Is aborting puppies/kittens right or wrong?

Yes, pets can have abortions. Sometimes it's done in conjunction with a spay and other times it's done with medication to keep the animal 'intact', usually if the animal is a pedigree and/or used for breeding. These procedures are not without risk, either.

What is your opinion on the matter?

**Of course this would exclude any medically necessary procedure.

It's just as wrong as a human abortion. 39
For pets it's OK but human abortion is NOT OK. 8
I'm pro-choice so it's all OK by me. 45
I'm pro-choice but since it's forced upon the animal,it's NOT OK. 43
Other answer, I'll comment. 11
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 37 )
  • Frosties

    There's no definitive answer. It's not "always yes" or "always no". It's a "sometimes" thing. Same as it is for humans.

    Might sound like a cop-out; actually it's just reality. It depends on circumstance.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • GeorgeMcBob

    It's better than waiting for them to be born and then drowning them.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • DolphinAngel

    Yeah like that option it's not ok because the animal has no choice... It might be necessary due to health problems but I think those health problems are faults of the humans too in at least 90% of those cases -.-

    Yeah I fucking hate humanity... and I seriously don't know why IIN brings me to state that in close to every comment I make =P

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • I dont think abortions are right at all.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • lennyb72

    If its a yorkie, then just smash its entitled skull on the spot. Those things take everything and give nothing. Its ok to cover a yorkies selfish body with pitch, lite it in fire, and piss on the smultering remains.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • DogsDogsDogs!

    I think it's wrong as it would be for a human. But animal or human (even though humans are animal, mammals,) if in a tight spot sometimes you have to.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Moonbow

      No one gives a fuck what YOU think! You're one of those misguided weirdos who only cares about "life" from the point of conception until birth. After that, you couldn't care less if a baby, kitten, or whatever starves to death, gets flattened in the street or ends up in the hands of some sadist who tortues it. Your only interest is making sure females give birth! It's truly a shame your mother didn't abort YOU and save us all from your uninformed, asinine comments!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • myownopinions

    I'm half-half on this. On the one hand, the I do believe in pro-choice and it's stupid for a pet owner to abort a pet because of pedigree. If they value their pet that much, then they shouldn't have let it get impregnated with another animal in the first place. On the other hand, humanity is regretfully a horrible thing, and the born puupy or kitty might just be uncared for by their owner because the owner didn't want the pet in the first place.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • thinkingaboutit

    well pets are property...and people have been killing animals since the dawn of time....

    SO idgaf. It's not the same as human abortion, in my view.

    If the person is having their pet's offspring aborted simply b/c they didn't get them neutered...that's foul. Same as if a person is aborting their baby simply because they didn't want to use protection.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • aussiewolf

    just get the cat desexed.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Austalien

      Yeah cut their genetals off and microchip them derp to me that's worse then euthanizing them >.<

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • It’s wrong! Abortions should only be done with the consent of the mother, and even there it can be wrong.
    Dog mothers are unlike human mothers in that they never not want their baby. So aborting the pups would be wrong on all levels.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Sunshine:)

    Abortion is abortion, no matter who the victim. Common sense.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Moonbow

    There are millions of unwanted dogs and cats in the world that die of starvation, get run over in the street, or at the hands of sadists. Anything a person can do to prevent the birth of even more unwanted pets is a plus and for those who are too lazy or negligent to get their female pets spayed, that includes aborting unborn kittens and puppies. Anyone who is against aborting kittens and puppies is a sadist who gets off on seeing and thinking about animals starving ans suffering.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Why should they be aborted.Theres plenty of HOMELESS/POOR people always looking for something to EAT.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Ibelievethis

    I looked at the pictures of those gorgeous adorable little baby puppies and kitten and cried. After reading some of these comments I can't help but to wonder" How can anyone possibly think it's ok to abort these beautiful creatures". Surley an animals innocence makes people want to protect it. Baby animals are so trusting and uncorrupt and totally incapable of doing any harm to anyone or anything. I think by my commment you know my thoughts but for the record here goes in my opinion abortion of any creature animal or human is evil. xx

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Only cats, they're fucking monsters that torture other animals before killing them. ABORT THE SHIT OUT OF THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • trytoforgetthis

    Didn't take the time to read the other comments.

    Why not just spay/neuter the animal if you're going to want to suck the "baby" guts out of them either way? Unless there are difficulties in the pregnancy...then, yeah. I'm sure you'd rather save your pet over other circumstances.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • shade_ilmaendu

    I am pro choice, but the animal doesn't get a choice. You have to think about this from the pet's perspective. All they know is their babies were inside of them, healthy and safe. And all of a sudden they're gone. The animal doesn't understand why. A mother who has lost her child (for given most animals strong instinctive urge to reproduce this is what it would be for them) is in a badly irrational place.

    There was an article I found not too long ago about a family who had given their dog an abortion. The dog didn't know what had happened, was confused and all messed up for days, and ended up getting scared and biting someone and getting put down. :/

    You really shouldn't give an animal abortions same way you shouldn't give them drugs. They don't undetstand whats happened.

    *EDIT* Also, spay and neuter your pets, your friends pets, your pets pets! :D Haha seriously, stray populations are ridiculous anymore. Its becoming a problem in my town cause of the college Im guessing, people dumping off unfixed cats left and right.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • suckonthis9

      The animal (I'm assuming it's a mammal, although I hate to assume anything, for the usual reasons. Please correct me if I'm wrong.) does not have "babies" inside of them. They would have, if pregnant, either an embryo or a fetus at various stages of development. Please correct your terminology in future.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • shade_ilmaendu

        FETUSFETUSFETUSFETUSFETUSFETUSFETUSFETUSFETUSFETUSFETUS.

