Is it normal to wonder what the point of a contract is if you can break one?
Last year my roommate and I wanted to live off campus second semester (better $ deal and far less cramped), but she didn't haven any cash since she'd paid for the dorms with all her money. I'd been saving up for a new computer and bike since I have to get from Cambridge to Boston and back every day and it's a b-finish-the-word-for-yourself to wait on the bus down Mass Ave. I cashed out my savings--and I work two jobs while in school!--and paid for the first, last, and security deposit. But first, I got some legal advice, and paid an extra $300 for a local attorney to write a promissory note with payment schedule between us, and got this notarized (she signed it). She works at the same lab I do, so I know she earns enough for rent and repayments. Plus, I saw her new Ipad Pro...
She was late with the first payment, then stopped paying, getting angry with me for reminding her she owed money days before it was due. Recently I told her we'd have to go to small claims court to enforce the contract if she continued to refuse to pay. What she said back to me stunned me. She threatened to declare bankruptcy so she wouldn't have to pay me ANYthing back. On checking as many legal sites I could and MA state law, I am learning she's right. I'm like, are you fraggin' serious?
Anyone else ever deal with deadbeats who refuse to live up to a signed contract? If so, any of you left wondering what the point of a legally binding contract is if someone can just pay for bankruptcy and get out of the contract? Especially when the contract's between two people of equal financial worth (or lack of)?