Is it normal to hate all of you

No apology necessary. I feel no Ill will towards you.

I was the one who accidentally set this all off in the first place so you have my apologies as well.

felix is stray kids not bts!!

but if u had to like someone put a gun to your head and said u have to pick 1 bts member who would you pick you can use this pic as a guide to choose - https://i.pinimg.com/564x/90/f1/96/90f1968ef3ea13b631f1ae430d8ea581.jpg

That chat moment got you real mad, huh? xD It was honestly the saddest thing to watch.

...Vvaas. Are you telling me that he's entitled to throw these malicious lies out but I should "Be the bigger man" and just allow him to spread these rumours with no response? No? He isn't entitled to being treated nicely by the people he's being malicious to. Also, I told no lies. Everything I've said about him is what HE has said recently, I'm just repeating them.

He never once mentioned them as "s*x traffickers", he said it was a "Russian gangster civilian" and "Illegal Chechens". I don't believe he killed s*x traffickers at all, and if he's saying that now then I'd expect as much after what he originally said painting him in a horrible light, and you have absolutely no reason to believe that other than his word alone, a word which I've demonstrated on many occasions now is unreliable.

"Big whoop, dyat owns illegal firearms, as long as he isn't going around shooting people."
...That's the point of the law saying he's not allowed fire arms, because the government in his country has deemed him as unfit to the public to own them, Vvvaas, and your response is, "Big whoop? Until he uses them to kill (again) he's allowed them because I say so"? Like, okay dude. Jesus Christ.

"Imagine snitching on a guy who killed sex traffickers."
I don't believe he killed sex traffickers. His story of how he just happened to be amongst a gang but not a gang member and just happened to find another random gang, and he just happened to know they were traffickers during a time where Russian ultranationalists are killing Chechens, and now they're suddenly s*x workers, is a fantasy you've bought in to because he's your "Best friend", Vvaas. And his excuse of, "Well they let me out early? So means I'm not bad afterall", there were literally Russians sentenced to ten years for killing innocent Chechens that got let out early just like him, dude.

"He can break 100 conditions for his parole, who cares!?"
He is literally only out and not facing punishment for killing five people because it is assumed he isn't breaking his parole, his country, the government, the law, cares, Vvaas.

"How is storing firearms as a violent Schizophrenic with multiple murder charges and had a substance abuse problem, who says people should die liking people he disagrees with effecting anyone!?"...Look, I'm intending to leave this by tomorrow, if this is really the calibre of justification you've somehow reached, there's nothing that can be done to convince you of the immorality in Kholat's part. A coked up schizophrenic with a history of violence and murder having access to firearms is just cool beans, I guess. This is actually insane. Do you really think "99%" of people outside of your friend circle would be like, "Ye, that's cool, in fact give him MORE GUNS!"? Really? There's legit nothing I can say here, this is a grasp on reality that goes beyond lunacy.

"And there you go again". He literally told me that by the very definition he used to initially claim I tortured animals, that he tortured humans and animals, which I repeat is by the standard he used to claim I tortured animals. It was ME that was telling him that his definition was wrong and meant that he was guilty of torturing humans and animals and he said "Yes, I tortured humans"...Like, I'm not even allowed to use his own words at this point now? He can take something I said around 13-15 years ago, take it out of context, lie about it, but I can't use his own words he used just last night? Cooooome offf it, Vvaas. Like, I'd go in on you about it more but I don't know how much of that chat you've seen but it must not of been all of it if you think I've made it up.

Bro. Okay, actually, let me get the quotes up.

WhistleBain:
— 19/03/2023 18:55
You tortured human beings.
[18:55]
By definition.

Kholat:
Kholat — 19/03/2023 18:55
Yes

WhistleBain — 19/03/2023 18:56
And you're comparing that to you, who is admitting to "torturing" humans?
[18:56]
A comment online about torture, compared to actually torturing someone.
[18:56]
You're putting yourself in to a knot, Kholat.

