To the swedish guy who doesn't care about ukraine:

Earlier today, a member posted a comment saying they didn't care about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and they didn't understand why so many people are upset about it. They also stated that they agreed with Sweden having no official position on this aggression, due to their policy of neutrality. I can't see that thread anymore, so I guess they've deleted it and slunk off to their sauna to down a few aquavits and sulk about how nasty internet people can be.

I've just noticed that a few hours ago, a Russian foreign ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, warned both Finland and Sweden that they will face “detrimental military and political consequences” if they ever attempt to join Nato.

So, basically, even if a referendum of Swedes resulted in a 99% vote for Nato membership, the Swedish government would know that making any move in that direction would result in Russia being pissed off and possibly making military moves against your country, so it most likely wouldn't happen.

Now ask yourself, just how free is anyone if they're able to do anything they want - as long as the neighbourhood psycho gangster isn't annoyed by it? Just how much independence and self-determination does a country have if it's foreign policy is constrained by fears about the reaction of a bigger and more powerful neighbour?

Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 21 )
  • MonteMetcalfe

    I think it's the people of Ukraine's choice of how they want their government run, not Vladimir Putin's.

    It's like telling a woman (who can't stand you)she is your girlfriend, raping her, then telling her she'll learn to love you because you know what's best for her. You're a couple whether she likes it or not.

    It's insanity.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Boojum

      It's funny, but KholatKhult's ridiculous "tough love" reference popped into my head while I was getting up this morning. Given what I know about his life, I actually found him even using that phrase disturbing.

      I'm still having my first coffee of the day, so my brain isn't fully in gear, but I've been trying to think of a personal relationship analogy that at least sorta works for what's going on with Ukraine and Russia. This is the best I can do:

      Ukraine is like a woman who decided that she wanted to be free of a couple of powerful men who had controlled and screwed her for a very long time, and external events happening to those guys allowed her to finally tell them to fuck off and leave her alone (Ukrainian People's Republic, 1917). The most powerful man decided he wouldn't accept that, and he physically coerced her into marrying him (the 1917–21 Soviet–Ukrainian War).

      In the early years of the marriage, there was some serious abuse (7 million Ukrainians dead in a famine deliberately created by Stalin, 1932-33), but the man calmed down a bit as time passed. He still kept taking from her pretty much whatever he wanted, but he started paying some attention to her needs and giving her gifts, and she learned to accept that there was no chance of her ever getting a divorce.

      As is often the case in such relationships, there was a lot of emotional abuse and manipulation going on, and she eventually came to believe that he wasn't _really_ all that bad. Eventually, she began to believe that she needed him controlling her life. Of course, all the time, she was still the much weaker member of the marriage, and she had no option but to get fucked by him whenever he wanted it.

      Then, all of a sudden, something dramatic happened. The guy took stock of his life, looked around at how his neighbours were doing, and realised that the ideology that had guided all his decisions simply didn't work in the real world. His mansion looked really impressive from the outside, but the foundations were sinking, the walls were full of rot, the toilets didn't work so shit kept piling up and he couldn't afford the maintenance it needed. In fact, when he checked his bank balance, he realised that he was all but bankrupt because of all the really stupid decisions he'd made over the years. His sociopath-level self-confidence took a battering, and everyone suddenly saw that he wasn't actually as big and bad as he once was.

      The guy also realised he wasn't even as physically strong as he once was; he still had a howitzer in his back yard he could use if any of his neighbours ever really pissed him off, but that wasn't much use in the arguments he was having with all the women he'd forced into marriage and his coerced mistresses when they said they couldn't see any reason to stick with him.

      Almost all the women that the guy had forced to marry him or be his mistresses dump him, Ukraine included.

      The guy goes off and sulks for a while, then he starts make some changes to the rules he lives by. His life gets a bit better, and he starts to really hanker for the good old days (well, good for _him_, anyway) when everyone in town saw him as a real man, listened carefully to what he said and feared what he'd do if they annoyed him.

      By now, most of his former mistresses have been in touch with the cops, and they've installed abuse panic alarms. That annoys him because it will make it more difficult for him to rape them if he ever wants to do that one day, but he has other, much bigger and more urgent problems to sort out in his crumbling mansion, so he lets it go. A few of his ex-wives have got those alarms too, but they were only side-hoes and never gave him much satisfaction anyway, so he lets that slide too.

