Is it normal to learn from novels from a teacher?

Alain de Botton wrote the book "On Love" and it taught me that a woman doesn't want a man to be too nice, but either likes a helpful man who's macho and acts like a stud, or one who mistreats her, but not a too perfect man with silence of words and loving her every move, she wants you to do things. If you have one in 5,840.62 chance of meeting up with that women, then chances are you will, months later, see her again, in a blind date where no sex happens, except perhaps a kiss, a flirt and a touch. I found out that you should take the woman to the art gallery to find out the symbolism between the mythological paintings, like that of Cupid's arrows being taken away from him by his mother, which perhaps symbolises that his submission was taken away from him, or that bees will sting Cupid who tried to steal the honey, I think that means if you steal a wife from a man you will get hurt. You need to look for clues, find out what the woman likes, it's not as simple as asking her a series of questions, you need to find out if she's lying. You can't be genuine in a relationship, when previously I thought the whole thing would merge sex with love, I don't think love has anything to do with it, I think it's about being a hunk, muscular, well-built, and strong, that will win a woman's heart (heart for sex), and not the other way around, it's complicated, but these are hints in seducing women. Is that normal?

Voting Results
0% Normal
Based on 1 vote (0 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 9 )
  • SmokeEverything

    Thhis is really long and boring. Don't learn from teachers. Drop out of school as soon as possible and learn from the world.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      It's already done, the teacher is an author, and back in school I am, learning philosophy (on the internet), it's all about having the skills to work, that's what learning is for, but with the books teachers give you, it's about life. As soon as I've done my philosophy course I'll drop out of there and learn what's normal as opposed to those idiots who have a disability (which I've been introduced to all my life), I'm antidisabled: that is I escape disability, try to live normal, and choose ability.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • SmokeEverything

        Learning is not about having the skills to work. Open your mind friend, there's a whole world out there that we know nothing about outside of the indoctrination the school system throws at us. You think you're learning and really you're becoming more and more brainwashed with fake history and bland repetitive memorization of facts. You think reality exists so that humans have a place to go to work?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Hansberger

          Things are put there for the key reasons: you learn to work, you read to learn about life, religion's put there to control you, ideologies are put there to support a government or system, atheism's put there to make you look smart and to tell the truth, Buddhism's put there to start a whole new culture and live an honest life, axiological atheism's put there to avoid obeying God. They're not there for any abstract purpose but a very concrete one.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • SmokeEverything

            Exactly. You go to school to indoctrinate you and get you used to getting up early and putting in 8 or so hours into boring unrewarding tasks that you don't want to do. It's brainwashing you into becoming a part of a machine and leaving you thinking there's no other options or ways of living. Atheism is scientism, they worship the teachings of scientists and schools and other "wise men" who are really nothing different from religious authorities. They don't teach you how to hunt, fish, treat injuries, etc, it's just fake history and made up scientific theories. I agree with you that it's all there for a concrete purpose, but life doesn't have a concrete purpose. A cloud has no purpose and neither do we.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Hansberger

              Brilliant, then you'll agree that if I want to be a philosopher going to school 3 times a week to teach I want to be brainwashed into supporting a machine, as my other post clearly depicts my support for industry.

              Comment Hidden ( show )