What is your complete view on pornography?

I saw some arguments happening in another thread about how you can't be this or that and still watch porn and what about the little ones, etc, so I decided to fan the flames a bit. What do you think about porn?

Is it the root of all evil? Are you NoFap?
Is it cool and healthy? Are you gooning?

I also want to know what your opinion is on the different types and nuances of porn. Some of it's regular, relatively-realistic stuff between average-looking people. Some of it's off-the-wall crackers in neon bright colors. Some of it's hentai! Do you believe it's a slippery slope? Is it only dangerous to certain people, or all people?

All porn is bad, it ruins you 7
Drawings/animations are worse than live action 0
All live action porn is wrong, but cartoons are fine 2
Amateur porn is okay, and cartoons are fine 1
Only certain kinds of fetish porn are bad, everything else is fine 5
All porn is fine, who cares 10
Other 4
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 75 )
  • bigbudchonger

    I think porn is a problem. This is coming from someone who watches it regularly. It just fucks you up when you watch too much, and it's easy to be a coomer when porn is just a click away.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      It sucks but it's about self moderation more than anything. Yeah it's a click away but it's still up to you to click it.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Somenormie

    As long as you do not watch heavy amounts of it then you're fine. I've watched a few straight porn and lesbian porn videos and hentai lately( which are my favorite ones )

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      Hentai goes after your idealized version of porn. Proportions outside of reality (not talking just about eyes)

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • KholatKhult

    Consumption of pornography is a pretty good litmus test for whether an individual has any discipline at all.
    Pornography directly feeds immoral, hedonistic, and grotesquely gluttonous selfish desires. I have absolutely zero respect for porn addicts who promote/defend the production of pornography.

    The sex industry is built on exploitation of vulnerable people. If someone is performing sexual acts for payment, they are under financial coercion due to capitalism. For-profit pornography and prostitution is not consensual, as the worker is involved because they need to make a living and lack alternatives.

    Not only does the porn industry directly exploit its workers, it enforces societal malice against women and LGBT+ people disproportionately.
    Porn pushes for furthering harmful fetishes, like physical harm, fetishizing youth, and taboo situations.

    The production and consumption of for-profit sex work should be outlawed and carry heavy punishment for those who illicit it. And those who have worked in the industry should be reeducated

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      I think prostitution should be legal. Carried out through state monitored and regulated brothels. Cant really completely outlaw a practice that's as easy as selling sex.

      Would really curb the amount of drug addicted whores on the street being abused by their pimps and customers.

      You dont have to like or even condone it. I just see it as a lesser of two evils.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • KholatKhult

        No. Would still be sexual encounters under financial coercion, and thus unconsensual sex. There will never be solidarity between men and women so long as men believe that no matter their condition, they will always have access to a woman’s body so long as he tosses some cash at her.
        It is pure evil, and laws should reflect the morals of its people and set a standard.

        In nations that have state controlled brothels, they import women from poorer nations to work them.
        Those buying “legal prostitutes” are still abusing these women outright, and so is the state that regulates and taxes them.

        You are incredibly lazy and lack any sense of virtue.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • LloydAsher

          Let them get a union, only citizens can work in the fine brothel establishments, rather than being shackled to impromptu massage parlors with their citizenship on the line.

          Making pot illegal didnt stop possession, making alcohol illegal increased the death toll for alcohol poisoning. Just saying for common vices such as this it's just way easier just to legalize and then regulate then it is to make it illegal and fill out prisons.

          It's not lazy its utilitarian, cut down on disease vectors, widely improve on workplace oversite. Give the incels something to do.

          I'm not in favor of exacerbating hedonist behavior, I'm trying to come up with solutions for making a world a better place. No solution is 100% but if we just improve the efficency of monitoring vices on a legal basis it would be easier to keep the lowest in our society from being impacted by the iron fist of the justice system. Why make moonshine that you can go blind from or buy weed that could contain fentanyl when you could buy it from a regulated dealer?