"Kholat — 19/03/2023 18:56
Killing is a tool Whistle, I’ve always stood by this
[18:56]
I am not a peaceful man"

Like, step off, man. I feel like Ricky Gervais up here, "I know he's yar friend! Ah don't ceeeh". xD

For the record, I don't believe Kholat tortured animals and humans, that's the entire point. That the definition he used to claim I advocated for torturing animals would mean he tortured humans and animals. My entire point is that he used a made up definition of torture to claim I suggested torturing animals in the first place. So don't preach to me about "attempting to defame dyat and twist his words to make him appear as something he isn't" when that is exactly what he done to me, he took my words, applied a made up fake definition that he doesn't even believe in, and used it to spread a lie about me, and then you've come in here like, "Don't you dare be mean to my buddy!"? Bro.

That "Or whatever" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. There is literally NO evidence of me suggesting torturing animals, there is ONLY evidence of me suggesting HUNTING animals to KILL, something KHOLAT has done in the past. So you're lying right now, unless you have access to some information I haven't seen and don't know about, in which case cough up, surely if I was trying to hide that I wouldn't ask you to openly share it so we can all, including me, can actually see the proof? Meanwhile I have a full convo log of Kholat saying everything I've alleged of him.

You're right, there is no "coincidence" here. I already explained that. The vast majority of you here taking his side are from that Discord server where you're all friends, dude. Of course there's a heavy bias in his favour. You literally say "big whoop" to his literal past and present crimes regardless of who it puts at risk "because he hasn't done nothing yet" despite his conditions for release is to safeguard the public from him, and your response is "Big whoop, ItDuz made a comment 13-15 years ago, therefor bad ItDuz"? You've fooled yourself in to thinking the majority of people wouldn't see how messed up that is because you guys have insulated yourself into a friendgroup, but I assure you that the wider public, the law, and government, would not only judge Kholat as insanely guilty, but they would look at people like you as psychotic enablers who thought that was acceptable. So spare me your lectures in thinking you have any room to judge me on any moral level, you don't.

"By legal definition, Dyat has done crimes."
On every moral level, he's done crimes, and he refuses to accept his punishment for his crimes, punishments put in place to lessen risk to the general public. You're cool with that. I, and I assure you most people outside of your friendgroup where you wouldn't be able to "Yes-man" each other to oblivion, think that's abhorrent.

Oh, that's cool. At least he's honest about his excessive law breaking to randos online where there's no consequence. He sounds like a stand up guy, bro.

Yeah, no shit he doesn't torture animals because his definition of torture was retarded, which is why him saying that I advocated for torturing animals was also retarded by his own denouncing of his prior definition of torture he held when claiming I advocated for torturing animals. That was the point, fuckwit. xD
Only I can deadass get in to a conversation with Kholat where he's trying to convince me that HE tortured humans and animals while I'm trying to convince him that he didn't, only to have his friend come in like, "HOW DARE YOU SAY HE DONE THOSE THINGS, MUH MISSING CONTEXT!?" While I'm here just facepalming into oblivion.

You guys are straight up braindead.

Extra context!
He abandoned that "definition of torture" only yesterday mid-way through our conversation only after his attempts to claim I tortured animals would mean that he himself has tortured humans and animals by his own definition, to which he then jumped between three completely different definitions.

This means, that since he only done this yesterday, the humans and animals he killed years ago, was done with his view that he was willingly torturing them.

I've grown up around animals too, in fact I also have a history of working with rescues to help animals, does that mean you claims of me torturing animals aren't true by that fact alone? You wouldn't afford that to me so why would it apply to you?

"Suggesting I am anything less than ethical is insanity."
...You killed five people and to this day are breaking laws. I don't know where your definition of "Ethical" comes from but I'm sure your farm has some flying pigs on it.

If only you had the same enthusiasm to not break the law or break your parole conditions for killing five people as you do defending your "ethics" then this conversation wouldn't exist.

Edit* You sneaky Bakka, I caught that edit.
Just like to point out, Pink, that means he would have painted you in the same light as me if I didn't make him budge from his initial use of the word "torture".

Meh, somewhat, somewhat. Ya'know, it's not really hard to do. Every time you tell these lies I just type out what I said last time and you end up responding like this not even trying to substantiate your lies. It is what it is, amigo.