      After a while, he gets things more or less sorted out at home, and he starts to believe that he's really got a handle on life now. Then he starts to brood about all those those women who installed abuse alarms. He decides that, by doing that, they were disrespecting him. In fact, the more he thinks about it, the more he believes that, really, those women are threatening him. They must have installed the alarms so they could call in the cops for reinforcements when they attack him, and that's exactly what they're secretly plotting to do some day. And then the idea takes root that it's actually the _cops_ who are planning to attack him, and they're just using the women as cover.

      Then, when one of his very first ex-forced wives decides that she really wants to talk to the cops about one of those alarms because he's been stalking her, sending her threatening messages on social media, and doing his best to screw up her life in various ways, he seethes with anger. She needs to be taught a lesson she won't forget. She needs to be made to see that her life only has meaning when she's with him. All of his former wives and mistresses need to see that he is indeed really a man again, and they should never, ever even think of messing with him.

      They all need a hefty dose of tough love. If that love needs to be delivered in the form of bombs and bullets, well, it's not his fault that the women are too stupid to understand what they need and how things would be better all around if he was in charge of their lives again.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Boojum

    It's pretty damn obvious that Putin does not consider NATO a joke.

    And, yeah, I'm sure the Ukrainians are all feeling very safe today.

    Ukraine does indeed have a problem with corruption, but do you honestly believe that Russia has many positive lessons to teach anyone on that point?

    I fully accept that ordinary Russians aren't maniacs; you, for example, have always struck me as a fundamentally decent, rational person. However, have you had a close look at your tsar recently?

    The general consensus amongst foreign leaders who have had contact with Putin over the years was that he was a fundamentally rational person, although his goals and means to achieve them could be highly dubious by the standards of modern liberal democracies.

    But something has gone very wrong with the dude. Maybe it's a demonstration of the cliché about power corrupting, and absolute power corrupting absolutely. Maybe it's the fact that, after more than two decades in power, Putin has come to believe that he knows everything and can do no wrong (remind you of another recently ex-national leader?). Maybe Covid-nuttiness has wormed it's way into his brain like it has for many others. What else explains his bizarre habit of keeping a five metre long desk between him and visiting statesmen? What else explains him toasting official visitors from twenty metres away? What else explains the bizarre videoed cabinet meeting (or was it an interrogation?) held in a vast rotunda of the Kremlin?

    Or maybe he's just been sucked down the rabbit hole of Russian nationalism, he's lost in the delusion that the USSR was the pinnacle of human achievement, and he's determined that he'll be remembered in the history books as the leader who restored Russia to true greatness. By which he actually means that other countries will fear Russia rather than dismissing it a has-been state run by grasping politicians who always bow to the tsar and oligarchs who happily screw ordinary Russians over for their personal benefit.

    As I say, you've always seemed to me to be a reasonable sort of guy and I'm certain that you're pretty bright. I find it very sad that you seem to be happy to swallow the official Putin line without any serious question.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • PurpleHoneycomb

    I want to start this off by saying I do not hate Russia. I hate the Russian government. It wouldn't be a stretch to imagine many western people feel the same.

    We believe the Russian people to be equally as sensible as other nations; which isn't very sensible. All citizens of the world have the ability to be blinded by the desires of their government. This includes people from any country. Not just one.

    The issue most western people have with what Russia is currently doing is not related to NATO. Most of us agree that NATO should be willing to help Ukraine if they got them into this mess. We also recognize that our governments are acting (understandly) out of fear of mutually assured destruction.

    Our issue with what is going on is that your war that Putin and several of your people deem "necessary" is an act of senseless violence against the innocent people of the country. What you deem tough-love is what we deem unacceptable behavior. The attacks and murder you're committing can be best compared to when my country invaded the middle east. Terrorism masquerading as necessity.

    I am well aware of The United States's history of invasion. My opinion of those invasions is the exact same as yours. That it is a disgusting act of greed and self righteous justice. Going to war knowing that no other nation can block your actions is wrong. Purposely using the threat of nukes to deter world leaders that might have stepped in is worse. Particularly when you're far larger and more powerful than the nation you invaded and Putin clains it is for "protection".

