If you have someone blocked
You should not be able to see what someone posts if they are blocked on here.
Yes | 7 | |
No | 7 |
Ask Your Question today
You should not be able to see what someone posts if they are blocked on here.
Yes | 7 | |
No | 7 |
Not unless they are just being an ass just to be an ass. Not that I cant handle the flak but if someone doesnt add to a conversation they are just extra noise that I dont care to see in my feed.
People who ridicule me based solely on their perceptions of me doesnt garner the same momentum if they just refute the point that I make.
No, because otherwise it just gets rid of anonimity. I would rather pussies get upset because someone they blocked posted something as oppossed to having no anonymity on a site where half the posts are about seriously degenerate things.
I think the only person I blocked was chalie.m mainly because they would just complain and complain about my charicter flaws rather than the discussion. Which is completely pointless on IIN since the majority of the conversations are solely about a discussion topics, rather than personality critiques.
I always likened her personality to Gordon Ramsay's. She says mean things, true, but she seems to do it to get dominoes tipping over in someone's head. Don't get me wrong, she's said things to me. She called me a shit stirrer a few times and I kinda understood but didn't really. I now understand it as like a victim mentality with a petty, grudge-holding twist
Not saying either one of you is right/ wrong but it's probably worth exploring. As far as the pointlessness goes, I wish I had a cool analogy for this, but you'd want a smooth hammer and sharp saw? Your brain's a tool too and any small "deviations" can translate to tragic consequences. This is getting out of hand but I feel like I'm on a roll, but the true god of our ancient ancestors was physics, with spears in hand, predators on the prowl, and fire-wielding and crafting. Thinking better has always equated to better odds of success and there is something to be said of a stranger's assessment of ourselves
"I'm pretty sure you also dropped out of highschool you mentioned that 6 months ago according to my notes, and 3 years ago you said you hate philosophy but now you're a philosopher..."
-Charli.m
Theres nit picking points and then theres blatant name calling. I can handle the nit picking, hell I welcome it. Name calling is uncivil (not that IIN normal is designed to be civil) but labeling me a baby killer in a post about dental hygiene is both uncalled for an irrelevant to the subject matter.
I mean, she's a woman though. And we're guys. Do babies have some life threatening dental concern?
Pfff "shes a woman" I dislike that argumentative point. Yes I'm a guy and I wouldnt want my girlfriend to abort my theoretical child. If it was a discussion on periods she would have me beat in experience. Giving women extra discussion bonus points in abortion conversations undermine the valid fact that killing babies is something I wish we could avoid for contraception reasons.
What I was saying is that she slanders me from other unrelated topics. The vendetta against me rather than the points she clearly cannot outline is my problem with her. I am not made of paper mache. To undermine the point of debating is a point that she clearly did not care for.
I was still able to see the posts of the people I blocked. I couldn't see their comments or their username on the site though. I wound up unblocking them all since it was pointless. XD