Every time. xD
You jump in, spouting a mountain of lies, then upon being responded to you're like, "Huh, I don't even care!"
Sad. We've done this so many times now Countess that the next step in the trend is after you've ignored the response to your lies, you go over to cheerlead for S.W. I'm actually going to ask you not to do that this time, I don't know if I can deal with both his and your ego combined. xD

Well, there's plenty to say, just not on your half. You said a bunch of nonsense, left out all the information you were told on it from the last time you brought it up, like why I ended up choking my step dad because I was a scared kid being threatened to be killed by a psychotic abusive boyfriend of my mother's after being attacked by him, literal child abuse I was enduring and you're trying to use that against me, and suddenly that's being brought up again you want to bow out? I mean? K.

I'm not a piece of shit, actually. You know what the hilarity is? I'm actually a pretty good guy, I just disagree with you on politics. Like, you don't even know my work history and I've never told you because it's so different from what you believe that there would be no point in even telling you. xD

I never told someone to try torturing animals, you're lying again even though I caught you out on this last time. I suggested that the person take out his urge to "kill", not "torture" out on small creatures, along the lines of hunting. There's absolutely no way you can reasonably twist that in to "torture" and the fact you attempt to only shows exactly why you're just a vile individual.

"There's really nothing left to say."
No, there really isn't, because even you understand that being in here taking issue with me but not a 5x murderer just shines a large light on the fact that you aren't after me because your moral compass leads you to be, the reason you have issues with me is your ego, which is why you acted this way towards me waaaaay before you found the comments you take out of context and/or lie about.

Oh, no worries. I actually didn't know it was a copypasta either at first. I just got suspicious at the wording and decided to check it out.

So how did you just happen to be amongst gang members? How were you aware that they were "Chechens" within Russia "Illegally" and were "Trafficking", and in that spot at that time? What form of trafficking are we talking here? As in trafficking refugees or sex trafficking, or labour trafficking? Elaborate. I'd like to know.

Okay, here's another question. Were you responsible for the deaths of some that were being "trafficked"?

You're a D-bag. You reply as soon as I start my workout. I'll have to type in between sets.

1. Wrong. I clearly stated I was "waiting" for an opener, not manifesting an opener myself, which is what "baiting" implies. You're already trying to misrepresent what is happening(lie).
You then say that I have both directly and indirectly referenced you but then follow it up by saying "Why don't you unlock me so we can talk"...That's what we're doing now.
However, I already know what you think of me because we've had this discussion before, and you were fully able to communicate with me in the IIN chat room. Not only this, but I was ALWAYS willing to chat to you on the Discord server, a server YOU kicked me from after our last debate. So this idea that you're open to talking to me is fictitious. I took away one out of three avenues for us to communicate, and you're lying about having no ability to communicate with me despite us having multiple conversations after I blocked you on here.
So this idea that I've never given you a chance to defend yourself is a lie. You've had multiple ways to defend your position and talk to me, it's not my fault you didn't take up those options.

2. Yeah, I did. Kind of like how you openly tried to spread rumours about me on a subject you and I have talked about before, a conversation in which you have ignored to further spread these rumours to others here. What, did you think you were able to try and weaponize edgy comments made around 15 years ago and also LIE about the torture element that was never within those comments to portray me as a monster without your far, FAR worse moral failings being brought up in response? Very silly.
You being a schizophrenic isn't a moral failing, you being a violent schizophrenic with a substance abuse problem as a convicted felon owning illegal firearms IS the problem. You can't even abide by your own penance for your crimes that you think it's no big deal that you can't even stick to your punishment for murdering three people, and you then respond saying, "Oh, big whoop, I'm a violent convicted murderer with schizophrenia and a history of substance abuse who owns an arsenal of fire arms because I'm above the law and don't have any idea of decency that would see me to abide by my punishment for my crimes." Like, eat shit, dude. You killed three people and you can't stick to your punishment for it? Absolutely ridiculous.
So when your response to all of that is, "Well at least I'm honest", I'm just going to respond telling you that your honesty means nothing compared to your crimes and your unwillingness to even TRY to pay for your crimes. Three people dead, Kholat. That's what you did.

My traps? You just mad I could beat you at a footrace and take you out with a fist bump. ;)

"Vaas invites everyone, it's his server, not mine."
Weird, Vaas told me you kicked me from the server, so why are you trying to downplay your abilities in this server as a mod?