          Or is this a philosophical debate on human worth? Do we go off of individual chastity and the ability to be corrupted and cut out those who cannot play by society rules hoping the iron hand is what stops people from going down the dark path? Or do we acknowledge humanities collective shittiness and find ways to mitigate a natural inclination for self destruction?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • KholatKhult

            You are trying to embrace the commodification and sexual objectification of bodies, there is absolutely nothing that can justify that.

            I have zero interest in appeasing incels, I prefer they kill themselves.

            Acknowledge humanities collective shiftiness ? You’re projecting. I know many fine people, just because you’re a piece of shit with hedonistic individualism and rampant selfishness doesn’t mean everyone is. It will not be self destruction it will be the destruction of people like you until the worthy are left to finally have a second of peace and comfort.

            Stand for something good for once in your existence fucking Christ. Nihilistic doomer nonsense. You have the privilege of internet and you spend it protecting the worst fuckin people anyone could think of because you don’t actually give a shit about anyone and you don’t think it will effect you. Some people have the fire to actually fight for a better world

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • malaparte

              "Some people have the fire to actually fight for a better world"

              Read: clutch pearls over the internet and caterwaul like an elderly Sunday school teacher while defending your nation's imperialistic aggression towards Ukraine.

              The world is breathing a collective sigh of relief knowing that such warriors as yourself are fighting the good fight - thank you, KholatKhult, for being the hero that nobody fucking asked for or ever knew they needed.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
            • LloydAsher

              Go on then. Fight the good fight. The world will be better with you in it. My question is that if you have to exicute every person who doesnt perform to your exact specification your blade will never dry. Fighting natural inclinations and ideology is endless and complex.

              Most people dont do bad things. But you would be amazed by the percentage to those with thoughts and fantasies. I'm simply allowing the thoughts and fantasies exist, keep them within the sunlight so you can at least keep track of it. But by prosecuting to a high degree I can guarentee you wont even catch the worst offenders. Allow the common man some leeway.

              In my view I'm not allowing evil to win either. I'm simply ridding the worst of them. If people stay in the shallow end, allow them to. Otherwise you might make a slope into a sheer drop. What, you think drug dealers just deal in single products? People will gravitate towards areas of the most convience where you can monitor for safety and quality.

              I guess your problem is that you cant see that I'm trying to help people in an indirect way. Ridding the world of porn suddenly wont make porn go away. Remove all drugs and people will make more drugs. You can try but all I say is go after the worst first. Or you will just clog your own system with the mild cases.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Grunewald

      I agree with you. I will say though that it's a lot easier for a person with little self discipline not to do porn if they already don't do it.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Clunk42

    Porn directly leads to unnatural vice, which has been the ruination of many souls; just as other immoralities should be illegal, so too should porn.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Yaidin

    I used to be kind of obsessed with porn, but after meeting the people behind it both- animators, actresses and sex workers- I can't feel anything for it but disgust or pity. Best way to quit a porn addiction, I guess.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Millie_the_evil_saint

      Why do the animators evoke pity?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Anonnet

    Not going to lie. Way more NoFap zealots in here than I expected. The doomsayers really make me laugh, since most of it amounts to the old saying about growing hair on your palms. Everyone who masturbates knows it doesn't happen, yet there remain tons of people that are absolutely convinced that your life and/or soul will be sent into a death spiral if you go to PornHub.

    Meanwhile, over in the countries where porn actually is restricted or banned...

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • KholatKhult

      This site’s demographic is incredibly strange

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Curiouskitten444

        Lmao

        Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Clunk42

      You know, a "death spiral" is actually a fairly decent way of describing Hell, since it is a death without end. So, I suppose a "death fractal" would be a more accurate term.

