Is it normal for the holy to be sure of the truth w/o changing their faith?
You know how religious people are sure that their religion's truth in itself, the whole truth and it's backed up by saying either their religion's right or your religion's right, that they can't both be right. Well I'd like very much to think like Clunk42 and like in his defence of Catholicism think Protestantism/Puritanism is right against the Catholics like he's against the Protestants and Puritans and like Clunk42 I'd like to think everything is objective truth and argue with him, given that I know I'm right and he's wrong and I should stamp out sin and be the defender of sinlessness.
None of us has proven to one another through religion without any science, religion doesn't prove religion, it only gets attacked by even the minor differences. He's never asked me one question of what my puritanical life entails, not one, he makes the assumption that he knows my religion and how sinful it is, what a load of hogwash, if Catholicism really is the true church why was there a history of Catholics burning Protestants? Of course the Catholics will think they're right, that's because they had a history of bloody suppression of Protestants, sugarcoating it with virtues such as helping the needy, ordinary behaviour with commitment to Jesus Christ, they clean up all the holes in their faith and marginalise the Puritans as arseholes with a false morality, of course a belief being defended isn't going to open itself up to the truth of the faith, the Protestants know how wrong the Catholics are. Is any of this normal?