"You pissed everyone off"
My Guy, a bunch of people on that server were pissed off with me before I ever joined, it was the first thing Vaas said to me before trying to invite me to the server in which I rejected joining BECAUSE I didn't want to piss people off with my presence, but Vaas asking me multiple times finally got me to join.
Okay, so you even admit you kicked me from the server where you had access to talk to me, so why are you trying to pretend you had no avenue to have your say with me when it was you that snipped your own ability to do so? "I can't defend myself! :'(! *kicks Goose from communications* D': It's not fair!" You do make me chuckle sometimes.

I tried to find peace with you so many times, dude."
Stop. The nerve of you claiming false civility from me when this current situation has come about as a result of you lying to me because someone happened to say something nice to me shows that this isn't true. You were nice to me so far as you could afford to be, which is why you're so willing to lie to me right now.

You're damn right I like an audience, Kholat. Do you think it's a bad thing to want others to see what is being said? You do realize you're trying to criticize me for not allowing you to hide what you want to say to me to everyone else? I'm not going to talk to you privately so that you can be a weasel and talk all nice to me in private while making malicious lies about me in public, that's cowardly to me with a lack of any grace.

Hey, #PinkPickle, notice this here. He's trying to allude to past conversations with other users now. This is the type of pivoting I'm referring to. He's trying to change the topic by baiting past dramas. Watch how I deal with this and his response to it. Notice that he has done nothing thus far to defend his initial lies about me while validating everything I've said about him.
So, Kholat. You're saying I think you're in cahoots with Count? Didn't we have a conversation where I accepted I was wrong in assuming you and Count were in cahoots? Why are you lying about the Count thing as if we haven't had that discussion? Just another example of your, at this point compulsive lying tendencies.

"I don't get what satisfaction you get out of making personal stuff public".
- You just admitted in your response that you never tried to hide your immoral acts from the public, so why are you lying by suggesting I have shared private personal stuff when you admit you never hid it?
- You don't get to criticize me for bringing up your moral failings in life after you try to publicly lie about mine, especially when your crime is MURDER.
- #PinkPickle, notice this here. He's currently trying to shame me for bringing his personal character in to question after he has initiated this behaviour to try and spread malicious lies about my morality. This is the type of behaviour that contributed to me blocking Kholat, he's just incapable of self reflection.
As for calling me a psych case. Again. Thank you, Mr 3x murderer, schizophrenic, substance abusing, illegal firearm owning, parole breaking, individual. I'll be sure to put that in my psych notes. xD

This isn't an act, amigo. I like to emote to set the tone in which way I'm saying something via text because the intent and emotions behind words can get confused, and emotes help to express the intent behind words. If I'm laughing, making a joke, or find something ridiculous, I'll emote to show as such. If I'm not happy about something, I'll emote about it. I'm so very sorry that me "emoting" is something you get so uneasy over. It's 2023, people emote, my guy.

"I wish you would drop this act and speak truthfully."
Kholat, not only have you admitted to everything I said being true about you but you haven't even tried to defend yourself in response to me calling out the lies you were trying to spread about me. Do you really think this is going in your favour? That I'm the one being demonstrated as a liar here? Have some self respect and at least realize where the wind is blowing in this discussion.

So in summary, let's just put this conversation in to perspective. (This is more so for PinkPickle than you, comrade).
- Kholat Lied in claiming I was "baiting" him despite my comment not suggesting such a thing.
- Kholat has openly admitted the things I said about him being true.
- Kholat has said absolutely nothing in response to me highlighting him lying about the things he initially claimed about me.
- Kholat's view of going against his parole for KILLING PEOPLE is, "So what, cuz? I live in the mountains and sheet, the law don't apply to me".

And as a side note, I will say this, Kholat. People disliking me in that server has never bothered me. It never bothered me when I joined and it never bothered me when you kicked me. I'm fully aware of why they dislike me and it has nothing to do with my character and everything to do with my ability to discuss topics, as evident by them liking you despite being arguably the worst person to ever enter this site. Now I won't say all of them are bad people, probably most aren't, but if you think I'm going to be upset at the fact that the people that like the company of a 3x murdering, violent schizophrenic, with a history of substance abuse and an illegally owned arsenal, but don't like me? I don't take that as a slight against my character but an example of going in the right direction.

I'm honestly stunned that this was your response. We can stop here if you like, I don't think you realized that this response just validated everything I said.

