Is it normal that i want a civil war to break-out in the united states?
I really hope that a massive civil-war will break out in America. It would be hilarious seeing rednecks fight the BLM.
Ask Your Question today
I really hope that a massive civil-war will break out in America. It would be hilarious seeing rednecks fight the BLM.
This is awful. As if anyone here knows what true war feels like. Ever notice how fucked up veterans are? And the people who come from war torn areas are a bit traumatized. This country already sucks at managing life, adding war would seriously fuck the world in a chaotic crazy kind of way.
I'm hoping both the left and right can quit their childish ways and start to get along before God sends us to the corners for being assholes.
The entire system is specifically designed to make half the population argue with the other half of the population over state-approved issues that have no effect on the people pulling the strings. The people controlling the banks don't give a crap about gay people getting married, a bunch of them are probably gay themselves. But gay marriage is a safe, polarizing issue that's never going to be resolved, so they can keep bringing it up any time there's an election to divide people.
Our own government seems to be trying very hard to make this a reality. But the truth is the majority of the country is too soft to actually take up arms so the result is less war and more just people parroting points from the news online.
Would you fight? Or are you a chicken hawk who would let everyone else do your fighting for you?
I think it might be what your country needs, but I don't think it would be funny.
People who have led very privileged and sheltered lives do sometimes have trouble understanding the reality of stuff like this. Just be aware that if a war did break out, you might lose all of that special security you have that protects you from having to deal with the real world.
I think the war just took place and it was done by pen and ink. Free trusted elections are over in the USA and maybe the world. I would never trust the press again. believe all the allegations or not there are too many for some not to be true. From computer programs problems, to refusing to let observers, to just counting for days until you get the results you're looking for. The press has an agenda and they are working to push their propaganda issues. The first to go should be fox news, then CNN. But at least CNN admits they are a left win organization and don't try to act differently. Watching from the outside American elections have become a war of city dwellers against non city dwellers. Pull up almost any state results. If the vote was by sq kilometers or area the Democrats wouldn't stand a chance and reverse is true for the Republicans as long as cities continue to stack people on top of each other and pay big business to move to their area those that live and work outside the city are just along for the ride. Require everyone to own a rood of land that's about a 1/4 acre and be a stake holders in their country or your much more likely to go down the socialist path.
I hear a lot of people making that argument, "News is biased but X is at least X" Nope. It's all propaganda. They need to keep people arguing so they put different points on different channels and people pick the one that says things they like, declaring it the least shitty news network. Saying the goal of news is to inform the public is like saying the goal of school is to actually teach kids useful information.
While a part of me thinks a civil war breaking out would be better in the long term for a restructuring of the political landscape, I'm not sure it'd be a popular choice for the many millions of Americans who would have their livelihoods torn apart by it.
As an outsider it's easy to look past the negative effects of civil war and just laugh, but consider the people who would be under siege. It would be tragic.
How will the rednecks meet the blm people without going through all the normal folk? There are no mason dixon lines like in 1850. Where will I fight I love all the gays and guns and squirrel eating freedom loving vegan abortion hating well armed Americans all over this beautiful country. Good luck.
Well I got enough food and ammo to stay alive for a bit. Problem is I got no water stored. So id be forced to interact with such bullshit. Id rather this not happen and keep moving forward with my life.
I MEAN IT WOULD BE HILARIOUS IN THE NEWS BUT LIKE I DONT THINK U SHOULD ACTUALLY BE HOPING FOR VIOLENCE ON SUCH A LARGE SCALE LOL
Life is boring, but wishing something that would have so many inconvenient consequences isn't normal.
At least right wingers are being up front about what hateful warmongers they are.
Both the far-left and the far-right are hateful and violent. Thus it'd just make sense if those two groups were to engage in actual combat, instead of just mocking each other on the internet.
Why don’t you just build a wall around the whole of Alaska, round up all the far-left and far-right lunatics, dump them in there together and let the Hunger Games begin?
Built it around New Jersey I never hear anything good about that state except they're the place New York send their trash. It's also small enough to force them to get along or destroy one side.
Lol I did consider New Jersey I just thought it was a little small. Your comment reminded me of a disturbing story I read the other day set on the New Jersey Turnpike, it’s not for the faint hearted though...
https://unsettlingstories.com/2018/05/09/a-questionable-glory-hole/
What are you talking about? I don't want a war. However, I believe that the current population is so content that they have fallen into stupidity and gluttony. A war would temporarily decrease contentment, reducing stupidity and gluttony.