I hate google

I googled "honeymoon stage" and it came up abunch of pictures of faggots kissing. Then it made me curious I decided to google "can a man get pregnant?" And the first thing that comes up in bold is "yes a man can become pregnant"

And this is the shit we are supposed to use to figure out about the world and current events.

Voting Results
82% Normal
Based on 11 votes (9 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 39 )
  • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

    me searchin for obscure or obsolete industrial equipment...

    google: "WALMART!" "HOME DEPOT!" "AMAZON!"

    like for fucks sake do you really think i can saunter into home depot and pick up a 600 amp federal pacific circuit breaker from 1978?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • bbrown95

      I get the same results! Any time I look up something that is out of production, I get results from Wal-Mart and Amazon on the regular, and while they typically have the items listed, they're listed as "currently unavailable". 🙄 Why not take those items off of your site if you know they're not going to be restocked?

      I also had a Federal Pacific breaker box and was told there were no parts to fit a box that small available in the US, and advised to replace it for safety reasons. Mine was from 1967.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

        their residential stuff was awful

        id rip it the fuck out and replace it first thing

        im surprised any insurance would cover a house with it

        teir industrial stuff wasnt as bad

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • bbrown95

          Yeah, I had it done as soon as possible. Before it was replaced, I was really careful about only running one appliance at a time, just to be extra safe. House fires are a big fear of mine, so I'm glad I've upgraded to something safer! I'm about halfway through replacing switches and outlets as well, since some were starting to go bad due to age.

          I was surprised my insurance covered it, too, as I had initially been told most insurance companies wouldn't.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

            it wasnt onea them houses where they used aluminum romex is it?

            feedin the main lugs of a panel with aluminum is fine if done right

            feedin each branch circuit in the house with aluminum was a short lived doomed-to-fail experiment in that era

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • bbrown95

              No, thankfully not!

              Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Sometimes Ebay is the way to go for that stuff

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

        oh im well aware

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • "Yes, it's possible for men to become pregnant and give birth to children of their own. In fact, it's probably a lot more common than you might think."

    😡 god protect the children from these bastards

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • kelili

      Amen.

      These statements infuriates me too.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • mathewdavis133

    the homophobia is so real on this site.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • girlinadarkcorner

    I haven't used google in years, i found duckduckgo.com a lot better and more reliable. Also they don't track you or store any info on you at all.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • kwg2005

      DuckDuckGo has gotten woke. They recently announced they are filtering out results that tell things from Russia's perspective. I don't want that from my search engine. I now use Brave browser and Brave search.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Yeah I get surprised when people recommend duckduckgo. Its just as bad as google now. Only difference is supposedly they dont spy on you.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • girlinadarkcorner

        I've been using brave for a couple years now, but I didn't know they had their own search engine.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • jethro

    Ahhh you are the person who made the post about being terrified of love.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Boojum

    I just Googled "honeymoon stage" and the results in the image tab were a bunch of memes and diagrams and pictures which were almost exclusively heterosexual. I page-downed ten times, and counted three pictures of gay couples.

    As others have said here, Google monitors us and the algorithm tries to give us what we're most likely to want. If you're getting lots of gay stuff, that's likely because your search and browsing habits are very much like the search and browsing habits of gay guys.

    BTW, you might want to consider that a lot of people realise that any guy who rages about the horrors of gayness very likely does that as part of his efforts to repress his covert feelings of sexual attraction to other men. If you want to continue to pass as straight, you should probably tone down the rants about gay guys.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Its funny how the go-to for progressives is to always try to gay shame people.

      But just to test what you said I just used another device (mobile) I used a VPN that put me in Atlanta and I tried the search "honeymoon stage" and the exact same results came up. All on the front page without me even clicking the image tab.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • GuvnorsOtherWoman

    I hate Google too. They're a greedy corporate who think they own the world and everything in it. I favour DuckDuckGo.

    And no, men cannot get pregnant.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • kwg2005

      DuckDuckGo has gotten woke. They recently announced they are filtering out results that tell things from Russia's perspective. I don't want that from my search engine. I now use Brave browser and Brave search.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • GuvnorsOtherWoman

        I have Brave but have not configured it. I'll bear that in mind.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • bbrown95

    I get annoyed with it due to the accuracy of the search results, even with using quotation marks. They help, but I still get a lot of crap I don't want and am not searching for.

    I also hate how no matter what you type when looking for specific products, they'll have the same variety of very generic results for only one of your words near the top. For example, I was casually looking at flooring to match my house's interior (which is pretty much the opposite of what is currently being offered, lol; my house is all warm tones and much of what I'm finding is cool tones and/or has a lot of gray in it, which I'm not a fan of), and the same few floors were posted at the very top. I cannot stand the vinyl plank "wood" flooring, so typed "-wood", which is supposed to remove anything containing that word. Nope, still mostly fake wood floors on the first page.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Clunk42

    The real good search engine is searx.webheberg.info

    If you can't find it through SearX, you probably can't find it on the regular internet. That is both a good and a bad thing, honestly. So, unfortunately, you can still that heinous article, but you can also see people roasting that article. It's great.

    Just a note if you want to use it, though, make sure you thoroughly go through the preferences and remove things you don't want to search with and add things you do want to search with, otherwise you will end up with some... rather "untailored" results. For example, if Frinkiac is on in the image search options, expect Simpsons screenshots.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • lolasprat

    I dislike Google too. Try Bing, I looked up both of the things you said and it gives perfect results.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • I use Bing sometimes. Search.brave is also a good one. Brave will often give you things that google and duckduckgo will shadowban.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • lolasprat

        Didn't know of Brave. It's good.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Anything controversial go to brave. If you google something like "hunter biden laptop" it will only show you the corporate mainstream media results from Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, ect. If you search for it on brave it will give you websites to the actual Biden emails, texts, and pictures. It gives you more info and google is abunch of propaganda ran by SJWs faggots. Never look up controversial shit on google. Its always opinionated bullshit.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Somenormie

      hello lolasprat long time no see

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • lolasprat

        Hey, I've around for sometime now but not commenting.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Orphan

    Well... Just to help u understand. Someone who was born female, who transitioned and considers himself as a transman, this transman can get pregnant if he still has his female reproductive organs.
    What google gets wrong is that they call these people men when they are actually biological female TRANSmen.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Sarah_Is_Jimins_Number_1_Fan

    apple sauce prices at walmart

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Tommythecaty

    Just rattles off the f bombs.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • hauntedbysandwiches

    I hate that too

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Somenormie

    Why does that anger you?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dude_Jones

    Google watches you. It figures out what you want to hear. That means you must train it to recognize your preferences.

    For example, I train Google by searching for “top 25 unbiased news sources”. Then I click thru them so Google remembers. In future searches, Google cuts the crap and give me links to stuff with footnotes and solid references.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • I tried to do it and it gave me a chart of most reliable news outlast and it had CNN at the top.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • dude_Jones

        Try this link:

        https://adfontesmedia.com/static-mbc/?utm_source=HomePage_StaticMBC_Button&utm_medium=OnWebSite_Button#iLightbox%5B55ae411ba1d86ecfc48%5D/0

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Thats the one im saying it has CNN in the green zone as in non bias and then fox is in the bottom zone where it says "propaganda". I put fox and cnn in the same category of propaganda. I think this chart is opinionated and made by progressives.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • dude_Jones

            Meh. CNN is bad because it’s so simple minded. The Wall Street Journal is better, although slightly to the right.

            Comment Hidden ( show )