Is it normal to literally act normal?

I think it's literally normal to do all that's normal, whether good, bad, evil, great, or indifferent, what's you're opinion? No longer am I having a strange or extraordinary character (weird), or any form of it, except slightly unusual, relatively normal and nothing strange or quirky (the two s and q words imply that you're more than slightly unusual). I go for adventure, that's natural (simple, basic and essential) for me whether I'm normal or not. It's regular and typical if not usual, I mean, without strong individuality, true to my type, happening routinely, it's customary, I mean based on tradition, e.g. magick, adventure (or adventure wannabe), old radios, old music, conservative, it's long established. Furthermore, what I do is part of a rule, it's part of my standards of selfishness, as most people are either of two extremes: selfish or selfless, so I'm a regular person. Furthermore I do science the regular way, it's according to its rule, e.g. the scientific method, it's systematic, to do with symbolising and formalising, it's a report on the theories of the natural things, it's intended to explain in the form of a story, the nature of something, based on its classifying things as its names or its structures, it's often to do with classification, as my science says cetaceans aren't mammals nor fish (using scientific rules) because they don't suckle their young, and that they're of the class and clade cetacea, I furthered the science to include that they're of the order artiodactyla and the suborder whippomorpha, and that cetacea can't be an infraorder but a class since mammals and cetaceans are of a different group, mankind has confused cetaceans with another group for too long, and now I discovered it's a separate group, it's orderly methods. Therefore classifying is science. This to me is regular, it follows a rule. And my science is physical, so it's typical. Therefore I'm normal, what do you think?