Is it normal to think that pokemon should've ended after season 9?

64% Normal
9 Comments

Seriously. They've been dragging Ash's adventure on for far too long, it seems. They should've finished his story after season 9 (Battle Frontier) by winning, going back to win the Kanto and Johto Leagues, hooking up with Misty, returning to Pallet Town for good and maybe introduced a new protagonist with his or her own friends for one more new season and then be done with the show for good. Can't believe there's 19 seasons of Pokémon now. It's completely ridiculous. Do you think they should've ended it sooner?

Voting Results
64% Normal
Based on 22 votes (14 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 9 )
  • flyingnostalgia
    8 years ago

    Yes!!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
  • KingTermite
    8 years ago

    Seriously, only an idiot would watch shit like that to begin with.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
      -
    • Anonymous Post Author
      8 years ago

      Just let people watch what they want without being judgmental, please.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • KingTermite
        8 years ago

        2 days to come with that, huh? Nice reflexes. Bet you got those sitting on a couch watching TV.

        But, no, I think I'll still go around house to house smashing televisions because people don't watch what I like. Oh wait, I don't do that, so I guess I do let people watch whatever sort of inane shit they want.

        And, being judgmental is all that separates us from the animals so go watch TV little puppy.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        0
        0
          -
        • Anonymous Post Author
          8 years ago

          Actually, I hardly watch TV. How'd you feel if someone called you an idiot for a show you may like?

          The things that separate us is intelligence and reasoning. Not being judgmental towards each other.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
            -
          • KingTermite
            8 years ago

            What does "hardly" mean? Do you not understand that using subjective terminology weakens any possible argument you might be asserting? No, I suppose you don't, so it seems intelligence and reasoning isn't your strong suit. Do you know why more animals get run over by cars than people? People have the ability to discern (or... judge) that a 3000lbs predator that is moving very fast will kill them if they run in front of it. Of course, it's a little bit more complicated than that, but that's the core of it: judgement.

            And I don't like any television programs so if you want to call me an idiot for not wasting any of my time on that stupid shit, then fire away. However, I think you'll find that it's not a very strong argument. If you doubt, go ahead and try, ripping apart your futile attempts amuses me.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
            0
            0
              -
            • Anonymous Post Author
              8 years ago

              Hardly meaning practically never. I am smart and reasonable FYI so I'd appreciate it if you didn't insult me by saying I "lack" those traits. I won't insult you.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
              0
              0
            • Anonymous Post Author
              8 years ago

              Hardly meaning practically never. I am smart and reasonable, for your information. You're not an idiot so don't call me one by saying I lack both traits.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
              0
              0