Ask Your Question today
since lgbt is a sin according to the bible and quran, if I am a believer am I sinning when I tolerate and accept them?.
I believe in God and accept him as my savior, but I tolerate lgbt is that not a sin?
Sin is an outdated concept. There is only enlightenment and ignorance. It is ignorance that makes people hurt others.
The bible doesnt accept "every kind of slavery". The bible gives you laws governing slavery and what they can and cant do and what you can and cant do to them
The bible and the quaran both say to put gays to death. Dont compromise your religion or yourself because two beta males wanna have buttsex. What has a gay ever done for you? Now compare that to what God has done by creating the entire world. Gays just run around and complain in the streets over kids not being able to chop their dicks off in religious states. Are they worth going to hell over?
No the Quran does not tell us to kill others our religion is peaceful and tell us to not hurt ourselves or others although homosexuality is a major sin but whether if your straight or straight ally god will forgive you no matter what. Our religion does not tell us to put any specific people to death neither the Quran
Are you a muslim? Also, if so, what do you think of the Shias beating the shit out of themselves?
Quran and the bible IS filled with those teachings, it's normal back then, but now not so much.
"Men who imitate women and women who imitate men and he who goes unto animals and he who goes unto men"
"If you find someone doing what the people of Lot did, kill both the doer and the one with whom it is done."
This is Allah referring to Sodom and Gamora
Want more versus there's a lot of them
The Bible's defo against homosexuals but it doesn't say to put them to death
See, that's a common misconception. Christians don't hate gays. We don't hate anybody, at least if we're following the scripture properly. What we do hate, however, is sin, and to condone homosexuality is to condone sin, which is hateful, since sin is bad.
"Lgbt" isn't a sin, it's not in any bible, dude, be specific. I'll just assume you're talking about homosexuals.
I don't know, depends on what you mean by "tolerate". If you mean "leave them alone", no, I don't think that's a sin. You're not an executioner and it's not your place to judge. Pray for them if you want to.
If by "accept", you meant "accept them into your mouth", then yeah. Yeah that would probably be a sin.
I was responding to "Because to me that outright encourages slavery and says nothing about what kind is and isn't allowed"
You are holding onto the narrative that translation issues arent a thing. You can question that verse but if you are claiming the bible is pro rape when the verses right before your questionable one tell you to kill all rapists then its bad faith.
"When you acquire a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years; in the seventh year he shall go free, without payment. If he came single, he shall leave single; if he had a wife, his wife shall leave with him. If his master gave him a wife, and she has borne him children, the wife and her children shall belong to the master, and he shall leave alone."
Im not gonna keep debating the bible if you are gonna just be bad faith. You've obviously not read any of it and have heard these things from some liberal site.
you either edited your comment or I only read the last part and now see you addressed the bible.
Theres many translations of the bible because remember it was written in hebrew. Its actually very hard to translate things you lose so much meaning. If you are interested in the other translations you'll note only yours even says seize. "If you do KJV 1900 its: "If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found" it doesnt say seize because that was a bad translation clearly if you look at the previous verses.
You are being disingenuous and being in bad faith by defending this position when the previous verses clearly address rape. But this is why I usually ignore young feminists.
Thank you for correcting me. Yes I was talking about the 13th amendment.
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
Notice it says "EXCEPT FOR PUNISHMENT OF A CRIME"
"If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her...." It does not say rape it says "seize" her and this means to have sex with her without marriage. Remember the old testament wasnt originally written in English but Hebrew. If you go up just a few versus to verse 25 it addresses rape "But if a man finds a betrothee young women in the countryside, and the man forces her and lies with her, then only the man who lay with her shall die" but feminists always like to ignore that to claim the bible is pro rape. In reality the bible actually says to execute all rapists. The bible addresses rape a lot
and believe it or not slavery is legal in the USA under the 18th amendment. If you are convicted of a crime then you can be subjected to labor and its perfectly constitutional. I believe criminals should be punished and why keep them laying in bed all day. So in a sense I do support it. The bible also does not direct that you must have slavery in your society it just says that it is not a sin.