What do you think about andrew tate?
Yeah, what do you guys think about him?
I like him | 7 | |
Neutral | 12 | |
I hate him | 20 |
Ask Your Question today
Yeah, what do you guys think about him?
I like him | 7 | |
Neutral | 12 | |
I hate him | 20 |
A comic book artist tweeted out a fundraiser to help cover the cost of a life-saving surgery for their young son who suffers from Cerebral Palsy
Andrew Tate, decided to respond with this tweet
“Do you feel like a failure that the amount you need to help your own son is less than a quarter of what I spent on 1 of my 5 cars?”
He is also in custody on sex-trafficking charges, and is one of the most vile misogynists of anyone with his platform size.
He is also one of those dudes who repeatedly fetishizes teenagers.
He also believes that Cheating on women is the right of men, and says that sleeping with as many women as you can while you’re in a relationship is what makes you a man, but women who cheat are disgusting.
He says “Women belong to men”, and repeatedly has said they shouldn’t be allowed to drive
I believe Andrew Tate should be shot in the street and so should the socially-stunted who think he’s a messiah.
Some idiot will claim that he “encourages men to better themselves” but I’ve seen his “inspiration” and it’s on the same elementary “go to the gym, uhhhh brush your teeth” level as children’s books. If you need a “role model” to convince you to take basic care of yourself you should be in therapy.
If you think I’m being harsh I think you’re a coward.
Only the retarded can’t tell that he’s very very clearly completely separated from reality.
A complete loser with fragile masculinity who has a cult following of simps that would probably suck his tiny penis if he asked them to. He's bald too so there's that. I don't mind bald men but for someone who thinks he's such hot shit with probably, in his mind, superior genes it's pretty ironic. Well, he's just a classic narcissist really. Nothing new under the sun. There's tons of narcissists.
He's an experienced fighter, Chess champion, multi-millionaire, massively influential, better shape than most men, and massively successful with women. This is partially why men gravitated towards him because he WAS all the things he said worked in order to be successful. So to pretend that he's some basement dweller with no attractive qualities when he's more successful with women compared to the majority of men? Not the best angle to take it.
Not trying to play the devil's advocate here, but why is it socially acceptable to shame people for having small dicks? Isn't that a form of body-shaming?
He's a piece of shit. He has made a few valid points, but most of what he says is garbage.
I think you'd have to be insane to like him lol as he's said pretty much every horrible thing a human can ever say about anything from women to religion to insulting terminally ill people. He's the biggest narcissist on planet earth and had a pyramid scheme going on for naive young men.
He's an asshole. There's nothing much that needs to be said outside of that.
The topic of Andrew Tate is an interesting one, it brings out the worst in both sides. A lot of Andrew Tate's teachings aren't great or realistic but there are also those that use the Andrew Tate side to preach and moan as a moral grandstand to feel even as close to relevant compared to him, and you find that such people don't actually care about the topic someone like Andrew Tate facilitates, demonstrated by their inability to dive in to the topic beyond a surface level of "He bad man, bad man is bad".
Let's ignore the sex trafficking fiasco, if he's guilty he's guilty if he's not he's not. That's not the interesting element of the Tate conversation.
Is a lot of what Tate says ridiculous? Yeah. Is everything he says ridiculous? No. For example, he will say ridiculous things like men should be able to cheat but on the other hand he will accurately speak to men's frustrations in the world when it comes to the male/female dynamic and not expecting less for what you're worth as a man. Another thing you can't miss is that Tate has the habit of portraying things in a horrible manner almost as if intentionally trying to rile people up for publicity to then argue the point later after the attention is on him.
What we need to ask is why so many men gravitate towards Tate, that's where this conversation is important. I believe Andrew Tate appealed to a lot of men very quickly because these men that agreed with Tate's good points were already an audience that laid dormant way before Tate's relevancy. It's no secret that men today are showing increasing dissatisfaction with women, you hear it everywhere in male spaces and it's increasing. Men are losing hope in women and they're growing more and more frustrated with a culture that treats them not only as secondary but also as villainous.
Then in comes Tate, rich, powerful, in great shape, and charming, a masculine man to bat for you against a culture that's been attacking you left and right for over a decade, and he gains widespread support as a result. Suddenly SO MUCH of what you wanted the world to hear can be amplified through this man because he is unavoidable and unapologetically so. It made those men feel that they were finally being heard, that someone was finally able to make a trend happen in the opposite direction, a trend that allowed men to say, "I'm not the problem, you are" for a change while they finally had the motivation to better themselves be it in their career or something basic like fitness.
One thing Tate done amazingly was that he lit a fire under men's asses and taught them to feel shame over being, in no better term, simps. He reminded men that they need to be strong and that women must also live up to a standard to be worthwhile, and if they don't then they're not worth considering. Let's be real here, he made basic points about women with large body counts, single mothers, GFs that go to a club to dance next to sweaty men, and even that was called misogynistic even though men almost universally aren't attracted nor want such things in women.