He reads all my shit even though he blocked me so I know he’s going to comment some “hehehahahoho did he say that about little ole me xD? Giggle blush teehee” AHHHHH CURBSTOMP CURBSTOMP CURBSTOMP

That's a bit generous. Sadly, it in no way suggested that doing so was for the benefit of reducing the urge to kill humans (as twisted of advice as that would still be). Rather, it simply asked if they had ever thought about trying it out, knowing full and well it is the stepping stone to murder that virtually all serial killers have in common.

Hmmm, well, if they have truly said anti women comments I guess I just haven't been at the right place at the right time to see it.

I've only been on here for 2 months tops so maybe it was just said before I showed up.

I'm going to withhold judgement until I see it for myself.

I mean no offense saying this but it doesn't feel right to change my opinion based on anecdotal evidence that I haven't seen with my own eyes.

I definitely cannot condone the torture or killing of small animals for pleasure however.

About the Andrew Tate thing. I know absolutely nothing about him so I only have what you guys have said to go on. So I have no idea what is and isn't true.

Jesus Christ. Thanks for the "short" version, S.W. xD

1. Well said, S.W. It's almost as if it's also TV trope for killers in television too, like the characters that I tried to appear like on the site for attention when I was younger. Like you said, it's so well known that even I knew about it when I was a kid.
In fact, we've had this conversation before. When you bring up the "Kill people he likes" line, I already told you that it's a line from a character from American Horror Story called Tate Langhton that I tried to emulate, I literally plagiarized a quote from a scene on that TV show to look edgy. You left that part out again, which you always do when retelling this story.

2. Oh...You pretty much admit what I mention in #1. What exactly was I to do? Randomly go around telling people I disagree with something they weren't even around to know about? Whenever anyone mentions it, like you, I do exactly what you suggest and have done for years, so why are you pretending I don't? As for being young, if I recall correctly I was between the ages of 17-20 when I made such comments, and that's a push as I don't even acted that way at 20.

3. This is when I think S.W is about to shine his real issue with me. This guy rarely if ever won any debates with me and every single time there was an attempt his friends would come in to start stuff like this. I really hope this guy's ego shine's through in the rest of this.

4. Yes, I did trash talk you. Your introduction was you gloating about how smart you are compared to others that you somehow got some well-known dude on Twitter to recant his Tweet. I can't recall the full ins and outs of that but it no doubt got spicy. Then you made a big, huge post trying to portray yourself as some modern day Casanova and my response to that was to say "Jesus Christ" to which you deleted it claiming I was in some way warning you about a "crazy stalker ex" who may use this site, to which I was scratching my head like, "Wah?" because all I said was "Jesus Christ, dude."
That then spiralled in to you creating this huge story about stalkers to cover up the miniscule fact you posted cringe, and I didn't believe the Stalker story, which I will go on to explain.

5. This. Is. A. Lie. Let me explain what actually happened. He offered some story about a stalker ex after he posted something that was pretty embarrassingly self masturbatory. As a result of this it became a go-to argument we'd have. During these arguments he would say that he deleted the post because it revealed "too much information", which was that his ex looked like Jennifer Lawrence. During these debates S.W would CONSTANTLY bring up private new information about his relationship with his "ex" which would expose this "ex" to figuring out which user he was on the site, which is why I didn't believe the story he was spinning to be true. So, during our discussion, S.W tried to gaslight me by spreading that I was an alcoholic, and be it shameful or not, decided to play in the pig pen with him to show him how easy it is to behave in such a manner, and I asked if he's so scared of his ex finding out who he is on this site because despite him badmouthing his "ex" online to a bunch of strangers, maybe she'd have similar stories of the abusive gaslighting behaviours he engaged with me in...To which he freaked out, which was a weird reaction to have but the point was to show that such vile behaviours he engaged in were easy to do, and that I could do it better if I was to use such shady tactics. HOWEVER, what S.W doesn't mention, is that I never believed him to have this "crazy ex" in question, therefor I don't believe he did "abuse" his ex because there was no "ex" in question to be abused. Again, he left that pivotal part out because he's playing a game.

6. I'm going to start skipping the self inserted masturbation of, "ItDuz was a dum dum, I won every argument ever". If he thinks I lost debates, that's fine. Not here to argue that.

7. Okay, if I'm gonna try keep this short for Pink to read. If you've gotten to this part, Pink, S.Ws ego is starting to show. Read how invested he is over the idea of me losing to him.