        ;P

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • NeuroNeptunian

    Ultimately it's all up to the human perspective, right? Animals are guided by instincts and probably wouldn't consent to such a procedure, whether or not it is necessary for their life. That's why it's up to us to make decisions for what is best for them. Just so long as the decision will be made with the well-being of the animal in mind, then I'd say it's a wise decision.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • suckonthis9

    Funny that you didn't include pro-abortion in your list.
    Yes, let's over-populate the world with not only people, but with stray animals as well.
    Maybe your grandchild could catch one of these strays, and at least they'll have a pet for company as they watch the end of life on Earth.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • sograceful

      Actually they did. Pro-abortion is commonly referred to as pro-choice.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • suckonthis9

        Incorrect. Pro-choice is a neutral. It could mean either that you are for or against abortion, or indifferent to abortion.
        Please also note that this poll is strongly biased in favour of an irrational anti-abortion stance.
        Please also note that the poster further confuses the issue by equating animal abortion with human abortion and declaring that it's wrong.
        Also, most animals can't choose whether they have an abortion or not.
        The poll choices should have simply been:
        I'm for animal abortion
        I'm against animal abortion
        I'm a total whack job, with a hidden agenda
        Other answer, I'll commment

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Icedangel11

          Nobody is out there sitting around for a pregnant animal to come around going 'OH YEH, LETZ ABORT SUM PUPPEHZ!11!!'

          ProCHOICE is just that. It's for the CHOICE of having an abortion if you see fit. It's not neutral or 'meh, it exists' its an active movement to give people the choice, if they want to take it. Pro LIFE is against having an abortion except in rare occasions (rape, for example). Both are human terms and do not apply to animals.

          Frankly, Pro-abortion would be a huge political cluster fuck as it would mean you are FOR abortions. Not just having a choice to get one, but actively pushing for everything to get an abortion. Could you see the campaign signs? Theres be like.. babies with X's through them or something.

          And also, since when are animals smart enough to make sentient choices such as whether or not to reproduce? Honestly, the stray bitch on the street barely surviving is not thinking 'I'm in heat, better stay to myself as I couldn't feed my puppies!' having a choice would entail the dogs to CHOOSE to get pregnant. Since they are instinct driven animals and cannot choose, this eliminates the 'choice' factor.

          And also, are you kidding me? Animals spontaneously abort ALL THE TIME. Have you ever TRIED breeding a horse? They can be pregnant and then just randomly have an abortion for no reason. Hell, I've seen a mare five months into her pregnancy just pop out a horse fetus. Perfectly healthy mare, not stressed, just poppin' out a fetus for no reason. Same thing happens in dogs, cats, an pretty much everything else. Though, in human terms we call it a 'miscarriage' because if people went around saying 'I had a spontaneous abortion.' people would crucify them.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • suckonthis9

            Let me make this perfectly clear; these so called pro-life people are fucked in the head. They are so short-sighted and narrow-minded that they are unable to see the consequences of their actions. Should they be allowed to continue with their bullshit agenda, it will be the end of ALL human life, and quite probably ALL life on Earth. This will happen sooner than you think, should we continue on the path we're on.
            Not only are these people against abortion, many are also against using contraception and many still advocate to reproduce prolifically in an already overpopulated world. Many are deluded into thinking that people will stay celibate until marriage, when anyone with a half a brain in their head, knows this doesn't happen. Another unplanned and unwanted pregnancy, hurry up and get married, because they taught their children that contraceptives and abortion is wrong.
            I grew up in a world that had half the number of people that there is today, and there was plenty of people around. More than enough. Where they get this idea that there aren't enough people is beyond me.We are currently adding about 75 million people to our population every year. That is far more people than in Mexico City, New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago metropolitan areas combined. Every person needs food, water and resources. We are currently using ALL the arable agricultural land on the planet. Our agriculture is heavily dependent on fossil fuels. The 'easy' oil is going to run out in about 40 years. Then what? Then we will have to use more coal and more natural gas to compensate. With an ever increasing population, these will soon be gone too. They will then use up all the biomass in only a couple of years. There will be wars, mass starvation and collapse of civilization. We need to turn this around, and quick. Keep in mind that if every female had only one child, starting today, global population would still increase for some time. Some people are deluded into believing that some 'miracle' technology will be developed. As far as I know, they are not making any more Earth.
            These pro-life idiots must get their unfounded idea that human life starts at the moment of conception out of their head. We must employ every strategy to reduce our population, including Universal contraception, family planning, delayed pregnancy and abortion if necessary.
            Again, I am pro-abortion, and if these pro-life idiots demonstrate, we should round them up, and send them to school, and teach them about overpopulation, sustainable development and the true nature of reproduction.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Icedangel11

              Oh, of course. I agree fully about Pro-lifers. I myself am Pro-choice. I more push for contraceptive use and pregnancy prevention measures.

              I know what you mean, but Pro-abortion movements wouldn't gain much support, if only because of the name. Pro-abortion implies that you want everyone to have abortions. Pro-choice sounds nicer.

              Have you looked at the PRegnancy crises center issue? These places pretend to be abortion clinics only to stress and lie to women about providing care and financial aid if they keep their babies.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
        • Exactly, pro-choice would cover all those possibilities. All it means is that you're open to abortion, maybe not for yourself but you don't tell others what to do, all the way up to wanting abortions for all. I don't see the point in breaking it down into tiny sub-categories.

          The poll isn't biased because I don't have any agenda, I merely wanted to get a basic grasp on how people feel about it, I'm not mailing it to the president or something to stop animal abortions. Simple curiosity, that's all. I included an 'Other' option if you weren't happy with the other choices.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • suckonthis9

            Not biased, really?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • sograceful

              Oh come on, calm your titties. It's an Internet poll, genius. Does it really matter whether or not it's biased?

              Comment Hidden ( show )