Andrew Tate was a symptom of men's ever growing lack of faith in women. He didn't create this audience, he loaned it. There will be a new Andrew Tate but the audience will be of old.
His message is just basically "work hard, make yourself appealing to women if you want women, if you are depressed look at your life because if you're fat and broke living with mom of course you're gonna be depressed. Get a 6pack and make 6 figures and see if you're still depressed."
Its all basic shit your dad teaches you. He just says it in a funny way but nothing he says is ground breaking if you think about it.
At first I hated him because my introduction was that weird tape that got leaked of him doing bdsm shit with the girl and that tape coupled with the showing off cars and stuff I thought he was a giant douchebag that was like "hey look how cool I am I can abuse women and you should too!"
But then after youtube shorts recommended me so many of his videos I started listening to more of his stuff and realized he's right about most of what he says. Its nothing that crazy honestly its what white parents have been teaching their kids since forever but kids listen to him because its coming from someone they deem as "cool".
I like Andrew Tate, but it's not like his teachings I can use in my day-to-day life.
I mean, nothing. I've agreed with some stuff he's said, but that's about it.
Aye, I'd honestly suggest to just have a view of him yourself. I'd suggest watching his interviews and debates on panels first as his content is filled with moments that are deadpan jokes that can be difficult for some pick up on. Not to say he doesn't believe things that are absurd, he definitely does but some of the things he's said that are clearly jokes were taken literally, so watching him express his views on a platform where the jokes are less prevalent, like interviews and panels would be my first suggestion. You won't agree with everything or disagree with everything but you'll get a better feel for him.
That being said, I'd honestly suggest just ignoring this whole headache of a topic if that's moreso the direction you're leaning in to.
Oh I got kholat blocked. Hes a male feminist who joined a discord I was in and doxed and contacted my local police saying im raping my wife. He's very extreme when it comes to feminist stuff.
The truth of the matter is a lot of people believe his imprisonment is political because of all the women on the indictment the authorities say he was trafficking they all came forward and said they werent trafficked. He owned a webcam business and employed women. He hasnt even been charged with a crime yet they have just kept him detained now for months. Its a really sketchy case. But if it is true I agree he should be executed or whatever for holding women against their will. Its just when u look into the case it looks sketchy.
Honestly, it depends on your perspective. I have Kholat blocked so I had to sign out to see what he was saying, and some of it is true but a lot of it is taken completely out of context and he fell right in to Tate's bombastic way of representing his point to bolster the amount of eyes he gets on him through controversy.
The fundraiser thing IS true, however the part that Kholat left out is that in that same Tweet Tate offered to fund the life saving surgery for that child if the guy he was mocking asked. Something I noticed about Tate is that he represents things in the most asshole way possible even when he is offering help or giving a valid opinion, there's even an example of it in the list Kholat offered.
Kholat's also said he "fetishizes teenagers". What Kholat is referring to are adults, those of the age of 18-19, which Tate says that adult women around 18-23(roughly) are in their prime. Tate was NOT referring to underage teenagers like Kholat was implying.
As for men being able to cheat on women, from what I can remember this is one of Tate's views, somewhat. I can't recall if this was in relation to "high value" men, his mentality being that if women are chasing after men every other woman wants then they're going to have to accept the fact that they're with a man that has easy access to women, which was why their partner was attracted to them in the first place. There's also the fact that more recently it aligns with his Muslim religious views. That being said, I think he has a misguided view on love.
As for Tate saying women belong to men, Kholat also conveniently left out another important part of that. This is the example I was meaning in regards to Tate being bombastic with how he initiates his views to the public to garner controversy and gain popularity from it before demonstrating it's reasonableness. Tate was not saying that "women belong to men" in a general sense, he was referring to relationships and also believes the same of men to women, that if you give yourself to another person then you "belong to them" in the sense that you're "their" girlfriend or "their" boyfriend and therefor have to listen to them more and have more obligations to them than you would others. Tate wasn't saying that a man has utter control over a woman's very existence, nor did he exclude men from this treatment.
Tate also done charity work for stray dogs and orphans in Romania, so I hear but he keeps is hush hush.
Regardless of the current sex trafficking case that's still on-going, there's still plenty of reason to dislike Tate but it's so boring when people are lazy with their reasons rather than hating him for honest reasons. Hopefully a little more insight on the instances being referenced will give you more info to like or dislike him more honestly.
Personally, my view is that if he's guilty of his sex trafficking allegations, then fuck 'em. Let him rot. If he's not then, well, that's going to cause chaos but on his views alone? Around 50/50. He makes some very good points and some very bad points, so I'mm'a not just make the cartoonish conclusion that he's either good entirely or bad entirely.