Obligated to know what youre talking about
If someone makes a bold claim but when you question them for details out of curiousity, they tell you to read a certain book they read or give you a youtube video. Shouldnt you be kind of obligated to know what you're talking about if you make a claim? Like you should be able to explain it yourself. If you are so sure of something shouldnt you be able to explain it in detail? Otherwise it looks like you dont understand it well and could be wrong. Its not good to have strong opinions on things you dont know enough about to explain.
Yes | 3 | |
No | 6 |