    Ask the civilian population of Ukraine if they feel protected by anyone.

    The world is long past the need for petty wars to be established by or against the world super powers. China, the United States, and Russia already have more than enough people. More than enough land. More than enough power. All 3 of our countries are run by people disguising themselves as better than the rest of the world.

    I do agree that we should stop demonizing the PEOPLE of these nations and start focusing on the issues we truly have with them. But saying that Ukraine is being treated mercifully when the innocents are being punished for the potential sins of their leaders is questionable at best.

    Regardless, Putin's actions are the only thing to unite most nations around the world as being immoral in several years. Even governments that are currently keeping a neutral position are asking for the violence to stop.

    Most common people don't want Russia to fall. We want peace. Putin has decided that wasn't an option and as such as drawn our ire.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • cumlordvegeta

    How the fuck does this have -9 comments on the front page

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Boojum

      Russian hackers, obvs. 😁

      To be serious, I suspect it's related to how an IIN member who is (or at least was, as of yesterday) in complete agreement with Putin's invasion deleted all of his multiple posts. I guess some glitch in the site's post-counting algorithm gets confused when there are responses to comments which are no longer there to be commented on.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • KholatKhult

        The only thing I could say that you and other members here would deem “acceptable” is if I said I hoped my country “loses” and all of our soldiers are killed by Ukrainians.
        We are at war. It is sinister to lessen the death and danger by “debating” with a bunch of foreigners on a website.

        It was dishonorable I even said anything to begin with. I know what I believe, but it was an insult to my beliefs to act as if death this tragic is something that could be spoken about to someone who doesn’t respect me or mine.

        It is impossible for me to respect your opinion on the situation, because it’s insane to me you think this is something you’re entitled to have an opinion on.
        Speaking to you and others here about this should, and did, make me feel ill and ashamed.

        It was awkward you tried to make it personal against me by saying what you know about my “personal life”. Whether you meant my criminal history or what I don’t know.

        I’m struggling to articulate my feelings on any of this in a way that I think is at the level of respect I believe is required, so I won’t. I’m furious.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Boojum

          To deal with the personal bit first: I found you using the term "tough love" disturbing because I'm pretty sure you're a father or about to become one. "Tough love" has been used by parents to justify all sorts of abuse, from refusing perfectly reasonable requests from their kids in order to teach them that life is shit and they'll never get what they want, to occasionally hitting their kids, to habitually beating them up over the most trivial infractions of petty rules, and even to locking them up in the cellar and starving them to death. Any parent using that term is a red flag for me.

          I know you're smart enough to recognise a strawman argument when you see one. If you reread what you've written here, can you really not see how you've deployed one?

          I have no doubt that there are those who would be pleased to see every single Russian who crossed the Ukrainian border dead, but I'm not one of them. The vast majority of those guys are very young conscripts who had no choice but to serve their time in the military. By all the accounts I've read, conscripts in the Russian army get crap pay, are treated like shit by contract soldiers and considered expendable cannon fodder by many officers. I'm pretty sure you'll dismiss it as Ukrainian propaganda, but there are several videos floating around on the internet where captured Russian conscripts say that they were told before they crossed the border that it was all just an exercise, and they didn't need to worry about anything.

          As for the contract soldiers, I imagine many of them decided to stay on after they'd served their minimum term because they decided there wasn't much chance of them finding a decent job in the civilian world. Having made that decision myself in my youth, I have some sympathy for them.

          None of those guys who are on the receiving end of whatever the Ukrainians are giving them - whether it's shouted insults to their face or something way more hurtful - made the decision to cross the border, and nor did any of their immediate superiors who gave them the order to do so. None of them deserve to die or to suffer physical or psychological trauma that will mess up the rest of their lives.

          And the most important point is that none of them _needed_ to suffer that crap. Ukraine wasn't attacking Russia or preparing to do so, and nor was any NATO country doing so.

