Hiv unprotected sex

First, if the guy forced you to have anal sex, he raped you. Or at least that is the definition of rape in civilised parts of the world.

Others have covered the HIV issue pretty well, but they haven't talked much about the bleeding you mention.

The rectal bleeding is almost certainly due to physical damage to your anus. You seem to be wondering if the blood you saw was in his semen; that's very definitely not a symptom of HIV infection. If it was, there'd probably be a lot fewer people who were infected with HIV and had no idea of who it was they got it from.

Unlike the vagina, the anus and rectum are not self-lubricating. Contrary to the impression you may have got from porn, some sort of lubrication should always be used during anal sex. If lube isn't used and the thrusting of the penis (or toy) is vigorous, it's very likely that the anus - externally, internally or both -will be torn. Since that area is very well-supplied with blood vessels, bleeding is very likely. Generally, this damage heals pretty quickly, but bowel movements are likely to be uncomfortable while this healing is going on, and you'd be wise to do what you can to keep your stool soft.

Go get screened because if it was recent, in the first stage the virus is not detected by testing.
I wish you well.

If you have an STD, it's 200% your fault.

I'm sure that's a story ISIS would love to hear.

You’re probably bleeding Bc you had anal for the first time and it doesn’t seem like he was gentle. Don’t stress over HIV. But don’t have sex with anyone else until you’ve been tested. There’s more than just HIV in the world.

It's like this. If he has HIV, then there is a fair chance you will be infected (transmission is not 100% on contact - but repeated contact enough times = 100% transmission).

But, most people don't have HIV. So your statistical odds are relatively low. Which means nothing if he has it.

While testing is possible. It may take many weeks (or even months) for the HIV to develop enough for the testing to be reliable.

In western medicine countries about 97% of people will need 3-12 weeks for the virus to grow to a level where the western antibody tests (blood-work test) will be reliable. But, some people take up to 6 months for the infection to develop to that level.

Older testing techniques may not detect HIV for 6 - 24 months after infection.

Sorry you are going through this.

Note: you can also get HIV from a woman should you choose to find one of the readily available females that exist in every society.

Condoms are not 100% protection either (and will fail with long term routine sex with a partner with an STD). That is the reason why the package says that condom use reduces the chance for infection (instead of saying it prevents infection).

Only for "nearly sure" method is with a long term partner where you had appropriate STD testing after all the normal incubation periods (3 months) after they last had sex; and then have a committed relationship where they do not have sex with anyone else but you (or another partner having undergone the same STD testing after the same waiting period for incubation). This is not 100% as none of the testing is 100% reliable, and it's still (and very rare) possible to get an STD without sexual contact. But, it's the method I have used for decades... and I can assure you that it ended all STD issues and concerns of my younger years.

Honestly dude most likely you're in the clear. If it was just one time your likelyhood of getting it is quite low. But dont neglect getting tested just to be sure. Im sure you already know HIV is spread much easier through anal. You could spread it to someone else. And if you do have it which I doubt its treatable today you can live life normally and even get your levels so low its undetectable and can not be spread.