if they were why ? what was the purpose of it? As nature has a purpose for everything but there is always malformitys in some child birth were they are genetically different . Some however think there is a recessive gay gene but if that’s so that means gayness has a purpose what could that purpose be ? they say that people crave fatty or sweet things because cave man time when they would have to go days without eating . Stray animals have a habit of overeating because of this fact after they find a home . so everything can be explained that way and I explained about everything I could think of .
I read, or well skimmed through it (sorry but if you're not even going to bother using capital letters after full stops then I quit putting in the effort to read through it all).
"so everything can be explained that way and I explained about everything I could think of ."
So you misunderstood the definition of human nature? Okay, I see what you're telling me now.
Most of the things you typed were obvious and already known. I really don't see how this makes sex a bad thing at all; also all you mentioned were primitive, instinctual facts. In no way were they a reasonable argument for the opposition of sex.
You seem to have this impression that sex is a bad thing . I never siad that you are still missing my piont I am saying the piont of it is to create children . God I have no idea why you poeple keep thinking I siad It was a bad thing becuase I never siad sex was bad ovbiously you are just a bunch of sex crazed monkeys . I never siad I had anything against sex I stated this over and over . There is nothing bad about sex i know you all have this impression that screwing everything that moves is a good thing but it isnt . i siad sex is ment for procreation End of story . I never siad It was bad I never siad it was Great . I never siad it was anything more than that . I am saying most things in human exsistance are motivated by primal instict even the most complicated things .thanks for not getting the piont again I do not give a shit how Fantastic or horrible sex is I was stating a fact that no one seems to understand and yet again you are missing the piont I think it sad you have to make everything about sex when That is not what it is about at all . if you think sex is completly bad that is your problem it is MENT FOR PROCREATION ALL THINGS WE DO IS MOTIVATED BY HUMAN INSTICT . I WILL PUT IT IN CAPS SINCE YOU SEEM TO BE MISSING WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT . SO READ THIS I ALREADY STATED IT OVER AND OVER AND OVER !!!!!
Well you freakin' said the OP was a great person when their title is "IIN I'm AGAINST sex." Do you goddamn know what against means?
Doesn't everyone already know the primary function of sex is reproduction? Isn't that obvious?
And as for people enjoying it or not that's THEIR opinion. Some people think sex is great because they really enjoy it and they feel it increases an emotional bond they have with someone. This doesn't make them lesser or whatever it's just their opinion. >_> Can't you understand people will enjoy different things? How limited is your empathy?
Well if you weren't so utterly shit at English then I could get what you were saying. Seriously, I had better grammar when I was 10 years old.
Your still missing the piont I do not think the OP is really agianst sex I think they are against having it whenever with whoever all the time like most poeple like to do . Infact I never siad you were bad for having sex I just siad it is meant for procreation if you really think Im wrong try to disprove the fact it is meant for procreation by explaining why we have children when we have sex ? you say this is stating the ovbious if it really was and everyone knew it already why does everyone wish to argue the piont so badly please explain that I am looking at it from a sciencetific piont of view not an emotioniol one as all of you do and the way the OP is would be a very logical sense aswell . I do not know why you poeple have to be so Hanky panky as you know what it is auctuly meant for and you will still argue the piont .
Is it normal that I'm against sex?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Alright, before I even read your 3 comments I'm going to firstly apologize for insulting you at the end. It was immature and unnecessary, I was stressed at the time it's not personal.
Anyway, I'm going to read and respond to your points now.
Indeed, we're not. I was not disagreeing we didn't have a link I was disagreeing with your statement of "everything we do is human nature" this means that everything we do is the same because the definition of human nature entails that it's shared by all humans. Everything we do isn't exactly the same as everyone else.
"Complication"? The view of sex and love being wonderful is an opinion and one generally considered not to be a complicated one as it is merely describing the two things positively. If your opinion is different, I disagree that it means you've come above humanity and discovered "what life is all about".
Problems? Yes. But doesn't EVERYTHING cause problems? Eating causes problems because if someone eats it means there's less food for someone else, the same could be said for breathing because someone else is using oxygen that others want which could also cause arguments and dilemmas.
Simple beginnings? On the contrary, scientists find this very difficult to understand how the separate atoms, chemical reactions and how everything started with their various theories (one to name would be the flawed "primordial soup") on how it all began. To this day we don't know the answer.
"Simple rules"? Of what, morale? Morale is differed from place to place and nowhere can you really "make rules" and expect them to be easily followed. In my opinion, there is no absolute rules. There are many shades of gray and what is considered good and bad is greatly differed depending on how you were raised/your environment, ect.
Well, that's just how humans are. Emotions will be emotions. I don't think they can ever be solved unless emotions are wiped out completely or drawn down to a minimum. But then, what would we be living for? We would simply be mindless zombies striving for things with no reason. No point. What will we get out of it? Oh sure, it'd be more efficient and we'd make a tower quicker. But then what? What pleasure/satisfaction does this tower give us with no emotions?
I'm just going to reply to the other two separately, because it seems you've "changed opinions"?