      Losing all your God-given graces and staining your soul so horribly that you can't go to Heaven without being contrite and having your sins absolved for the sake of a few minutes of pleasure is never a good idea.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Anonnet

        I believe in a God slightly more merciful than one that one that would equate a few minutes of masturbation to mass murder. If that's not compatible with your view, that's fine.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          God doesn't do that. The mass murderer would have it far worse in Hell than the masturbator.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • LloydAsher

            Correct me if I'm wrong but isnt the biblical cannon of hell vague? Theres no dante's inferno tiers. Only that it's a bad, painful place (insert fire) for all eternity.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Clunk42

              First thing's first, sola scriptura is a heresy. Second, it is only just that the punishments of different people in hell for different crimes are different. In the same way that there are many mansions in heaven, each with a different position that is more or less gratifying than the others, there are many places in hell, and each man will be published according to his particular sins.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
    • LloydAsher

      I thought it was just me being a spicy boi and posting philosophical ideals of freedom and line drawing.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • MonteMetcalfe

    My usual view of pornography is from the side. But sometimes they get that camera shoved right in there.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 1234tellmethatyoulovememore

    As long as everyone involved are legal, consenting adults, I don't care.

    Trust me, if you knew what half your friends were really into sexually, you'd side-eye at least half of them.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Curiouskitten444

    I'm personally in recovery from masturbation and porn addiction. For me, it made it nearly impossible to achieve orgasm without porn. I was masturbating everyday. It got in the way of being on time to things. It also got in the way of me being present with my body during masturbation and while having sex with others. I always had a fantasy or video playing in my head instead of feeling the sensations or even telling the person what I actually wanted and what felt good vs just trying to fantasize to reach orgasm because I wasnt expressing to the person " hey that doesn't feel good, can we try this?"

    Anyways. My answer is other because some people get addicted, some people it fucks up their perception of sex and intimacy, some people it makes them think they can degrade people without consent etc. Some people it doesn't fuck with.

    Now in hindsight, the idea of only fans, porn, sugar babies, it really worries me how the person feels about themselves that they would do these things for money.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Anonnet

    "North Korea is super based"
    Only on IsItNormal... and probably North Korea. Where are you from, again?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    ...In human suffering

    So you are right

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • KholatKhult

      Human suffering is when no sexualized drawings of children allowed whine whimper whine

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Ligeia

    The very concept of commodifying sex for entertainment purposes is sickening enough, not to mention the shitty industry practices. If you watch the cartoon porn you're a freak. So yeah none of it.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      "A freak is better than a monster." ~LloydAsher 2023

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    I boy I wish.

    I fully understand why people disagree on my above points. But I truely think that's the middle ground approach to this debate.

    Supporting freedom is icky like that sometimes. You got allow/ defend the worst people out of moral principle. Not all freedoms are equal but I definitely dont think porn is really that much of a fork in the road of morality.

    Dont like porn? Dont look for it. Dont want kids to use it? Keep your kids from the internet. Give them a flip phone. The internet is inherently unsafe for children.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Clunk42

      "I definitely dont think porn is really that much of a fork in the road of morality."

      The sexual revolution is one of the worst forks in the road of morality in existence, and it was egged on in large part by the porn industry, which was interestingly lead by anti-theistic Jews (you can look it up). Porn is indeed a massive fork in the road of morality.

      Looking at things from a purely materialistic/relativistic point of view, I would agree with you, even with your comment below that people seem to disagree with, but there is considerably more to life than "freedom".

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Grunewald

        Please don't bring Jews into this. It isn't necessary to state their ethnicity even if they were Jews.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          I shouldn't mention the fact that pornography was pushed in large part by the cursed, faithless Jews; those whose perfidy is greater than the Protestants and those who "say they are Jews and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan"?

          No, it is entirely relevant to the topic at hand, and it is entirely logical that they, of all people, were the biggest pushers of the sexual revolution.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Grunewald

            There is neither Jew nor Gentile, slave nor free...