8. As for the "slavery was okay" part. It's interesting he portrays it this way. Let me explain what actually happened. A user here by the name LloydAsher was having a debate with S.W, to which Countess inevitably showed up and they just started dogpiling him, belittling him, calling him names. I thought the conversation would be a good one to listen to, and I understood what Lloyd's argument was, aswell as S.Ws. I took no sides but I wanted to hear some perspectives. I had to jump in to the discussion to help Lloyd not get his point misrepresented by these two, to which they were intentionally doing, and Lloyd thanked me. This then turned into another dung flinging contest, is as always expected when communicating with S.W, and the discussion derailed once again. The argument was, is there and can there be scenarios in which slavery is understandable, to which my hypothetical was if a group of people were stranded on an island and only one knows how to make a boat to save everybody but refuses to, should the group be morally justified to force that person in to labour to build the boat to save everybody. Suddenly how he represented this instance is much different now, right? He wouldn't answer, btw. Not that it's relevant.

9. Me and Pickle already talked about the blocking stuff elsewhere. Yes, I blocked you because every time I was having a debate with one of you, up to three people you're personally friends with off-platform would show up, which would mean I'd have to take the time to argue with three people at once, which I personally wasn't going to invest time in, so I blocked you. BUT, you have always had access to this account, S.W. Infact, the purpose of this account (WhistleBain) was so that I can have discussions without you and Countess sperging out on my SaddleGoose account but that you would also have an avenue to contact me via this account, which is why I came in with this account declaring myself as ItDuz when you already believed was also SaddleGoose...Because I told you in the members chat.

10. I never frequently brought you up, S.W. I think there was once, at most twice where I did. This is after you and Countess were spreading rumours about me.

11. Hahahaha. Okay, this part is hilarious. I knew you were watching. I never portrayed myself as a woman, S.W. What I said was, "Why does everyone assume I'm a guy?" The purpose being not that the assumption was wrong but that I never disclosed my sex, but I knew, God I just KNEW it would get back to you somehow given how much time and effort you were putting in to me.
Want me to validate this? You won't be able to find a single comment on this site of me saying I am a woman.
I won't say you're lying here, I'll just say that your hubris is really easy to use against you. xD
As for emojis? "That's how women be"? No? xD Might be hard to believe but I actually use Emojis all the time, you can actually see that happen in my earliest comments with the ItDuz account. I just tried to be super duper serious on this site and thought emoticons took away from that. You got it completely backwards. I take it smiley faces are part of the dark triad attributes too, huh?...Omg, I was joking. You are actually saying that using emoticons is a dark triad attribute. Omg. Haha.

12. Was it obvious I was ItDuz that whole time?! Really!? :O I wonder...If...That was...Intentional. I wonder what else would have made that super obvious? Oh! *snaps finger* I know! Like how immediately upon you asking me what my old account was I immediately told you that I was ItDuz? Seriously, now. xD
I love the fact that you portray everyone in that Discord server as laughing at me about, when I was able to act as if nothing had changed but my username, make it obvious I don't like you with the SaddleGoose account, literally tell you I was ItDuz, watch you guys go on for months about how you "cracked the case!" with spelling errors and the exact same opinion as my last account, meanwhile I'm just laughing my ass off that you took it so seriously "proving" I was ItDuz when I literally told you from the start. xD

13. Omg, nvm. You even mention it in your follow up point that I told you I was ItDuz. This. Is a lie though. It wasn't meant for "his" eyes. You literally asked me who I was, in fact we even had a further conversation about life and stuff. Weird you're lying but it doesn't matter too much.

14. "He knew how fucked he was if he pissed me off."
- Again, listen to these people. They honestly do think this highly of themselves, they're all from that server btw. This is what happens if you debate them and don't do too hot.

15. Omg. Listening to you re-write image to pretend you were some mastermind. I was never afraid of my SaddleGoose account being affiliated with my old account, which is why I told you, you didn't stumble upon that you asked for it. This is why I was willing to openly admit all of it when I thought you guys were really gone from the site because I was only denying it to watch you guys go in to a frenzy about something that was obvious to everyone. xD

I'm skipping some more. The account business isn't why we're here. But again, listen to how this guy speaks about himself. "I proceeded to give him the biggest dismantling in IIN history".
This guy really does think he's the sh*t. He used to do this every time. This is the level of ego I was dealing with, and I'm sure there's more to come in this comment. I really do hope he mentions himself as being "A big intelligent spider with everyone else in his web" again, that one was funny. Spooderman.