          I understand that you're very angry that people here and all over the world have condemned the action taken by Putin. You say that none of us here - and, by extension, nobody else outside Russia - has the right to have an opinion on this. Does that mean you also believe nobody outside the USA has the right to have an opinion about the foreign adventures that country has engaged in over the years, or to have an opinion about anything that ever happens inside the USA's borders? Does that mean you feel you have no right to have an opinion about how any foreign government treats all of its citizens or some portion of them?

          Something that came across very strongly in your deleted posts is that, in your mind and in some sense, Putin _is_ Russia. You seemed to be annoyed by me using the word "tsar", but I did so because that is what Putin has made himself, even if he doesn't have a crown or sit on a throne. He is personally in charge. He has suppressed all political opposition systematically and often with extreme violence, just as the tsars of old did. He has a little group of advisers around him, but there's no doubt who makes the ultimate decisions. The Duma exists only to rubber stamp and applaud his decisions. And, just as Elizabeth II in some sense _is_ Britain in the minds of many (particularly older people), Putin's PR machine and Russian state media have worked hard over the last couple of decades to instil the idea in the heads of Russians that Putin _is_ Russia.

          Since you're an intelligent guy, you have to understand that the invasion of Ukraine was all on him personally; in spite of the bizarre spectacle he set up last week with his security council, it wasn't a decision made after a rational assessment and debate at the highest levels of the Russian government.

          As I've repeatedly said, I am sure you're a smart guy. I admire you for getting through all the shit you've experienced in your life and still apparently being a basically decent human being. As a monoglot, I also find your command of English admirable.

          If you're finding it very difficult to rationally and coherently defend Putin's actions in Ukraine, I have to wonder if that's because you know, deep down, that what he's done in your name is irrational and indefensible. And I have to wonder if the rage you're feeling is based on an acute attack of cognitive dissonance: you desperately want to believe that what Putin has done is right and justified, but in your heart, you know it isn't. You very much want to believe that Ukrainians and Russians are siblings, and to believe Putin when he says the Ukrainian people are victims of a corrupt regime made up of a bunch of drugged-up neo-Nazis, but what you've seen of how ordinary Ukrainians are responding to their supposed Russian liberators is in direct conflict with that.

          Cognitive dissonance can be very challenging to deal with. Most often, people cling to their beliefs when confronted with contradictory evidence. Rather than looking at the evidence and altering their beliefs, they defend their opinions by dismissing the evidence. They choose to believe that those who have put forward the evidence are delusional or are working to some covert, malign agenda, so they resort to ad hominem attacks. Often, because they know they cannot defend their views in rational terms, they simply refuse to discuss the matter with anyone whose views are different.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • PurpleHoneycomb

    Edit: The comments I were responding to have been deleted.

    I have several points to make. I also want to say that I'm personally not bothered by you specifically. You have the right to speak your mind and while I might disagree, you have your reasoning for believing what you do.

    Honestly, I personally appreciate the outlook from a Russian. It allows for a perspective that our media isn't projecting. Please take the time to read the entirety of each point before jumping to a conclusion. I acknowledge your concerns.

    1. Death and War

    A single death would be one too many. Even injuring a member of the civilian population is taking things too far. You expect Ukrainians to lay down their weapons and let you take their land, destroy their government...but come in with bombs and military grade equipment. The death and destruction is far too grim for many people to ignore.

    2. War, Specifically The United States

    I acknowledged this in my previous comment but will ellaborate more.

    This is a topic I unfortunately have to agree with you on, but only partially. Our most recent war in the middle east is incredibly polarizing amongst our people. When 9/11 happened, it united the nation. I was a mere 3 months old and grew up seeing the war play out.

    Do you want to know how many young people I've met in my life that supported the war after Osama Bin Laden was killed? 0. Do you want to know how many people I willingly associate with that support the civilian casualties? 0.

    Only the most politically extreme people in our country supported the prolonging of it. Well, the political extremists and the rich that were profiting off of it. That war should have ended long ago. I ended contact with my father, amongst many reasons, for regularly saying that he supported the war.

    The United States isn't innocent, but neither is Russia in the attack. I even acknowledged that I thought our wars were "disgusting acts of greed and self righteous justice". I promise you that if I live to see another war, I will either be protesting it or imprisoned for doing so.

