Is it normal to prefer women without tattoos?

It's not just females, I prefer both male and female with little or no tats.

I agree, especially females keeping the canvas clean or no more than 1 or 2 small discreetly placed tats looks more appealing.
For guys i do have a different standard. A couple tats, maybe on biceps or lower arm, even maybe a lower leg tat, but no sleeves, face, neck or full body type tats. You like art that much, pay to have it painted and hang it on a wall.

Again just a personal preference and we all have them. I do have a reason for my different standards besides just mpo.

Formal fashion, when males get dressed up they cover up more. The neck, face, and hands, are about all that shows.
Female; the more formal we dress it seems the less we cover. Low cut in back and front, the more leg or higher the split the better. Even open toe or barely there shoes, just strap a heel to the back of your foot and you're good. A cum here tat does not really look appealing (mpo) at a formal event.

I agree for the most part. Ican’t stand to see a beautiful body marred with hideous drawings. But I have seen a tasteful butterfly etc on a girl’s thigh or arm. It looks cute.

Normal.

I want to gey a tattoo of my late Siamese cat on my arm.

It's normal, we all choose what we require for a woman.

Thats why when I watch porn its usually russia porn. They're almost always clean skin and younger. It just looks cleaner.

Why do women get tattoos? Surely because they like them.

Seriously, how is this even a question?

Thanks that's reassuring!