Is it normal i think is it normal should be changed to is it natural?

Ok so I know this may initiate a debate or cause arguements but Im not looking for that. Im simply refering to morals here. There are a lot of people in the world and on this site that have gotten there fundamental morals up side down. I have read and come across horrific things. Few to mention are; thinking incest is ok and/or acting upon it, homosexuality experimentation including the fact that it would be ok for incestuous homo relationships to develop eg- 2 brothers or sisters and last but not least Beastiality! These actions are way over the line and if you were to ask yourself - Is this natural ? Answer is No!! Of course its not but is it normal in todays fucked up society where they try to legalise everything and anything for the satisfaction of human immoral desires then the answer would be yeah .

Voting Results
40% Normal
Based on 20 votes (8 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 39 )
  • Avant-Garde

    Regardless of what word you use, it will all still be subjective.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Not entirely .

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 213

    OP is right ,posts like this are needed keep 'em comin'

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Im glad some one on this fucked site leans towards sustaining good principles :)

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • 213

        They will argue with you over and over but they know such things are not good for society ,.how about people atleast accept reality for once and refrain from staying from negativity

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Yeah and frankly im getting tired of BS remarks and pityfull attempts to try to make something that is not ok, okay… They will get defensive but its only cause deep down they know they are in the wrong like u said .

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • NeuroNeptunian

    I'm not going to read the post because not worth.
    I'm just throwing out there that it should be "Is it acceptable?" or "Is it ok?". I don't think relentlessly masturbating over the FB profile picture of a female classmate you had in the third grade because you two played doctor once on the playground and you're 24 now and that was the only true physical contact that a female has ever made with your penis is normal... but it's ok. I mean really, who's gonna find out?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Read above explanation.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Pika-girl

    Aren't they... similar? No point in changing it... It's just the name, anyway. Everything else is gonna be the same.

    In my opinion, incest and homo... You can love whoever you want. You have the right to. Okay, okay. It's not that I support them or disagree with them (but I do support homosexuality, although I'm not homo.), but I guess it is wrong at times. I remember hearing that incest is illegal... Is it? I'm not sure.

    But my main point is: People have the right to do whatever they want. They choose their own life and live it however they want.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • It certainly is Not the same. People have accepted anything and everything as acceptable and ok "to do" when its not. So a question such as ; IIN I wana fuk my mum or IIN I wana have sex with my dog is a pointless question on this site when u can guarantee its going to be voted as "normal". Despite the fact it goes against basic principles as well as being un natural. It might be normal in todays unjust society to fuk an animal but if u were to ask Is it natural? Of course two diferent species engaging in sex is NOT natural. We dont see a cat and a dog mating or a guinea pig and rabbit. Why ! Because its not natural .
      Sure you can love who u want BUT remember love is felt with the heart Not the genitals therefore you love your pet or mum but it doesnt involve the sexual act because its not right . Simply as that .

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Pika-girl

        I guess you could change the name of your posts, then, to "Is It Natural". No big deal. :)

        ...NAME IT WHATEVER YOU WANT~

        The site would still be IINormal, but the titles would be IINatural. BOOM! Problem solved.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • howaminotmyself

    Morals are not based on what is natural. Storms are natural but there is nothing moral or immoral about natural disasters.

    You cannot simply refer to morals as if they are the same for everyone.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • They are based on that actually- Read my above explanation. Also attempting to compare it to natural disasters is not only stupid but very irrelevant.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • howaminotmyself

        No no no no no no no. You explained nothing. Morals are not based on what is natural. Nor are they based on what is normal as if the two are the same thing. This gets the organic marketing into trouble. Organic may be natural but does not mean better or good. Ignorance is frustrating. (Does that analogy fit into your head better?)

        Morals are based on what society deems as proper behavior for the advancement of society. It is subjective in nature. Always has been, always will be. Note, it does not mean nature, but has a nature.

        And why would you use this site as a beacon for what is actually normal/common? Just because someone posted it, does not mean they are telling the truth. And just because people aren't ganging up on them and chastising those trolls, doesn't mean we have no principles. Look up morals again. Because that isn't the sign if a person with decent morals.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • b
          You cant use that analagy since organic food has absolutely nothing to do with sexuality. Its like trying to compare chalk and cheese.
          You are in fact the ignorant one as you certainly have no idea of the difference between natural and normal. It may be normal to want to engage in sexual activity with an animal for instance but that is Not morally acceptable nor just. It is a corruption of societies morals. If it were natural then ud be actively seeing animals cross breeding with each other. And the very few that do, do it out of pure innocence or ignorance as they do not acquire the perception us humans are supposed to obtain.
          The posts and comments are certainly an indication of peoples low standards. I never said I wanted the perpetrators slandered to pieces but a mere reflection in words of its wrong doing would be good .