16. He says I've mentioned abusing animals numerous times. Ask him to provide evidence of this. I want to see these "numerous times", and ahead of time I want to mention that at most they "abuse of animals" will come in line with the concept of hunting, and made 13-15 years ago. Ask him. He "has it in spades" so ask him for it.

17. Man, he is still going on about the account business. Watching him gloat about this is honestly letting me relive it all. Good times. If I knew you guys were coming back I would of kept it up. Assholes. xD

18. Eh, that doesn't sound like me? "Mr S.W, you win, there's no coming back from this for me!" What? You know, the longer you type the more you're willing to just make up, I noticed that about you.

19. More talk about the username stuff. I lol.

20. He's lying again. He never asked if "I was drunk" he was trying to gaslight me. What he suggested was that I was an "alcoholic" because mY TEXT WAS LIKE THIS...I had hit the caps button before rapidly typing a response as I was playing a video game, and THAT was the basis for him, not asking if I was drunk, but calling me an alcoholic, to which I told him no but he wouldn't accept it as an answer and referenced my spelling habits as an obvious sign of being an alcoholic. This is when I started to criticize him for using addiction as a means to try and insult me, and to save face he came out with a convenient story of suffering from alcoholism himself (which he uses here) to avoid the criticism that he was trying to use addiction to insult me, an addiction I didn't have, I was just playing some video games.
Oh, as a small special mention, this is also around the time they would consistently insult and demean me but had the nerve to ask me not to joke about the fact they seemed to have a "close" relationship and CountessDouche got upset incase her boyfriend seen it and asked me to take it back. Me being the absolute monster that I am, agreed and made a comment saying I'm just joking and it's not to be taken seriously, because I wouldn't want an actual IRL relationship to end over some stupid online beef. Evil, I know. xD

21. Jesus Christ, point 21 and thats after cutting out all the unnecessary stuff.

22. WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? Ok, I will take the baseless assertions from you but how did you miss the character development point of Dexter so much? "Dexter doesn't like to kill"...THAT'S THE PLOT! He enjoys killing and his adopted father can't stop that urge in him so he trains Dexter to channel it in to killing "the bad guys"...How did you miss that plot? Did you even watch the show? xD
"It's even implied that he doesn't like killing animals but that's later in the show."
Is that the newest season that came out like ten to 12 years after I made those comments, S.W? But yes, Dexter killing animals in the early stages WAS a plot point. He liked killing animals, which is why he did it, because he couldn't kill humans.
Insult me all you like but don't change the plot of of that show! xD

23. We're almost done. Thank God. No, I openly admitted to it, kind of like I did from the start with you, S.W. Like I said above, you guys were gone from the site so the purpose of denying it after it was obvious and already admitted to, had no fun in it, you guys weren't around to watch create a huge investigation about it and stroke your own egos on for "solving the case!" xD

24. Yes, I made a joke about a 5 times murderer missing a leg. "Be nice to the convicted murderer, Goose"? That's your approach? Okay. Haha.
- Also, in your absense from the site, have you been watching Twitch? You're very fond of the 4K line. Who exactly are you trying to emulate? I'm actually curious.

25. Yes, empathy sure is my problem, S.W. I'm here arguing against a man that was convicted for killing five people, breaking the laws put in place to safeguard the public from men like him, a man that admits by his own definition tortured humans and animals, but you seem to exclusively take issue with me for making a few comments over a decade ago while constantly saying, "I WON THE DEBATE, I WON THE DEBATE!" Do you think it's not obvious to anyone that isn't impartial what really is your reason for disliking me? It's not your moral compass, again, in here to defend convicted murderer, it has everything to do with your ego.

9th or 10th worst? Curious to know, do I beat the convicted murderer on that list or? Just so we can gauge where your morals lay.

Your excessive use of xD comes off as psychopathic, like you're struggling to contain an unreasonable amount of rage

Yes.

Thanks, Mr 3x murdering, schizophrenic with a history of drug problems that's currently in possession of an arsenal of illegally owned firearms, glad to hear your opinion on the matter. xD