I knew the atlanta shooter was white before the news

Oh so can we blame the rest on biden? Apparently since we are blaming the covid deaths on our leaders there has to be what 100,000 to bidens name?

I really really worry about this country.

Oh I thought that was a fake event.

You should. I agree. Within there's a lot of educational content and sarcasm so thick you could cut it with a chainsaw.

Nukes? Hardly. No one even uses nukes on other countries anymore. Superpowers' biggest problem with nukes now is how to dispose of them because everyone knows dropping a nuke is asking to be nuked and it only takes so many to catalyze a nuclear winter and wipe out humanity.

Perhaps it would be more prudent to focus on these things:

• The US has the largest stockpile of smart weapons in the world, something which historically terrified Russia. "Smart" weapons as opposed to "brilliant" weapons (which are totally self-guided) are capable of maneuvering about highly convoluted areas, changing route if needed, finding highly specific targets with laser-like precision (often via literal laser navigation), and are often designed to do minimal damage to the target's surroundings. It's long been known that they would be the go-to answer to any serious internal insurgency.

• The US is widely regarded as the planet's leading anti-insurgency force by far, practically specializing in it at this point.

• This particular insurgency would be taking place domestically, granting the US god-like powers over the playing field unseen elsewhere.

• Insurgents would be grossly out-geared in one-on-one and party-on-party, especially in terms of defense.

So nukes? No. Here's what would actually happen. Perpetually patrolling units would take several lunatics in one-on-one unscathed right off the bat as a mere statement while gassing out others. Internet and cellular communications would be shut down so as that collaboration would be all but hopeless among insurgents and in the event that they did band together, smart weapons would take out specific pieces of infrastructure as needed.

Roads would be closed down and "brilliant" weapons which listen for and attack moving vehicles would be utilized. Very quickly most insurgents would be low on ammunition and without the potential for foreign resupply. If the US really wanted to be nasty they would disable the power grid (the same thing superpowers plan to do should a modern war ever be fought on one another's land) but honestly I doubt they would as it would just be overkill in an easily winnable conflict.

In the end there will have been minimal casualties and collateral damage as the internet is reconnected and news will spread of the government making an example of the stubborn by all but charging them with war crimes. It will quickly become evident that guns sans ammo aren't really worth living holed up like prey. The entire thing will be a crash course in the fact that the second amendment was talking about a vastly different world. Those willing to die or be imprisoned for the cause would be diminished as the government was simply taking guns, not taking guns and lining them up before firing squad.

The people standing around taking pictures were the distraction, they were there to make it look like harmless fun. Of course the media ate it up and we saw a whole lot more of them than the gulag or the people dressed head to toe in tactical gear with zip ties. They weren’t there for harmless fun and they weren’t there to be on camera. They were there to blind people and break limbs and that’s exactly what they did.

If you try you can also find independent documentaries and articles debunking the nonsensical conspiracy theories around Sandy Hook. It’s just like 9/11. For every site claiming to prove it was an inside job(Bush knew it was coming and didn’t care enough to stop it. but that’s not the same thing as the US government being an active participant and blowing up the towers or whatever), there’s a whole bunch more sites explaining that, while jet fuel can’t melt steel beams, it can and did weaken them to the point of collapse. There were no bombs in the towers or the pentagon, unlike the real bombs that were actually placed at the DNC and RNC headquarters on January 6th.

So you’re saying the CIA is behind the NRA and gun manufacturers seeing their profits soar every time there’s a mass shooting? I guess it’s possible, if you can buy half of Congress you can probably buy the CIA.

I live in a city that just decriminalized mushrooms last year. They’re literally safer than marijuana, which is pretty fucking safe to begin with. Things definitely aren’t normal out there, but some of this stuff is contributing to making things less normal.

I can point you to the multiple people who were arrested for illegal firearm possession, but since Fox News hid that from you I’m sure you won’t believe it anyway. Trump told the terrorists to go to the capitol and stop the count. “Show strength” in his words. Obviously that wasn’t going to happen peacefully. He didn’t tell them to go home until after it was clear that his coup attempt was not going to succeed, but he did tell the terrorists that he loved them. Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube let him spread lies, hatred, and harassment for years without doing anything, how far are they supposed to let him go? He used their platforms to inspire terrorists to kill a police officer and they’re supposed to let him keep breaking their rules? Who’s pretending to care about democracy? It sure as hell isn’t the people who attempted to violently overthrow the results of a free and fair election. The one thing we know about the bombs is that it wasn’t planted by anybody associated with BLM or ANTIFA, they get thrown in jail just for standing on sidewalks and denied bail. But you can attempt to overthrow the government, kill a police officer, maim and injure dozens of other police officers, ransack the capitol and steal classified information, go home and brag about it on social media, and stay home while you await trial. Hell of a country.

Why would the towers tip over? Why would any of the floors tip over? That makes no sense. The towers were standing straight up, of course they would fall straight down, they’re not the leaning tower of Pisa. And saying the floors below the impact shouldn’t collapse from the weight of the floors above them is like saying the weight of one domino couldn’t knock over 95 dominos. This is exactly what I was talking about. You nutjobs cling to debunked claims made by pseudo experts and ignore all the actual experts in the field that explain why those people have no credibility. For every person falsely claiming buildings shouldn’t fall like that, there’s countless people with a whole lot more credibility explaining why that’s exactly how they would fall. For every person erroneously claiming that the calls couldn’t be made at that altitude, there’s countless people explaining how that person is wrong or misinformed or misleading. Only two of the calls were made from cell phones - and the plane was below 10,000 feet for nine minutes - while the rest were made from phones built into the plane. You probably weren’t even alive in 2001 but I personally made phone calls from those phones well above 10,000 in June of 2001. It was not difficult. In a lot of ways, it was actually EASIER to make phone calls from planes than it is today. Burning debris from Tower 1 fell on Building 7, it burned uncontrolled because the sprinkler system was damaged by the collapse of the twin towers, and it collapsed. It started on the 13th floor and the cascading effect led to the progressive collapse of the entire building. The term “progressive collapse” exists because it’s a known phenomenon, 9/11 wasn’t the first or last time it happened. That’s why the fire department knew it was coming, that’s how the reporter knew it was coming. That’s like saying a blizzard is man made because a meteorologist said it was coming while it was still sunny outside.

It’s been 20 years. Every single possible conspiracy theory has been completely and thoroughly debunked.