    3. Russian and Asian Representation in The West

    Western society, for the most part, is no longer okay with the bullying of another's culture. When someone makes a joke about a person's race or culture, it is usually called out immediately. Most young people seek to separate ourselves from these awful opinions and stereotypes.

    I do, however, acknowledge that the 30+ population are likely demonizing you and other Asian countries. I've seen it first hand. My girlfriend and her family are Indian immigrants. I see her struggle with being stereotyped by older people on a regular basis. We see her culture consistently mocked in western media. We hate it and before my cancer diagnosis we were regularly protesting, boycotting, and seeking to help normalize different cultures.

    Things are getting better, though. Games no longer rely on the "Better dead than red." philosophy. Nearly every major game since 2016 has focused on other plots. Fortnite, Among Us, Horizon: Zero Dawn, God of War, Elden Ring, Red Dead Redemption, Ghost of Tsushima, Far Cry 5...The list is ever expansive of titles that do not rely on the teachings of the 1960s.I do, however, seek to acknowledge 3 exceptions to the rule. Overwatch, Call of Duty, and Spider-Man PS4.

    Call of Duty is a franchise that desperately needs to either adapt or die off. The entire franchise profits off of wars and the misrepresentation of people. It's American nationalist propaganda.

    Overwatch, while mostly progressive with its international diversity, portrays Russia as corrupt. The Russian hero, Zarya, is a walking stereotype. This is bad.

    Spider-Man PS4 uses a Russian supervillain, Rhino, and an Asian terrorist, Martin Li. Martin Li is by all accounts a racist portrayal of the Asian culture. Rhino, on the otherhand, is one of my favorite fictional characters. Not because he's an evil Russian, but because they write him as more than that.

    I hope it's apparent that, at least from American media, the number of "Russia Is Bad" propaganda films has lowered. If it's different in Europe, I do apologize but I'm unaware. (Although I do imagine the number of American propaganda films will rise due to the Ukraine situation unfortunately.)

    4. Care: Government Versus The General Public

    It is unfortunate that our world leaders do not actually seem to care. I personally am not pretending to care, but obviously I can not speak for everyone. I wish that Biden would do more, but it's readily apparent that he and other politicians are pretending to care. I imagine the levels of care vary amongst people. That's to be expected. There are even people that openly support Russia in this decision.

    We've told our government that we do not believe sanctions are enough. They aren't listening. If our politicians were genuinely concerned, oil would no longer be purchased. The SWIFT decision would have already been made. They would have started to recruit soldiers.

    This brings me to a linked point...

    5. "Where are you then?" (A quote from your response to Boojum.)

    You are aware that westerners are asking for troops to be deployed, correct? That there are hundreds of people across websites that are asking if they can join the Ukrainian armed forces? People want to do something. We want to go help. We can't. No options are being provided to those who want to.

    All over the internet people from around the world are asking how they can join the Ukrainian defense. There are plenty of keyboard warriors but many who seek to follow their morals.

    Even if we were suddenly given a clear path to provide the assistance, how many people can afford to help? Some are too poor to travel. Some are too busy with their children. Others, like myself, are too sick.

    Seriously, what are poor people in The United States, Japan, Australia, Canada, or other non-European countries supposed to do if they want to provide themselves to Ukraine? They can't afford a plane ticket. They likely don't even have a passport.

    If I was able to travel to Ukraine and fight for them I would. Would this benefit me? My country? No. In fact it would almost certainly result in my death. Unfortunately I'm being treated for cancer and have become an amputee.

    I'm hoping that a clear path to volunteer defenses are opened but until then the most we can do is donate to Ukraine or voice our disapproval with Putin.

    6. Closing Points

    Something people need to get better with is recognizing that disagreeing with the governmental decisions of another country does not mean you are demonizing the country itself. We're voicing our concerns with a fucking war. A war in which a world super power is attacking a small nation.

    The west criticizes the US for prolonging war in the middle east all the time. If we had struck first, we likely would have been criticized just as much as Putin is today.

    I do feel sympathy for the genuine demonization that happens. I'm sure that it happens fairly often just as it happens to us. Keep in mind that western politics is fairly divided compared to that in Russia.

    When I say I dislike your government, I specifically mean the individuals within the government. Yes, your government is run by Russians. That's a fact. However I would dislike the decision to invade Ukraine regardless of which nation did so. Putin just so happens to be the figure behind the decision in this case.

