Christians, why do you ignore christ?

In Luke 18:22, Jesus says to sell ALL that you have and distribute to the poor. As an atheist, I totally ignore this blatantly insane advice. However, virtually all Christians ignore it too. Why? It seems very hypocritical...

Voting Results
64% Normal
Based on 11 votes (7 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 23 )
  • Clunk42

    "Lo, he makes a plain difference between keeping the commandments, which is necessary for every man: and being perfect, which he counsels only to them that will. And this is the state of great perfection which Religious men do profess, according to Christ's counsel here, leaving all things and following him." -Douay-Rheims gloss on Matthew 19:21

    In other words, it is a very great good, but it is neither necessary for salvation, nor are all called to participate in it.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • bigbudchonger

    I doubt they do, and I doubt you actually know they don't.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • KholatKhult

    Commie Christ

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • DrPissenschitz

      Whenever someone says Christ was a socialist or communist, I feel the need to point out that the main difference between his charge to share the wealth and the government forcibly coercing you into it. Jesus was all about doing it and doing it of your own free will, otherwise it's not generosity or charity

      Granted, I get that your comment was a joke

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • KholatKhult

        “Government forcibly coercing” you to redistribute wealth, or to do anything at all, is not communist. As the “government” would be by citizen council and all decisions would be bound by democracy

        Nationalizing resources, industry, or the means of production, does not mean you are taxed to hell, Lenin during the Bolshevik revolution ran against the Tsar’s taxation of the people

        You’re stuck in the idea of Communism being ran like some sort of totalitarian regime, this is not possible

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          Democracies still forcibly coerce. Just because people voted for it doesn't mean everyone wanted it, unless the government literally goes about exiling everyone who ends up voting in the minority, and, even then, that would still end up coercing some people.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
        • DrPissenschitz

          Lol I've never claimed to know much, if anything, about communism

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • KholatKhult

            You’re alright lol
            Unfortunately I do know about communism so I’m Sisyphus’ed with the burdensome nightmare of explaining it, or else I lose social credit

            Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Clunk42

      Hey Kholat, unrelated to any discussion going on here, I recently heard someone suggest that the Russo-Ukrainian War is actually self-defense on Russia's part; what do you think about that?

      He says that Russia is fighting to defend the people living in the Donbas from Ukrainian aggression. Would you say this is an accurate take or no?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • KholatKhult

        I’ll respond to you with something decent in a day or so, I’m recovering from a concussion

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          Oh, that sucks. What happened, if you don't mind my asking?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • normal-rebellious

            Do you not realise that true Christianity's eating a set diet of modest foods, and wearing the clothes, and caring about what you drink? When Jesus said don't worry he didn't mean eat, drink, and wear anything no matter, he literally meant don't worry, don't be anxious, be happy, then the Catholics are having a buffet of decent foods like biscuits, coffee, and cake, and potato salad, fools! The food should be simple, you're just following simple rule not to eat luxurious foods, but the food isn't modest! Not one bit, simple means not pretentious or showy, unpretentious, and furthermore I don't like Catholic attire, you dress casual when Christians should dress modestly, believe me it's in the Bible and Muslims dress similar to this.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Clunk42

              Simple means nothing when it comes to food, because the term "simple" is intently subjective. Is a soup that has 50 ingredients complex even if all you do is throw each of them into a pot? Is a bread with 6 ingredients simple even if it is very finicky to make? A professional chef would call things simple that I would never dare to call such.

              An example of a dress code in front of a Sedevacantist Chapel:

              https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FtczUVTXoAAI_a5?format=jpg&name=large

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    It's not cherry picking. Some things in the bible can just be disregarded if needed, as it's not a requirement for entry to heaven.

    I was raised Lutheran and how my family interpreted giving was based on 10% of earnings. When we pulled out of our church because they were going hard left into the ELCA they had to immediately form a meeting to reevaluate their budget. As my family was one of the biggest donors to said church because of said 10%

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • normal-rebellious

    Jesus was proud of his simple advice to do things ascetically, despite people clinging to belief that Jesus was selfish, he wasn't selfish, I don't listen to Jesus's advice to do ascetic practices, it doesn't make me happy, it's a cherrypicked religion, you're supposed to cherrypick Jesus and make up your own Christianity and do what you say, reading the Bible, otherwise you'll be a sheep following a dead Christ, but the corners are cut by choosing a sect, selling house and possessions isn't good, you need a house, and furthermore you get away with this ridiculous Bible-throughout religion in the city of churches. There's no reason to think Christians aren't hypocrites, they "follow" the Bible but are eating a steak Diane, or pizza on pizza night, that would be hypocritical, as a Lawrence Chaderton Puritan I choose to follow the diet and clothes to the letter 💌, but nothing's a sin, moderate Christianity's the way, it's just that I watch movies and so because it's not healthy I shouldn't be an idiot watching theatre, drama, or entertainment, I should be watching documentaries and not the theatre to watch Hamlet, or Showtime/YouTube to watch "Buffalo '66", that's a stupid choice as it could rot your brain, to do so the Puritans if not rest of Christians would be hypocritical.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

    *counts out my 30 pieces of silver*

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Grunewald

    Yes, Jesus said it... to one specific person.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • noid

    He was giving instructions to a specific person.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • kikilizzo

    Christians ignore everything in the bible except what they feel like not ignoring.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • DrPissenschitz

    Jesus also said "be ye perfect even as I am perfect". He gave instruction to strive to do our best knowing full well that we're imperfect and will fall short. The important thing is to do your best, and obviously nobody is in a position to give EVERYTHING they have, because they'd die of thirst, starvation, or exposure

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • RoyyRogers

    Op making valid pionts

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Jellypop

    I'm a Christian, but Jesus is the biggest a*shole and the biggest hypocrite

    Comment Hidden ( show )