            Also, when the John the Divine was talking about the Jews of the 'Synagogue of Satan', he meant pious people who didn't practise what they preached - not Jews as a hatable subset of society. In the very early church, Christianity was viewed as an extension of and a completion of Judaism, and non-Jewish converts were a minority. To be a good follower of The Way was to be a good Christian, was to be a good Jew.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Clunk42

              That first verse is referring to the equality among those in heaven and for those who convert to the faith. That is, it doesn't matter what race you are in heaven; one is awarded according to one's works.

              What you aren't seeing is that the "Synagogue of Satan" refers to modern Jews in general. The only true Jews now are the Christians. Modern Jews are not true Jews, because they are not Christians; they are members of the Synagogue of Satan.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
          • KholatKhult

            Oh lord here we go again

            Comment Hidden ( show )
      • LloydAsher

        I understand that "freedom" has its ups and downs and that's what some people get butt hurt about. When you really give a crap about freedom you have to advocate for crappy opinions that you dont share just because you dont share them. When you are free you are also free to starve.

        Freedom isnt some 100% idealistic goal for human enlightenment. There are limits even the most fervent libertarian wont advocate for. Since I am speaking from a materialistic and relativistic point of view, I have to put up with the dregs of society because of my views on freedom of consumption.

        Heck I'm a pro life Libertarian (wont find too many of those) I think the fetus right for continued existance outweighs the womans right of convenience (when it's her actual health in question then her right towards continued existance gets the vote)

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          "Advocat[ing] for crappy opinions" is a very mild way of saying "allowing the preventable ruination of souls to take place."

          "When it's her actual health in question then her right towards continued existance gets the vote."
          Why does her continued existence take precedence over the child? They are both human beings, and it could very easily be argued that the child has a far greater right to live, as the child will likely live longer and has never participated in any evil acts in his lifetime.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Anonnet

            Kind of off-topic, but the mother takes precedence in that situation for a couple of reasons:
            A. She's not likely to die willingly, she'd have to be forced.
            B. No one knows the baby. There isn't as much social grief there as there would be over the mother's death (provided she was an average person and not a monster).

            The death of the mother over these circumstances would end up not only drawing contempt towards the child, but causing guilt for them, even though none of it was their fault. It's different from something like saving the children from a sinking ship, where the parents are more likely to preserve their children willingly and other people (friends and relatives) have had time to grow attached to the children as well.

            These aren't things that are "very easily" argued against. It's not as simple as just "younger = better". We're talking about either straight-up killing the mother or watching her do her own abortion on the likely chance she doesn't cooperate, and then turning around and calling ourselves morally good.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Clunk42

              The child would not die willingly, either. In an abortion, one is forcing the child to die.

              Social grief is irrelevant to morality.

              A feeling of guilt has nothing to do with the morality of the situation. It is far better to be alive and sad than to be dead.

              The only killing is the killing of the child. It is not killing the mother to allow the child to remain alive, for there is a chance that the mother will survive. The child will always die in the case of an abortion.

              There is no "watching her do her abortion." If the mother murders her own child, it is her fault, and she deserves the death penalty for her heinous disregard for morals. Thus, if she were to have died, she would die either way.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
          • LloydAsher

            "Its possibly short lifetime"

            A baby is in a schrodinger's cat like predicament of value. The woman has a fixed value already established. Your idea is that a baby has infinite value, but theres a chance at a negative value (kid dies). ideally its advantageous that the child lives if the mother lives as well as they would be both positive values. But if the mother dies just for the baby to die that would be a negative value all around.

            The gamble is assuming the womans life is less valuable than the babies life dispite the womans ability to give birth to another baby, cancling out the advantage for the baby to continue existing if it's a threat to its mother.

            You see the gamble that the babys life has a higher chance to be a net benefit rather than just the mothers/ chance of more life.

            While I see it as the mother having a higher net benefit through both being alive and producing more children.