    If Joe Biden had declared we were going to attack Cuba, I would be voicing these very same opinions. Look at my previous posts and comments and you'll see me criticizing my own government fairly often.

    I mean, even if Emanuel Macron had invaded Switzerland, I would be upset.

    Prioritizing your home and your people is an honorable cause. It's common moral ground that many people have and it's not even necessarilya bad one. It's one I disagree with, as I find even American nationalism a bad thing. It is a good moral though.

    If you actually want to speak, and I recognize that you are, I'm willing to listen. I believe that everyone should be willing to say their opinion. I can't say that I'll necessarily aggree but I will listen.

    I sincerely hope you don't think I think you're brainwashed. I think you're no more brainwashed than WeirdGuy, Litelander, or LloydAsher, all of whom I regularly disagree with but think highly of regardless for speaking up for what they believe in. Do I believe they're brainwashed? Of course not. And neither do I belive you are.

    I respect you for speaking your thoughts and hope you continue to do so. I may disagree, and in this case I very much do, but I still think you deserve to have your own thoughts.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • MonsteraDeliciosa

      "no more brainwashed than"

      You are a true gem!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • PurpleHoneycomb

        I'm not sure if this is intended to be a compliment or a snide comment, but I stand by everything I've said.

        I would imagine that all people are influenced by what they want their governments to believe. Being influenced and being brainwashed are different things. Kholat seems intelligent enough to make his own opinions, and the his opinions are obviously going to be influenced by where he lives.

        While I disagree with patriotism/nationalism, my general sentiment is that I dislike Putin and other members of the immediate government. I may disagree with Kholat but that doesn't mean I have to insult him. I have no reason to.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • MonsteraDeliciosa

          Absolutely a compliment.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • GaelicPotato

    Of course they're anti Russian. Russia is a shithole with a maniac for a leader.

    Declaring war on Ukraine and blowing shit up is not mercy. It's massacre and you're insane if you think that's normal and good.

    Russians are moronic and brainwashed. Yes I do think that. You're a fine example.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      If russia was an actual democracy we wouldnt be having such disdain for russia. Russia and China are both bullies that get their neighbors to "understand" by wielding a giant club.

      Since america fluctuates leaders pretty regularly you dont have the rampant amount of overt takeover and bullshit russia and china try to justify. The middle east is a shitstorm because of so many factors. Ukraine? I dont see a justifiable reason other than russia thinking they could show off their big dick and turning out it's a flaccid one.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Boojum

    There are still Italians who have pictures of Mussolini on their walls and believe that fascist Italy was a wonderful period of Italian history. There's still - God help us - a significant minority of the British public who believe Johnson is a wonderful Prime Minister in spite of the heaps of evidence that he's an incompetent, self-serving fool. From what I've read, there are still quite a few Russians who idolise Stalin, in spite of copious amounts of proof that he was a vicious thug who killed millions of the people he governed and his paranoia about the officer corps very nearly resulted in the USSR losing to Nazi Germany. There are still millions of Americans who truly believe that Trump is a wonderful person and he was the greatest US president ever.

    So what Russian grannies choose to put on their fridges says precisely nothing useful about Putin other than that he has a very effective PR machine, and that many Russians desperately need to believe that their leader is a fantastic guy.

    You speak in praise of nationalism. I was born and grew up in what has to be one of the most strongly nationalistic countries in the world - the USA. Since I left the States, I've seen and experienced the results of Scottish, English, Welsh and Italian nationalism. I've also visited vast cemeteries in France and various places in Germany where the remains of the logical endpoint of nationalism can be seen.

    Whatever national costume or badges it wears and whatever flags it waves, nationalism always sucks. It's always a negative force and it's always ultimately destructive. It's always about ego and primitive tribalism. It's always one of the first cards played by an autocratic politician who wants to manipulate the masses for his own ends. Most of the time, it's used to get people to pay less attention to the crap that's actually going on in their lives due to inept or actually wicked government, and make them instead focus on how they can play a part in making their tribe greater by kicking the shit out of some other tribe.

