Is it normal to act strange?

To be extraordinary, I find this common in weirdos. 'Normal' adj. following an established norm, rule or principle. 'Norm' n. the achievements of a social group. In other words, is weirdness a social thing or is it denying society? I don't think rejecting the standards of society (asocial) is the same thing as acting weird. Lots of individuals are extraordinary, I'm thinking rare, unique, distinctive and a king-loving freak. I've noticed saints have extraordinary virtue, but are saints normal people? I'm struggling to be as good as that, but I don't think agnostics are saints. This is strange I suppose, but I've noticed the uncommon, they tend to attract notice, stand out from the crowd, is this normal when compared to inventing your own non-conformist style? Then there's rum, meaning strange and queer, which is unusual because I never met a rum person. Yet they never get drunk. People call me weird, but I'm not weird, I'm a freak. So to be different other than weird, would you class that as normal?