            Though if its through simple convience that's a net negative as the child's infinite value is tossed through sheer selfishness of the mother.

            That is why my poision stands unmoved. If human life is infinite value then it becomes simple addition.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Lusty-Argonian

    Honestly I used to really enjoy porn more when I was a teenager but now days I just find it boring most the time. It's to marketed for money rather than fun and just feels unnatural. Even oral stuff wich was always a favorite of mine they spend more time trying to look good at it rather than just trying to satisfy their partner and I just can't get into it. So pretty much no more porn for me mostly.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Clunk42

    Now, I'm not really taking part in this argument, but, who's to say that those countries aren't lying about their suicide rates? Who's to say they're not just reporting different numbers to make themselves look better? It's not like anyone would be able to tell, right?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • KholatKhult

      These nations allow for independent journalists and foreign reporters, it requires a lot of time, money, diligence, and risk of turmoil, to cook the books and push false data.
      That’s a lot just to save face to foreigners on the internet

      You can go visit these countries if you like, the only countries with travel restrictions to North Korea are the US and South Korea, because you lot have proved unable to follow the local laws. Russians and Chinese visit just fine.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Kermitthehog

    Who fucking cares? somebody you will never meet spending 15 minutes of their evening jerking off will never effect you. I don't get why people are chomping at the bit lately to ban porn.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    All porn is fine except the ones that film illegal acts. Child, snuff, that bad shit.

    When it comes to animated porn, everything goes since it's just cartoons. So yes that 700 year old vampire trope does get a pass, since no one is getting harmed. Weird but fine. If that's what pedos do in order to curb their irl tastes fine. I'd perfer that then them acting on it with real children.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • KholatKhult

      Why would you wake up and decide to protect people who watch animated child porn on the internet

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Clunk42

        It makes sense to me. Ultimately, the issue people have with child porn comes from the fact that it's exploiting children. If it doesn't have actual children, there's no real materialistic moral argument. And, also, it is better for pedophiles to watch fake children than real children.

        Of course, I don't think people should make or watch animated child porn, or any porn in general for that matter, but, from a purely materialistic standpoint, I don't see an issue with it.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • LloydAsher

        Because it's not real children getting abused. Dont get me wrong, a practicing pedophile gets thrown on a pile of burning tires for all I care for. But those who are on the cusp of being a practicing monster I think this would be the line.

        Some poor bastards are born pedophiles, others are victims of abuse in a vicious cycle. I think the 700 year old vampire excuse is good enough if that's the line we draw it at. Actually producing or owning the real material should get your ass killed.

        I'm not protecting nobody just saying it's probably hard to draw an arbitrary line in the sand for the age of fictional charicters, rather it's just easier to say it's just all fiction and if you act on it in real life you should be shot. If it curbs actual pedophilia I think that would do society some marked benefit instead of making the anonymous pedophile problem worse because now you wont have a pressure relief valve in that system.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ChrissySnow

    When I was younger, the porn I liked best was stuff I made or wanted to make. This was a long time ago, so the social stigma was a lot worse back then, so I didn't make nearly as much porn as I wanted to make. As far back as I can remember, I wished porn was more commonplace and more socially acceptable in our daily lives.

    Primates don't run off to do it in secret, they do it in front of the whole tribe. I don't see why we changed but I feel like the desire to see or be a part of sex or porn is based in our genes.

    Since I don't hardly see it or make it anymore, I don't believe it's a slippery slope.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • This is part of why I tried to see if people differentiated between drawings/animations (plus written stories) and live action porn (and within that, amateur stuff). It turns out most people here don't differentiate at all, which boggles me.

      It's pretty easy to see why there's a stigma for photos and videos, especially stuff that comes from studios and big names. Living based off of your popularity isn't all fun and games, especially when that popularity is dependent entirely on your body. Plus, people are creepy! There's no way to attract normal people that like to see beauty without attracting weirdos that stalk and commit crimes, and the more people that are involved with producing any given porn, the creepier it gets.

