I follow sects, not religions

Why do people regard them necessarily as cults, and why would I care about the Christianity of Jesus Christ? People are misunderstanding what I'm doing, throughout my adulthood in my thirties I was always sectarian, as even the Luciferianism was a sect of Luciferianism, no offence with the isms, and by the way I follow a Christian sect not a Christian religion, mostly subsects are what I follow, sects of sects, those smaller sects, the smaller the better, sect comes from the word sequi meaning "I follow", and I always wanted to join a sect, therefore I'm 100% sectarian. The Platonism I follow isn't the original mysticism but a sect of mysticism and the reason I follow sects is because sects are better than the original and subsects are better than the original sects, a sect is an improvement of religion and is meant to replace a religion. The sorcery I follow is a sect of a very ancient sorcery which is a sect of another sorcery, and another one, and another one and is a sect of witchcraft. Cult isn't the point, the point isn't even that I'm spiritual, the point is two things, sects not religions, and that I'm religious about it not spiritual. I admit I'm trying to follow religions, but I'm sectarian about it. Sects tend to be more accurate than the original and aren't as violent as religions, it's normal enough following an anti-Semite sect which is only reasonably different, it's not too different to anyone else's hate for the jews. And the sorcery sect I follow is the Necronomicon, which itself is a sect of necromancy as sorcery often is. Puritanism is the Christian sect I'm following and from a few days ago I made up my mind and it will never change again. The sect of Puritanism I follow is the New England schism that broke away from the English Puritans as a dissenting religious body of Anglicanism, a sect is defined as either a schismatic or dissenting religious body, or a religious or political body that rejects accepted beliefs and doctrines. All I wanted deep down was to get back to being a Puritan like I was when I was 34 for a less obvious reason: being normal like back then when people don't find this to be accepted behaviour.

Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 16 )
  • Meowypowers

    I subscribe to the paragraph sect

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • lol

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Tommythecaty

    “And the sorcery sect I follow is the Necronomicon, which itself is a sect of necromancy as sorcery often is”

    That is wildly incorrect.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • normal-rebellious

      It's not incorrect, sorcery often is a sect of necromancy and Necronomicon is a sect of necromancy, you don't believe it, of course you don't, it sounds made up, I rest my case!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Tommythecaty

        Sorcery is a pretty broad term.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • EnglishLad

    There's an inverse relationship between respect and sects, i'm talking about religious sects like a mormon sect, that says you can't have sex with members of different sects, but you can't have sex with members of the same sex.

    So if the sects can't be different and the sex can't be the same, the only sex left is some left hand shame.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • normal-rebellious

      That's a joky way to put it, it's got nothing to do with sex, it's sects, not sex, it's about solving the religious problem.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • a-curious-bunny

    I'm from a small little public near Washington our leaders name is Dave. He's a great man who's poop doesn't stink and he never cried when he was a baby. Trully inspiring stuff

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 1WeirdGuy

    Hansberger you are now a christian?!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • normal-rebellious

      As it always has been when the alcohol use and smoking indoors was rattling my roommate's cage, making him very angry and driving him crazy from continuing going and going and going caused by failing to hide my disobedience and even if I openly told any truth that I did it the staff can't take it, they would talk me down for my disobedience. And furthermore it's OK to do this hiding the evidence when your religion didn't stutter, it said not to smoke in public and to drink for no longer than an hour, it didn't say not in the house or how to do it so that's totally up to me. People don't understand and it's out of sheer stupidity what they are when these rules of my religion are so simple I'm allowed to have the freedom to drink located in or out anywhere I want and allowed to smoke any way I want under every circumstance as long as it's not in public.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • normal-rebellious

    I read between the lines, the Bible says something about loving the sorcerer and taking as a Christian who's anti-magick wisdom from the magick of sorcerers and not killing them, the Bible is simply anti-magic (not just magick) but it's not anti-conjuring of magic tricks and it's not anti-sorcery, especially if it's a Christian's own black magick to kill a witch, it's also against divination except Christian divination of revelations and the apocalypse. Not divination? Could've fooled me, predicting omens as Christians do is divination, and furthermore Christianity is undoubtedly not anti-superstition since beliefs in numerology, and oneiromancy is in the Bible. Therefore Christianity is either just pagan superstition and bloody ridiculous and childish fool nonsense or it's just dictating, the definition of religion which I don't find spiritual. And furthermore just avoiding all magic altogether is simplistic, real Christianity is only against a specific magic, not magic in general, it's against witchcraft and wizardry and nothing else, not for its magic but because witches even male witches are thought of as bad people. And I'm not sinning and would still go to heaven if I was doing sorcery. And it's not absolute crap I'm writing, the significance of this is that I'm no enemy of religious accuracy and I don't blaspheme against Puritanism, therefore as the "point" is also where other religions went wrong and the one and a half thousand years it took to get it right isn't something to dismiss.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Clunk42

      Line breaks would allow readers to understand what you have to say much more than they can at the present moment.

      The Bible says the exact opposite of what you claim.
      "And when they shall say to you: Seek of pythons, and of diviners, who mutter in their enchantments: should not the people seek of their God, for the living of the dead? [20] To the law rather, and to the testimony. And if they speak not according to this word, they shall not have the morning light." - Isaias 8;19-20 (DRB)

      "Wizards thou shalt not suffer to live." - Exodus 22;18 (DRB)

      If you claim that second verse to be about wizards, rather than sorcerers, here is a more modern translation.

      "You shall not permit a female sorcerer to live." - Exodus 22;18 (NRSVCE)

      It also says:

      "Go not aside after wizards, neither ask any thing of soothsayers, to be defiled by them: I am the Lord your God." - Leviticus 19;31 (DRB)

      "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are fornication, uncleanness, immodesty, luxury, [20] Idolatry, witchcrafts, enmities, contentions, emulations, wraths, quarrels, dissensions, sects, [21] Envies, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like. Of the which I foretell you, as I have foretold to you, that they who do such things shall not obtain the kingdom of God." - Galatians 5;19-21 (DRB)

      Many versions choose to translate "witchcraft" and "wizards" as "sorcery" and "sorcerers". Ultimately, in Christianity, there is no difference. All magic is wrong, and all attempts to use magic of any sort are evil. To attempt to predict the future under religious context (things like the end of time) are also evil.

      The devil's number is 666; that's just the way that it is. It is the number that the devil will use to brand people in the end times. It does not foretell anything or put any magical properties upon it. It is merely the set of characters used to denote the devil.

      Whether or not a vision in a dream has any worth is ultimately up to God, and the church takes many steps to ensure that any visions they may count as canonically holy are actually holy and do not contradict any church doctrine or the Bible in any way.

      Christianity is not anti-superstition, since wizardry and sorcery are works of the devil, and so they are best avoided.

      I doubt magic-users of any variety go to Heaven considering the fact that intentional participation in magic is a mortal sin. Ultimately, it is up to Jesus to decide who does and who does not go to Heaven, however, not myself.

      Puritanism is one of the most anti-magic sects of Christianity in existence, and yet you claim it isn't against sorcery.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • normal-rebellious

        Yes Puritans were generally against magic in history but they haven't read the passage in the Bible saying to make friends with a sorcerer.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          They probably haven't read it because it doesn't exist. There is no Bible verse that says that, and you can not provide one that says that that isn't contradicted by a more context-specific verse.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • normal-rebellious

            It seems to not exist but it's in there, that's because the Bible's made up, I should've been secular like I was since the helicopter, yes, I question my beliefs every day and I question myself.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Clunk42

    What type of absolute crap is this? That's not how it works, and Puritanism despises sorcery of all kinds.

    Comment Hidden ( show )