Should religion be taught in public schools?

It should be mandatory! It should consist of a few major religions that have a strong impact in the world. The more young students learn about the world, the more they will understand why certain things happen. Most people of the high school age or younger only have knowledge of their own religion, or none at all. If religion is made mandatory in public schools, students will have access to the knowledge of religions beyond their own.

In college I was offered a religion course and there was no preaching or any bias towards any religion. As long as the teacher/professor keeps their own beliefs separate from the lecture, the class will be completely informational.

There is along history of Christianity, 2000 years that has changed the course of history. Unbiased instruction on all religions should be discussed. There are almost 7 billion people on this earth. Twenty years ago 6 billion. Forty years ago 4 billion. Fifty years ago over 3 billion. Seventy five per cent of these people believe there is a god. One hundred years ago there was nearly a billion people alive. They have all died by now. Just in the last 100 years there have been 10 billion people on this earth. Seven and a half billion have believed there was a god. Why should we ignore those numbers in our schools?

yes 18
no 25
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 46 )
  • VinnyB

    In a private school they can teach whatever they want. In a public school, in a country with religious freedom, I don't want the government to determine that one religion is more important than another and so the belief system of this religion should be taught but the believe system of this other religion should not. Look at how many denominations of Christianity there are, Christians don't even fully agree what Christians believe, you expect the government to figure it out?

    The existence of religion and it's roll in history should be taught and already is. Things like the how Egyptian society was built around the idea that the Pahroah was a living god, the role the Catholic Church played in the Europe, the Crusades, the effect that the rise of Protestantism had on society and politics, the role religion played in World War II, I can go on and on.

    All of that is history, it is found in schools currently, it belongs in schools, and is the extent to which religion belongs in school. The belief systems of the religions that the government deems most worthy do not belong there.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Ellenna

      I totally agree with all that, Vinny. In Australia public schools have been infiltrated by a very conservative fundamentalist christian organisation which has been exposed on a number of occasions for teaching sexist and homophobic views, but it's still there, brainwashing away at every opportunity.

      This should not be paid for out of public taxes! If parents want their children taught a particular religion's moral values they can either send their kids to a private school and/or pass on their religion at home and in their churches.

      History as affected by religions is a different matter and should be taught in the same way as the effects on history of political and social movements.

      I also believe the religious content of home schooling should be monitored by the education department: I once had a brief cleaning job for a family who were homeschooling and I couldn't help overhearing the conservative bullshit that was being pumped into these little kids, it made my stomach turn. Every subject on the curriculum seemed to be riddled through with fundamentalist dogma.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • anti-hero

    If it is optional like art, music, drama...

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Short4Words

      I agree. I don't think faith teaching should be mandatory yet it should also not be completely forgotten.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • NeofelisNebulosa

    It should be taught as a cultural class, but not as "truth." Because most religions are not compatible... If one is true, the others cannot be. The only way to be fair would be to treat them all impartially and just discuss the historical impact they have had on the earth.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Pseodonihm

    Make them aware of the choices. Yes. Make them choose. NO!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ArmusWasTheFirstTroll

    Classes about religion? Sure.

    Religious classes? Nope.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • modernism

    I completely agree. There's no harm in unbiasedly enlightening people on the different religions or lack of beliefs. It's a wonderful idea to show what differing religions actually believe in instead of leaving students to buy into whatever they happen to hear about religions other than their own.

    I think it should be mandatory. These are the kind of things you should know if you're going to be living in the real world.

    I can't find an issue with it, and I think it's a great idea.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Arm0se

    It is taught, from a historical standpoint, not from a religious one. How can you talk about the Romans and not mention Jesus? How can you talk about China without ancestor veneration?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Unimportant

    People certainly shouldn't be taught religion. Being taught ABOUT religion - that sounds like a reasonable idea.

    As long as the majority of people remains ignorant, pupils might as well learn about it in school.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Ellenna

      Good distinction, Unimportant, I fully agree, but it does depend on who's doing the teaching. Religious bigots will inevitably try and influence their pupils and should be carefully watched

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Unimportant

        Absolutely. I think that overly pious people as teachers is generally a bad idea.