      But then there's writers, artists on DA, animators on Patreon, etc. Many of them are both anonymous and solo, so many of the worst aspects of pornography are absent. The person who's comfortable doing their own porn, especially when they're not out getting plastic surgery for it, simply doesn't seem that bad or unhealthy. The thing is, I think people understand that, they just don't acknowledge it because they don't really acknowledge any porn that isn't a live action video.

      For instance, the kind of stuff that gets thrown into fiction novels is pretty insane and is often even more pornographic than the average video tape, but no one's judging old ladies for buying books with shirtless dudes on the covers because... you know... who reads books, anyway? People still think Stephen King is a genius, and I didn't even know who the author of Fifty Shades of Grey was before I Googled it just now.

      TL;DR
      I agree with you, basically just saying that porn won't be socially acceptable as long as dark stuff keeps happening among stars and studios, and as long as everything that isn't on PornHub and OnlyFans is constantly considered "niche" even when it literally isn't.

      And you're right, it's not a slippery slope.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • StrawberryLollipop

    I personally am not an enjoyer of it, but if someone likes it-- and doesnt watch illegal/very weird things on it-- then i dont mind, its not my issue

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Iambillythemenacetosociety

    I really don't care. It doesn't have an impact on me, so I don't think it really matters! I do find it annoying though.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Tommythecaty

    My feelings on it are pretty neutral. If I didn’t watch it I’d just make it up in my mind.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Anonnet

    Main thing I really disagree with in your post is the part about rape. I'm pretty sure the reason we see it as one of the most heinous crimes is because of what it does to the (most often) woman in question, not because of the concept of debauchery. People have emotionless, anonymous sex. Some even participate in orgies. None of it's anywhere near a crime in the same way rape is a crime.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      Might I add rape isnt exclusive to women.

      Sexual violence has historically been viewed worse than typical violence. In a more modern context to that of forced subservience with the additional perspective of mental damage.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    Human rights though can just sit on the back burner though right? Who needs freedom of speech? Everything is peachy, because we say its peachy.

    Chinas "I cant believe it's not genocide" is what I have to disagree about listing china as a country that's people are not worse off.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • KholatKhult

      The country that invented cancel culture, is ruled by only two parties that are the exact same, has some of the highest personal debt in the world, highest prison population, and where everybody’s property is owned by the banks and private corps, wants to give a speech about freedom
      Muh freedom !!1!1!1! Human rights !!!1!1!1!1!

      You forget I have a property in the US, I see the taxes you lot have to pay, you’re getting fucked over

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Clunk42

        All this, says the communist. I don't like the American economy, and I don't agree with LloydAsher, but switching out the American economy for communism would solve nothing. Also, the reason for the high taxes is because of those two parties that are exactly the same you were just talking about.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • LloydAsher

        Least we dont kill our prisoners for their organs. And as my above points out I'm all for lessinging the punishments for low level non violent crimes. As for our spending. It's quite a burden that all these countries are using the usa to get a free pass on investing in their military, poland got the right idea. Though it's kinda hard to not enjoy seeing you guys get your teeth kicked in with the crumbs that we give to ukraine, who will be in debt to us. Worth it.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          That's not worth it at all, because Ukraine is inevitably going to have lost, and then, at that point, the only difference will be that Russia hates you now.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • LloydAsher

            They already hated you. But now they dont have 100k+ military members and used up stockpiles of weapons. All for a bargain price.

            Also theres no way the west will fold on ukraine. Russia has proven to be so incompetent in warfighting that if they decided to go to war with nato it would be such a blood bath for russia that they would use nukes. So a proxy war using ukraine is the safer option to wear down russia to a non threat.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    And you use Cuba as the only example because?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ObamaIfHeWasBlack

    "*snap* bad move, bukcaroo, yer going in my cringe compilation!" -Redwing

    Comment Hidden ( show )