Moon landing. fake or real?

Adam ruins everything also shouldnt be taken as being the arbiter of truth either.

That being said I 100% know the moon landing happened. How? A shit ton of math.

can i use the laser to cut trees down in my yard too cause it seems like a bit of a one use investment that might not have much return

theres not too much call for $100k high power lasers on craigslist here

That was a good idea to leave those there.

But the moon is still useful. Controlling the tides. And acting like a perimeter defense system against wandering space crap.

So your argument is because we sent a robot on mars in the current day, it must have been impossible to land on the moon in 69? Weird argument.

But the soviets agreed we landed on the moon. They had every single reason to say we didnt... unless we actually made it first.

You care enough to post a comment.😄

In general not true. But, I do believe there was one mission where the astronauts on that mission lived noticeably shorter lives due to space radiation.

There was another crew that just due to luck escaped becoming "walking dead men" on the return trip to earth as there was a significant solar flare that ejected a lot of material towards earth that hit something like 14 hours after splashdown.

Had that occurred while they were out of low earth orbit the radiation would have caused so much damage to the astronauts that they would have died within a week or so.

All the talk by Musk and others about a manned mission to Mars is pure hokum at this point because of the deep space radiation issues - especially during solar flares.

It would take a truly massive spacecraft to contain enough mass to protect the crew and most crew occupied spaces (to prevent things from becoming radioactive - and then having those things transported around the crew areas). Typical estimates is for it to contain the crew, command/control center, and normal work areas inside a vessel that holds 10 ft of water or water ice, or something like 15 ft of polyethylene plastic on all sides (the masses are about the same between these two options).

People theorize about some kind of Star Trek force field that will stop the radiation... but, no one has any idea's of how to build one that works against different kinds of radiation. So we are left with simple mass of a kind that's good at radiation shielding.

The Apollo moon missions were very very and very expensive. Once we did it, and did a number of science missions the excitement of achieving the goal wore off and people started looking at the cost versus the payback. The last several moon missions were canceled.

Starting about a decade ago it was decided that a return trip and the establishing of a permanent base on the moon as a prelude to a Mars mission would be worth it (despite the cost) - so expect us to be back on the moon in another 5 years (if not sooner).

Because it's unnecessary but there is talk of them going back