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
Comment Hidden (
show
)
0
0
No I am not saying it is the same I saying the motivations are the same and aspects of our primative nature is what is a underline cuase for everything we do . If we live in familys is like living in a pack , if we live in a community that is a clan . If we compete that is nature as all creature compete to survive and rise above the pact . When poeple have instict to protect that is do to natures instict to protect your young. however just as in nature they sometimes reject the previos children from previous marrages or arrangements . Poeple fight over males and females as in nature becuase the better males and females pass on better genes and all poeple have a desire to pass on genes of themselves so there blood line dont die . I am saying the instict to stay with family is a safety issue and instictive for animals to stay within a pack for protection which humans call a family . the home serves as a shelter and sex is for reproduction . humans need a sinificuaint amount of so there bodys can make repairs . Now insanity is a flaw in the genitic structure or dysfuction in brain cussed by tramma or effect of earlier tramatic events . The brain will try to protect you from the terror by represing it and this cuases problems as your brain is not ment to fuction like that which will create insanity . even sweat in your pits when poeple sweat in the pits and down in crotch it was meant to attract mates but we have evolved to be repulsed by it . its also siad poeple give of hormones when they are aroused that psychologicly attracted to when given off . So all this can some down to sceince and human design .
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
Comment Hidden (
show
)
0
0
now people have things such as things for guys with glasses or girls with big boobs this too can be explained . Since glasses are a sign of intelligence they could be attracted to what their mind are perceiving as such and it said in the past a busty women was wanted because wide hips , and big breasts proves a better women to have babies with so the bigger the boobs the better the female is for making babies another fact. Now some women want a strong athletic man , a attractive one or a smart one . Why do you think this is ? a strong male makes strong children and has strong genes . A smart male will make money as he can take care of family . A attractive male is attractive for a reason he has superior jenes . So That’s to answer the question . Now the question of gays as that is against nature has many thoerys . Some however think that it is by nature and they become gay as a blocker , it is something that happens to prevent more baby’s from being born when we are over populated and do not have enough resources to share . often when someone becomes like this sometimes it is because they are raped and are repalled by the opposite sex . some say it is insanity as it is illogical a theory that angers most gays . Some say they are born that way but if they were why ? what was the purpose of it? As nature has a purpose for everything but there is always malformitys in some child birth were they are genetically different . Some however think there is a recessive gay gene but if that’s so that means gayness has a purpose what could that purpose be ? they say that people crave fatty or sweet things because cave man time when they would have to go days without eating . Stray animals have a habit of overeating because of this fact after they find a home . so everything can be explained that way and I explained about everything I could think of .
--
lolol555
11 years ago
Comment Hidden (
show
)
0
0
I read, or well skimmed through it (sorry but if you're not even going to bother using capital letters after full stops then I quit putting in the effort to read through it all).
"so everything can be explained that way and I explained about everything I could think of ."
So you misunderstood the definition of human nature? Okay, I see what you're telling me now.
Most of the things you typed were obvious and already known. I really don't see how this makes sex a bad thing at all; also all you mentioned were primitive, instinctual facts. In no way were they a reasonable argument for the opposition of sex.
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
Comment Hidden (
show
)
0
0
You seem to have this impression that sex is a bad thing . I never siad that you are still missing my piont I am saying the piont of it is to create children . God I have no idea why you poeple keep thinking I siad It was a bad thing becuase I never siad sex was bad ovbiously you are just a bunch of sex crazed monkeys . I never siad I had anything against sex I stated this over and over . There is nothing bad about sex i know you all have this impression that screwing everything that moves is a good thing but it isnt . i siad sex is ment for procreation End of story . I never siad It was bad I never siad it was Great . I never siad it was anything more than that . I am saying most things in human exsistance are motivated by primal instict even the most complicated things .thanks for not getting the piont again I do not give a shit how Fantastic or horrible sex is I was stating a fact that no one seems to understand and yet again you are missing the piont I think it sad you have to make everything about sex when That is not what it is about at all . if you think sex is completly bad that is your problem it is MENT FOR PROCREATION ALL THINGS WE DO IS MOTIVATED BY HUMAN INSTICT . I WILL PUT IT IN CAPS SINCE YOU SEEM TO BE MISSING WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT . SO READ THIS I ALREADY STATED IT OVER AND OVER AND OVER !!!!!
--
lolol555
11 years ago
Comment Hidden (
show
)
0
0
Well you freakin' said the OP was a great person when their title is "IIN I'm AGAINST sex." Do you goddamn know what against means?
Doesn't everyone already know the primary function of sex is reproduction? Isn't that obvious?
And as for people enjoying it or not that's THEIR opinion. Some people think sex is great because they really enjoy it and they feel it increases an emotional bond they have with someone. This doesn't make them lesser or whatever it's just their opinion. >_> Can't you understand people will enjoy different things? How limited is your empathy?
Well if you weren't so utterly shit at English then I could get what you were saying. Seriously, I had better grammar when I was 10 years old.
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
Comment Hidden (
show
)
0
0
Your still missing the piont I do not think the OP is really agianst sex I think they are against having it whenever with whoever all the time like most poeple like to do . Infact I never siad you were bad for having sex I just siad it is meant for procreation if you really think Im wrong try to disprove the fact it is meant for procreation by explaining why we have children when we have sex ? you say this is stating the ovbious if it really was and everyone knew it already why does everyone wish to argue the piont so badly please explain that I am looking at it from a sciencetific piont of view not an emotioniol one as all of you do and the way the OP is would be a very logical sense aswell . I do not know why you poeple have to be so Hanky panky as you know what it is auctuly meant for and you will still argue the piont .