    There's nothing wrong with being proud of what one's own country has achieved, even though that's usually nonsensical. For example, you may well feel a sense of pride at the role the USSR played in WWII, but I seriously doubt if you personally took part in the Great Patriotic War.

    But there's huge difference between national pride and nationalism. The latter is all about othering those who don't belong to your tribe. It's about being willing to impose your will on other countries simply because it is your will or because you'll gain something tangible from conquering them. It's about the delusion that your nation is "better" than any other country in the world in every possible way, and that gives you and your fellow citizens the right - or even the duty - to take whatever you feel like taking from other countries, and give a good kicking to anyone who dares to cause you even the most trivial problems.

    If everyone applied similar rules in their personal lives, society would rapidly collapse into violent anarchy. The same applies at the nation-state level.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • dude_Jones

      Addendum:

      Zacharova's threat of military action against Sweden is highly inflammatory to American tribalism. Sweden would be joining NATO, because Murica zealots ENJOY filling up cemeteries. Especially with drones flown over satellite links so they can watch it on television with a cold beer at the ready.

      My pitch for moderation is, “Please guys, let’s only target top Russian military officers. That would validate your enjoyment of animal behavior and taxpayers would not bear the heavy expenses of unnecessary missile use.”

      I hope Putin’s will to power stays at the level of a Roman circus. I would hate to have him pout by pushing the red button.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 1WeirdGuy

    Its a complicated situation because Putin is proving the need for nato. On the other hand according to Russia the US promised Russia Nato would not move east (the US denies this happened). But if you look at a map of when that promise was supposedly made it has definitely moved east.

    The US would not like it either if Russia put troops in Cuba.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • olderdude-xx

      Before you go counting promises (which were never put into writing) - you might want to look at written promises with other countries as signatories to the agreements.

      Russia, under Putin, has clearly violated the ban on Medium Range missiles (why the US canceled the treaty)

      They have, under Putin, clearly violated the 1994 agreement to guarantee Ukraine's borders in exchange for Ukraine returning what would make them the 3rd largest nuclear warhead country stockpile of USSR nuclear weapons to Russia (negotiated and witnessed by the UK and USA).

      They have, under Putin, clearly violated the 2014 Minsk protocol for resolving the Eastern Ukraine situation.

      Russia has zero credibility. The won't even honor (or try to renegotiate) international agreements and treaties that they have signed.

      I also doubt that the USA would ever have told Russia that NATO would not expand. It's a core charter principal that NATO would accept other countries that met certain geographic and political criteria. Easter European countries clearly have always met the geographic criteria.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • 1WeirdGuy

        George H.W Bush absolutely assured Gorbachev that nato would not "expand even one inch eastward" during 1989 I will put a source below that goes over a declassified US document stating this. The CIA director was furious that this promise was made at the time because they knew it was one we would not keep and would lead to problems later.

        And during that 1994 agreement to return the Ukrainian nukes didnt USA agree to defend Ukraine from Russia if Ukraine gets rid of them?

        Also the US and NATO promised Ghaddafi if he gave up his nukes he would be spared. He gave up his nukes and he died by getting raped with a knife by US/NATO rebels that later turned into isis. This is the main reason why Kim Jung Un is scared to give up his weapons.

        https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

        I am on the USA team but I try call out the BS on all sides I try not to be bias and shill for the USA when our corrupt government does stupid shit.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • olderdude-xx

          You do understand that things said verbally between countries, and even individuals, can change based on changes in situations over years.

          There is a huge (I do mean HUGE) difference between a private verbal promise and an international agreement that is negotiated with the assistance of other countries and put into writing with the assisting countries signing as witnesses.

          Countries cannot be legally held responsible for private verbal promises, or even in some cases written agreements between 2 countries.

          But, openly negotiated international agreements with other international countries involved and witnessed are fully legally enforceable in court and in the UN (should the courts or the UN agree to take up the case and act on it).

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • olderdude-xx

    I don't think either Finland or Sweden is concerned about what Putin thinks about them at this point.

    Finland government leaders did make a comment several weeks ago that the would likely join NATO if Russia invaded Ukraine.

    Putin cannot say he was not warned about that.

    Sweden is in a bit of a different situation... and I cannot predict how they are actually going to react.

    Comment Hidden ( show )