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • howaminotmyself

            Wow. Take a course in philosophy or comparative religion. You are clueless and shouldn't engage in this debate that is clearly out of your depth.

            And maybe a science course to learn what natural means.

            Or perhaps a dictionary.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • I can tell that your reaction is feigned and that you have run out of feeble ideas. No one who speaks truth and reflects notorious behaviour requires any sort of written text or even a decent IQ for the matter. You are the one clearly out of your depths as absolutely nothing you say to try back up condoning such immorality will come any where close to the truth.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

    that shits gonna happen whether yall likes it or not

    its happened all around the world past & future and is happenin right now to boot, its a reflection of humanity as a whole

    seems like the peoples like yall whatre tryin to tell everyone else to live by theys big ole fancy moral codes are always the first ones to git caught breakin em

    them incest and dawgfucker posts git knocked down pretty quick and usually git mocked to death beforehand

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ArmusWasTheFirstTroll

    I stopped at the first incorrect point. What is morally wrong about incest? Given, of course, that all involved are consenting adults and that they don't intend to bare children.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Wow if you have not figured out why and asuming your older than 12 then I actually am apalled.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • ArmusWasTheFirstTroll

        Wow, your comment added nothing to the discussion. How about giving an argument?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • No point in arguing with someone that basically cant tell black from white.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • ArmusWasTheFirstTroll

            Excuses . . .

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • reminiscent

    The only thing you mentioned that is both normal and natural is homosexuality.
    like seriously?... are you seriously going to compare it to a sister and brother having sex???

    And if you notice on all the other things you mentioned they end up getting voted as not normal.

    You might have said you did not want an agument but you knew you would get one by including homosexuality in your list. So apparently you did want one...debate it with me then...you will loose.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Can 2 men have sex and one of them become pregnant? Answer is a definite no. Can 2 females have sex and get pregnant ? NO! Do you see animals fucking each other in the ass ? No- All because its un natural for one to engage in such an activity. If everyone in the word turned homosexual the human race would become extinct. I do not have anything against gay couples , im just trying to point out something that people seem to be obscurred to.
      You are incorrect on the fact that my above statements are voted not normal. Iv seen alot of posts that majority of people condone it such as beastiality that was voted 80 percent normal -_-
      I did not ask for a debate, can you see an words in my post that say " I want a debate "? No! Unless u cant read or have dyslexia. You can fight/argue all u want- It Will NEVER change the facts that the human race is injust in so many areas especially sexual means.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • reminiscent

        ...
        Homosexuality can be found in many animal species. .. if its found in nature its natural.

        If no one was gay we would have even more people on this planet.
        Isnt it nice that there can be a nice couple that can adopt a child? I think thats nice and very helpful to humanity.

        Thing is your scenario is never going to happen ...nether is no one being gay... its like saying well if everyone on the planet turned into dolphins then humans would go extinct. .. true but highly unlikely and a bit silly.

        The thing is about not wanting a debate... is your choice of topic and thefact that your posting your opinion... you know people are going to debate with you... dont post at all if you truly dont want a debate.

        I have personally only seen incest and bestiality get down voted. That or its some people trolling.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • No its not- Not unless its accidental therefore its Not natural.
          And we can quit arguing about arguing since that is not the point of my post.
          Sure gay couples help keep the population at bay but my point on it not being right still stands.
          Im not too sure if they r trolling on the latter two- Seems not az there are numerous comments usually supporting the post. I hope they are though.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • reminiscent

            Ummm... I hate to break it to you but just to list a few ...rams, lions, and Penguins...are three animals who practice homosexuality.
            you can google for more information...by it can be found in many species ...and there for is natural.
            just because you personally find it icky doesnt meen its not natural.
            Accidental would be if it happened once or twice...like a coincidence. .. but no it happens offten.

            No one is trolling you about gays... its a real thing. Not sure why you think it would be a troll.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • They dont practise it. They dont think ! They are not capable of a conscience unlike homosapiens. Sure it can occur in nature out of pure innocence due to lacking the ability to decide whether its the right sex or not. They are animals! Clearly im sure u know we are meant to sustain a higher level of understanding right from wrong since we are meant to be able to discern this.
              I also was targeting alot of other issues too and this is not the main one of my concerns. Like I said - im not against homoness. Its just not nesessarily right.

              Comment Hidden ( show )