The christian anti gay thing is dumb

Christians are notoriously homophobic and try really hard to cause suffering for gay people by lobbying governments etc to legislate for inequality. But it’s really weird because if Christians don’t want gay people to be gay what they are saying is that gay people must be straight. But if gay people turned straight would they be happy if gay people married their daughters? I doubt it. If I had a daughter there is no way I would want her to marry an ex gay guy because I know that marriage will end and cause my daughter a lot of grief at some point when he can no longer resist going back to dick. Also if gay people can just turn straight then what they are saying is that straight people could just as easily turn gay which is absolutely ridiculous. If you’re truly straight you know that what you like. If you’re a man you like pussy. You have no desire to suck a dick. If you did then you’d be bi or a closeted homo. The same goes for gay men. Gay men like dick, they have no desire to eat pussy or play with tits. It’s gross to them.

Voting Results
75% Normal
Based on 16 votes (12 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 73 )
  • oceanandsea

    Being gay isnt normal

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      Yep if it's not in 90% of the population its not normal. That being said its numbers are a natural occurance. Also who gives a fuck anymore.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • mouldiwarp

      You’re 11 years old, why are you on this website??

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • SmokeEverything

    As far as I understand being gay is only bad biblically because literally any sex that wasnt being done for the purpose of reproduction was bad. Technically pulling out to avoid pregnancy is a sin.

    The reasoning behind this would seem to be that if you want to raise a large army you want to have as many babies as possible. People don't think about the reasons why these dumb rules were created in the first place, and who was benefitting from them. The priests got to eat the meat of sacrificed animals too, so yeah again, who is benefitting from making these rules?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Clunk42

    As a "notoriously homophobic Christian," I'd prefer if you acted more as an asexual. The purpose is not to cause strife; rather, it's to prevent strife. Your actions will matter when the time of judgement comes.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • So in other words you expect anyone who does not comply with your moral code and ideology to be celibate. Can you not see how ridiculous that is? Who the hell are you to control the consensual sex lives of grown adults? Didn’t Jesus say not to judge? Then how is it so many Christians take it upon themselves to judge others? Also about this “time of judgement”, firstly it only matters to you because you believe such a bunch of crap with zero evidence except some book written not by “god” but by flawed ancient humans over 2000 years ago. Newsflash - times have changed. Women are no longer chattel and you’re allowed to eat shellfish so maybe quit cherry-picking to validate your distorted and superstitious belief system. Second if there is going to be any judgment it’s going to on the insecure hypocritical people who go around thinking it’s up to them to judge and control other people and thereby causing much suffering and harm. God is just going to stop you all at the gates and declare “ I told you all not to fucking judge, you FAILED, bye” Why is it so many of your priests and pastors turn out to be such perverts? The Roman Catholic Church has been exposed as nothing more than a pedophile cult. If anyone needs to change it’s Christians.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Clunk42

        I prefer it, not expect it. I know many people because this world is a world filled with sin. I have no control of the lives of other adults; that's what governments are for. Technically, Jesus said this:

        "[1] Judge not, that you may not be judged, [2] For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged: and with what measure you mete, it shall be measured to you again. [3] And why seest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye; and seest not the beam that is in thy own eye? [4] Or how sayest thou to thy brother: Let me cast the mote out of thy eye; and behold a beam is in thy own eye? [5] Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam in thy own eye, and then shalt thou see to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye." - Matthew 7:1-5

        Confession and repentence are our ways of "cast[ing] out first the beam in [our] own eye[s]." Your beliefs have no evidence, either. Prove your beliefs to be true; you can't. No beliefs can be proven true until the day of judgement. The Bible never claims women to be "chattel", in fact, Paul says to treat them with respect, so your is nonsense. Jesus himself said that we are allowed to eat shellfish. What matters in the end are the intentions of the action taken, not the action itself. The pedophilia problem was a real thing that was adressed by the church. It's pretty much gone, now.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
    • charli.m

      And as a straight, ex Christian non bigot, I think it's none of your or my business what other people do so long as it isn't harmful to others.

      Why do you think you, as a Christian, get to dictate what the morals of the entire of the world are? (Hint: "cos the Bible" is not a reasonable answer.)

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • LloydAsher

        As a straight, ex Lutheran non bigot but definitely chauvinist, I agree it's no ones buisness who you preach for. But is throwing internet tomatoes really going to change anything? Besides a pultry feel good because you downvoted at them?

        Let them say their peace. Sure being an asshole isnt nice but bitching about it isnt gonna make them go away, heck some are masochists.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          I'm ex-Lutheran, too. I realized that those guys have no clue what they're talking about, contradict themselves constantly, and don't even have consistent beliefs about the main point of their church. They say that you are saved "through faith alone," but can never agree upon what that actually means.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
        • charli.m

          Big assumptions there, sweet cheeks.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
      • Clunk42

        Gay marriage is harmful to others. It harms the two participants, those who came to the wedding, and the person who oversaw the wedding.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Gay people getting married doesn't invalidate anyone else's marriage

          Homosexuality also reduces competition for mates

          I believe people should be able to have some sense of sovereignty over their lives

          Thinking ill of someone because you believe they'll be punished is a presupposition leading to dogma, the true work of the devil

          Is it not so that no one could understand god, see him or hear him? And has his societal implications not changed drastically over the centuries? Shouldn't he who has not sinned cast the first stone? Are people not made in his image?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Clunk42

            While that is correct, it is completely unimportant.
            That is also completely unimportant.
            There's this thing called "free will," and people use it all the time.
            "Thinking ill" is an excessively harsh phrase.
            That does not prevent God's word from being important. As Revelation says, things have changed and will continue to change for the worse. The context of Bible verses can be quite important; that verse is referring to the death penalty for adultery, and Jesus is saying that none of the people there have done little enough sin to be able to punish a person of meager sin. I don't agree with murdering homosexuals, so the verse does not relate. People are made in God's image, but, unlike God, people are slaves to sin.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • I think publicly/vocally criticizing someone is still casting a stone? You know in my mind I always imagine a crowd full of people dropping their rocks and accept whoever it was they were about to stone

              Comment Hidden ( show )
        • Hiva

          Um no. The only thing that’s harmful are your bigoted opinions.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Clunk42

            What's bigoted about them?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
        • charli.m

          It really doesn't. That's...pathetic, even for you.

          "Cos the Bible" is not a valid point to people who do not believe in the Bible.

          Aren't you claiming to be a constitutionalist? What about separation of church and state?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Clunk42

            Arguing that one should be able to marry someone of the same gender also harms others by normalizing sin.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • charli.m

              What part of "cos the bible" is irrelevant are you not able to understand?

              You don't get to force your belief system on people while simultaneously whining that other religions are trying to force them on you. Hence, bigot.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
            • Hiva

              Haha absolutely agree with Charli. The bible and sin are not relevant or valid points to non believers.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Hie_Thee_Hence

    I'm an atheist, and I agree with you. I would point out, though, that being gay will get you arrested, convicted, and executed in some Muslim countries. I don't understand why so many people focus on Christians and give Muslims a pass.

    Comment Hidden ( show )