        Actually, I think being overly pious is already a bad idea itself.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Ellenna

          Have grown up with excessive hypocritical piety, even the tiniest smidgeon triggers off my bullshit detector every time and that includes newage piety

          Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Pseodonihm

      Well said.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • thegypsysailor

    Absolutely NOT!
    Again, I will say it; religion is the greatest sin of mankind. More people have been slaughtered horribly in the name of one gawd or another than for any other reason.
    Religion is the true evil and should be wiped from the minds of man.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Did half those people deserve to live in the first place?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • thegypsysailor

        Why not?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • God had a plan and reason for each of them to die. If the clergy condemned them to die then it must have been for a justified reason.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • thegypsysailor

            So your gawd had a plan that his representatives (clergy) should be pedophiles and destroy the lives of so many children, if you follow THAT way of thinking?
            That way leads to insanity, my friend. THINK!

            Comment Hidden ( show )
          • slings_and_arrows

            So when a schoolgirl is walking home from school and gets bundled into a car and raped and murdered...that's just part of God's mysterious plan?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Its sad but yes god works dose everything for a reason. While it may be hard at the time it will do great things future.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
          • Ellenna

            Does that apply to all clergy? How about the muslim clergy who believe in the same god as christians and jews and perpetrate barbarities in the name of religion?

            They believe death by stoning is god's will too

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • yes god would not have made the clergy if he did not know that they would spread his will here on earth!

              Comment Hidden ( show )
          • Couman

            Ir's now obvious you're just trolling. Get back under your bridge.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • green_boogers

    Nope, not in public schools. It will never remain a secular survey of religious culture. Religious groups will try to infiltrate the course material to demonize competing religions.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Arm0se

    Yes, from a historical standpoint, not a religious one.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • NyanStrike

    Well, they should be taught about many religions and beliefs and what atheism is so they can form their own opinions but it shouldn't be like a graded subject so kids have a bit more freedom here

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • gestroido

    WTF**king man

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • mystery7

    Of course students should be taught about world religions, to do otherwise is absurd. They may as well bury their heads in the sand for what it's worth.

    Following a certain spiritual path is a personal choice.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Holzman_67

    No I'm generally against any form of brainwashing. People will discover religion if they need it in their lives.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • theseeker

    No, religion shouldn't be taught, but I will say religions share a general message. It doesn't matter where the message is coming from. The important thing is understanding the message, which should be taught.

    If you look closely religion has too many flaws. Getting into the specifics of different religions is definitely a bad idea. It fucks with your mind because I've learned each religion has its own biases.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • howaminotmyself

    My 7th grade history class taught me about religion. We learned about the big 5, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Islam. And a little bit of Paganism too.

    This was a public school in California. My nephews are in public school in a different state and learning about the two Buddhas. Seems pretty standard to me. Sorry you went to a crappy school.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Springfurmich

    yes. there should be and there is, a subject called religion studies, in plenty of countries.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Mytwin295

    I remember in highschool we had a cultural unit in my world studies class where we looked at hinduism budism and islam in relation to books that we were reading... I think it should be manditory to have the class but opitional to take it.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ______________

    I agree, OP. To want to go into a world where over 30 percent of people are Christian without a basic understanding of what they're about sounds silly. And equally, I was also taught the religion of atheism in my school and have a good grasp of what big bang atheists are about.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Ellenna

      Atheism is not a religion! How can it be when the term itself means a lack of belief in the existence of a god or gods?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • ______________

        The lack of belief in God/Gods is the same as the belief in the lack of God/Gods.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Ellenna

          Still doesn't make it a religion

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • ______________

            It does, under the vast majority of the definitions of 'religion'. Not to mention that a lot of the time atheists act similarly to other religions like Christianity.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Ellenna

              I don't care what definitions you're looking at, I'm going by the MEANING of the word or has the world finally become like Alice's Wonderland where words mean whatever anyone wants them to mean?

              Atheism is about belief, not behavior. Humans act like humans whether they're religious or atheistic.

              Comment Hidden ( show )